Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 03:48:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 18621 18622 18623 18624 18625 18626 18627 18628 18629 18630 18631 18632 18633 18634 18635 18636 18637 18638 18639 18640 18641 18642 18643 18644 18645 18646 18647 18648 18649 18650 18651 18652 18653 18654 18655 18656 18657 18658 18659 18660 18661 18662 18663 18664 18665 18666 18667 18668 18669 18670 [18671] 18672 18673 18674 18675 18676 18677 18678 18679 18680 18681 18682 18683 18684 18685 18686 18687 18688 18689 18690 18691 18692 18693 18694 18695 18696 18697 18698 18699 18700 18701 18702 18703 18704 18705 18706 18707 18708 18709 18710 18711 18712 18713 18714 18715 18716 18717 18718 18719 18720 18721 ... 33346 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26382695 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
December 15, 2017, 11:55:26 PM

That tears it. I'm ignoring everyone. Angry
1715615291
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715615291

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715615291
Reply with quote  #2

1715615291
Report to moderator
1715615291
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715615291

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715615291
Reply with quote  #2

1715615291
Report to moderator
1715615291
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715615291

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715615291
Reply with quote  #2

1715615291
Report to moderator
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715615291
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715615291

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715615291
Reply with quote  #2

1715615291
Report to moderator
ragnar0k
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 101



View Profile
December 15, 2017, 11:55:53 PM

Bcashers are becoming more belligerant now that even ripple passed them SmileySmiley
fabiorem
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 347


View Profile
December 15, 2017, 11:56:02 PM

If bitcoin is worth $100k each then I think $100 fees are reasonable. No crisis.


And there's litecoin for cheaper things. Already have Segwit and atomic swap, fees are very low. You can buy a car with bitcoin, and beer with litecoin.
Gab0
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 283
Merit: 127



View Profile
December 15, 2017, 11:56:48 PM

Is it necessary to quote the title of White Paper? Can you offer a reference in which Satoshi affirms what you say? I do not think that 10 dollars will be included in the catagory of micro payment. LN will be useful for real micro payments, cents or even less.

Sure:

Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments...not things needing to pay less than 0.01.



That statement is out of context. He meant that he was not efficient at that moment.
Look what it says a little later.


Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments.  Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01.  The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that.

Bitcoin is practical for smaller transactions than are practical with existing payment methods.  Small enough to include what you might call the top of the micropayment range.  But it doesn't claim to be practical for arbitrarily small micropayments.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 15, 2017, 11:58:47 PM

If bitcoin is worth $100k each then I think $100 fees are reasonable. No crisis.

Wouldn't the logical course of action in said event be to dump all of your bitcoin at once since it requires you to spend $100 everytime you want to use it, and then transfer your money into a cheaper system instead of spending $100+ per day in fees? lol.  Of course, said paradigm would have you seeking out two instruments, the base of Exter's pyramid since it provides the best store of value (gold and silver) and then holding what you need to keep liquid to spend in the worst money of gresham's law since it has lowest fees (fiat dollars).
OWZ1337
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 17

BITCOIN===>THE DISRUPTIVE CYBERCURRENCY


View Profile
December 15, 2017, 11:59:35 PM

Bcashers are becoming more belligerant now that even ripple passed them SmileySmiley

BeeCash will never bee bitcoin :-D weeee ~ still fools are buying<<<<
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:08:28 AM

So here is the deal, and I'm only going to say this once.

We will implement a larger blocksize patch when AND NOT BEFORE you fuckers stop trying to bully us into it.

necessary preconditions

>Ver desists from going on the MSM and talking FUD shit

>no more rhetoric about "firing" or pushing out the Core devs

>an end to the mempool spam

>3 days without a bigblock post in this thread

then we can talk, as long as we feel we are being pushed NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN!  Y'all continually threaten the Core community, and then wonder why we react with fear...if you don't get how this is never going to help I don't know what to tell you.

get it through your goddamned thick skulls
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:09:27 AM

So here is the deal, and I'm only going to say this once.

We will implement a larger blocksize patch when AND NOT BEFORE you fuckers stop trying to bully us into it.

necessary preconditions

>Ver desists from going on the MSM and talking FUD shit

>no more rhetoric about "firing" or pushing out the Core devs

>an end to the mempool spam

>3 days without a bigblock post in this thread

then we can talk, as long as we feel we are being pushed NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN!  Y'all continually threaten the Core community, and then wonder why we react with fear...if you don't get how this is never going to help I don't know what to tell you.

get it through your goddamned thick skulls
It's needed now. A year ago.

And why the fuck are you letting ver dictate anything?
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:10:42 AM

Relax guys, Satoshi's vision is alive and well, it's just called bitcoin cash now.

All I care about is when this entire ecosystem eventually implodes, I hope the jews and/or wall street (same difference) are left holding the bag instead of idiot middle-americans purchasing $20,000 bitcoins and then having the bottom drop out to $0.  It looks like that's how it will play out since the middle-class is already tapped out anyway and has no money to purchase this vapor garbage.  Wall street jews attempt to pump bitcoin and discover...wait, nobody else actually has money to buy our pump.
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366
Merit: 4186


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:11:40 AM

Oh, how I'll really enjoy quoting this discussion when the Lightning Network (or other proper scaling solution) goes live and becomes mainstream...

Reminds me of a song by Leonard Cohen:

"and all the lousy little poets coming round
tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson"
spiderbrain
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 889
Merit: 1013



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:13:36 AM

Relax guys, Satoshi's vision is alive and well, it's just called bitcoin cash now.

<racist_sh1t/>

Hello. Please stop being super racist. That is all.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:14:41 AM


And why the fuck are you letting ver dictate anything?

I'm not.  He is (thankfully) y'alls problem.  You deal with him.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:15:19 AM

Oh, how I'll really enjoy quoting this discussion when the Lightning Network (or other proper scaling solution) goes live and becomes mainstream...

Reminds me of a song by Leonard Cohen:

"and all the lousy little poets coming round
tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson"
Nope. Lightning is gonna fail as hard as segwit. We need something universally applicable, and NOT FUCKING OPTIONAL.

Bigger blocks work. Nobody except miners would be affected, and even miners would keep their relative position to one another. There would be literally no change, for anyone, except anyone who pays fees. Which is all of us.
ragnar0k
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 101



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:22:22 AM

Bcashers are becoming more belligerant now that even ripple passed them SmileySmiley

BeeCash will never bee bitcoin :-D weeee ~ still fools are buying<<<<

Not really - every bloody altcoin is pumping except bcash despite personal pitches on tv
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366
Merit: 4186


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:24:25 AM

Oh, how I'll really enjoy quoting this discussion when the Lightning Network (or other proper scaling solution) goes live and becomes mainstream...

Reminds me of a song by Leonard Cohen:

"and all the lousy little poets coming round
tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson"
Nope. Lightning is gonna fail as hard as segwit. We need something universally applicable, and NOT FUCKING OPTIONAL.

Bigger blocks work. Nobody except miners would be affected, and even miners would keep their relative position to one another. There would be literally no change, for anyone, except anyone who pays fees. Which is all of us.

The "bigger blocks" solution hasn't been tested on a network of the size and load of that of Bitcoin. Bcash is not Bitcoin. "Bigger blocks", will appear to solve the problem for some small amount of time, until the fees will rise again and we'll soon be asking for "even bigger blocks", ad infinitum. A proper scaling solution should be implemented, one that can scale right now to peak-time VISA levels, by design.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:26:00 AM

Oh, how I'll really enjoy quoting this discussion when the Lightning Network (or other proper scaling solution) goes live and becomes mainstream...

Reminds me of a song by Leonard Cohen:

"and all the lousy little poets coming round
tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson"
Nope. Lightning is gonna fail as hard as segwit. We need something universally applicable, and NOT FUCKING OPTIONAL.

Bigger blocks work. Nobody except miners would be affected, and even miners would keep their relative position to one another. There would be literally no change, for anyone, except anyone who pays fees. Which is all of us.

The "bigger blocks" solution hasn't been tested on a network the size of Bitcoin's. Bcash is not Bitcoin. "Bigger blocks", will appear to solve the problem for some small amount of time, until the fees will rise again and we'll soon be asking for "even bigger blocks", ad infinitum. A proper scaling solution should be implemented, one that can scale right now to peak-time VISA levels, by design.
We need more capacity. The most straightforward and most likely to work solution is to increase the blocksize. There is no reason not to. At least, no non-political reason.

Also, MAKE A FUCKING PRACTICAL SUGGESTION! If you have one. Which you don't, which is why you don't.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:27:02 AM

I am starting to see Ver as a sort of Hillary Clinton character.

He is so distasteful that there is a large "anything but" vote.

Shit, we probably WOULD be rocking 2MB blocks right now if not for this one guy.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:28:16 AM

I am starting to see Ver as a sort of Hillary Clinton character.

He is so distasteful that there is a large "anything but" vote.

Shit, we probably WOULD be rocking 2MB blocks right now if not for this one guy.
Yes. Segwit is the Anything But vote.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:30:49 AM

At least, no non-political reason.


precisely

so stop bullying and start bridge building
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
December 16, 2017, 12:32:00 AM

At least, no non-political reason.


precisely

so stop bullying and start bridge building
Right then, let's do this. One question and one chance to answer.

Do you believe that the current transfer capacity of the bitcoin network is sufficient? Just a straight yes or no.
Pages: « 1 ... 18621 18622 18623 18624 18625 18626 18627 18628 18629 18630 18631 18632 18633 18634 18635 18636 18637 18638 18639 18640 18641 18642 18643 18644 18645 18646 18647 18648 18649 18650 18651 18652 18653 18654 18655 18656 18657 18658 18659 18660 18661 18662 18663 18664 18665 18666 18667 18668 18669 18670 [18671] 18672 18673 18674 18675 18676 18677 18678 18679 18680 18681 18682 18683 18684 18685 18686 18687 18688 18689 18690 18691 18692 18693 18694 18695 18696 18697 18698 18699 18700 18701 18702 18703 18704 18705 18706 18707 18708 18709 18710 18711 18712 18713 18714 18715 18716 18717 18718 18719 18720 18721 ... 33346 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!