Anyone in the first world who got a STEM degree in the last 100 years, and is otherwise employable, has had no problem finding a high paying job. I'd wager the same will be true for the next 50 years, anyway.
If you didn't go to college, or received a bachelor's degree in something useless, like psychology or art history, then you're obviously in for a rougher ride. And that's all on you.
This is obviously not true because I just quoted employment stats for engineers in Canada the other day and it was like 30% employment for new grads. Going into STEM doesn't guarantee you jack shit now. I guess you can make the excuse for such abysmal stats that their jobs were all shipped to China or something, and that everyone needs to apply 2000% tariffs to all Chinese goods to fix it, but it's what the current situation is.
As for the nature of capitalism, capitalism is just a synonym for natural selection. The purpose of natural selection is basically for the strong to kill off the weak, or encroach upon their territory and resources, exploit them, starve them to death. In a collective arrangement known as a nation, knowing what the purpose of capitalism is, do you think anyone would actually choose pure, anything goes, unadulterated capitalism if the results were giant swathes of the population agreeing to be economically exterminated or enslaved? 80% or higher of the population?
All the jobs being outsourced to China, India, or wherever through global labor arbitrage is about as capitalistic as it gets. This is capitalism - monopoly men and middlemen exploiting and killing off everyone. A nation is a type of collective agreement, typically always between an ethnocentric collective - because all non-ethnocentric nations collapse. If people are coming together to create any type of collective or rules based game, they're typically NOT going to agree to play one with such bad results.
The purpose of a nation is for ordinary, valuable, or contributing members of that society to survive, not to try and kill them off on purpose. This is how systems like national socialism from the Nazis arise, because capitalism isn't even possible if you're going to have any form of national government. The second you create any form of national govt that can impose it's will on everyone, capitalism is over. You can either have pretend capitalism, which is just going to be some klepocratic, crony capitalistic, too big to fail monopolies that are your new slave owners, or you can have national socialism where instead of the government making all public policy based upon "what is good for the crony capitalism corporation", policy is based upon "what is good for the common white man".
It sounds extreme, but the vast majority of nations already practice some form of this, because like I said, pure, unadultered capitalism doesn't have a very viable conclusion. The breakup of monopolies I would consider a national socialist ideal. The govt stopped doing so because it drifted away from national socialism and the greater good of white people towards crony capitalism. Free enterprise and everything else would still exist as well, just not to the extreme detriment of the whole.
Poll
