Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[bargainbin]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a stump speech document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document"  

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak  

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be



Re. pedo freak: Who's the bro taking fashion cues from Uncle Fester?

[hdbuck]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a stump speech document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document"  

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak  

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.




different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

[edgar]

#aztecspastic

[aztecminer]

We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

problem is we have been speculating about a fix for the last TEN MONTHS!

[bargainbin]

...
What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak  

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.




different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

Lol @ not understanding that different clients are different because different rules & that any hard fork will make any client not following it as relevant as BBQ client.

[adamstgBit]

We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

problem is we have been speculating about a fix for the last TEN MONTHS!

i'd say we've been speculating about how a HF will result in 2 chains, or will never be fixed, consensus will never be reached, core dev's out to kill bitcoin, XT classic, everything expect a fix. So many times market has dropped hard on blocksizebitchfest related things. no one speculated they would come up with segwit. and when they did market wrongfully didn't react ( probably because people dont understand how gr8 segwit is)

market price is totally incorrect right now.

[hdbuck]

...
What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak  

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.




different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

Lol @ not understanding that different clients are different because different rules & that any hard fork will make any client not following it as relevant as BBQ client.

any hard fork would lead to an altcoin with their respective node percentage vs the rest of the clients, sure, but keep diggin while you are at it

[Elwar]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

Hopefully you're right Elwar unless any more self obsessed idiots in public positions want to try & destroy bitcoin AGAIN !!!!

[aztecminer]

We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

I agree, but it could = the end of this rally. Or every rally from here on out.

so long as the full blocks are temporary so is this effect
and speculation that it's only temporary should further reduce this effect.

problem is we have been speculating about a fix for the last TEN MONTHS!

i'd say we've been speculating about how a HF will result in 2 chains, or will never be fixed, consensus will never be reached, core dev's out to kill bitcoin, XT classic, everything expect a fix. So many times market has dropped hard on blocksizebitchfest related things. no one speculated they would come up with segwit. and when they did market wrongfully didn't react ( probably because people dont understand how gr8 segwit is)

market price is totally incorrect right now.

yeah i dont know how great "segwit" is yet .. i better find out fast or i wont get anything done today from laughing .

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[adamstgBit]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

no way, a correction is currently underway, we'll be at 750 in no time.

[bargainbin]

...
What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak  

That's right, it's all in the code. Which will change into whatever Core's puppet masters want it to be

errr, nope. still lots of people not willing to 'upgrade'. dont worry.




different clients, one protocol, same rules.. isnt that wonderful?

Lol @ not understanding that different clients are different because different rules & that any hard fork will make any client not following it as relevant as BBQ client.

any hard fork would lead to an altcoin with their respective node percentage vs the rest of the clients, sure, but keep diggin while you are at it

Read the emboldened, again and again, until you begin to understand and die of shame. Or start drooling and nod off, whichever.
But, to entertain your tangent, you're wrong yet again A hard fork followed by majority of hashpower *is*  Bitcoin, by definition.

[Elwar]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

no way, a correction is currently underway, we'll be at 750 in no time.

I think people will want to see work toward the agreed plan first. We are about 2 months away from the long climb up to the new high.

But I would not put it past another FUD drop in price before then.

[aztecminer]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

no way, a correction is currently underway, we'll be at 750 in no time.

I think people will want to see work toward the agreed plan first. We are about 2 months away from the long climb up to the new high.

But I would not put it past another FUD drop in price before then.

did u notice that the blocks are 96% full this morning

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

no way, a correction is currently underway, we'll be at 750 in no time.

I think people will want to see work toward the agreed plan first. We are about 2 months away from the long climb up to the new high.

But I would not put it past another FUD drop in price before then.

And then straight shot to $32,000. Isn’t it Adam?

[adamstgBit]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

no way, a correction is currently underway, we'll be at 750 in no time.

I think people will want to see work toward the agreed plan first. We are about 2 months away from the long climb up to the new high.

But I would not put it past another FUD drop in price before then.

And then straight shot to $32,000. Isn’t it Adam?

no that happens in ~1.5 years starting from ~6000$ 

[Laosai]

market price totally incorrect right now.

Actually, before the latest block size/Mike Hearn ragequit the price was fairly stable in the $430 range. The price dropped at that point.

Now we're back to the safety of that $430 range.

From here the price should slowly rise due to the normal factors.

Hopefully you're right Elwar unless any more self obsessed idiots in public positions want to try & destroy bitcoin AGAIN !!!!

Let's hope this is te only thing able to harm btc. I'm a bit skeptical though, this up trend seems too good to be true...

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[JimboToronto]

Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still stuck around $440, eh?

Let's get this thing moving up.