Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[AlexGR]

So who panic sold at 4xx?

[1715172064]

1715172064

[1715172064]

1715172064

[1715172064]

1715172064

[1715172064]

1715172064

[savetherainforest]

So who panic sold at 4xx?

I panic sold at 771$    ... Could have sold at 773$.   

[orpington]

So who panic sold at 4xx?

I panic bought at $4xx

[AlexGR]

So who panic sold at 4xx?

I panic bought at $4xx

Good catch

So who panic sold at 4xx?

I panic sold at 771$    ... Could have sold at 773$.   

Or 777

[savetherainforest]

Probably this will happen...  

[petahashminer]

Probably this will happen...  

holy shit,

it is amazing,

we have to sell our houses yatchs one sport cars , then buy bitcoin in the next few hours.

[AlexGR]

Probably this will happen...  

holy shit,

it is amazing,

we have to sell our houses yatchs one sport cars , then buy bitcoin in the next few hours.

Fiat transfers don't work that well on Saturdays and Sundays though...

[savetherainforest]

Probably this will happen...  

holy shit,

it is amazing,

we have to sell our houses yatchs one sport cars , then buy bitcoin in the next few hours.

Fiat transfers don't work that well on Saturdays and Sundays though...

All this sh!tstorm started on August 3rd ... so they had 2-3 days time to do stuff.

[adamstgBit]

will bitfinex users accept a generalized loss percentage of 36.067% across all accounts and assets. or will we see a class action soon?

bitfinex says:

This is the closest approximation to what would happen in a liquidation context.

which seems like a fair statement.

plus with their proposal bitfinex is fully back up and running soon, allowing users to access their funds right away.

i'm betting this arrangement will stick.

[jt byte]

Watching the stock market, traders be like:

Coming soon.....

(in the next year...)

(98%)

Now that put a hope in some souls who are looking at some QE's.

[JayJuanGee]

So who panic sold at 4xx?

I panic bought at $4xx

I almost panic bought at $488; however, the price was moving so much, and I was having troubles getting my transaction to go through, and by the time my transaction finally went through, I ended up panic buying at $507.   

[adamstgBit]

this is impressive.
i am impressed.

[LogHangingConsortium]

will bitfinex users accept a generalized loss percentage of 36.067% across all accounts and assets. or will we see a class action soon?

If your bank or my broker gave you a 36% haircut? But I bet you're right, people will vent a little, tire themselves out, take what they're given.

banks get bailed out.

altho, i have heard rumours that governments would stop doing this and bail-in's like Cyprus might be become the norm again ( i say again because apparently back in the day, banks were not "to big to fail" )

No, for cases like this banks have *insurance*. In US, that's FDIC. The bank might fail (3 have in 2016), but their customers, punters like you, lost exactly no money. None. Nothing to do with bailouts.

But let's forget banks. You'd take this haircut from your broker? I wouldn't take that shit ("Honest man, I got robbed") from my runner. People don't even know wtf happened, and they're already gushing with gratitude because they got some edit: got promised some of their money back. Even the dollar holders, whose shit wasn't affected. Amazing. No wonder people here always get robbed -- might as well hang a sign saying "ROB ME BRO, No consequences at all if you fuck up, and I'll be your best friend if you let me keep half. You can't lose!"

Enjoy bailing in BFX and "Socialized losses," lol.

[adamstgBit]

will bitfinex users accept a generalized loss percentage of 36.067% across all accounts and assets. or will we see a class action soon?

If your bank or my broker gave you a 36% haircut? But I bet you're right, people will vent a little, tire themselves out, take what they're given.

banks get bailed out.

altho, i have heard rumours that governments would stop doing this and bail-in's like Cyprus might be become the norm again ( i say again because apparently back in the day, banks were not "to big to fail" )

No, for cases like this banks have *insurance*. In US, that's FDIC. The bank might fail (3 have in 2016), but their customers, punters like you, lost exactly no money. None. Nothing to do with bailouts.

But let's forget banks. You'd take this haircut from your broker? I wouldn't take that shit ("Honest man, I got robbed") from my runner. People don't even know wtf happened, and they're already gushing with gratitude because they got some edit: got promised some of their money back. Even the dollar holders, whose shit wasn't affected. Amazing. No wonder people here always get robbed -- might as well hang a sign saying "ROB ME BRO, No consequences at all if you fuck up, and I'll be your best friend if you let me keep half. You can't lose!"

Enjoy bailing in BFX and "Socialized losses," lol.

isn't the FDIC just formalizing the agreement that governments will bail-out banks? oh wtv. i dont need to know how the legacy system works.

point is bitfinex has been hacked, shame on them for having a shitty p2sha wallet impl??, or maybe it was an inside job?? doesn't really matter, the end result is the same, (unless someone can prove it was an inside job and find the person responsible...)  but IMO they are handling it the best that they could.

i do believe that if this would go to court we would have the same result, liquidation of bitfinex and all accounts and assets getting a very similar % of their funds back, ( we saw this result with mtgox did we not?) but they wouldn't see there money for years, they would have to pay lawyers and bitfinex would be dismantled.

keeping this out of court and accepting bitfinex's settlement is probably in the best interest of everyone involved.

[criptix]

Well I guess my 70-100% payback or bust was pretty close.

Looking at the overall situation I would guess that will see a bfx comeback with less volume in the midterm.

If they are smart and get their security correct this time I don't see why they can't get back on their feet like poloniex.

Edit:

If the numbers are correct then bankruptcy will be far more expensive then a (temporary?) Haircut of 36%

[JayJuanGee]

will bitfinex users accept a generalized loss percentage of 36.067% across all accounts and assets. or will we see a class action soon?

If your bank or my broker gave you a 36% haircut? But I bet you're right, people will vent a little, tire themselves out, take what they're given.

banks get bailed out.

altho, i have heard rumours that governments would stop doing this and bail-in's like Cyprus might be become the norm again ( i say again because apparently back in the day, banks were not "to big to fail" )

No, for cases like this banks have *insurance*. In US, that's FDIC. The bank might fail (3 have in 2016), but their customers, punters like you, lost exactly no money. None. Nothing to do with bailouts.

But let's forget banks. You'd take this haircut from your broker? I wouldn't take that shit ("Honest man, I got robbed") from my runner. People don't even know wtf happened, and they're already gushing with gratitude because they got some edit: got promised some of their money back. Even the dollar holders, whose shit wasn't affected. Amazing. No wonder people here always get robbed -- might as well hang a sign saying "ROB ME BRO, No consequences at all if you fuck up, and I'll be your best friend if you let me keep half. You can't lose!"

Enjoy bailing in BFX and "Socialized losses," lol.

isn't the FDIC just formalizing the agreement that governments will bail-out banks? oh wtv. i dont need to know how the legacy system works.

point is bitfinex has been hacked, shame on them for having a shitty p2sha wallet impl??, or maybe it was an inside job?? doesn't really matter, the end result is the same, (unless someone can prove it was an inside job and find the person responsible...)  but IMO they are handling it the best that they could.

i do believe that if this would go to court we would have the same result, liquidation of bitfinex and all accounts and assets getting a very similar % of their funds back, ( we saw this result with mtgox did we not?) but they wouldn't see there money for years, they would have to pay lawyers and bitfinex would be dismantled.

keeping this out of court and accepting bitfinex's settlement is probably in the best interest of everyone involved.

I agree overall that Bitfinex's settlement proposal is pretty decent, given various alternative possible outcomes, but making some kinds of arguments, that this is the best we can get based on settlement in court blah blah blah.. seems to be going a bit too far.. and also suggesting that this is amongst the best of the arrangements is going too far, too.  Ultimately, we gotta continue to take what Bitfinex says with a grain of salt and also to attempt to hold their feet to the fire in that hopefully in the long term the intent is for Bitfinex to attempt to provide full restitution to their users, and hopefully the bitfinex coin is intended, designed and will be implemented in such a way to strive towards the achieving of the long term restitution of existing customers (who are taking a haircut).

 Bitfinex cannot lose sight that they owe a duty to their customers, and they fucked up in some kind of way in allowing this to happen to such a considerable magnitude.

[LogHangingConsortium]

point is bitfinex has been hacked, shame on them for having a shitty p2sha wallet impl??, or maybe it was an inside job?? doesn't really matter, the end result is the same

Exactly. You don't know what happened, you don;t care what happened, and you get fucked. Willingly. Because it's the optimal short-term solution (you get some of your money back).
Because it's always smarter to run than fight. Sort term, that is.

keeping this out of court and accepting bitfinex's settlement is probably in the best interest of everyone involved.

But it's a suboptimal long-term solution. Because this way, instead of getting fucked once, you're gonna get fucked over and over and over. Because the fucker knows that this never goes to court, because entire history of Bitcoin.

So yeah, no government is gonna bail out BFX. You will. And you'll keep bailing them out, while they take your money.
This is what you signed up for. Enjoy!

[criptix]

^

Is roach temp banned or something?

Or are you another genuine zionist conspiracy believer?

Btw. eat more beaver

[savetherainforest]

^

Is roach temp banned or something?

Or are you another genuine zionist conspiracy believer?

Btw. eat more beaver

Neah... I just get a vibe off of him that he is a "fiat lover!" 

I'm all about rainbows and unicorns... peace and prosperity... all that kind of bullsh!t... Btw, look at them charts!

It seems I voted right ">620".

[yefi]

No, for cases like this banks have *insurance*. In US, that's FDIC. The bank might fail (3 have in 2016), but their customers, punters like you, lost exactly no money. None. Nothing to do with bailouts.

In the EU deposit insurance is limited to 100K Euro. Deposits beyond that are not protected from haircuts.