Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2026, 01:16:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 14836 14837 14838 14839 14840 14841 14842 14843 14844 14845 14846 14847 14848 14849 14850 14851 14852 14853 14854 14855 14856 14857 14858 14859 14860 14861 14862 14863 14864 14865 14866 14867 14868 14869 14870 14871 14872 14873 14874 14875 14876 14877 14878 14879 14880 14881 14882 14883 14884 14885 [14886] 14887 14888 14889 14890 14891 14892 14893 14894 14895 14896 14897 14898 14899 14900 14901 14902 14903 14904 14905 14906 14907 14908 14909 14910 14911 14912 14913 14914 14915 14916 14917 14918 14919 14920 14921 14922 14923 14924 14925 14926 14927 14928 14929 14930 14931 14932 14933 14934 14935 14936 ... 35749 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26966785 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
matrix zion
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 381
Merit: 251


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 03:37:54 PM

Wow 2 nights in a row. Just got home from the bar to see I missed the action again.

Maybe it'll still be low enough in the morning to buy the dip.


really ?? 400's is time to buy Huh

Unless we break the 400 floor again Smiley

And don't go by "not possible" or "we'll never see under 400 again"
Cause only a few weeks ago in January people were saying exactly that!
Result: we easily reached the 360 ^^
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4690
Merit: 6169


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 03:40:07 PM

An early good morning Bitcoinland.

Despite waking up early, I see last night's buying opportunity has already vanished, just as I feared it would.

Oh well, next time. For now, go Bitcoin go.
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 03:40:28 PM

billyjoeallen still bearish? Close your shorts already. Don't be greedy. You will not get a better price anytime soon.

Cheap coins right now. We've had a pretty big correction or dump whichever you like to call it. No sign of sub 400 again though so if you're considering buying then don't.....just do it.

Buy now or cry later.


i'm good for crying.. thanks for advice though .
aztecminer
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 03:42:22 PM

I swear to god that if I can't get profit with my short I stop trading :p


seems like u should be able too.. but then this is bitcoin = #bizarroWorld
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 03:46:27 PM

An early good morning Bitcoinland.

Despite waking up early, I see last night's buying opportunity has already vanished, just as I feared it would.

Oh well, next time. For now, go Bitcoin go.

you should try selling some everyonce in a while and buy back lower if your not going to pump more $$ into it, this is a satisficing alternative.

its easy
you wait for me to be all like

Quote
MOOON
┗(°0°)┛

then you sell
then 6hours later you  buy back with 10% profits

 Cheesy
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 03:50:26 PM

so i was thinking

we could have a second layer that is not centralized, but not as distributed as bitcoin.

we'd have censorship resistance and all that good stuff from decentralized systems, BUT the thing is we'd expect nodes to be sitting behind a fairly good home connection like the connection i have here 1GBbps.

a sorta of decentralized change tip sidechain.

not as secure as bitcion, but i believe we can get pretty fucking close, and besides thats the tradeoff of using bitcoin's "second layer", if yu want ultra secure payment, you push it to the first layer blockchain.


There are these excellent recipes you can get for free, about all sorts of delicious things you can cook with your Foreman Grill.
The thing about it ...you really don't need a George Foreman Grill to cook them.
Makes George Foreman Grills seem like a smart buy tho, and the people who bought them get to feel a little less disappointed & stupid.
Get my drift?
Smiley
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 03:52:05 PM

did the ETH devs say they would allow it to scale?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:00:46 PM

Coin



Explanation
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3584
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:00:54 PM

did the ETH devs say they would allow it to scale?

The amount of ETHs scales...and scales...and scales...with no limit.
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:01:19 PM

did the ETH devs say they would allow it to scale?

It's all a part of the Grand Unified SmartContractTM.
jk, i know nothing about ETH.
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:05:16 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 3090


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:09:21 PM

did the ETH devs say they would allow it to scale?

The amount of ETHs scales...and scales...and scales...with no limit.

I was under the impression that that had changed. I think it was going to be unlimited once upon a time but now it'll be a much lower inflation rate once a certain amount has been reached. The faffing around isn't much of a turn on.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:11:43 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.
gijoes
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:17:29 PM

did the ETH devs say they would allow it to scale?

Currently, it scales much worse than Bitcoin (no big wonder, with full-blown Turing-complete language on blockchain). Half-year into existence, its blockchain already approaching 10GB and growing fast. There is some vague handwaving about future "sharding" and whatnot, but realistically, its chain will be much bigger than Bitcoin's, and it'll happen pretty soon. Interesting to see how they'll cope with their own scaling crisis.
noobtrader
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:21:55 PM

I wonder if  "second layer solution" is another name for masternode like dash Huh

if so i agree 100% it was awesome, even if btc masternode owner get only the tx fee or something in return. it would be awesome.
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 24, 2016, 04:22:52 PM

did the ETH devs say they would allow it to scale?

Currently, it scales much worse than Bitcoin (no big wonder, with full-blown Turing-complete language on blockchain). Half-year into existence, its blockchain already approaching 10GB and growing fast. There is some vague handwaving about future "sharding" and whatnot, but realistically, its chain will be much bigger than Bitcoin's, and it'll happen pretty soon. Interesting to see how they'll cope with their own scaling crisis.

I'm new to all this, but how come Bitcoin can't scale, and its price keeps going down, but ETH can't scale & the price just keeps going up (+6.49% just the past 24 hrs.) Huh
This is all so confusing Sad
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:22:52 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.


It has the bearing that if Back's support of the agreement is his own or is representative of Blockstream's support. It gives BS wiggle room to renegotiate terms it thinks is better (renege).  If this as a real report, that is. If F2Pool backs out (and I'm not sure why they would), it makes it more likely the agreement will fall apart.

adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:36:37 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.


It has the bearing that if Back's support of the agreement is his own or is representative of Blockstream's support. It gives BS wiggle room to renegotiate terms it thinks is better (renege).  If this as a real report, that is. If F2Pool backs out (and I'm not sure why they would), it makes it more likely the agreement will fall apart.
ya F2Pool  backing out would make the agreement fall apart, then its back to square one.
i can't blame them for being mad at Blockstream, and now demand Clear support from them or else.

and now look at this : https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/43bgrs/peter_todd_sw_is_not_safe_as_a_softfork/

at this point if F2Pool and the rest of the miner are ready for a change of government so am I.

it might be preferable to do this now, rather than later...

billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:41:57 PM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13993733#msg13993733

Is this accurate? F2Pool.com backing out of consensus roundtable agreement?

i don't understand how Adam Back trying to distance himself away from Blockstream cheats F2Pool, or as any bearing on the consensus.

and that users trust rating says  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=16114
Quote

He is threatening to DDOS Kanos pool and is scamming his miners and not verifying and building on blocks from kanos pool, he says it himself in his posts, please see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg13204430#msg13204430

Quote
Tried to extort Discus Fish (F2Pool) for 2 BTC (via DDoS attack).
correction that ^  was a sent Feedback.

no idea but doesn't seem very legit.

hmmm is F2Pool speaking for all its clients when it says that.


It has the bearing that if Back's support of the agreement is his own or is representative of Blockstream's support. It gives BS wiggle room to renegotiate terms it thinks is better (renege).  If this as a real report, that is. If F2Pool backs out (and I'm not sure why they would), it makes it more likely the agreement will fall apart.
ya F2Pool  backing out would make the agreement fall apart, then its back to square one.
i can't blame them for being mad at Blockstream, and now demand Clear support from them or else.

and now look at this : https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/43bgrs/peter_todd_sw_is_not_safe_as_a_softfork/

at this point if F2Pool and the rest of the miner are ready for a change of government so am I.

it might be preferable to do this now, rather than later...



I completely agree, but there's no way that will happen without a market crash.  Elections are a scary new thing to the Chinese.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1039


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
February 24, 2016, 04:42:58 PM

fing hell, this is such hell, just when you think things might start moving again BAM peter todd block's the stream
Pages: « 1 ... 14836 14837 14838 14839 14840 14841 14842 14843 14844 14845 14846 14847 14848 14849 14850 14851 14852 14853 14854 14855 14856 14857 14858 14859 14860 14861 14862 14863 14864 14865 14866 14867 14868 14869 14870 14871 14872 14873 14874 14875 14876 14877 14878 14879 14880 14881 14882 14883 14884 14885 [14886] 14887 14888 14889 14890 14891 14892 14893 14894 14895 14896 14897 14898 14899 14900 14901 14902 14903 14904 14905 14906 14907 14908 14909 14910 14911 14912 14913 14914 14915 14916 14917 14918 14919 14920 14921 14922 14923 14924 14925 14926 14927 14928 14929 14930 14931 14932 14933 14934 14935 14936 ... 35749 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!