Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2019, 11:55:55 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 17:
$0 - 2 (1.8%)
<$6,500 - 7 (6.1%)
$6,500-$6,750 - 1 (0.9%)
$6,751-$7,000 - 2 (1.8%)
$7,001-$7,250 - 3 (2.6%)
$7,251-$7,500 - 6 (5.3%)
$7,501-$7,750 - 4 (3.5%)
$7,751-$8,000 - 12 (10.5%)
$8,001-$8,250 - 13 (11.4%)
$8,251-$8,500 - 6 (5.3%)
$8,501-$8,750 - 6 (5.3%)
$8,751-$9,000 - 11 (9.6%)
$9,001,$9,250 - 10 (8.8%)
$9,251-$9,500 - 9 (7.9%)
>$9,500 - 15 (13.2%)
$20,000 - 7 (6.1%)
Total Voters: 114

Pages: « 1 ... 22327 22328 22329 22330 22331 22332 22333 22334 22335 22336 22337 22338 22339 22340 22341 22342 22343 22344 22345 22346 22347 22348 22349 22350 22351 22352 22353 22354 22355 22356 22357 22358 22359 22360 22361 22362 22363 22364 22365 22366 22367 22368 22369 22370 22371 22372 22373 22374 22375 22376 [22377] 22378 22379 22380 22381 22382 22383 22384 22385 22386 22387 22388 22389 22390 22391 22392 22393 22394 22395 22396 22397 22398 22399 22400 22401 22402 22403 22404 22405 22406 22407 22408 22409 22410 22411 22412 22413 22414 22415 22416 22417 22418 22419 22420 22421 22422 22423 22424 22425 22426 22427 ... 24203 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21222477 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (64 posts by 15 users deleted.)
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1341


UNLEASH THE FURY!


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 10:42:36 PM

Important question about the ichimoku cloud. If we pass through it, will the white buffalo be waiting to greet us on the other side?

Shiroi suigyu wa anata desu.
1560686155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560686155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560686155
Reply with quote  #2

1560686155
Report to moderator
1560686155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560686155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560686155
Reply with quote  #2

1560686155
Report to moderator
1560686155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560686155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560686155
Reply with quote  #2

1560686155
Report to moderator
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560686155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560686155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560686155
Reply with quote  #2

1560686155
Report to moderator
1560686155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560686155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560686155
Reply with quote  #2

1560686155
Report to moderator
1560686155
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560686155

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560686155
Reply with quote  #2

1560686155
Report to moderator
Arriemoller
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Activity: 882
Merit: 620



View Profile
January 09, 2019, 10:43:56 PM

You all are really a bit obsessed with your roach toyboy, aren't you?

No.  Actually most of us (try to!) ignore him.  For us this thread is only 47 pages long too.

Mmm so you have on ignore to ?
Roll Eyes

Everybody does.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 972


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 10:49:01 PM

There is also the edge to edge effect where once price enters the cloud it can be drawn to the opposite edge.

This is true. We have already passed thru the majority of resistance and into the cloud structure. What we are going to encounter this next trading session is the lagging span running into the conversion line. If that is breached and the price remains near these levels it would be pretty bullish imho. If not, yah..expect a retraction.

Important question about the ichimoku cloud. If we pass through it, will the white buffalo be waiting to greet us on the other side?

Shiroi suigyu wa anata desu.

+1 WOsMerit


Hai, watashi no yūjin, kita no osuushi wa watashitachi o sukuu tame ni kite imasu.
Wekkel
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1143


yes


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 10:51:01 PM


----------
The flip-flop report

Some observer effects have been noted and I am now concerned that this "consolidation" period could turn into a correction downwards.

D
https://i.imgur.com/J1NYVbx.jpg
#dyor

I still want to see that attempt towards $4,300 but agree that the technical picture is deteriorating now towards a correction.

Arbitrary lines but this is what I am looking at:

Deeyoh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 14


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 10:58:37 PM

1000 BTC sell wall on Finex at 4079.. was being eaten so it was pulled.  Hmmm, may be going up.   Someone really wants the price lower.   Hopefully all the weak people already dumped in the low 3k's.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:06:35 PM
Last edit: January 10, 2019, 01:36:27 AM by JayJuanGee


It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Edited to add my response to the following post.

Does it matter who said it initially? He posted it as a screenshot so it's clear he's not claiming it is his and it's not news or information that needs sourcing as it's self-contained and therefore interpretable without context.

Who cares who said it. I mean if a random hobo in the street said it would that change how you interpret the statement? You either agree or disagree. You are either receptive to the argument (insofar as present) or not.


Yes, it does matter, in part, for the reasons that I stated above.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1496



View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:06:55 PM

You all are really a bit obsessed with your roach toyboy, aren't you?

No.  Actually most of us (try to!) ignore him.  For us this thread is only 47 pages long too.

Mmm so you have on ignore to ?
Roll Eyes

Everybody does.

Sometimes I forget I'm not logged in, and I'm like "FFS why am I see this shit from that fkn idiot troll again?" Lol
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1398


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:10:23 PM


It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Welcome back JJG.  Good to see you are rested and ready for action.  
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:13:33 PM
Last edit: January 09, 2019, 11:28:12 PM by JayJuanGee

I miss JJGs voluminous posts.  Cry

I be like this:




JJGs shortest post ever, and an answer that made me laugh.

I do so prefer his new short style.

If I am trying to catch up, then there be no time for elaborationings.   Shocked

Must be a New Years resolution, or the AI program is completed now. Cheesy

Now, I be like this:

bitserve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 748


HODL.


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:20:10 PM


It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Glad to see you back JJG.

I will solve this right now: Mic, JJG has a point here, you should *always* post a link to the source of your memes/twitter quotes.

Happy now? Smiley

P.S.: I needed almost a couple of minutes to make sense of your post. Please consider there are some non-english speakers here. Mic isn't. Neither me.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:23:12 PM

[edited out]
......I have repeatedly indicated that the chance seems unlikely, but there is no proof per se that CSW is not satoshi. Given the evidence we have at this time, that would be tantamount to disproving a negative. That ain't how logic works.

Your statement here, jbreher, borders on crazytalk.

There is absolutely no burden for anyone to prove that CSW is NOT Satoshi.

The burden is 100% (or at least fucking close to 100%) upon CSW to prove that he is satoshi, if that is what he intends to claim (or continue to claim). 

Furthermore, decent and reasonable means of attempting proof through signing of a known satoshi block have been outlined many times, and CSW fails and/or refuses to even attempt the most reasonable acceptable means to accomplish such identification verification.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 1034


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:37:37 PM

Sometimes I forget I'm not logged in, and I'm like "FFS why am I see this shit from that fkn idiot troll again?" Lol

Most other people on my ignore list fade away. It's hard to believe he's still here.
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2155


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:39:09 PM


It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Glad to see you back JJG.

I will solve this right now: Mic, JJG has a point here, you should *always* post a link to the source of your memes/twitter quotes.

Happy now? Smiley

P.S.: I needed almost a couple of minutes to make sense of your post. Please consider there are some non-english speakers here. Mic isn't. Neither me.

In Some cases I understand, and I provide the link.... but when its just Some random that says a Nice “line of Words” whiteout any further info, Then i say WTF is the big deal jjg?
If i would say on twitter ....

I like BTC the most its better than gold... be fast and buy blabla...
What does it matters who wrote that? Its just about that line, about those Words

I know when there is an article like an ETF thing, that 23th rich Guy on BAKKT, that Russian thing, in those cases i provide a link

Is that so BAD?

ivomm
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 305


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:45:02 PM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

1000 BTC sell wall on Finex at 4079.. was being eaten so it was pulled.  Hmmm, may be going up.   Someone really wants the price lower.   Hopefully all the weak people already dumped in the low 3k's.

Earlier today I noticed that someone was hitting the sell button multiple times from the local peak of 4160 on Bitfinex. This is not the first time for me to recongize a single seller, rather than multiple simultenous sells. It was at first like a gut feeling, but now it is seen clearly that someone with >3000 (may be >10K) bitcoins is satisfied with this price and is impatient to sell. Same ol' same ol'. It happened so many times in 2018, the worst of which was the insane selling of fake Satoshi (CW) to pump his pathetic shitcoin. I really don't understand these people. If I was an early adopter/investor/miner with thousands of bitcoins, I would never sell for 80% less from the last ATH! This shows weak hands and lack of belief in the future of the king of all decentralized money. Of course, I know that there are miners who have to pay for their electricity bills, margin and futures shorters, etc. All this combined with the lack of good news (ETF) brought us here. But all this will not be enough to hold the price after the next halving, even without ETF. In fact, an early approval in 2019 can cause a pump and dump like in Dec 2017. It will be best if sometime after the next halving when staying at least 1 year well above 10K, the ETF be approved. Then we may witness prices which seem somewhat unrealistic now (100K party, cough, cough  Wink) I don't know for you, but I would like to see and enjoy those flickering ATH's signs everywhere and every day with all my stash intact! (I miss them so much that I am almost tempted to post one of those now  Grin)
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2155


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
January 09, 2019, 11:55:42 PM


+1 (this merit thing is starting to get annoying for WO leechers)

send him yours Smiley

especially you with that pacman avatar

why isn't that on a HAT yet ??

 It would probably be too small in the patch plus he can't part with his avatar.




Aaah ok
Otherwise it would be something perfect to work on ..... Smiley
HairyMaclairy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1398


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
January 10, 2019, 12:01:56 AM

[edited out]
......I have repeatedly indicated that the chance seems unlikely, but there is no proof per se that CSW is not satoshi. Given the evidence we have at this time, that would be tantamount to disproving a negative. That ain't how logic works.

Your statement here, jbreher, borders on crazytalk.

There is absolutely no burden for anyone to prove that CSW is NOT Satoshi.

The burden is 100% (or at least fucking close to 100%) upon CSW to prove that he is satoshi, if that is what he intends to claim (or continue to claim). 

Furthermore, decent and reasonable means of attempting proof through signing of a known satoshi block have been outlined many times, and CSW fails and/or refuses to even attempt the most reasonable acceptable means to accomplish such identification verification.

He also happens to be on the run from the Australian taxation authority. 
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2155


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
January 10, 2019, 12:05:13 AM

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49141095#msg49141095

seems to be(for now?), and seems to be because Lauda is back in lol
but i understand it less now than the old version....

Lauda shouldn’t be anywhere near it, based on well publicised ‘allegations’
Agree 100%. Also philipma1957 has fallen off and he's the only decent guy left. Madness.
But respect for theymos for tryna get something moving..


edit: ok maybe trust a couple more guys than that

I also don’t know how it really works, but i do see, there are no RED Numbers under V8 anymore
So you are to be trusted from know? Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Edit: HaHa LoL⬇️
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 2206


Be a bank.


View Profile
January 10, 2019, 12:05:38 AM

^don't trust a soul

https://github.com/CultOfCraig/cult-of-craig/
micgoossens
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 2155


We Vegeta !!!!


View Profile
January 10, 2019, 12:24:43 AM

Its my time to take the

HODLnap

Good night fellow WO’s

#keepHODLING
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
January 10, 2019, 12:44:16 AM



Cute.
Pages: « 1 ... 22327 22328 22329 22330 22331 22332 22333 22334 22335 22336 22337 22338 22339 22340 22341 22342 22343 22344 22345 22346 22347 22348 22349 22350 22351 22352 22353 22354 22355 22356 22357 22358 22359 22360 22361 22362 22363 22364 22365 22366 22367 22368 22369 22370 22371 22372 22373 22374 22375 22376 [22377] 22378 22379 22380 22381 22382 22383 22384 22385 22386 22387 22388 22389 22390 22391 22392 22393 22394 22395 22396 22397 22398 22399 22400 22401 22402 22403 22404 22405 22406 22407 22408 22409 22410 22411 22412 22413 22414 22415 22416 22417 22418 22419 22420 22421 22422 22423 22424 22425 22426 22427 ... 24203 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!