aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:14:01 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD yeah... and because of it we amaericans have to pay #abusivehightaxes ... and soon we will have to endure the acts of desperation of 'negative interest rates' and 'cashless society' so that can steal more money from us.... the 'interest to infinity' debt slavery system is collapsing and i am laughing daily at the entertaining news everyday of the collapse and the turds holding on desperately to their failing and failing system.. the reason these turds hold on to this failing system is because they do not have the intelligence to figure a better system. this goes back to what billyjoe commented on about dealing with idiots everyday . its the only explanation for people who cling to a failing system in which they must rely on figuring new ways to steal more money from 'All of US' ..
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:15:18 PM |
|
More BS: " Thankfully we at Blockstream are given the freedom to speak and act as individuals on this matter. Even Adam is attending as an individual, his signature not carrying the weight of representing Blockstream in this instance. I cautioned against going and was not in the room (I feel this meeting was antithetical to Bitcoin and no good outcomes were likely) so I only know second hand like you what was or was not said. But regarding the "consensus" document that was posted on medium, no I am not on board with that outcome."~ maaku7 https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/46po4l/we_have_consensus_in_april_we_get_sw_3_months/d07gqici guess the whole "blockstream conspiracy" is shown to be the total bull it always was ...
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:15:43 PM |
|
block height 399878 0 confirmations awesome!
|
|
|
|
bargainbin
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:16:48 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD yeah... and because of it we amaericans have to pay #abusivehightaxes Nonsense. Abusive taxes can (and were) charged long before the end of gold standard. [Britain's] Abusive taxes were the justification for the American revolution, remember?
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:18:34 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD LN doesn't have legal tender laws to force people to use it. If it's not backed by Bitcoin (or something) the market will probably reject it in favor of something better. You're missing my point (or, rather, I'm just not being clear) Most people don't know or care what the $ is backed by. As long as I get my stuff when I hand over the $$$, everything's cool. Don't care what Visa is backed by, 'long as when I hand over the card, I get goodies. Same with LN. If people start using LN, and it becomes accepted, they're using LN, *NOT BITCOIN*. Just like when people started using $$$, they started using $$$, *NOT GOLD*. Saying that LN solves Bitcoin's tx problem is like saying USD solved gold's portability/divisibility/ease of use problem -- it's nonsense. clueless ... every LN channel necessarily begins and end with a TX on the bitcoin network, for ever and ever, there is no LN without bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
bargainbin
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:19:37 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD LN doesn't have legal tender laws to force people to use it. If it's not backed by Bitcoin (or something) the market will probably reject it in favor of something better. You're missing my point (or, rather, I'm just not being clear) Most people don't know or care what the $ is backed by. As long as I get my stuff when I hand over the $$$, everything's cool. Don't care what Visa is backed by, 'long as when I hand over the card, I get goodies. Same with LN. If people start using LN, and it becomes accepted, they're using LN, *NOT BITCOIN*. Just like when people started using $$$, they started using $$$, *NOT GOLD*. Saying that LN solves Bitcoin's tx problem is like saying USD solved gold's portability/divisibility/ease of use problem -- it's nonsense. clueless ... every LN channel necessarily begins and end with a TX on the bitcoin network, for ever and ever, there is no LN without bitcoin. Nah, LN can be backed by *ANY BITCOIN CLONE* So now you know
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:19:46 PM |
|
LOL, just withdrew some BTC from an exchange, they are paying 0.00015936 XBT = $0.0924195 CAD per tx. just got 2 confirmations in like 2 minus. Blocks are only full if your are not paying almost $0.10 per transaction.
We don't need to guesstimate: From cointape.com, based on what is happening: 1-10 satoshi per byte = from 7 blocks to infinity. 11-20 satoshi per byte = from 2 blocks to 28 21-30 satoshi per byte = from 0 to 5 blocks 31-40 satoshi per byte = from 0 to 2 blocks 41-50 satoshi per byte = from 0 to 1 blocks 10 satoshi per byte = 0.011$ per 258byte tx 20 satoshi per byte = 0.022$ per 258byte tx 30 satoshi per byte = 0.033$ per 258byte tx 40 satoshi per byte = 0.044$ per 258byte tx 50 satoshi per byte = 0.055$ per 258byte tx it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain thats the plan right? LOL their plan is so full of contradictions Yep, and we go from being a community of equals to facilitating a settlement layer for large economic entities to run LN and sidechains on. If you're worried about node centralization, lean back for a while and try to figure out who the fuck will want to run a regular node for free for that.
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:20:57 PM |
|
^^The Blogchain knows you really didn't need to send a buck & are spamming. I hope Blogchain loses your bitcoin, to teach you not to mess with it.
valid transactions are valid transactions. $1 in Bitcoin was not spam in 2011 and it's not spam today. in fact $1 in March 2011 = 1BTC ($425 today). what will $1 in BTC be worth in 5 years. it's ignorant to want to control the money supply by wishing monetary units vanish or get lost, all valid transactions should be valid. valid transactions should have at least 6 confirmations, you did read the bitcoin whitepaper correctly right?
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:21:06 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD yeah... and because of it we amaericans have to pay #abusivehightaxes Nonsense. Abusive taxes can (and were) charged long before the end of gold standard. [Britain's] Abusive taxes were the justification for the American revolution, remember? we are paying the highest taxes the world has ever seen ever.. i do not really owe the IRS 30+% of my income...... the usa needs a Magna Carta ... put me in the govys database of revolutionaries please!
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:23:22 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bargainbin
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:23:30 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD yeah... and because of it we amaericans have to pay #abusivehightaxes Nonsense. Abusive taxes can (and were) charged long before the end of gold standard. [Britain's] Abusive taxes were the justification for the American revolution, remember? we are paying the highest taxes the world has ever seen ever.. i do not really owe the IRS 30+% of my income...... the usa needs a Magna Carta ... put me in the govys database of revolutionaries please! More nonsense. Taxes accounted for about 25 percent of the United States' GDP -- placing the U.S. 27th out of 30 countries studied. The five with the highest percentages were Denmark, France, Belgium, Finland and Sweden, each of them with taxation accounting for more than 42 percent of gross domestic product.Oct 20, 2015 --Google search for "countries with highest taxes"
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:25:00 PM |
|
LOL, just withdrew some BTC from an exchange, they are paying 0.00015936 XBT = $0.0924195 CAD per tx. just got 2 confirmations in like 2 minus. Blocks are only full if your are not paying almost $0.10 per transaction. and so it begins - to quote rocks The goal is to slowly introduce a fee market. First slowly knock out very low value transactions, then add SFSW to slightly increase capacity. Then knock out moderately low value transactions, then add 2017 2MB HF to slightly increase capacity.
They will increase capacity, but at a very slow rate that falls behind usage growth. The effect will be a slow introduction of a fee market that removes more and more use cases for Bitcoin. There is a limit to how slow Bitcoin can grow just like there is a limit to how slow an airplane can fly before it falls out of the sky. I don't know what that limit is, but somebody apparently wants to find out. good test pilots know that one of the first things to do when type converting to a new aircraft is handling familiarisation which should include taking it into a stall, side-slips, perhaps an incipient spin ... you need to test the limits before you really know the system behaviour thoroughly enough (at the limits) before you take it up for a real bashing in turbulence with paying passengers on board
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:29:17 PM |
|
it's OK tho, when LN comes out fee will go right back to 1cent, because it will relieve a lot of pressure from the blockchain
LN is designed to improve scaling. Fee reductions are just a consequence of being able to conduct more transactions. Remember how the US$ got bootstrapped? the Gold Standard? Gold standard's long gone. People still use LN USD yeah... and because of it we amaericans have to pay #abusivehightaxes Nonsense. Abusive taxes can (and were) charged long before the end of gold standard. [Britain's] Abusive taxes were the justification for the American revolution, remember? we are paying the highest taxes the world has ever seen ever.. i do not really owe the IRS 30+% of my income...... the usa needs a Magna Carta ... put me in the govys database of revolutionaries please! More nonsense. Taxes accounted for about 25 percent of the United States' GDP -- placing the U.S. 27th out of 30 countries studied. The five with the highest percentages were Denmark, France, Belgium, Finland and Sweden, each of them with taxation accounting for more than 42 percent of gross domestic product.Oct 20, 2015 --Google search for "countries with highest taxes" i disagree that i owe 30+% taxes.. http://www.newsmax.com/finance/Personal-Finance/Norquist-tax-foreign-income/2014/06/23/id/578696/http://blog.turbotax.intuit.com/health-care/affordable-care-act-101-what-is-a-health-care-reform-tax-penalty-15262/http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/IRS-US-tax-foreign/2014/08/06/id/587148/http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2014/09/16/forget-zimbabwe-u-s-tax-system-ranks-at-bottom-just-better-than-portugal/#3f5f350e5818http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/new-record-federal-tax-revenues-top-3t-1st-time
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:38:09 PM |
|
block height 399880
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:39:44 PM |
|
dont worry when we fork off, your 1MB block will be more then enough.
|
|
|
|
bargainbin
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:39:49 PM |
|
What does the fact that *your* taxes are high have to do with "[US] accounted for about 25 percent of the United States' GDP"? If you're in the > 30% tax bracket, my heart won't break for you, you'll get by. Somehow. What does the fact that US taxes you if you live overseas (your first link) have to do with anything? Give up your US citizenship, problem solved
|
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:57:07 PM |
|
What does the fact that *your* taxes are high have to do with "[US] accounted for about 25 percent of the United States' GDP"? If you're in the > 30% tax bracket, my heart won't break for you, you'll get by. Somehow. What does the fact that US taxes you if you live overseas (your first link) have to do with anything? Give up your US citizenship, problem solved what are u a govy shill ?? it is definitely not out of the question that i would leave the USA .. or that i might give up my citizenship too.. problem is I cannot own a gun in most places i might move too . you are arguing it is ok for the USA to rip everyone off.. and i disagree with you.. and your 'interest to infinity' debt slavery system is built upon THEFT .
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
February 24, 2016, 09:59:22 PM |
|
Broadcast after 399882 (so that we can have a measurement when it gets in).
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
February 24, 2016, 10:00:52 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|