gembitz
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 04:30:54 PM |
|
I'm starting to truly believe that about 85% of the blocksize debate spammers here and on reddit are just alt coin shills hoping to spread FUD and get cheap bitcoins.
^there really is no debate we are raising the blocklimit to 2mb end of discussion ! 
|
|
|
|
gembitz
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 04:32:34 PM |
|
Good morning Bitcoinland.
I see the panicking has slowed down and the price is back in 4 digits... currently $1046USD (Bitcoinaverage).
I hope everybody stocked up when the price was so low. Once again, dip-buying holders rewarded for their patience.
The bounce back up was so sudden it makes me wonder what sparked it. Jihan Wu suddenly come to his senses?
At least the market seems to have come to its senses.
Now maybe al the FUDsters, trolls and alt shills can crawl back into their holes.
^everything is fine jimbo ~ and i found adam and the rest of the btu trolls i love this!! :-D * altbitcoin are heading into space**
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 04:33:03 PM |
|
I'm starting to truly believe that about 85% of the blocksize debate spammers here and on reddit are just alt coin shills hoping to spread FUD and get cheap bitcoins.
^there really is no debate we are raising the blocklimit to 2mb end of discussion !  I say we raise it to 100GB and die the next day! All for death (bitcoin death I mean)! 
|
|
|
|
|
BinaryReign
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 151
Merit: 111
BTC HODLer
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 04:53:19 PM Last edit: March 21, 2017, 03:31:21 PM by BinaryReign |
|
With this climate it could be a dead cat bounce indeed.
Than again, those tokens finex made may have turned the tables on value? lol idk, but I'm getting fomo heh Approaching $1050 now, if this is a dead cat I suspect now is the time to dump  Update: already $1050+ on some exchanges heh  With price so low yesterday the continuing rise in price could trigger some dumping, could be dead cat. Majority of bears are gone now, hopefully we won't get a huge red candle or another slow drop. Glad we're back at 4 digits now that the guys who fell for FUD and such have sold off. I've never been anything but a perma-bull, hodler, and dip buyer, well, except early on when I mined 3.4 btc with this PC in 2013 (2 Radeon 7970s  ) and more later with my BFL Asics. Anyway, the BUllshiting bothers me because I didn't sign up for a chinese owned, centralized coin that required an above average computer to fully participate. I feel like we should do our best to keep it so that anyone who can get their hands on a decent $100 laptop from craigslist can run a wallet/node. That's why I will dump the BUttcoins as soon as they arrive, and even fire up the old miners I have collecting dust if need be, and continue running a core node.
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 04:58:00 PM |
|
Sounds to me like you actually did panic I probably did... but also took a calculated risk, I dont think the risk/reward of the situation is reflected at a price of $1000+ right now. I took a bet that there is a higher chance that I can get back in lower than miss out on a rally with the current climate did you buy back already? good luck, mate.
|
|
|
|
Dafar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 04:59:34 PM |
|
Sounds to me like you actually did panic I probably did... but also took a calculated risk, I dont think the risk/reward of the situation is reflected at a price of $1000+ right now. I took a bet that there is a higher chance that I can get back in lower than miss out on a rally with the current climate did you buy back already? good luck, mate. No... I'll wait a few days
|
|
|
|
Ted E. Bare
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:03:23 PM |
|
The dump was extremely excessive, I guess it makes sense for the price to recover somewhere in between at least.
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:04:46 PM |
|
Eh, they won't have to sue. Jihadi Wu only has 33% of hashing power and the others got the message from the market reaction.
|
|
|
|
Chevas Regal
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:05:03 PM |
|
Bitcoin back to 4 digits now, it is now time for altcoins to sink, already sold some of my lisk at 20k SAT which I bought at 9k SAT, around 2.63btc profit today. 
|
|
|
|
Killerpotleaf
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 812
Merit: 250
A Blockchain Mobile Operator With Token Rewards
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:05:16 PM |
|
Sounds to me like you actually did panic I probably did... but also took a calculated risk, I dont think the risk/reward of the situation is reflected at a price of $1000+ right now. I took a bet that there is a higher chance that I can get back in lower than miss out on a rally with the current climate did you buy back already? good luck, mate. No... I'll wait a few days at least you still have a bunch and a ton of cash .
|
|
|
|
julian071
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:08:26 PM |
|
Fuck, all this volatility and I only made 1.7%  I suck at trading.....
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:09:24 PM |
|
As usual, the short-dumper bottomed out... and now he's gonna make everyone who panic-sold doubt the market from 970 all the way back up to their sell point. 
|
|
|
|
Holliday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1012
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:12:19 PM |
|
Is there any practical reason why bitcoin couldn't be patched so miners can set their own blockreward?
Of course. The absolute rejection of the users of any chain containing blocks that deviate from the established reward schedule. Is there any practical reason why bitcoin couldn't be patched so miners can set their own blocksize?
Of course. The absolute rejection by the users of any chain containing blocks the deviate from the established size parameters. I wasn't really looking for an answer. My version was rhetorical. I think you understood that, though. Firstly, node operation does not require SSD latencies. HDD speeds are fine. So 25 bux. Yet... so what? Less than 0.2 BTC? Waaaaaah. Buck up buttercup - those that refuse to invest shall be rightfully cast aside. And good riddance to you too. It would be one thing if you even tried... but... I guess you're just too. damned. insignificant.
Storage isn't the real concern. It's RAM (in the short term) and bandwidth (in the slightly longer run).
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:17:23 PM |
|
Is there any practical reason why bitcoin couldn't be patched so miners can set their own blockreward?
Of course. The absolute rejection of the users of any chain containing blocks that deviate from the established reward schedule. Is there any practical reason why bitcoin couldn't be patched so miners can set their own blocksize?
Of course. The absolute rejection by the users of any chain containing blocks the deviate from the established size parameters. I wasn't really looking for an answer. My version was rhetorical. I think you understood that, though. Firstly, node operation does not require SSD latencies. HDD speeds are fine. So 25 bux. Yet... so what? Less than 0.2 BTC? Waaaaaah. Buck up buttercup - those that refuse to invest shall be rightfully cast aside. And good riddance to you too. It would be one thing if you even tried... but... I guess you're just too. damned. insignificant.
Storage isn't the real concern. It's RAM (in the short term) and bandwidth (in the slightly longer run). At larger blocks (hence more tps) and larger databases, SSDs will be the only way to go. You can trade SSD for RAM all you want, but the truth is that expensive resources will be needed that are not easily available. Hence, decentralization goes down the drain. For Bitcoin to be bitcoin, we need average JOE to be able to run a full client easily.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12835
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:21:50 PM |
|
Sounds to me like you actually did panic Yep. Each of us, especially longer term HODLers and accumulators, should attempt maintain various plans that we do not take such extreme measures, like selling 50% of our coins during a dip. Selling during a dip is a bad idea in the first place, but sometimes, there are events and news that may cause someone to reasonably conclude that the price is going much lower, and in those cases we may want to sell a decent percentage of our stash on the likelihood that the price will continue to drop... But, still we gotta be careful because frequently the opposite can occur, especially in bitcoinlandia.... Even in panic mode I cannot see myself selling more than 10% at any one time, and maybe up to 20% in a real worse case scenario. This FUD about BU doesn't really seem to rise to the level of anything in which we should panic. Am I wrong?
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12835
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:37:11 PM |
|
Segwit First!
^screw seqwit+ screw btu ... lets just increase to 2mb and get on up to $2000 ladies?  Are you retarded? What is the justification to move up to 2mb? If there is no justification, besides merely "sounding like a good idea", then there should be no need to presume that 2mb actually resolves anything - besides caving into some whiners and maybe even bringing some disadvantages. Anyhow, we should not be advocating to do things just because it "sounds nice"
|
|
|
|
Genesis1337
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:37:46 PM |
|
we are the majority deal with it
segwit? we should just do UASF
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:39:45 PM |
|
Segwit First!
^screw seqwit+ screw btu ... lets just increase to 2mb and get on up to $2000 ladies?  Are you retarded? What is the justification to move up to 2mb? If there is no justification, besides merely "sounding like a good idea", then there should be no need to presume that 2mb actually resolves anything - besides caving into some whiners and maybe even bringing some disadvantages. Anyhow, we should not be advocating to do things just because it "sounds nice" Double the transaction capability (and lower fees as a side effect) is plenty of reason. It's the people who are against growth that have some explaining to do.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
 |
March 19, 2017, 05:39:49 PM |
|
we are the majority deal with it
Agree.  
|
|
|
|
|