Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[coralreefer]

This is still the most entertaining thread at bitcointalk.  It spans from "it's going to the moon" to the "sky is falling" and back again....I really hope most here are just kidding around and don't take this so seriously 

[1714749650]

1714749650

[1714749650]

1714749650

[1714749650]

1714749650

[1714749650]

1714749650

[bones261]

target 15950

[bitserve]

This is still the most entertaining thread at bitcointalk.  It spans from "it's going to the moon" to the "sky is falling" and back again....I really hope most here are just kidding around and don't take this so seriously 

Be water, my friend.

[Raja_MBZ]

You call a 50% dip a correction? No I think it's a crash.

It's "your" way of thinking. Cryptos are totally different than real-life stuff where 50% declination is a crash. In our sweet crypto world, even 50% is a correction. See, bitcoin is already making a path towards new ATH, and I'm glad that this correction happened, as due to this, we got rid of weak hands.

[coralreefer]

This is still the most entertaining thread at bitcointalk.  It spans from "it's going to the moon" to the "sky is falling" and back again....I really hope most here are just kidding around and don't take this so seriously 

Be water, my friend.

Ahhh, yes...I like that advise ;-) 

But in all seriousness, I hope people focus on their family and friends during this time of year, and of course their health...the rest of this...this is just fun...enjoy the ride which ever way it may go

[Ibian]

This is still the most entertaining thread at bitcointalk.  It spans from "it's going to the moon" to the "sky is falling" and back again....I really hope most here are just kidding around and don't take this so seriously 

Be water, my friend.

Be water... and cut 60 armed men down.

[El duderino_]

Breaking 24777$ prediction game


27/12/2017 bikerleszno
30/12/2017 digithusiast
31/12/2017 Raja_MBZ
01/01/2018 elg
02/01/2018 wachtwoord
04/01/2018 d_eddie
05/01/2018 BTCMILLIONAIRE
06/01/2018 HanvanBitcoin
07/01/2018 ghandi
08/01/2018 savetherainforrest
09/01/2018 explorer
10/01/2018 bicoinpsycho
11/01/2018 Bitcoinaire
12/01/2018 speedwheel
13/01/2018 undeadbitcoiner
14/01/2018 northypole
15/01/2018 ivomm
16/01/2018 maca068
17/01/2018 bitcoinvest
18/01/2018 last of the v8s
19/01/2018 mfort312
20/01/2018 1982dre
21/01/2018 flamast2
22/01/2018 RealMachasm
23/01/2018 willope
24/01/2018 kartala
25/01/2018 orpington
26/01/2018 rolling
27/01/2018 LFC_bitcoin
28/01/2018 jojo69
29/01/2018 CristiTCM
30/01/2018 rayX12
31/01/2018 realsteelboy
01/02/2018 twocorn
02/02/2018 mancroofer
03/02/2018 True Myth
04/02/2018 poolminor
05/02/2018 itod
06/02/2018 scheptan
07/02/2018 vapourminer
08/02/2018 alexeft
09/02/2018 siera
12/02/2018 yonton
13/02/2018 Wekkel
14/02/2018 Thekool1s
15/02/2018 starmman
16/02/2018 Globb0
17/02/2018 leveldkrypto
18/02/2018 olesh
19/02/2018 BitCoinBurger
20/02/2018 Paashaas
21/02/2018 flynn
22/02/2018 icygreen
23/02/2018 erisdiscordia
24/02/2018 phil_s
25/02/2018 sirazimuth
26/02/2018 Arriemoller
27/02/2018 yonton
01/03/2018 bones261
06/03/2018 sa_94
07/03/2018 NUFCrichard
08/03/2018 Imbatman
10/03/2018 STT
11/03/2018 badream
13/03/2018 erre
15/03/2018 podyx
17/03/2018 fragout
18/03/2018 fabiorem
21/03/2018 dakustaking76
23/03/2018 nikauforest
31/03/2018 vroom
01/04/2018 somac.
02/04/2018 kurious
05/04/2018 bitcoinbunny
10/04/2018 ludwigvon
11/04/2018 hairymaclairy
27/04/2018 drbrockoin
01/05/2018 sprinkles
02/06/2018 oblox
03/08/2018 toxic2040
05/11/2018 mikenz
31/12/2018 melman2002
12/02/2019 FractalUniverse
21/04/2019 gentlemand
20/02/2020 romneymoney
18/12/2021 luckygenough56


Maybe because its This time of the year we make a small game Just to call 24777$ (CET) the one with the day of breaking This price wins .25 BTC
The list Will be Made after This post So When a date is taking iT cannot been taken again
When the winning date is exactly in the middle of 2 each Will get .25
Oterwhise closest to the winning date wins

LIST MAKING ENDS 25-12-2017  @ 22.00 cet

AFTER THIS POST NO MORE NEWBIES MINIMUM 50 Posts

SOME HAVE TAKEN A DATE THATS ALLREADY OCCUPIED      -fluidjax
                                                                                       -vito5
                                                                                       -Dotto
                                                                                       -Ibian
                                                                                       -
                                                                                       -
                                                                                       -
              TAKE DIFFRENT DATE PLEASE GRTS

Last update So far....

[yonton]

27/02/2018 $24777

[Dabs]

Well ... I doubled my bitcorns ....

[Emelectrol]

Breaking 24777$ prediction game

20/03/2018
thanks

[coralreefer]

Breaking 24777$ prediction game

20/03/2018
thanks

I'll put my vote in for 16/02/2018

[jojo69]

Well ... I doubled my bitcorns ....

hats off, that, by definition, takes some serious gonads

[realr0ach]

I technically called the bitcoin top 11 months ago in the following post if you count segwit as 2MB blocks:



The rationale for this post is that bitcoin doesn't actually function as a store of value.  It's so called value is entirely based around flow and not stock.  It cannot derive value from anything besides the utility it provides to facilitate turnover in commerce.  I estimated the point at which bitcoin is forced to morph from a general commerce system to a mostly settlement layer, and that is the point at which the invisible hand of the market crushes it because there are far better stores of value to use as a settlement layer like gold and silver.

The purpose of a real settlement layer is to do things like store generational wealth without having to worry if the bottom dropped out of it over night.  The value of things like gold and silver is NOT based entirely on flow like bitcoin. They can derive value more from stock, while bitcoin can't.  If you stash away a pile of imaginary bitcoins for 10 years, you have no idea if the value will be higher, lower, or completely zero when you come back to them.

Technically, increasing the TPS of bitcoin is beneficial to price, but that's only if you can trick people into believing it's decentralized when it's not actually possible to create a decentralized digital currency.  The only core reason for most of bitcoin's commerce right now is an attempt at regulatory arbitrage.  Due to the extreme centralization of bitcoin, the govt will easily destroy that use case causing it's lack of fundamentals to be exposed, nullifying anything people attempt to do with TPS or propaganda claiming it's decentralized when it's really not.

Post where I made that prediction:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-roach-report-vol-10-why-bitcoin-is-currently-a-roach-motel

[enter`name`here]

I technically called the bitcoin top 11 months ago in the following post if you count segwit as 2MB blocks:



The rationale for this post is that bitcoin doesn't actually function as a store of value.  It's so called value is entirely based around flow and not stock.  It cannot derive value from anything besides the utility it provides to facilitate turnover in commerce.  I estimated the point at which bitcoin is forced to morph from a general commerce system to a mostly settlement layer, and that is the point at which the invisible hand of the market crushes it because there are far better stores of value to use as a settlement layer like gold and silver.

The purpose of a real settlement layer is to do things like store generational wealth without having to worry if the bottom dropped out of it over night.  The value of things like gold and silver is NOT based entirely on flow like bitcoin. They can derive value more from stock, while bitcoin can't.  If you stash away a pile of imaginary bitcoins for 10 years, you have no idea if the value will be higher, lower, or completely zero when you come back to them.

Technically, increasing the TPS of bitcoin is beneficial to price, but that's only if you can trick people into believing it's decentralized when it's not actually possible to create a decentralized digital currency.  The only core reason for most of bitcoin's commerce right now is an attempt at regulatory arbitrage.  Due to the extreme centralization of bitcoin, the govt will easily destroy that use case causing it's lack of fundamentals to be exposed, nullifying anything people attempt to do with TPS or propaganda claiming it's decentralized when it's really not.

Post where I made that prediction:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-roach-report-vol-10-why-bitcoin-is-currently-a-roach-motel

If you call a top everyday eventually one of those calls will be right. /brokenclocktwiceadayorsomething

[realr0ach]

I technically called the bitcoin top 11 months ago in the following post if you count segwit as 2MB blocks:



The rationale for this post is that bitcoin doesn't actually function as a store of value.  It's so called value is entirely based around flow and not stock.  It cannot derive value from anything besides the utility it provides to facilitate turnover in commerce.  I estimated the point at which bitcoin is forced to morph from a general commerce system to a mostly settlement layer, and that is the point at which the invisible hand of the market crushes it because there are far better stores of value to use as a settlement layer like gold and silver.

The purpose of a real settlement layer is to do things like store generational wealth without having to worry if the bottom dropped out of it over night.  The value of things like gold and silver is NOT based entirely on flow like bitcoin. They can derive value more from stock, while bitcoin can't.  If you stash away a pile of imaginary bitcoins for 10 years, you have no idea if the value will be higher, lower, or completely zero when you come back to them.

Technically, increasing the TPS of bitcoin is beneficial to price, but that's only if you can trick people into believing it's decentralized when it's not actually possible to create a decentralized digital currency.  The only core reason for most of bitcoin's commerce right now is an attempt at regulatory arbitrage.  Due to the extreme centralization of bitcoin, the govt will easily destroy that use case causing it's lack of fundamentals to be exposed, nullifying anything people attempt to do with TPS or propaganda claiming it's decentralized when it's really not.

Post where I made that prediction:

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@r0achtheunsavory/the-roach-report-vol-10-why-bitcoin-is-currently-a-roach-motel

If you call a top everyday eventually one of those calls will be right. /brokenclocktwiceadayorsomething

That's the only real one I've made.  Calling a top for the market cap of the coin based on things like fundamentals is a lot different than people calling a top based on things like useless TA.

[natewelt]

I know this link (https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions) shows total unconfirmed transactions...but does anyone have a link that shows a linear chart over time with the unconfirmed transactions?

Trying to get a feel for the trend. Although I know it's up in general would still like to see it...

[jojo69]

breakout confirmed

[natewelt]

breakout confirmed

No way. We still need to break above 16k on stamp to confirm. And even then I'd say don't call a breakout until new highs.

[realr0ach]

breakout confirmed

You mean whale conmen who are attempting to paint the tape and then will dump after they find out there's nobody to buy their overpriced coins post-painting the tape.

[vroom]

I know this link (https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions) shows total unconfirmed transactions...but does anyone have a link that shows a linear chart over time with the unconfirmed transactions?

Trying to get a feel for the trend. Although I know it's up in general would still like to see it...

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#all
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count?timespan=all