Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 06:48:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Price Target for Nov. 30, 2024:
<$75K - 0 (0%)
$75K to $80K - 0 (0%)
$80K to $85K - 0 (0%)
$85K to $90K - 3 (15%)
>$90K - 17 (85%)
Total Voters: 20

Pages: « 1 ... 16507 16508 16509 16510 16511 16512 16513 16514 16515 16516 16517 16518 16519 16520 16521 16522 16523 16524 16525 16526 16527 16528 16529 16530 16531 16532 16533 16534 16535 16536 16537 16538 16539 16540 16541 16542 16543 16544 16545 16546 16547 16548 16549 16550 16551 16552 16553 16554 16555 16556 [16557] 16558 16559 16560 16561 16562 16563 16564 16565 16566 16567 16568 16569 16570 16571 16572 16573 16574 16575 16576 16577 16578 16579 16580 16581 16582 16583 16584 16585 16586 16587 16588 16589 16590 16591 16592 16593 16594 16595 16596 16597 16598 16599 16600 16601 16602 16603 16604 16605 16606 16607 ... 33915 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26491720 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:14:23 PM

I think at least a few of the major ones like OKCoin and Huobi.
http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/01/17/bitcoin-price-thrives-despite-china-curbing-margin-trading/

What's the deal with their international iterations? I assume okcoin.com stayed open and .cn was hobbled but haven't been paying much attention.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:15:01 PM

I am a bit surprised that noone has mentioned one of the consecuences a split between CORE and BU would have, apart from the AMAZINGLY HUGE volatility lower combined price etc...

1) If Bitcoin is split in two, core side will be at 1MB max block size at that time, and BU with an undetermined but bigger max block size.

2) Both "parties" will start dumping each other strongly. Chaos will reign and volatility could be so huge as to wipe ENTIRE order books up and down. (mainly down, even to 0).

3) All leveraged positions will be wiped on the peaks and valleys.

4) The difficulty will be much higher than the hashrate which, by itself, will create big delays between blocks. It is uncertain how big though.

And this is what I haven't seen anyone mention:

5) There will be a huge spike in transactions with people sending his coins to the exchanges. And I mean an unprecedently HUGE number of transactions. Orders of magnitude higher than anything we have ever seen.

6) Core with its 1MB max block and difficulty over hashrate combined will take ages to move the coins (which is not that bad because there will be less BTC coins arriving at the exchanges to be dumped), BU blocksize...well, I am not sure what it will do in that scenario, but it is possible that it will lead to additional hard forks/blocksize adjustment. Also Orphan blocks will be everywhere.

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

I could go on... but the only reasonable conclusion is that all this chaos and confussion will benefit noone (maybe to exchanges in the short period, due to the extreme volatility and huge number of trades) and that all this nonsense must come to and end now.





Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:19:00 PM

I am a bit surprised that noone has mentioned one of the consecuences a split between CORE and BU would have, apart from the AMAZINGLY HUGE volatility lower combined price etc...

1) If Bitcoin is split in two, core side will be at 1MB max block size at that time, and BU with an undetermined but bigger max block size.

2) Both "parties" will start dumping each other strongly. Chaos will reign and volatility could be so huge as to wipe ENTIRE order books up and down. (mainly down, even to 0).

3) All leveraged positions will be wiped on the peaks and valleys.

4) The difficulty will be much higher than the hashrate which, by itself, will create big delays between blocks. It is uncertain how big though.

And this is what I haven't seen anyone mention:

5) There will be a huge spike in transactions with people sending his coins to the exchanges. And I mean an unprecedently HUGE number of transactions. Orders of magnitude higher than anything we have ever seen.

6) Core with its 1MB max block and difficulty over hashrate combined will take ages to move the coins (which is not that bad because there will be less BTC coins arriving at the exchanges to be dumped), BU blocksize...well, I am not sure what it will do in that scenario, but it is possible that it will lead to additional hard forks/blocksize adjustment. Also Orphan blocks will be everywhere.

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

I could go on... but the only reasonable conclusion is that all this chaos and confussion will benefit noone (maybe to exchanges in the short period, due to the extreme volatility and huge number of trades) and that all this nonsense must come to and end now.


it all depends on which chain satoshi dumps on...
that chain will die.
not because he crashed its price
but because he expressed his preference
arklan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:23:50 PM

I am a bit surprised that noone has mentioned one of the consecuences a split between CORE and BU would have, apart from the AMAZINGLY HUGE volatility lower combined price etc...

1) If Bitcoin is split in two, core side will be at 1MB max block size at that time, and BU with an undetermined but bigger max block size.

2) Both "parties" will start dumping each other strongly. Chaos will reign and volatility could be so huge as to wipe ENTIRE order books up and down. (mainly down, even to 0).

3) All leveraged positions will be wiped on the peaks and valleys.

4) The difficulty will be much higher than the hashrate which, by itself, will create big delays between blocks. It is uncertain how big though.

And this is what I haven't seen anyone mention:

5) There will be a huge spike in transactions with people sending his coins to the exchanges. And I mean an unprecedently HUGE number of transactions. Orders of magnitude higher than anything we have ever seen.

6) Core with its 1MB max block and difficulty over hashrate combined will take ages to move the coins (which is not that bad because there will be less BTC coins arriving at the exchanges to be dumped), BU blocksize...well, I am not sure what it will do in that scenario, but it is possible that it will lead to additional hard forks/blocksize adjustment. Also Orphan blocks will be everywhere.

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

I could go on... but the only reasonable conclusion is that all this chaos and confussion will benefit noone (maybe to exchanges in the short period, due to the extreme volatility and huge number of trades) and that all this nonsense must come to and end now.

i think plenty of people agree with that sentiment - chaos is bad, contentious hard fork = chaos.

the problem, i think arises with HOW to stop the divide. as in, "ok, we're not gonna fork, but we're also not going to give in! our way or nothing!" which... well, stagnation, which is what we have, solution wise.

it all depends on which chain satoshi dumps on...
that chain will die.
not because he crashed its price
but because he expressed his preference

damn... if that happened ... wow. just, wow.
BinaryReign
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 150
Merit: 110


BTC HODLer


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:24:55 PM

I am a bit surprised that noone has mentioned one of the consecuences a split between CORE and BU would have, apart from the AMAZINGLY HUGE volatility lower combined price etc...

1) If Bitcoin is split in two, core side will be at 1MB max block size at that time, and BU with an undetermined but bigger max block size.

2) Both "parties" will start dumping each other strongly. Chaos will reign and volatility could be so huge as to wipe ENTIRE order books up and down. (mainly down, even to 0).

3) All leveraged positions will be wiped on the peaks and valleys.

4) The difficulty will be much higher than the hashrate which, by itself, will create big delays between blocks. It is uncertain how big though.

And this is what I haven't seen anyone mention:

5) There will be a huge spike in transactions with people sending his coins to the exchanges. And I mean an unprecedently HUGE number of transactions. Orders of magnitude higher than anything we have ever seen.

6) Core with its 1MB max block and difficulty over hashrate combined will take ages to move the coins (which is not that bad because there will be less BTC coins arriving at the exchanges to be dumped), BU blocksize...well, I am not sure what it will do in that scenario, but it is possible that it will lead to additional hard forks/blocksize adjustment. Also Orphan blocks will be everywhere.

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

I could go on... but the only reasonable conclusion is that all this chaos and confussion will benefit noone (maybe to exchanges in the short period, due to the extreme volatility and huge number of trades) and that all this nonsense must come to and end now.







Essentially BU is a Kamikaze attack on Bitcoin..  Huh and the funny part is it's the bigger blocks that rek them in your scenario haha
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 5337



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:25:33 PM

it all depends on which chain satoshi dumps on...
that chain will die.
not because he crashed its price
but because he expressed his preference

tk3609
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Small trader


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:26:46 PM

First, removing 100X margin trading was great in that the FOMO buying bubble leading up to the ETF announcement could only go so high. It would have been ALOT higher if 100X margin trading had been enabled.

Which Chinese exchanges had 100x leverage?

I think at least a few of the major ones like OKCoin and Huobi.
http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/01/17/bitcoin-price-thrives-despite-china-curbing-margin-trading/

Hm, maybe on okcoin.cn because okcoin.com has only 20x. Thanks for the link
BinaryReign
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 150
Merit: 110


BTC HODLer


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:28:48 PM


it all depends on which chain satoshi dumps on...
that chain will die.
not because he crashed its price
but because he expressed his preference

and if he doesn't dump either?  Lips sealed
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:29:12 PM

it all depends on which chain satoshi dumps on...
that chain will die.
not because he crashed its price
but because he expressed his preference

Personally I think Satoshi would create a burn address along the lines of yOufUcKinGBratsruInedEveryThingFu2KokSukkAzzz69 and burn his holdings on both chains.
york780
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:31:44 PM

Is crypto done  Huh
alexeft
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:34:54 PM

Is crypto done  Huh

No, only the ones that have big blocks are!
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3934
Merit: 4459



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:35:47 PM

I am a bit surprised that noone has mentioned one of the consecuences a split between CORE and BU would have, apart from the AMAZINGLY HUGE volatility lower combined price etc...

1) If Bitcoin is split in two, core side will be at 1MB max block size at that time, and BU with an undetermined but bigger max block size.

2) Both "parties" will start dumping each other strongly. Chaos will reign and volatility could be so huge as to wipe ENTIRE order books up and down. (mainly down, even to 0).

3) All leveraged positions will be wiped on the peaks and valleys.

4) The difficulty will be much higher than the hashrate which, by itself, will create big delays between blocks. It is uncertain how big though.

And this is what I haven't seen anyone mention:

5) There will be a huge spike in transactions with people sending his coins to the exchanges. And I mean an unprecedently HUGE number of transactions. Orders of magnitude higher than anything we have ever seen.

6) Core with its 1MB max block and difficulty over hashrate combined will take ages to move the coins (which is not that bad because there will be less BTC coins arriving at the exchanges to be dumped), BU blocksize...well, I am not sure what it will do in that scenario, but it is possible that it will lead to additional hard forks/blocksize adjustment. Also Orphan blocks will be everywhere.

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

I could go on... but the only reasonable conclusion is that all this chaos and confussion will benefit noone (maybe to exchanges in the short period, due to the extreme volatility and huge number of trades) and that all this nonsense must come to and end now.



OR...you can chill out for a year or 18 mo and wait until the dust settles while mining alts.
In btc mining the biggest question would be WHERE as different pools would probably setup differently.
springgers
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:38:03 PM

Looks like we are going for sub 800$, thank you BU FUD for cheap coins
Where are you getting your info from friend?
I said $725 as york780 said he is predicting but now I see him saying 900EUR which is over $1000. So I don't know where he is pulling these numbers from.
And now people are taking about splitting it just like ETH did with the ETClassic crap but with BU?
This is madness.
 Angry
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:40:56 PM

This is madness.
Holliday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1012



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:43:26 PM

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

There is already several 10s of thousands transactions waiting for confirmation at most times. As you said, the chaos of a contentious hard fork would possibly increase transaction rates for a time (there will definitely be a lot of people disassociating their bitcoins coins from BUtcoins, which requires transactions). Also, there is the potential for additional spam attacks on both chains. I expect that should BU fork, they will go with the default size of 16 MB at first, just because who changes default settings? I fully expect those BU blocks to be full for a long time (they may even increase soon because of that, I mean, that is their MO). That means, in 60 days the BU chain will have doubled the size of the existing 8 year old chain, plus some.

Just something to ponder.
york780
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:45:06 PM

Honey badger destroyed , so 900 EUR confirmed. It looks like we wont see the price go below 1000$ Congrats USA hodlers, we europeans got rekt once again !
Ted E. Bare
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Bear with me


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:48:20 PM

At 30m and 1h; could that be a W-shaped bottom forming?
springgers
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 251


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:49:54 PM

I was just thinking of that saying and am going to rebuke it with.....

This is SPARTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! Grin

Ethereum should know this of BITCOINNNNNNN! Cheesy

Do not mess with the beast!
 or you will get your head chopped off. Angry
Let Dash hear this now! Cheesy
york780
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:51:35 PM

W shaped bottom already occured, still going down so that means a C wave !
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 250


A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards


View Profile
March 17, 2017, 08:53:35 PM

7) Even if in that scenario it seems that BU would be at an advange with its increased TPS over BTC, that will lead to more BUcoins arriving at the exchanges and being dumped by BTC supporters. The price of BUcoin will be much lower than BTC, at least for some time (days, weeks, months, maybe forever).

There is already several 10s of thousands transactions waiting for confirmation at most times. As you said, the chaos of a contentious hard fork would possibly increase transaction rates for a time (there will definitely be a lot of people disassociating their bitcoins coins from BUtcoins, which requires transactions). Also, there is the potential for additional spam attacks on both chains. I expect that should BU fork, they will go with the default size of 16 MB at first, just because who changes default settings? I fully expect those BU blocks to be full for a long time (they may even increase soon because of that, I mean, that is their MO). That means, in 60 days the BU chain will have doubled the size of the existing 8 year old chain, plus some.

Just something to ponder.

default setting for BU is 1MB
Pages: « 1 ... 16507 16508 16509 16510 16511 16512 16513 16514 16515 16516 16517 16518 16519 16520 16521 16522 16523 16524 16525 16526 16527 16528 16529 16530 16531 16532 16533 16534 16535 16536 16537 16538 16539 16540 16541 16542 16543 16544 16545 16546 16547 16548 16549 16550 16551 16552 16553 16554 16555 16556 [16557] 16558 16559 16560 16561 16562 16563 16564 16565 16566 16567 16568 16569 16570 16571 16572 16573 16574 16575 16576 16577 16578 16579 16580 16581 16582 16583 16584 16585 16586 16587 16588 16589 16590 16591 16592 16593 16594 16595 16596 16597 16598 16599 16600 16601 16602 16603 16604 16605 16606 16607 ... 33915 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!