Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 04:08:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 18693 18694 18695 18696 18697 18698 18699 18700 18701 18702 18703 18704 18705 18706 18707 18708 18709 18710 18711 18712 18713 18714 18715 18716 18717 18718 18719 18720 18721 18722 18723 18724 18725 18726 18727 18728 18729 18730 18731 18732 18733 18734 18735 18736 18737 18738 18739 18740 18741 18742 [18743] 18744 18745 18746 18747 18748 18749 18750 18751 18752 18753 18754 18755 18756 18757 18758 18759 18760 18761 18762 18763 18764 18765 18766 18767 18768 18769 18770 18771 18772 18773 18774 18775 18776 18777 18778 18779 18780 18781 18782 18783 18784 18785 18786 18787 18788 18789 18790 18791 18792 18793 ... 33315 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26370958 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 05:33:47 AM

It looks like this will push the price over 20k.

I don't see any reason why we won't blow through the 20s fairly quickly.

I hope your seastead sinks.
1714666104
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714666104

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714666104
Reply with quote  #2

1714666104
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714666104
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714666104

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714666104
Reply with quote  #2

1714666104
Report to moderator
RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1123



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 05:39:53 AM

So... Coinbase app currently has a glitch where you can't buy BCash. When you select the buy option it subtly changes it to a Bitcoin purchase. Bahahahaha

yeah...none of us would have seen that,  LMAO

SO, self-CORRECTION!

CoinBase now says customers can DUMP Bcash tomorrow!

YAY

Can they pump it back to 9K again please?


arklan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 05:40:46 AM

It looks like this will push the price over 20k.

I don't see any reason why we won't blow through the 20s fairly quickly.

I hope your seastead sinks.

Hmm... Seems elwar missed that call...

Course in no better. Still holding from 18825... Too scared to sell at a loss in effort to buy back lower.
phunixx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 121
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 05:50:47 AM

Patience....Normal fall and rise
Although i cashed out 3/4 of my btc 1 week ago.....
Other coins more interesting now
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2017, 05:53:13 AM

It looks like this will push the price over 20k.

I don't see any reason why we won't blow through the 20s fairly quickly.

I hope your seastead sinks.

Still don't see any reason why 20k would be a barrier since some of the exchanges went over. 15% drop after 1000% gain is just another dip. Same thing happened at $17k.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 05:57:26 AM

It looks like this will push the price over 20k.

I don't see any reason why we won't blow through the 20s fairly quickly.

I hope your seastead sinks.

Still don't see any reason why 20k would be a barrier since some of the exchanges went over. 15% drop after 1000% gain is just another dip. Same thing happened at $17k.

You thought we would blow past so much that you announced it, then opened a short. You're no better than the worst book talkers here.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:01:27 AM

When the cost benefit analysis of non-compliance outweighs the cost benefit analysis of compliance, that is when the goyim strike.  It's getting near.



Lofty dreams based on a story that is a distortion of reality. You are a lot more alone than you realize and you may never realize it but that did not happen the way you wish it did and it will not happen as you wish it would. What will happen is the idea of that as the means to you and yours living and dying for their goals; again.
You are a cell in a body in which they are the brain. We would all be worse off if you didn't perform your function, as whatever cell you are, out of delusion so why do you keep wasting time chasing a dream that can never bring you any upside in reality? Is it a fetish?

You can't defeat evolution and natural selection.  Humans are apex predators that should be functioning entirely in the K-selection spectrum, while it's obvious there are many evolutionary dead end groups on earth operating in R-selection mode.  The jews believe they can try and force upper-K groups like whites to "mongrelize" with straight out of the Congo jungle R-groups in order to dumb them down to make them easier to control slaves.  That and they want to form a divide and conquer strategy of infighting groups who are unable to unite for any common cause like overthrowing bankers.

It's a laughable idea and the ultimate sign of out of control hubris of the jew that will lead to his demise.  Instead of just trying to steal money through interest, the jew now attempts to play god himself, but does it in a way that's like trying to push against a one way river.  Each fat white woman you can convince to have 2pac babies will just end up being shunned by the upper echelon of k-selection whites, likely having a positive selection force on whites rather than negative one, making the group stronger by removing the weak links.

The jew sure didn't think that one through very well.  As for why the jew doesn't attack the asians, who knows.  They've spent so much time attempting to sabotage whites now that they've literally given away the planet on a silver platter to the asians for free.  If their goal was to make asians the new leaders of the world instead of themselves, good job.  I highly doubt the asians will be putting up with any jewish subterfuge in the end though.  One of the most "anti-semitic" (meaning anti-parasite) nations on earth right now isn't some muslim 3rd world dump....it's South Korea.
kludzins
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 251



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:17:43 AM

TODAY IS SO FUCKING BORING !!!





How you feelin now?  Grin
arklan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1008



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:22:20 AM

Will 16000 hold? The world... May never know.

Or, uh... You know, maybe we'll see in a few minutes. I was just trying to mimic that old tootsie pop commercial where the short kid asks the turtle and the owl how many licks it takes...


Ok so maybe I ruined it by trying to explain. Point is! Down at go. 
STT
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3906
Merit: 1413


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile WWW
December 20, 2017, 06:22:37 AM

I will have to side with realRoach on this one.   There is no doubt alot of gold waiting in the ground, since we only mine the earths crust and there is giant amount of gold deeper.  However the point of that relationship would be that gold extraction generally goes in line with technological advancement, its not excessively inflationary as we recognise most FIAT currency has become.   That standard is corrupted by politics and is not a benefit, service or parallel of human economic advancement, the world will be improved when we do not hold one countrys paper as a world reserve asset.

Blockchains are a positive technology but its probably also a false dynamic to say they are more limited then precious metals or in some way more unique.    To be useful the protocol is going to have to be developed further, its not static.   Quite likely BTC will not be the only 'ticker' symbol traded, they'll be many with each their own properties.

I have read recently IOTA exceeds BTC in transaction volume, I believe its much unfinished though

Oh man... This dump might have been my fault.  I bought this chocolate train tonight and I was gonna stamp CCMF into it and be all like
 Chew Chew Motherfuckers!
Unfortunately I left it inside the front door while I got the rest of the stuff out of the car and I called my daughter to help me... she didn't see the bag and stomped on the train  Cry

At first it looked like it might be okay -

[img]https://i.imgur.com/2Br599T.jpg


 But then as I tried to extract it from the plastic...


https://i.imgur.com/XDm1DbJ.jpg

 #REKT

 I'm going to have to eat it.



To be fair, it was driving the wrong way (to the left/"down") anyways, so maybe it was for the best that it derailed instead of choochooing the price to $0! Cheesy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:23:48 AM

Where exactly is BCH going to go if it keeps moving like this against bitcoin's movements. Is it going to flip parity and be worth MORE than BTC? Thats ridiculous. Is the world planning to revert to BCH?
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:25:47 AM

Where exactly is BCH going to go if it keeps moving like this against bitcoin's movements. Is it going to flip parity and be worth MORE than BTC? Thats ridiculous. Is the world planning to revert to BCH?

The world is Jimbo in a nutshell. So long as its paper wallets haven't lost dollar value.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:36:32 AM


Sends and receives are available immediately
 Shocked Shocked

How many noobs are going to be duped by this?

Duped? How so?



Coinbase just went full Bcash.

Every time Coinbase has a chance to retain or regain my respect, they lose even more.

Huh
Exchanges gonna exchange. Kinda their raison d'etre, that.



So, what was announced for as by January 2018 is happening now? Crazy coincidences ... .

^^^ FTFY



Bitcoin Cash is now on CoinBase. This can turn bad for bitcoin for some time, but one thing we all should always remember.

ORIGINAL REMAINS ORIGINAL

While true, the original Bitcoin died with the birth of Segwit. Accordingly, that which you loudly proclaim is an irrelevance.



I wonder if this was a regulated market whether all of Coinbase would wind up in jail.

Umm... _why_, exactly?



Haha who sold at $14,001 on GDAX?

I bought a couple at $14,250. Worked out pretty well, in retrospect.



I think BCash may have a huge problem now.

It's blown its trump card ...

Huh What exactly do you perceive as Bitcoin Cash's 'trump card'?



Ok serious question u guys

in what way is Btc better than BCash ?

from what i read online

BCash does everything btc does only better

Blaspheme

cmon
i want an answer

much lower fees, more transactions
so how is btc better ?

More people currently perceive Bitcoin Segwit as The Real Bitcoin, and perceive Bitcoin Cash as a renegade offshoot. Of course, the logical defense of this attitude is the fact that Bitcoin Segwit currently has more accumulated PoW behind it.  Or rather the only logical defense.



If bitcoin survives this then fuck me I AM SAYING at least $100000 per BTC this time next year

Of course Bitcoin Segwit will survive this. The only real question is what will be its market share?



Good lord what is the fundamental reason for bch to be worth $50b, or even $5b? There are no bch futures. There is no bch for sale on major exchanges. There is no bch adoption or bch merchants. You cant buy lambos, hookers or blow with bch.

Other than the fact that you are wrong on literally every count, you mean?
Well, I'll spot you the futures. There used to be BCH futures, back when the reality of BCH was ... err ... still in the future. I'm unaware of any such today.
But hey - being wrong on only 6 out of 7 ain't bad, amirite?
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:45:38 AM

To be useful the protocol is going to have to be developed further, its not static.  

You just described one reason bitcoin is not money.  Fungibility is a requirement of money.  Fungibility doesn't just mean the ability to mix outputs so you can't be tracked like Monero, it means the object in reference can't just randomly transform from an elephant to a flamingo.  "Evolving" is not a positive trait, it's a negative.  Money is supposed to be boring and predictable, NOT evolve into some other weird shit at random.  And who controls the course of said evolution?  That would be the power vacuum known as mining that's designed to centralize into either a cartel or full blown, one entity monopoly.  So bitcoin is more like a centrally administered authoritarian govt rather than "money" or "decentralized".
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 06:50:50 AM

Oh I see its moving on some news about opening on an exchange and not just moving against btc. wtf coinbase really?why not add dogecoin while youre at it.
orpington
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 512



View Profile
December 20, 2017, 07:13:30 AM

This Bcash/coinbase/Ver/CNBC fiasco is such a clusterfuck!

Who would actually be stupid enough to actually buy Bcash? lol
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 07:17:13 AM

Fungibility ... means the object in reference can't just randomly transform from an elephant to a flamingo.  

idonothinkthatwordmeanswhatyouthinkitmeans.png

Fungibility is simply the property that any unit of some substance is functionally equivalent to all other units of that substance.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 07:22:16 AM

Who would actually be stupid enough to actually buy Bcash? lol

Some time ago, I traded a large percentage of my BTC for BCH. Since then, my BCH is up 12x. From that time, my BTC is up too. By a whole 6x.

Stupid indeed.

I'd ask you to do the math, but you may be too busy calling others stupid to be able to compute 6 into 12.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 07:27:10 AM

Who would actually be stupid enough to actually buy Bcash? lol

Some time ago, I traded a large percentage of my BTC for BCH. Since then, my BCH is up 12x. From that time, my BTC is up too. By a whole 6x.

Stupid indeed.

I'd ask you to do the math, but you may be too busy calling others stupid to be able to compute 6 into 12.
I'm assuming he means regular users purchasing BCH instead of BTC before they use it to buy their drugs or whatever. Not traders playing a rally.
realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
December 20, 2017, 07:36:22 AM
Last edit: December 20, 2017, 07:52:18 AM by realr0ach

Fungibility ... means the object in reference can't just randomly transform from an elephant to a flamingo.  

idonothinkthatwordmeanswhatyouthinkitmeans.png

Fungibility is simply the property that any unit of some substance is functionally equivalent to all other units of that substance.

Don't play stupid.  You know damn well bitcoin is not fungible nor money by definition, and that an "evolving protocol" is also never going to be fungible even if you do mix the outputs.  I bet you've also made conflicting statements before about segwit claiming that it's really a fork or something even though the wallets are technically compatible, thus fit within your definition of equivalence in fungibility.  

If you assume each transaction type has completely different surface attacks vectors like attempting to turn segwit transactions into anyone can spend transactions or what have you, how could they possibly be fungible?  This is the never ending cycle of a so called "evolving protocol".  Just about nothing in it is fungible.  There's also not much difference in a hard fork and soft fork if both alter fungibility.
Pages: « 1 ... 18693 18694 18695 18696 18697 18698 18699 18700 18701 18702 18703 18704 18705 18706 18707 18708 18709 18710 18711 18712 18713 18714 18715 18716 18717 18718 18719 18720 18721 18722 18723 18724 18725 18726 18727 18728 18729 18730 18731 18732 18733 18734 18735 18736 18737 18738 18739 18740 18741 18742 [18743] 18744 18745 18746 18747 18748 18749 18750 18751 18752 18753 18754 18755 18756 18757 18758 18759 18760 18761 18762 18763 18764 18765 18766 18767 18768 18769 18770 18771 18772 18773 18774 18775 18776 18777 18778 18779 18780 18781 18782 18783 18784 18785 18786 18787 18788 18789 18790 18791 18792 18793 ... 33315 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!