|
Ted E. Bare
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 09:42:59 PM |
|
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown: Only 34 more days!
|
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 10:24:25 PM |
|
Good morning Bitcoinland. Still trying to digest the move up past $580 I see.  Couple more days of generally sideways before the next leg up, or do our Chinese friends speed things up? doubtful that the chinese will speed us through 4000 CNY. massive barrier there, i think the west need to drag china from 3999 to 5001 before they will start carrying again. Chinese are very superstitious, and the number 4 is very bad to them.
|
|
|
|
|
StraightAArdvark
Newbie

Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 10:24:48 PM |
|
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown: Only 34 more days!
And only hours to the (>$15) drop. Not trading advice, have been wrong before. But not often 
|
|
|
|
|
|
savetherainforest
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 10:40:46 PM |
|
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown: Only 34 more days!
And only hours to the (>$15) drop. Not trading advice, have been wrong before. But not often  In exactly 10 hours you will see that move / drop then it will just probably pop back up to the normal trend. (so 10 hours from this moment of the post)
|
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 10:57:30 PM |
|
They say it's who you know but that is only part of it. The other part is, it's how you do who you know.
|
|
|
|
|
kodtycoon
Legendary

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 11:39:06 PM |
|
break out incoming v.soon
|
|
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1004
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 11:41:39 PM |
|
Some very interesting trend analysis showing why bitcoin can't fail! http://imgur.com/jBM4tq6
|
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 11:49:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 06, 2016, 11:55:06 PM |
|
is that the legendary, flared tongue Argentinosaurus that Satoshi talked about?
|
|
|
|
|
Assmaster2000
Member


Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:09:29 AM |
|
break out incoming v.soon
Hello from the future! 
|
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:13:48 AM |
|
next stop 630
|
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:16:35 AM |
|
Soon, it will be time for the bears to capitulate.  Feel bad for the Ether bag holders, jumping in not-so-warm water shortly after a 15x increase. Media like the Economist and NYT preaching a holy sermon all the while, and steering naive profiters away from Bitcoin. Hype cycle, bitch. Less uninformed Bitcoin hodlers, the better. Send them to Ether. 
|
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:18:42 AM |
|
hope not, capitulation is often a reversal
|
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:23:15 AM |
|
doubtful that the chinese will speed us through 4000 CNY.
massive barrier there, i think the west need to drag china from 3999 to 5001 before they will start carrying again.
Chinese are very superstitious, and the number 4 is very bad to them.
I'd be fine with the west taking us to 5000 CNY. 
|
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:26:32 AM |
|
the creep continues..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ted E. Bare
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:29:26 AM |
|
Will the bears buy back in after 600? They sure should. Maybe they'll join us at 700?
|
|
|
|
|
Assmaster2000
Member


Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:49:28 AM |
|
Will the bears buy back in after 600? They sure should. Maybe they'll join us at 700?
Because bitcoin is hip and happenin'? 
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2350
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:57:53 AM |
|
is that the legendary, flared tongue Argentinosaurus that Satoshi talked about? ... it is becoming clear now he meant dragons not dinosaurs.
|
|
|
|
|
SheHadMANHands
Legendary

Activity: 1168
Merit: 1000
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 12:59:00 AM |
|
Will the bears buy back in after 600? They sure should. Maybe they'll join us at 700?
Because bitcoin is hip and happenin'?  Money is the simplest blockchain application (Bitcoin). Logically it's protocol architecture shouldn't include the weight and unnecessary complexity of a smart contract system. You put that shit on top (lisk).  From a security perspective (think wealth storage), simplicity wins out. A house with fewer windows and doors leaves less potential security holes. Ethereum will probably never be the "internet of money", and it's yet to demonstrate the utility of it's smart contracts. I believe it will (and hodling ether), but it isn't a sure thing. Bitcoin, at least, already works as money and as a store of wealth. So, yes. Bitcoin is fucking hip as hell. The original. 
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4438
Merit: 14402
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
June 07, 2016, 01:13:56 AM |
|
Segwit RC soon to be deployed - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8149Get ready for a price boost when Segwit comes out of RC unscathed and miners start accepting it bring to an end one chapter of this drama and sending bitcoin in the right direction for scaling. Thanks for the update He purposefully ignored forgot a critical component of the mining pool vote to change Bitcoin's operation: https://www.reddit.com/user/Jihan_BitmainSegwit will not be active on the network until Core releases binaries for the 2017 HF. Yeah... Good luck with that retarded and destructive approach... DUMB  The party in need of (extreme) luck would be Blockstream, if they intend to see segwit activated without Antpool. The specifics of the HK agreement were clear, and Jihan will be holding them to their word. Besides, you don’t run a node. You have an exchange hold some bitcoin for you… which makes your opinions on protocol, node policy, and network capacity just embarrassing. Pls resume writing paragraphs of piffle as you farm up those sig ad penny shavings, friend. Maybe it would help if you did not distort the facts? The facts are more or less that XT/Classic failed to provide sufficient evidence or logic to support a protocol change that would involve a hard increase in the blocksize limit. Accordingly, since there remains a lack of consensus for such position, there is no obligation for anyone to attempt to implement such a unnecessary change... that is only supported by a very small minority.... accordingly, the status quo continues, in which bitcoin is not broken.. and likely seg wit will be implemented and also achieve a consensus after a large majority of sensible folks realize that it is not controverted. furthermore, your attempt to characterize the situation as some kind of blockstream manipulation is nonsense. Bitcoin is decentralized, and therefore changes are difficult to achieve by any small group, whether that be blockstream, or the less popular but more whiny-vocal XT/Core criers over spilled milk. That's part of the reason why I said good luck with attempting to continue to open cans of worms that really don't need to be opened, because bitcoin ain't broken and there is no emergency requiring such proposed remedies, such as making an immediate increase in the currently 1mb blocksize limit.
|
|
|
|
|
|