arklan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 07:21:40 AM |
|
[https://www.hackread.com/millions-of-accounts-from-hacked-bitcoin-on-dark-web/[/size][/b][/center]
Thanks Fakhoury. My bitcoin talk account was hacked into in September (about the same time that Adam's account was hacked into). I made some changes, but based on your article, Fakhoury, I made a few more changes. If a hacker gets into another bitcoin related account that has value, it will take only a few minutes before you lose your bitcoin in that account. And, even if the account does not allow them to withdraw for a few days, they can pretty much deplete your account within hours, just by pumping and dumping whatever value you have in your account. My account got done too, unfortunately I've not been able to get it back  oh, is that what happened to adam? what's he going by these days? He goes by "who knows" hahahaha ...please tell me thats a joke... but them if anyone would do it, he would.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4144
Merit: 12547
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 07:46:31 AM |
|
[https://www.hackread.com/millions-of-accounts-from-hacked-bitcoin-on-dark-web/[/size][/b][/center]
Thanks Fakhoury. My bitcoin talk account was hacked into in September (about the same time that Adam's account was hacked into). I made some changes, but based on your article, Fakhoury, I made a few more changes. If a hacker gets into another bitcoin related account that has value, it will take only a few minutes before you lose your bitcoin in that account. And, even if the account does not allow them to withdraw for a few days, they can pretty much deplete your account within hours, just by pumping and dumping whatever value you have in your account. My account got done too, unfortunately I've not been able to get it back  oh, is that what happened to adam? what's he going by these days? He goes by "who knows" hahahaha ...please tell me thats a joke... but them if anyone would do it, he would. It is not a joke. Look at the few posts preceding this one, and you will figure out the answer to the seeming puzzle that really is not a puzzle. 
|
|
|
|
Wexlike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1474
Merit: 1087
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 12:23:38 PM |
|
Almost 1100$. 
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1630
Self made HODLER ✓
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 12:28:23 PM |
|
Almost 1100$.  Good recovery. Only $250 more to go 
|
|
|
|
travwill
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 12:29:38 PM |
|
Almost 1100$.  Yes interesting that we are running up. Enough technical and BTU talk, let's refocus this thread on price speculation. Take the other talk to other technical forums!
|
|
|
|
JohnUser
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 12:40:48 PM |
|
Almost 1100$.  Good recovery. Only $250 more to go  1350$ ? Its a long way with that f*cking HF btcu/segwit talking 1200 would be nice and show them how strong btc is.
|
|
|
|
simmo77
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 12:44:06 PM Last edit: March 21, 2017, 01:02:55 PM by simmo77 |
|
Almost 1100$.  Yes interesting that we are running up. Enough technical and BTU talk, let's refocus this thread on price speculation. Take the other talk to other technical forums! I sold all of my trading stash a few days ago because of all the fork talk - first time I've done so in a loooong time. Around 18 hours ago I bought back in. I didn't make much on the trade, increased my BTC holding by a little Now that the ETH and DASH shenanigans seem to be over, it will be interesting to see what happens to the price over the next few days. How many people will cash out altogether with their profits?
|
|
|
|
Ted E. Bare
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 12:48:50 PM |
|
It is always the same pattern and I love it. Multiple weeks trending up, followed by a hefty short lasting dump back to almost the exact top of the previous uptrend, and repeat for the following uptrend. So we end up with higher prices consistently. Only those couple of days of hefty dumping I do not enjoy. New target $1500?
|
|
|
|
Johnny00
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 01:23:02 PM |
|
Almost 1100$.  Yes interesting that we are running up. Enough technical and BTU talk, let's refocus this thread on price speculation. Take the other talk to other technical forums! I sold all of my trading stash a few days ago because of all the fork talk - first time I've done so in a loooong time. Around 18 hours ago I bought back in. I didn't make much on the trade, increased my BTC holding by a little Now that the ETH and DASH shenanigans seem to be over, it will be interesting to see what happens to the price over the next few days. How many people will cash out altogether with their profits? There are a lot more altcoins that will pump before BTC. ETH and Dash sold back to BTC, pushes the price up then mid tier alt coins will be pumped
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 01:24:37 PM |
|
Even though it is a long way off, I can see the halving of 2020 doing the same thing to the price it did this year. If we don't have any down years between now and then I could easily see $5-10k going into early 2021.
That is why little dips here and there are just more opportunity to buy.
|
|
|
|
york780
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 01:44:05 PM |
|
Bitcoin is now batteling to restore its value of march 18. If bitcoin cant break trough this its a major bearish signal.
|
|
|
|
simmo77
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:00:37 PM |
|
Bitcoin is now batteling to restore its value of march 18. If bitcoin cant break trough this its a major bearish signal.
Its up around 4-5% today, give it some time.
|
|
|
|
Dafar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
dafar consulting
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:04:38 PM |
|
Definitely feel terrible for selling... im sorry bitcoin 
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:10:24 PM |
|
Bitcoin is now batteling to restore its value of march 18. If bitcoin cant break trough this its a major bearish signal.
There is a sea behind that mountain or there isn't! See?!... I know everything!
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:14:58 PM |
|
Definitely feel terrible for selling... im sorry bitcoin  Well, what can I say? Thank you very much for the cheap coins. But don't worry. I'll sell half of them back to you next year when we hit $11,127.50!
|
|
|
|
Morgenst3rn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:37:36 PM |
|
Bitcoin is now batteling to restore its value of march 18. If bitcoin cant break trough this its a major bearish signal.
I'm quite amazed how quick the price of BTC rose again after the mayor FUD during last Thursday - Sunday. Has someone an idea how this happened despite the threat of a hard fork & the (new) rumors from China, regarding PBoC and regulations of the exchanges?
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:51:06 PM |
|
A compromise looks very likely  But I feel bad for selling... if I buy back now I will pretty much be down 5 btc..... ugh... don't even worry about it.. you can always buy back in at $1500 ..
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:54:10 PM |
|
Blocksize was never meant to be some resource that could be controlled by anybody.
Let Bitcoin scale already.
Make Bitcoin Great Again!
Finally, you make one out of three points that makes some sense. 1mb blocksize limits is the current state of bitcoin.. that is correct, and bitcoin was not meant to be easily changed. Therefore, 1mb blocksize limits seem to be the status quo going forward until there is some kind of convincing evidence and/or argument(s) that allows for it to be adapted in some kind of way, whether that is through seg wit or blocksize increases or any other "scaling" way forward. What's your angle? My angle meaning what? I already stated what I thought, no? In essence, I agree with any point that the current bitcoin system is established as a secure decentralized immutable way to store and transfer value. If what bitcoin "is" is undermined by some kind of centralized system or manipulation or FUD that allows for such undermining of bitcoin "as it is", then that would be problematic. My angle remains that XT, Classic and now BU are either aimed or have effects that are attempting to undermine bitcoin "as is"... ... so we will see how all of that plays out, and whether bitcoin is going to be able to preserve its value in one form or another regarding a secure decentralized and immutable system that allows for the storage and transferring of value Okay let's remove any possibility of ambiguity then. Are you against increasing the transfer capacity of the bitcoin network, yes or no? Just yes or no. no So why do you want to stay at the current 1 MB? You can't have it both ways. First of all. You edited out my answer. Second of all, you are planting assumptions about my position based on information that I did not provide. In other words, you are not really attempting to engage in any kind of meaningful interaction but instead wanting to disseminate your own talking points and to falsely attribute positions to others (isn't that called, creation of a strawman?) well he does have a point.. it is hard to interact with people who want to stay at the 1MB block size for obvious reasons.
|
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:56:13 PM |
|
Bitcoin is now batteling to restore its value of march 18. If bitcoin cant break trough this its a major bearish signal.
I'm quite amazed how quick the price of BTC rose again after the mayor FUD during last Thursday - Sunday. Has someone an idea how this happened despite the threat of a hard fork & the (new) rumors from China, regarding PBoC and regulations of the exchanges? I'm not sure something 'happened', more that panic sellers overcooked it, helped along by some strategic negative press. So this is more like reversion-to-mean than a fundamental turnaround. That sort of thing generally plays out more slowly, with the news providing noise in the short term.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4144
Merit: 12547
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 21, 2017, 02:59:48 PM |
|
Blocksize was never meant to be some resource that could be controlled by anybody.
Let Bitcoin scale already.
Make Bitcoin Great Again!
Finally, you make one out of three points that makes some sense. 1mb blocksize limits is the current state of bitcoin.. that is correct, and bitcoin was not meant to be easily changed. Therefore, 1mb blocksize limits seem to be the status quo going forward until there is some kind of convincing evidence and/or argument(s) that allows for it to be adapted in some kind of way, whether that is through seg wit or blocksize increases or any other "scaling" way forward. What's your angle? My angle meaning what? I already stated what I thought, no? In essence, I agree with any point that the current bitcoin system is established as a secure decentralized immutable way to store and transfer value. If what bitcoin "is" is undermined by some kind of centralized system or manipulation or FUD that allows for such undermining of bitcoin "as it is", then that would be problematic. My angle remains that XT, Classic and now BU are either aimed or have effects that are attempting to undermine bitcoin "as is"... ... so we will see how all of that plays out, and whether bitcoin is going to be able to preserve its value in one form or another regarding a secure decentralized and immutable system that allows for the storage and transferring of value Okay let's remove any possibility of ambiguity then. Are you against increasing the transfer capacity of the bitcoin network, yes or no? Just yes or no. no So why do you want to stay at the current 1 MB? You can't have it both ways. First of all. You edited out my answer. Second of all, you are planting assumptions about my position based on information that I did not provide. In other words, you are not really attempting to engage in any kind of meaningful interaction but instead wanting to disseminate your own talking points and to falsely attribute positions to others (isn't that called, creation of a strawman?) well he does have a point.. it is hard to interact with people who want to stay at the 1MB block size for obvious reasons. what is his point exactly? Who gives a shit what I want? It does not matter, and I am not saying what I want. I am merely saying that the big blockers are saying that they want something else. They want bigger blocks, and I am following whatever there is. So don't be shifting this discussion into what I want because what I want does not matter. I am not proposing any change or arguing for a change, and the burden of production and the burden of persuasion remains in the hands of those who are advocating a change, and currently, those happen to be the big blocker goofballs who are advocating for raising the blocksize limit.
|
|
|
|
|