Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[conspirosphere.tk]

https://youtu.be/4zLfCnGVeL4 Simon and Garfunkel - The Sound of Silence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja_wQnVgkEc Stereophonics - Maybe Tomorrow lyrics

Thx. But my advice is to find 432 hz music.
440hz Music is a major conspiracy: http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/08/440hz-music-conspiracy-to-detune-good-vibrations-from-natural-432hz.html

[mymenace]

So, charts and that ... Anyone worried about this low volume?

yes, concerned that I have not bought enough bitcoin

[CoinCube]

Would you like to address my points? Prove me wrong if you can. Or not, as you please.

Since you asked and the issue is an important one I will do so and ask the forbearance of those here only for BTC market discussion.

^^why is this forum so obsessed with jews? ffs.

Because they are the enemy. Literally. They own the banks, which run on principles contrary to bitcoin. The media, which corrupts our culture. The politicians who make the laws. No culture has ever benefited from letting jews live among them, which is why they keep getting kicked out of their host cultures. Hundreds and hundreds of times.

If you do not understand what you are struggling against you will waste your efforts in futile and self-destructive measures.

Yes the west is dying especially in Europe and yes our current financial system and media are playing a role in that decay but the underlying cause has little to do with everyone's favorite racial bogeyman. Europe is dying because they have voluntary abandoned the foundation that allowed Europe to rise in the first place. This foundation is not "whiteness".  if you go back in history to the fall of Rome and read about subsequent European development it is clear that the primitive and tribal Europeans lived in a world of utter barbarism. The Europeans were not the highest IQ group nor were they the most technologically developed yet they would go on to lead the scientific revolution and transform the globe. Why is this? The answer is not "white superiority". Europeans are neither the most athletic nor are they the smartest branch of humanity yet European culture would eventually dominated the globe why?

The answer is that the Europeans culture was philosophically sound. They formed a broad consensus around some very specific higher principles which allowed them to organize their societies into ever greater levels of sustainable complexity. This lead to a dominance that lasted for hundreds of years and is only now on the wane.

While it may be true that genetic homogeneity makes it easier to maintain philosophical consensus in the case of Europe the point is moot as Europe abandoned its consensus long ago. The embrace of Leftism and a nonchalance about cultural extinction is understood when one grasps the fact that European culture has been dying for some time. It is easy to rail against the symptoms of decline and look for scapegoats to attack. It is far harder to understand true causes and work towards addressing them especially when addressing the true problem requires people to look within rather then without.

The Jews themselves are actually in a very similar to much of Europe in that a huge number of Jews even wealthy ones have sadly abandoned the philosophical consensus that sustained them for thousands of years. Thus you see the rise of the the Jewish Marxists whom the foolish blame for all of the worlds ills. The sad reality is that some of these Jewish Marxist may be getting rich but they are also dying for like the Europeans they have largely abandoned the bedrock which sustained them. Secular Jews have close to the lowest fertility rate in the world.

American Jewish Fertility by Religious Current

Religious Sect	Average No. of Children per Woman
Secular	1.29
Reform	1.36
Conservative	1.74
Modern Orthodox	3.39
Ultra-Orthodox	6.72

Religion and Progress

The greatest obstacle to human progress is not a technological hurdle but the evil inherent in ourselves. Humans have knowledge of good and evil and with this knowledge we often choose evil.

Collectivism exists because it employs aggregated force to limit evil especially the forms of evil linked to physical violence. Collectivism is expensive and inefficient but these inefficiencies are less than the cost of unrestrained individualism. Collectivism aggregates capital for the common good and we are far from outgrowing our need for this.

1.   Prehistory required the aggregation of human capital in the form of young warriors willing to fight to protect the tribe.
2.   The Agricultural Age required physical capital in the form of land ownership and a State to protect the land.
3.   The Industrial Age required the aggregation of monetary capital to fund large fixed capital investments and factories.

A farmer in the agricultural age could achieve some protection from theft and violence by arming himself. He could protect himself against a small hostile groups by forming defensive pacts with neighboring farmers. To defend against large scale organized violence, however, requires an army and thus a state.

In 1651 Thomas Hobbes argued for the merits of centralized monarchy. He believed that only absolute monarchy was capable of suppressing the evils of an unrestrained humanity. He described in graphic wording the consequences of a world without monarchy a condition he called the state of nature.

In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. - Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

There may well have been a time in human history when the absolute monarchy of Hobbes was the best available government but Hobbes was writing at the end of that era. England had been transformed from a nation almost completely conquered by the Odin worshiping Great Heathen Army of 865 to a country that protected the legal rights of nobles in the Magna Carta of 1215 to a devoutly Christian nation that formalized the rights of judicial review for common citizens in the 1679 Habeas Corpus act. Hobbes had failed to appreciate the growth of moral capital that allowed for superior forms of government with increased freedom.

Our forefathers understood that it is morality and virtue that allows for freedom a lesson many today have forgotten.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Benjamin Franklin

“Is there no virtue among us? If there be not, we are in a wretched situation. No theoretical checks, no form of government, can render us secure. To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea. If there be sufficient virtue and intelligence in the community, it will be exercised in the selection of these men; so that we do not depend upon their virtue, or put confidence in our rulers, but in the people who are to choose them.” - James Madison

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.” - George Washington

In human interactions we often face a choice between cooperation (reaching a mutually beneficial exchange) and defection (advancement of ourselves to the detriment of our fellow man). The nation state, police, and laws suppress physical violence but do nothing to maintain the morality and virtue that sustain freedom. Collectivism limits some avenues of defection while opening entire new possibilities. New opportunities for defection arise along the entire economic spectrum. Everything from special interest lobbying, to disability scammers, and on a larger scale our entire fiat monetary system are essentially forms of defection allowing the few to profit at the expense of the many. Nation state collectivism has allowed for the creation of great civilizations and yet is entirely unsustainable in its current form.

"our Western civilization is on its way to perishing. It has many commendable qualities, most of which it has borrowed from the Christian ethic, but it lacks the element of moral wisdom that would give it permanence. Future historians will record that we of the twentieth century had intelligence enough to create a great civilization but not the moral wisdom to preserve it." - A.W. Tozer

The perishing of Western civilization, however, does not mean fragmentation and collapse. Indeed in this instance the opposite appears to be true and collapse looks set to drive us via economic fundamentals and debt into a single world government paradigm for reasons discussed at length elsewhere.

The evolution of the social contract is a progressive climb to higher potential energy systems with increased degrees of freedom. The state of nature begat tribalism. Tribalism grew into despotism. Despotism advanced into monarchy. Monarchies were replaced by republics. It is likely that in the near future republics will be consumed by world government, and perhaps someday world government will evolve into decentralized government.

Each iteration has a common theme for each advance increases the number of individuals able to engage in cooperative activity while lowering the number of individuals able to defect. Each iteration increases the sustainable degrees of freedom the system can support. Moral capital is the foundation that allows this progress to occur. For this reason ethical monotheism is the single greatest contributor to human progress from any source since human culture emerged from the stone ages.

"Nature is amoral. Nature knows nothing of good and evil. In nature there is one rule—survival of the fittest. There is no right, only might. If a creature is weak, kill it. Only human beings could have moral rules such as, "If it is weak, protect it." Only human beings can feel themselves ethically obligated to strangers.
...
Nature allows you to act naturally, i.e., do only what you want you to do, without moral restraints; God does not. Nature lets you act naturally - and it is as natural to kill, rape, and enslave as it is to love.
...
One of the vital elements in the ethical monotheist revolution was its repudiation of nature as god. The evolution of civilization and morality have depended in large part on desanctifying nature.
...
Civilizations that equated gods with nature—a characteristic of all primitive societies—or that worshipped nature did not evolve.
...
Words cannot convey the magnitude of the change wrought by the Bible's introduction into the world of a God who rules the universe morally." - Dennis Prager

The utopia of limited to no government would only be possible for a population constantly striving at all times to be moral. Such a utopia would require all individuals to always act cooperatively, honesty, and transparently. We lack the required moral fiber for anything like this to work at our current juncture in history.

See: Freedom and God for more.

[xhomerx10]

I just did a test transaction of 1 mBTC with an attached a fee of only 12 sats per byte to verify a new electrum wallet. It was a pretty standard 224 byte tx and I sent it via Blockchain.info. I was about to walk away for a few hours when I saw the electrum screen had changed slightly and now had a block height in the window beside the transaction. The first confirmation only took 3 minutes!  Three minutes with 12 sats per byte!?!?  SWEEEET!  Bitcoin is better than ever.  MOON!

[kurious]

There is only one single category of humans (?) more despicable than the joos, and that's the shabbos goym.
I feel shame for you.

Reality is reality. Feel free to live in your dream world with your artificial boogeyman you can blame for all the evil in the world. I am not stopping you.

It's noble to at least try.  You are not the only one sickened at the rampant right wing, Neo-Nazi, antisemitic bile on here.

I have tried to stand against it, but they won't change. I realise you feel the need to point out this view is plain sickening, nonsensical and historically false.  However, these people live in a bubble of ignorance where the holocaust didn't happen and Hitler 'wasn't all bad' and no one where they live has challenged their twisted views of reality.

I have seen r0ach willing on the 'Second holocaust' on here and no one spoke up, bar me. Shocking it is and so speaking up is right.  America is fucked if this is this is a level of debate that is even tolerated, but I guess you realised that, if you have spotted the irony of a nation of immigrants being so intractably racist. Voting for a leader who is a essentially a white supremacist withe temperament of a thin-skinned five year old proves it.

I am sure this may make me persona non grata here, but if they can say what the hell they like - no matter how evil or pro-genocidal - then others are free to say just how much they disagree and indeed hold their views in contempt.

[fabiorem]

So, charts and that ... Anyone worried about this low volume?

Are you worried with the HODL Kult?

[conspirosphere.tk]

Since you asked and the issue is an important one I will do so and ask the forbearance of those here only for BTC market discussion.

Your walls of text are useless, being 100%  b/s.

the underlying cause has little to do with everyone's favorite racial bogeyman.

This just attests that you know nothing.

It is easy to rail against the symptoms of decline and look for scapegoats to attack.

The "scapegoats" led us in this shit all along the last 4 centuries at least.

The Jews

Fuck them.
https://i.imgur.com/6M8mE8F.jpg

etc.

[soullyG]

I'm expecting a drop in the next 24 hours to about $4100, retest support there before we hopefully move on up 

[CoinCube]

It's noble to at least try.  You are not the only one sickened at the rampant right wing, Neo-Nazi, antisemitic bile on here.

I have tried to stand against it, but they won't change. I realise you feel the need to point out this view is plain sickening, nonsensical and historically false.  However, these people live in a bubble of ignorance where the holocaust didn't happen and Hitler 'wasn't all bad' and no one where they live has challenged their twisted views of reality.

I have seen r0ach willing on the 'Second holocaust' on here and no one spoke up, bar me. Shocking it is and so speaking up is right.  America is fucked if this is this is a level of debate that is even tolerated, but I guess you realised that, if you have spotted the irony of a nation of immigrants being so intractably racist. Voting for a leader who is a essentially a white supremacist withe temperament of a thin-skinned five year old proves it.

I am sure this may make me persona non grata here, but if they can say what the hell they like - no matter how evil or pro-genocidal - then others are free to say just how much they disagree and indeed hold their views in contempt.

Kurious it may surprise you to know that I voted for our president and am a supporter  

There is a lot of anger on the right because they see that their quality of life is declining and they often do not understand why. The best strategy is to engage with extremist on both the left and the right challenge their ideas while forcefully condemning violence. It is violence and suppression of freedom especially freedom of speech that must be opposed.  Both the extremist Nazi groups and the extremist Communist groups are more or less the same in their tendency to resort to violence as they would never be able to impose their ideology on society without it. This equivalence is lost on most.


Deadly Junk Science
http://www.scifiwright.com/2017/06/last-crusade-deadly-junk-science/

Junk science leads to more Junk Science leads to death.

The clearest example of Junk Science turning deadly is Trofim Lysenko.

Lysenko was Stalin’s director of the Soviet Union’s Lenin All-Union Academy of Agricultural Sciences. He rejected Mendel’s theory of genetics. He also rejected Darwin’s theory of natural selection, not on the grounds of being unsupported by evidence, but instead on the grounds of being “being foreign, impractical, idealistic and a product of “bourgeois capitalism.”

He proposed instead that evolution was based on cooperation and group struggle rather than the “bourgeois” notion of competition between individuals.

He held to Larmarckian that organisms evolved through the acquisition of traits that they needed and used (as when a giraffe, by stretching its neck to get leaves, actually made its neck lengthen and that this longer neck was then somehow passed on to offspring).

On this basis Lysenko boasted of being able to turn wheat into rye in a few years, to turn spring wheat into summer wheat and to be able to use the principles of material dialectic to get organisms to cooperate rather than compete.

Scientists who disagreed or showed insufficient enthusiasm were sent to jail, gulag, or firing squad.

The net result was that Russia, which had been a wheat exporter, went heavily into debt buying wheat from the United States, and went into a famine.

Millions died.

The race science of the National Socialist German Worker’s Party is the most notorious example of Darwinism run amok.

The idea here is that Darwinian competition between breeds of man produces an invariable conflict no peace can solve; that, indeed, such a peace is not desirable, as it will lead to a degeneration of the breeding stock; and that the competition has brought out higher and lower forms of human life, that is, Untermensch and Übermensch the slave races and the master race.

The theory from this concludes that one’s political loyalties and general worthiness as a human being spring from one’s genetic code, not from one’s political beliefs. Your skin color is your uniform. The fact that Cassius Clay (Negro) and Cat Stephens (Caucasian) are both Mohammedans, whereas Saint Kateri Tekakwitha (American Indian), Saint Paul (Jew), Saint Justin Martyr (Greek) and Saint Augustine of Hippo (North African) are all Catholic is a fact this theory cannot explain and cannot brush aside. Apparently the fact that one’s values, virtues, and habits of thought come from one’s genes is taken as a given, and the fact that these things come from one’s religion, or the religious background of one’s upbringing even if one is an atheist, is ignored without being addressed.

Race science is a crass attempt to solve the paradox of nature versus nurture merely by denying that upbringing and education have any effect on the human animal, that free will plays no part in one’s personality and loyalty. Race science merely decrees nature the sole sovereign of destiny.

That led to the extermination not only of appalling and astronomical numbers of Jews and Gypsies, but also of Catholics. Apparently genetics is passed through the Eucharist, according to the wonder science of the Left.

An aside: Those who believe that the Nazis were creatures of the Right rather than the Left are using a deliberately misleading classification. Leftists regard all who oppose Communism as one party, whether they be monarchists, republicans, libertarians, anarchists or totalitarians.  Since the National Socialists of Germany, the Fascists of Italy, and the International Socialists of Russia and China use identical means (propaganda and violence) to pursue identical goals (collectivist secular totalitarianism) and differ only in their uniforms and buzzwords, I suggest the debate about classification is fraudulent.

To be sure, whether one is a race collectivist who seeks the extermination of all lesser races by the master race, or one is a class collectivist who seeks the liquidation of all bourgeoisie and aristocratic classes by the proletarian class, may seem like a big difference to the twin brothers during their murderous struggles with each other. I am sure that a male rhino can tell the difference between a pretty female rhino and a plain one as well.

To the Christian, who believes that God gave the right of life, liberty and property, with the concurrent rights of freedom of conscience and the right to self-defense, to individuals first and foremost, I only care that I have a large bore rifle handy to shoot the rhino as it rampages, pretty or plain.

So it is with the various forms of Leftism. You may debate the Linnaean classifications of the various forms of political insanity involved if you wish. Which side is the Devil’s party is not under debate: merely count the number of piles of innocent dead bodies in mass graves, or cooked in furnaces, or unburied. You may use units of ten thousand per pile for ease of calculation. End of aside.

In America, the most persistent scientific fraud, working far more damage even than the many eco-hoaxes and enviro-scares of the modern Marxist attack on the West, is the Kinsey Report on human sexuality, which was used as the intellectual justification for the disaster known as the Sexual Revolution. Kinsey published two books: Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (1953). He met all criticism of his methods and findings by pretending that the objections were moral and ethical, hence were mere superstition and prejudice, whereas he was engaging in honest science. The findings were clear. The debate was over.

However, the findings were absurd on their face, claiming that seven out of ten men had slept with prostitutes, that half of all married men were adulterers, four out of ten males were homosexual, and one out of ten exclusively homosexual, and on and on. Of course, it was soon shown that his sample relied disproportionately on prison inmates, including those jailed for sex offenses, college students, and members of homosexual clubs and associations. The whole thing was Junk Science from start to finish, the Kinsey’s so-called research institute was just a swinger’s club where the ‘researchers’ staged orgies and swapped wives.

The junk science was again deadly, for the Sexual Revolution ushered in the abortion cult, which has consumed more innocent blood than ever the Aztecs spilled across the stepped pyramids of Mexico.

The junk science of environmental scaremongering has its death toll as well, when deaths from diseases carried by insects that could be easily and harmlessly killed by DDT continue to mount, when deaths from the poor freezing to death in Northern Europe, allegedly in civilized nations, when energy costs have been driven up by a jihad against coal and petrol. And, of course, the coal miners who die because atomic energy plants are never more erected in America are all preventable deaths due to environmental alarmism. Likewise the automobile injuries and deaths produced by the government mandating the creation of unsafe, lightweight cars to achieve unrealistic and artificial mileage-per-gallon standards.

There are pools, lakes, and oceans of innocent blood on the hands of all these ignoramuses and willfully ignorant cultists who worship science rather than understand science. The question is why we have for so long tolerated this deadly self-imposed blindness, insanity and hysteria?

  

[Ibian]

<snipped to save space>

I see nothing objectionable there, at least nothing worth making an argument of. But if we are looking at core issues, then we are looking at the cultural cycle which is driven by the amygdala.

When cultures rise they are majority K and largely homogeneous. This is necessary for them to rise in the first place, as a homogeneous population is a high trust population, which is required in order for a culture to operate under the rule of law and philosophical principles.

But cultures eventually peak. They defeat all their enemies and expand their borders as far as they will go, people become wealthy and decadent and intellectual and the next generation is weaker than the previous. After the peak comes the decline.

A culture in decline is majority r, as is the case now. One common trait of declining cultures is multiculturalism. The old values are not enforced, which enables foreigners to take over.

Jews, having no country of their own, have to live in a host culture. And only declining cultures allow that. This is why they actively work to undermine their society. They can only exist in a declining culture which will inevitably destroy itself, at which point the jews move on to another host culture. They are not the direct cause, but they do further the speed and severity of the decline and makes it harder to turn things around (which, as far as I know, has never successfully been done - I only know of a single example where the decline never set in, due to some very specific circumstances which can not be replicated today).

They are parasites, in the literal sense, and no culture has ever benefited from hosting them. If you or anyone else has an example to the contrary, I would like to hear it.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

So, charts and that ... Anyone worried about this low volume?

Are you worried with the HODL Kult?

30% haircut. Wait for it.

[Ibian]

There is only one single category of humans (?) more despicable than the joos, and that's the shabbos goym.
I feel shame for you.

Reality is reality. Feel free to live in your dream world with your artificial boogeyman you can blame for all the evil in the world. I am not stopping you.

It's noble to at least try.  You are not the only one sickened at the rampant right wing, Neo-Nazi, antisemitic bile on here.

I have tried to stand against it, but they won't change. I realise you feel the need to point out this view is plain sickening, nonsensical and historically false.  However, these people live in a bubble of ignorance where the holocaust didn't happen and Hitler 'wasn't all bad' and no one where they live has challenged their twisted views of reality.

I have seen r0ach willing on the 'Second holocaust' on here and no one spoke up, bar me. Shocking it is and so speaking up is right.  America is fucked if this is this is a level of debate that is even tolerated, but I guess you realised that, if you have spotted the irony of a nation of immigrants being so intractably racist. Voting for a leader who is a essentially a white supremacist withe temperament of a thin-skinned five year old proves it.

I am sure this may make me persona non grata here, but if they can say what the hell they like - no matter how evil or pro-genocidal - then others are free to say just how much they disagree and indeed hold their views in contempt.

You have no arguments. Just ad homs. That's why "we won't change", you give us no reason to.

As to certain discussion topics being tolerated - that's called freedom of speech, and it is one of the main pillars of our entire culture. Censorship is bad. It always ends with a lot of people being killed for having the wrong ideas.

[fabiorem]

So, charts and that ... Anyone worried about this low volume?

Are you worried with the HODL Kult?

30% haircut. Wait for it.

Nice. I'm going to buy more. This week?

[Elwar]

^^why is this forum so obsessed with jews? ffs.

Collectivism is an ugly thing. It is a lazy way of putting people into groups in order to deal with them as opposed to seeing them as individuals with their own thoughts and ideals.

[CoinCube]

<snipped to save space>

I see nothing objectionable there, at least nothing worth making an argument of. But if we are looking at core issues, then we are looking at the cultural cycle which is driven by the amygdala.

When cultures rise they are majority K and largely homogeneous. This is necessary for them to rise in the first place, as a homogeneous population is a high trust population, which is required in order for a culture to operate under the rule of law and philosophical principles.

But cultures eventually peak. They defeat all their enemies and expand their borders as far as they will go, people become wealthy and decadent and intellectual and the next generation is weaker than the previous. After the peak comes the decline.

A culture in decline is majority r, as is the case now. One common trait of declining cultures is multiculturalism. The old values are not enforced, which enables foreigners to take over.

Jews, having no country of their own, have to live in a host culture. And only declining cultures allow that. This is why they actively work to undermine their society. They can only exist in a declining culture which will inevitably destroy itself, at which point the jews move on to another host culture. They are not the direct cause, but they do further the speed and severity of the decline and makes it harder to turn things around (which, as far as I know, has never successfully been done - I only know of a single example where the decline never set in, due to some very specific circumstances which can not be replicated today).

They are parasites, in the literal sense, and no culture has ever benefited from hosting them. If you or anyone else has an example to the contrary, I would like to hear it.

The bolded portion above is the most important. What allows a population to have a high degree of trust which is required in order for a culture to operate under the rule of law and philosophical principles.

Here an answer provided by Bruce Charlton that I agree with. I will just post links this time so I don't get more angry messages about walls of text.

Religion as the proximate method of Group Selection in humans - implications of its removal
http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.com/2015/11/religion-as-proximate-method-of-group.html?m=1

Is it true that Man is a primarily religious being?
http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2017/06/is-it-true-that-man-is-primarily.html

In regards to parasitism I would simply argue that you are looking at the symptom and not the cause. Once a culture loses its identity and degenerates into a free for all of every man for himself before the house burns down the highest IQ individuals in that population will rise to the top and grab the most for themselves if they are not restrained by a moral code that prevents this. There is little doubt as to which population has that highest IQ in the world.

That said in regards to what benefit Jews have provided to the west the answer is quite a lot. Tremendous scientific achievements have been accomplished by Jews. On a deeper level Monotheism itself has its roots in Judaism and this is arguably responsible for society as we know it. I explored that point further here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1578467.msg15852496#msg15852496

[conspirosphere.tk]

That said in regards to what benefit Jews have provided to the west the answer is quite a lot. Tremendous scientific achievements have been accomplished by Jews. On a deeper level Monotheism itself has its roots in Judaism and this is arguably responsible for society as we know it. I explored that point further here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1578467.msg15852496#msg15852496

monotheism is possibly the biggest problem we have, because there are several, and other reasons. But since you must be a jew, let me fuck you off once again.

[Ibian]

<snipped to save space>

I see nothing objectionable there, at least nothing worth making an argument of. But if we are looking at core issues, then we are looking at the cultural cycle which is driven by the amygdala.

When cultures rise they are majority K and largely homogeneous. This is necessary for them to rise in the first place, as a homogeneous population is a high trust population, which is required in order for a culture to operate under the rule of law and philosophical principles.

But cultures eventually peak. They defeat all their enemies and expand their borders as far as they will go, people become wealthy and decadent and intellectual and the next generation is weaker than the previous. After the peak comes the decline.

A culture in decline is majority r, as is the case now. One common trait of declining cultures is multiculturalism. The old values are not enforced, which enables foreigners to take over.

Jews, having no country of their own, have to live in a host culture. And only declining cultures allow that. This is why they actively work to undermine their society. They can only exist in a declining culture which will inevitably destroy itself, at which point the jews move on to another host culture. They are not the direct cause, but they do further the speed and severity of the decline and makes it harder to turn things around (which, as far as I know, has never successfully been done - I only know of a single example where the decline never set in, due to some very specific circumstances which can not be replicated today).

They are parasites, in the literal sense, and no culture has ever benefited from hosting them. If you or anyone else has an example to the contrary, I would like to hear it.

The bolded portion above is the most important. What allows a population to have a high degree of trust which is required in order for a culture to operate under the rule of law and philosophical principles.

Here an answer provided by Bruce Charlton that I agree with. I will just post links this time so I don't get more angry messages about walls of text.

Religion as the proximate method of Group Selection in humans - implications of its removal
http://iqpersonalitygenius.blogspot.com/2015/11/religion-as-proximate-method-of-group.html?m=1

Is it true that Man is a primarily religious being?
http://charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2017/06/is-it-true-that-man-is-primarily.html

In regards to parasitism I would simply argue that you are looking at the symptom and not the cause. Once a culture loses its identity and degenerates into a free for all of every man for himself before the house burns down the highest IQ individuals in that population will rise to the top and grab the most for themselves if they are not restrained by a moral code that prevents this. There is little doubt as to which population has that highest IQ in the world.

That said in regards to what benefit Jews have provided to the west the answer is quite a lot. Tremendous scientific achievements have been accomplished by Jews. On a deeper level Monotheism itself has its roots in Judaism and this is arguably responsible for society as we know it. I explored that point further here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1578467.msg15852496#msg15852496

Yeah, religion is super important. Nietzsche predicted that replacing religion with secularism would lead to pretty much what happened a century later. But religion requires ignorance, and we simply know too much now. Not gonna come back in our time.

And this probably also has to do with the cultural cycle. A rising culture is a united one, and nothing unites people like religion. r's, on the other hand, are individualistic and so have less need for religion.

And yes, it is true that jews helped invent some stuff. But the advanced technology we have today is also one of the factors in our decline. It makes life easy, and it is an easy and safe life that turns people into r's. And I question the overall benefit of the nuclear bomb.

[Ted E. Bare]

Waiting for that all-time high... Too stable...

[CoinCube]

That said in regards to what benefit Jews have provided to the west the answer is quite a lot. Tremendous scientific achievements have been accomplished by Jews. On a deeper level Monotheism itself has its roots in Judaism and this is arguably responsible for society as we know it. I explored that point further here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1578467.msg15852496#msg15852496

monotheism is possibly the biggest problem we have, because there are several, and other reasons. But since you must be a jew, let me fuck you off once again.

Actually I am not a Jew. I have 0% Jewish DNA for those who mistakenly think Judiasm is a race and I am not a convert.

I used to be a secular atheist before I realized that position was logically untenable. See CoinCube Highlights for how I came to this conclusion.  Now I am an unaffiliated ethical monotheist who has not yet figured out what faith I fit best into.

If it makes you feel better it is possible I could someday be a Jew years from now. Modern Orthodox Judaism is a very logical faith and their lifestyle is very healthy. That said I do not know that I could handle the massive lifestyle changes such a faith would entail and I have little interest in the other branches of Judaism.

In regards to your personal comments. I will simply reply to you with your own words.

Indeed. I reached the stage where I expect to bring most of my coins to hell with me,

[bitserve]

At least r0ach was somewhat funny mixing his hate speeches with defending PM's against Bitcoin while we were hugely profiting from it.