Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[adamstgBit]

the funny thing is, you can already short if you want at POLO, but nobody is using it. ETH lending rates are still very low.

Any good trader will want to wait for confirmation to short. Doing so now would be either genius or stupidity.

geniuses sell on mondays 

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[Hunyadi]

crazy, but nice to see that BTC is able to hold its ground

+1

It's pretty much rock solid in spite of some fairly large splashes from eth.

seems to be fresh fiat thats driving ETH, otherwise it could have been really ugly.

Are you sure it's fresh fiat that drives ETH? I think it's just the same traders selling and rebuying, shorting, getting margin called etc.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[8up]

crazy, but nice to see that BTC is able to hold its ground

+1

It's pretty much rock solid in spite of some fairly large splashes from eth.

seems to be fresh fiat thats driving ETH, otherwise it could have been really ugly.

Are you sure it's fresh fiat that drives ETH? I think it's just the same traders selling and rebuying, shorting, getting margin called etc.

Total market cap of all crypto-currencies (BTW the only chart that really matters vs. FIAT)


you can clearly see, that since December bitcoin and altcoin markets are decoupled!


just for fun:

ETH is on its way to $30 > Bitcoin will fork ($400) > invested money in ETH will shift to Bitcoin ($800) > ETH will come back to $5

Edit: time frame is Q2 - after that we'll see a crypto bubble ETH $50 / BTC $3500

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[podyx]

Wow, ETH is still performing...

[Andre#]

Of course, you have a right to post in response to whatever you like, and you certainly have plenty of companions in this same thread, in many other forum threads and in redit/bitcoin whining, exaggerating and spreading the same kinds of misinformation about the same topic.  


In my thinking it rises to the level of whining because it appears to be deceptive in a variety of ways.

Many of you goofballs engage in all kinds of fancy dancing in order to describe various scares about technical issues that don't really exist because when push comes to shove, you are not really concerned about technical issues (at least those who really understand the matter) but instead just want to whine, whine and whine and you want to insist on a hardfork or some other governance matter, which is really about disrupting while at the same time blaming the other side rather than attempts at resolution of potential technicalities in a reasonable and responsible manner.  

Possibly, half of you are paid shills, another 1/3 are misinformed or super emotional.  If these supposed technical matters had been presented continuously, argued and evidence set forth as a technical issue, then possibly there may have been some attempt at resolution, but based on the much illogical insistence on hard forks and other blackmailing attempts, i get the sense that technicalities continue to be exaggerated, which seems to be the case whenever looking into any details or evidence in support of technical block limit problem matters.  

Furthermore, the next move after seeing multiple flaws in the overall technical arguments, trolls like you tend to want to drag the topic into the weeds in order to distract and divert, when in the end all you seem to want is a hardfork (which gets us back to governance rather than real and concrete technical matters regarding possible problems with  the current blocksize limits).

I didn't expect you to resort to name calling after running out of arguments. I guess I overestimated you.

Goodnight.

I don't really consider my comments to you as name calling.  I believe that I am just describing the dynamic that causes me to wonder why people seem to be get so worked up in arms regarding this whole matter because it remains very deceptive in its appearance in the pushing of XT and Classic that are something other than they appear to be.

It's quite remarkable that a moderator deleted my "O really?" reply to this post (with the names I was being called marked bold in the above text) for being off-topic, but didn't remove this one I was replying to. Baffling.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Of course, you have a right to post in response to whatever you like, and you certainly have plenty of companions in this same thread, in many other forum threads and in redit/bitcoin whining, exaggerating and spreading the same kinds of misinformation about the same topic.  


In my thinking it rises to the level of whining because it appears to be deceptive in a variety of ways.

Many of you goofballs engage in all kinds of fancy dancing in order to describe various scares about technical issues that don't really exist because when push comes to shove, you are not really concerned about technical issues (at least those who really understand the matter) but instead just want to whine, whine and whine and you want to insist on a hardfork or some other governance matter, which is really about disrupting while at the same time blaming the other side rather than attempts at resolution of potential technicalities in a reasonable and responsible manner.  

Possibly, half of you are paid shills, another 1/3 are misinformed or super emotional.  If these supposed technical matters had been presented continuously, argued and evidence set forth as a technical issue, then possibly there may have been some attempt at resolution, but based on the much illogical insistence on hard forks and other blackmailing attempts, i get the sense that technicalities continue to be exaggerated, which seems to be the case whenever looking into any details or evidence in support of technical block limit problem matters.  

Furthermore, the next move after seeing multiple flaws in the overall technical arguments, trolls like you tend to want to drag the topic into the weeds in order to distract and divert, when in the end all you seem to want is a hardfork (which gets us back to governance rather than real and concrete technical matters regarding possible problems with  the current blocksize limits).

I didn't expect you to resort to name calling after running out of arguments. I guess I overestimated you.

Goodnight.

I don't really consider my comments to you as name calling.  I believe that I am just describing the dynamic that causes me to wonder why people seem to be get so worked up in arms regarding this whole matter because it remains very deceptive in its appearance in the pushing of XT and Classic that are something other than they appear to be.

It's quite remarkable that a moderator deleted my "O really?" reply to this post (with the names I was being called marked bold in the above text) for being off-topic, but didn't remove this one I was replying to. Baffling.

It's always funny to me to see the moderators randomly fumble around this monkey house of a thread.

[adamstgBit]

Wow, ETH is still performing...

i put a tight stop loss and it got triggered  

bubble pop?

 

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[blunderer]

Fun With The Number Six:
BTC is only down $6 since yesterday & ETH is only up 6%

[herzmeister]

The irony is, well, look at Ethereum's blockchain size.

[ahpku]

now that we have know ETH will soon displace bitcoin, who's left to buy the ETH any higher?

As I understand it, ETH is not militantly anti-bank, anti-state, or anti-government.
So my guess would be banks, nations and governments.
And, of course, Russians wishing to invest in disruptive technologies which wouldn't earn them 7 YEARS IN THE GULAG , Wall st. money currently waiting in the wings, and, of course, those who wish to see GAINS OF 1500% IN JUST TWO MONTHS