Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 23, 2016, 06:19:09 AM |
|
He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block. We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today.
|
|
|
|
gizmoh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 23, 2016, 06:27:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
lottery248
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1006
beware of your keys.
|
|
January 23, 2016, 06:33:45 AM |
|
boi, after the bump in the china, seems china really given up with the XT and now stuck with the core - they want more transaction fees. this is probably discompetition to win others outside the china.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 23, 2016, 06:41:10 AM Last edit: January 24, 2016, 12:46:31 AM by BlindMayorBitcorn |
|
He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block. We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today. Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins.
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 23, 2016, 06:49:53 AM |
|
He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block. We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today. Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins. Oh what a happy day... but you shouldn't clamp iron manacles on your legs while you're waiting for the cavalry to arrive. Sidechains... LN... SuperLN, they all need to compete on an even playing field. Miners compete for fees and block subsidy, and they choose what software they run. The exterior solutions should cater to them, not the other way around.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 23, 2016, 06:53:27 AM |
|
He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block. We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today. Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins. Oh what a happy day... but you shouldn't clamp iron manacles on your legs while you're waiting for the cavalry to arrive. Sidechains... LN... SuperLN, they all need to compete on an even playing field. Miners compete for fees and block subsidy, and they choose what software they run. The exterior solutions should cater to them, not the other way around. Yep. See that sounds right, too. I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 23, 2016, 07:01:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 23, 2016, 07:03:50 AM Last edit: January 23, 2016, 07:14:36 AM by Cconvert2G36 |
|
He paid too much, first of all. But this is the arena we are entering... one of uncertainty, bidding wars, and limited capacity... while the reward is 25 BTC per block. We are should be planning for tomorrow, not today. Ok but, it seems to be a growing number of technically-minded people agree that under any real adoption scenerio this is going to happen. What happens when we move from 3tps to 6 or 10? I don't know enough to know if SegWit is just a dirty hack or not. But they all appear to be just can-kicks towards the inevitable day when adoption outpaces blockspace and the bidding war begins. Oh what a happy day... but you shouldn't clamp iron manacles on your legs while you're waiting for the cavalry to arrive. Sidechains... LN... SuperLN, they all need to compete on an even playing field. Miners compete for fees and block subsidy, and they choose what software they run. The exterior solutions should cater to them, not the other way around. Yep. See that sounds right, too. I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force.. It's the only force identified by satoshi for the handling of disputes. In a sense, it's the only authorized use of force in Bitcoin. You either believe that free market principles work, or you don't. Time, explain, sorry, etc.
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 23, 2016, 07:29:38 AM |
|
I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..
Maybe this was sarcasm, I'd have to read more from the previous discussion to tell. In case it's not: It shouldn't be surprising mining is becoming more centralized, seeing as Bitcoin appears to have been designed with that expectation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306" The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate." ('generating' being what mining was called way back,) So yeah. From that, it seems if you want highly decentralized mining, you should take a hard look at whether Bitcoin is suitable to your purposes.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 23, 2016, 08:01:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 23, 2016, 09:01:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 23, 2016, 10:01:53 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
January 23, 2016, 10:33:26 AM |
|
the battle of the blockchains how is it even a battle? I love bitcoin (first application of blockchain tech to create a money) and I don't see how these other efforts are competition at all. Banks want to keep their FIAT anyway, they're applying blockchain tech to other problems, like settlement of stock trade, tracking of asset ownership and the like. I applaud them because it can make the financial sector more efficient and above all: more transparent and therefore safer.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
January 23, 2016, 10:46:00 AM |
|
the battle of the blockchains That is brilliantly clever. Suddenly the R3 project makes a whole more lot of sense.
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 23, 2016, 10:48:52 AM |
|
the battle of the blockchains how is it even a battle? I love bitcoin (first application of blockchain tech to create a money) and I don't see how these other efforts are competition at all. Banks want to keep their FIAT anyway, they're applying blockchain tech to other problems, like settlement of stock trade, tracking of asset ownership and the like. I applaud them because it can make the financial sector more efficient and above all: more transparent and therefore safer. Trippin balls i see..
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 23, 2016, 10:54:30 AM |
|
I guess we have to decentralize all the things by force..
Maybe this was sarcasm, I'd have to read more from the previous discussion to tell. In case it's not: It shouldn't be surprising mining is becoming more centralized, seeing as Bitcoin appears to have been designed with that expectation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306" The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate." ('generating' being what mining was called way back,) So yeah. From that, it seems if you want highly decentralized mining, you should take a hard look at whether Bitcoin is suitable to your purposes. No sarcasm. I'm humbly struggling with some heady ideas.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1802
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 23, 2016, 11:01:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
January 23, 2016, 11:04:22 AM |
|
cointape.com Which fee should I use?
The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top. For the median transaction size of 338 bytes, this results in a fee of 10,140 satoshis.So first block inclusion for a normal tx is at 0.0001 right now, which is less than ...0.04$. That's the bitcoin we have.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 23, 2016, 11:20:18 AM |
|
cointape.com Which fee should I use?
The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top. For the median transaction size of 338 bytes, this results in a fee of 10,140 satoshis.So first block inclusion for a normal tx is at 0.0001 right now, which is less than ...0.04$. That's the bitcoin we have. If I didn't ask so many dumb questions I wouldn't learn so much. Don't mind me.
|
|
|
|
|