petahashminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1037
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 05:56:10 PM |
|
i think this is not gentleman.
what is the meaning of recent rise,
bear trap ?
i hate them all...
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 05:56:37 PM |
|
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-exchanges-unveil-emergency-hard-fork-contingency-plan/According to the statement – backed by Bitfinex, Bitstamp, BTCC, Bitso, Bitsquare, Bitonic, Bitbank, Coinfloor, Coincheck, itBit, QuadrigaCX, Bitt, Bittrex, Kraken, Ripio, ShapeShift, The Rock Trading and Zaif – the exchanges would list the BU asset under the BTU or XBU tickers in the event of a network split, which they collectively say "may be inevitable". That's some really great news! The big exchanges would list BU as an alternative asset in terms of a network split! So even with less hashrate BTC keeps being BTC.Awesome! I'm a bit technically ignorant about this. Would the BTC need to be sitting on an exchange at the time of fork? I'm just wondering because I have some sitting in a multibit wallet. If a hard fork is imminent and you want to preserve your options you should have your bitcoin on your own computer and run both Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin Unlimited. After the fork you will have double your bitcoin with the same balance on each fork. But added together the total value will be less than before the fork is my best understanding. We really want to avoid a contentious hard fork.
|
|
|
|
deepcolderwallet
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:08:06 PM |
|
http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-exchanges-unveil-emergency-hard-fork-contingency-plan/According to the statement – backed by Bitfinex, Bitstamp, BTCC, Bitso, Bitsquare, Bitonic, Bitbank, Coinfloor, Coincheck, itBit, QuadrigaCX, Bitt, Bittrex, Kraken, Ripio, ShapeShift, The Rock Trading and Zaif – the exchanges would list the BU asset under the BTU or XBU tickers in the event of a network split, which they collectively say "may be inevitable". That's some really great news! The big exchanges would list BU as an alternative asset in terms of a network split! So even with less hashrate BTC keeps being BTC.Awesome! Will it be possible to mine BTC with GPU again?
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:20:03 PM |
|
Will it be possible to mine BTC with GPU again?
That is a good question. Does anyone know?
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2274
BTC or BUST
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:24:41 PM |
|
I think no..
If it does fork and their is little hash on a fork, the difficulty will still stay sky high, so blocks will just be extremely slow.. Maybe you can cpu mine a fork after difficulty retargets, but if hash is low enough for you to mine with a cpu, then it pretty much won't be worth anything.. If I understand correctly, which is 50/50 chance..
|
|
|
|
infofront (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 3092
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:25:57 PM |
|
Will it be possible to mine BTC with GPU again?
That is a good question. Does anyone know? Absolutely not. I mean, you can, but you won't generate any appreciable amount of BTC or BU.
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:30:22 PM |
|
I think no..
If it does fork and their is little hash on a fork, the difficulty will still stay sky high, so blocks will just be extremely slow.. Maybe you can cpu mine a fork after difficulty retargets, but if hash is low enough for you to mine with a cpu, then it pretty much won't be worth anything.. If I understand correctly, which is 50/50 chance..
Wait a moment. If it forks, it means BU miners have a little more than 50% of the hashing power. Therefore BTC will remain with a little less than 50% and it will retarget the difficulty in a little more than a month instead of two weeks. It's not that bad!
|
|
|
|
travwill
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:37:13 PM |
|
I think no..
If it does fork and their is little hash on a fork, the difficulty will still stay sky high, so blocks will just be extremely slow.. Maybe you can cpu mine a fork after difficulty retargets, but if hash is low enough for you to mine with a cpu, then it pretty much won't be worth anything.. If I understand correctly, which is 50/50 chance..
Wait a moment. If it forks, it means BU miners have a little more than 50% of the hashing power. Therefore BTC will remain with a little less than 50% and it will retarget the difficulty in a little more than a month instead of two weeks. It's not that bad! Depends on when the fork occurs, and how much hash is left on each chain. I'm not sure if there is a default time built in but difficultly retargets every 2016 blocks. If hashpower drops dramatically all of the sudden on a particular fork/chain, then it will take a longer time to find blocks for sure - 15/20/1hour+, so it could take many many weeks to get things back to normal beyond the usual 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:44:22 PM |
|
I think no..
If it does fork and their is little hash on a fork, the difficulty will still stay sky high, so blocks will just be extremely slow.. Maybe you can cpu mine a fork after difficulty retargets, but if hash is low enough for you to mine with a cpu, then it pretty much won't be worth anything.. If I understand correctly, which is 50/50 chance..
Wait a moment. If it forks, it means BU miners have a little more than 50% of the hashing power. Therefore BTC will remain with a little less than 50% and it will retarget the difficulty in a little more than a month instead of two weeks. It's not that bad! Depends on when the fork occurs, and how much hash is left on each chain. I'm not sure if there is a default time built in but difficultly retargets every 2016 blocks. If hashpower drops dramatically all of the sudden on a particular fork/chain, then it will take a longer time to find blocks for sure - 15/20/1hour+, so it could take many many weeks to get things back to normal beyond the usual 2 weeks. 2016 blocks = 2 weeks . 1/2 the hashing power ~ 4 weeks
|
|
|
|
minero1
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:49:20 PM |
|
Oh yeah ...   What the heck is with the mantee pic? And what does this graph of what looks like two red dicks colliding with each other mean? That looks very scary. 
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:52:46 PM |
|
https://coin.dance/nodes/shareHeh.. yeah, it really looks like that BU fork is happening any day now 
|
|
|
|
york780
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:53:11 PM |
|
Triple digits time mark my words. 900 EUR seems a good buying price.
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 06:57:53 PM |
|
Triple digits time mark my words. 900 EUR seems a good buying price.
The thing is, the whale pumper since ~$1000 (2/15) had planned on selling off after the ETF event anyway. He (they?) just need a selloff/crash reason now. Problem is, they don't really have one except "dur hur BU fork threat dur hur, ETH/Dash much better dur hur". Social engineering FUD is all they got left.
|
|
|
|
Ted E. Bare
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:02:39 PM |
|
Triple digits time mark my words. 900 EUR seems a good buying price.
The thing is, the whale pumper since ~$1000 (2/15) had planned on selling off after the ETF event anyway. He (they?) just need a selloff/crash reason now. Problem is, they don't really have one except "dur hur BU fork threat dur hur, ETH/Dash much better dur hur". Social engineering is all they got left. Indeed, for most of us bitcoiners there is no incentive to sell. Nothing changed. You might get extremely lucky and buy back a little more coins at a lower price but that is no guarantee at all. Especially from where we are now. Look what happened after the ETF announcement. Many people sold at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3089
Welt Am Draht
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:04:33 PM |
|
Indeed, for most of us bitcoiners there is no incentive to sell.
The thing is though that I don't think there's much incentive to do anything in either direction. I wouldn't really be inclined to buy or sell at present. So if that means a small number does take a direction, a larger number might join in for larks.
|
|
|
|
arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:06:02 PM |
|
wait - bitcoin unlimited has 11%? that's what we're dealing with? 11 FUCKING PERCENT!? jesus christ you guys. or am i wrong and even with that 11% we'd still be shy of activating segwit? do we need 90% consensus or 95%?
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3089
Welt Am Draht
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:08:22 PM |
|
wait - bitcoin unlimited has 11%? that's what we're dealing with? 11 FUCKING PERCENT!? jesus christ you guys.
or am i wrong and even with that 11% we'd still be shy of activating segwit? do we need 90% consensus or 95%?
Check the blocks mined instead of nodes. That's over 30% at present. Nodes aren't really that meaningful as many will be sitting on Amazon servers that'll go off when whoever doesn't get their pocket money. Segwit is 95%.
|
|
|
|
tk3609
Member

Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Small trader
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:09:25 PM |
|
Looks like we are going for sub 800$, thank you BU FUD for cheap coins
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:16:10 PM |
|
r/BTC seems very angry about that exchanges announcement. i interpret that as a good sign.
|
|
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
 |
March 17, 2017, 07:17:27 PM |
|
wait - bitcoin unlimited has 11%? that's what we're dealing with? 11 FUCKING PERCENT!? jesus christ you guys. or am i wrong and even with that 11% we'd still be shy of activating segwit? do we need 90% consensus or 95%? it's about hashrate not nodes. and 32% isnt THAT minor.
|
|
|
|
|