Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2026, 07:14:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 14864 14865 14866 14867 14868 14869 14870 14871 14872 14873 14874 14875 14876 14877 14878 14879 14880 14881 14882 14883 14884 14885 14886 14887 14888 14889 14890 14891 14892 14893 14894 14895 14896 14897 14898 14899 14900 14901 14902 14903 14904 14905 14906 14907 14908 14909 14910 14911 14912 14913 [14914] 14915 14916 14917 14918 14919 14920 14921 14922 14923 14924 14925 14926 14927 14928 14929 14930 14931 14932 14933 14934 14935 14936 14937 14938 14939 14940 14941 14942 14943 14944 14945 14946 14947 14948 14949 14950 14951 14952 14953 14954 14955 14956 14957 14958 14959 14960 14961 14962 14963 14964 ... 35743 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26965968 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2016, 09:31:05 AM




Hmm, couldn't all the pools just go with 2MB and tell the devs who think they control everything to stop trying to make themselves feel important?

Bitcoin is by design controlled by the consensus of the miners, not by centralised control.
It would seem that there are all sorts of parties trying to control bitcoin and I guess they all simply fail to understand the design.

Doesn't really matter how important devs think they are, if they want to be a relevant part of the blockchain decisions then they need to be miners.

...

BlockStream/Sidechains/SegWit all sounds a lot like trying pointlessly to control altcoins and make something like a partial SPV ... to me.

Moments of Lucidity are Lucid.
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 09:48:23 AM
Last edit: February 27, 2016, 09:10:38 AM by Cconvert2G36




Hmm, couldn't all the pools just go with 2MB and tell the devs who think they control everything to stop trying to make themselves feel important?

Bitcoin is by design controlled by the consensus of the miners, not by centralised control.
It would seem that there are all sorts of parties trying to control bitcoin and I guess they all simply fail to understand the design.

Doesn't really matter how important devs think they are, if they want to be a relevant part of the blockchain decisions then they need to be miners.

...

BlockStream/Sidechains/SegWit all sounds a lot like trying pointlessly to control altcoins and make something like a partial SPV ... to me.

Moments of Lucidity are Lucid.


kano's a legend

Dude was elbow deep looong before any of these 2013 bubble joiners read their first article. Before Adam Back realized his "hashcash extended with inflation control" might just be a thing.

As the discussion has been split, and moved, here's the link to his actual comment:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377560.msg14005202#msg14005202
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2483


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 10:00:48 AM

Coin



Explanation
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3584
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2016, 10:19:42 AM

The fact that 90% of bitcoin holders bought bitcoins just to "get more fiat money" means that they all have a sell point and there will be very few huge run-ups.

But that's ok because it creates liquidity and stabilizes the price so bitcoin can actually be used as a currency.
Hunyadi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000


☑ ♟ ☐ ♚


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 10:25:44 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.0  Kiss
toknormal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 10:34:35 AM


Looks to me like BTC lift-off around early to mid next week (if not before).
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3314
Merit: 2187


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 10:43:59 AM

...It's a slidebar situation, not a binary one. The more you push the slidebar higher, the more problems you create. And pushing it just to satisfy the need for spam is irrational.

Yes, why others can't see it is beyond me.  Angry How much of centralization are you willing to sacrifice in order to support more dust transactions?  
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2483


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 11:00:48 AM

Coin



Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2483


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 12:00:48 PM

Coin



Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2483


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 01:00:49 PM

Coin



Explanation
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 26, 2016, 01:03:59 PM


billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
February 26, 2016, 01:40:52 PM

Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.

I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2483


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:00:49 PM

Coin



Explanation
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:08:21 PM

...It's a slidebar situation, not a binary one. The more you push the slidebar higher, the more problems you create. And pushing it just to satisfy the need for spam is irrational.

Yes, why others can't see it is beyond me.  Angry How much of centralization are you willing to sacrifice in order to support more dust transactions?  

Good question.
Hunyadi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000


☑ ♟ ☐ ♚


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:09:15 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9DqVWZXhE8&feature=youtu.be&t=4m45s

  Cool
Laosai
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:10:05 PM

The fact that 90% of bitcoin holders bought bitcoins just to "get more fiat money" means that they all have a sell point and there will be very few huge run-ups.

But that's ok because it creates liquidity and stabilizes the price so bitcoin can actually be used as a currency.

Perfectly correct statement.

Most people are not really in btc itself. But it avoids huge buble inflation it stabilizes the price and the inflation of btc so it's a rather good thing.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:21:52 PM


Wow!

Listening to normal people talk about Bitcoin is weird.
Tzupy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1104



View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:26:19 PM

Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.

I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.


The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend.
bargainbin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:26:53 PM

...It's a slidebar situation, not a binary one. The more you push the slidebar higher, the more problems you create. And pushing it just to satisfy the need for spam is irrational.

Yes, why others can't see it is beyond me.  Angry How much of centralization are you willing to sacrifice in order to support more dust transactions?  

Good question.

It's more of a silly question. Or, dare I say it? A frickin' stupid question. Because it presupposes that centralization will be altered in a meaningful way.
Let me use the "two wolves and one sheep deciding on dinner" analogy smalblockers have run into the ground:
Right now, it's not 2 wolves and a sheep, it's NINE wolves and a sheep.
You're the sheep.
The wolves are all friends, they hang together, already shook hands on having you for dinner.
Here, sheep:





Now tell me more about slidebars.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
February 26, 2016, 02:44:27 PM

Lambie, you’re becoming a bully like iCEBREAKER Cry
Pages: « 1 ... 14864 14865 14866 14867 14868 14869 14870 14871 14872 14873 14874 14875 14876 14877 14878 14879 14880 14881 14882 14883 14884 14885 14886 14887 14888 14889 14890 14891 14892 14893 14894 14895 14896 14897 14898 14899 14900 14901 14902 14903 14904 14905 14906 14907 14908 14909 14910 14911 14912 14913 [14914] 14915 14916 14917 14918 14919 14920 14921 14922 14923 14924 14925 14926 14927 14928 14929 14930 14931 14932 14933 14934 14935 14936 14937 14938 14939 14940 14941 14942 14943 14944 14945 14946 14947 14948 14949 14950 14951 14952 14953 14954 14955 14956 14957 14958 14959 14960 14961 14962 14963 14964 ... 35743 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!