Bitcoin Forum
September 05, 2024, 10:25:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (1%)
7/28 - 11 (11.3%)
8/4 - 16 (16.5%)
8/11 - 7 (7.2%)
8/18 - 5 (5.2%)
8/25 - 7 (7.2%)
After August - 50 (51.5%)
Total Voters: 97

Pages: « 1 ... 29930 29931 29932 29933 29934 29935 29936 29937 29938 29939 29940 29941 29942 29943 29944 29945 29946 29947 29948 29949 29950 29951 29952 29953 29954 29955 29956 29957 29958 29959 29960 29961 29962 29963 29964 29965 29966 29967 29968 29969 29970 29971 29972 29973 29974 29975 29976 29977 29978 29979 [29980] 29981 29982 29983 29984 29985 29986 29987 29988 29989 29990 29991 29992 29993 29994 29995 29996 29997 29998 29999 30000 30001 30002 30003 30004 30005 30006 30007 30008 30009 30010 30011 30012 30013 30014 30015 30016 30017 30018 30019 30020 30021 30022 30023 30024 30025 30026 30027 30028 30029 30030 ... 33705 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26453525 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 5233



View Profile
January 08, 2022, 03:43:23 PM


95%+ of WO'ers had no clue who that is, because they aren't old enough to have actually seen a movie that he was in. They had to google who he was.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 12777


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 03:54:43 PM


95%+ of WO'ers had no clue who that is, because they aren't old enough to have actually seen a movie that he was in. They had to google who he was.

I’m underage, but the day before it was on the news …. They showed a few movie pieces

Mostly movies around colored people they said

I never saw him before the news article

I believe 93 years old which is a very nice age….

Now he can RIP
Lucius
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3360
Merit: 6005


Crypto Swap Exchange🈺


View Profile WWW
January 08, 2022, 03:56:10 PM

95%+ of WO'ers had no clue who that is, because they aren't old enough to have actually seen a movie that he was in. They had to google who he was.

I'm glad to be one of the 5% who knows who it is - so even though Sidney Poitier may have been in the shadow of great actors like Katharine Hepburn & Spencer Tracy in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967), I personally remember him from that film in which he has achieved one of his best roles for me personally. RIP💐
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 04:01:27 PM


Explanation
eXPHorizon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 132


Precision Beats Power and Timing Beats Speed.


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 04:16:31 PM

Mobile Phones are reeusable or their Components mostly are that is why thr Refubrished program. They plan on decreasing the Phone Rubbish to 7bil by 2025. Ships are a valuable asset towards recycling too, alot of materials there ! You cant reuse some burned out GPUs or Asic.. its straight for the garbage bin except the copper inside and a aluminium radiator lol
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2478
Merit: 4559


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 04:32:18 PM

95%+ of WO'ers had no clue who that is, because they aren't old enough to have actually seen a movie that he was in. They had to google who he was.

I'm glad to be one of the 5% who knows who it is - so even though Sidney Poitier may have been in the shadow of great actors like Katharine Hepburn & Spencer Tracy in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967), I personally remember him from that film in which he has achieved one of his best roles for me personally. RIP💐

I remember him in Duel at Diablo (1966). That western left an impression on me, as I watched it at a very young age. The scene near the end when the Indians torture one of the characters by stripping him naked and leaving him to literally "bake" under the sun still haunts me to this day.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 5233



View Profile
January 08, 2022, 04:38:23 PM
Last edit: January 08, 2022, 09:17:16 PM by Torque
Merited by JayJuanGee (1), d_eddie (1)

OT: Hilarious how the MSM is beating up on tech stonks and saying there is a sell-off and people should avoid.

The whales are not selling off, they are massively shorting to get in a better long position. They are not getting out, they are getting in. I predict that Big Tech will end 2022 massively up.

But why would Big Tech be a buy, during a time when the Fed is jawboning about QE tapering and rate hikes?

Three easy reasons:

1. Because when there is less free money to go around, the Central Banks will do what they have always done in the past: take that lessened liquidity and concentrate it on just a few stonks -- the FAANGS. Then all the other stonk market indexes will tie themselves to those few equities. Just like they did 2016-. (yes, this market is completely rigged)

2. Because Big Tech is the gift that keeps on giving: low cost/high margins, easy digital marketing, and built-in obsolescence of products and services.

3. All the small and mid cap value companies' stonks will get crushed in a lower QE environment without any CB support.

I mean, they're already telegraphing it:
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/07/jim-cramer-says-these-5-old-tech-stocks-could-have-a-big-year-in-2022.html

Btw, this will also be good for Bitcoin.

BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 2766


Far, Far, Far Right Thug


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 04:47:10 PM

I remember Sidney Poitier mostly from Shoot To Kill with Kirstie Alley.

Apparently one of the very few movies he did in the 80s.

It isn't exactly a very famous film but I remember it being pretty damn entertaining.

That sort of bad guy holding a hiking expert at gun point and making their way through harsh terrain story.

Done many times since (see River Wild & Cliffhanger) but I remember Shoot To Kill being one of the first ones like that I saw as a kid.
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 3006



View Profile
January 08, 2022, 04:56:46 PM

95%+ of WO'ers had no clue who that is, because they aren't old enough to have actually seen a movie that he was in. They had to google who he was.
I'm glad to be one of the 5% who knows who it is - so even though Sidney Poitier may have been in the shadow of great actors like Katharine Hepburn & Spencer Tracy in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner (1967), I personally remember him from that film in which he has achieved one of his best roles for me personally. RIP💐

I literally knew nothing about him until I Google. Although I have seen few of his old movies.

RIP
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 05:01:28 PM


Explanation
eXPHorizon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 132


Precision Beats Power and Timing Beats Speed.


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 05:49:11 PM

The New Is Coming

The new is coming. We have said many times that there are changes occurring beneath the surface, so to speak. There are technologies which are available already on our planet and they have been available for many, many years. There are technologies to create free energy. Technologies to clean your water. Technologies to repopulate the Earth with beautiful, nourishing soil. These technologies are already there, but the old control is not allowing them to surface yet. But know, Beloveds, they are there. In this process of the old breaking down, there is much change happening.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 12777


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 05:55:42 PM
Merited by fillippone (3)

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 06:01:37 PM


Explanation
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2534
Merit: 2245


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 06:02:17 PM

I'm going to be OK. I just ordered some ramen from wish.com.
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 3006



View Profile
January 08, 2022, 06:15:39 PM

Every other token or coin try to be another “bitcoin”, but can they beat bitcoin here?


https://twitter.com/robustus/status/1479806883640840193?s=21
eXPHorizon
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 132


Precision Beats Power and Timing Beats Speed.


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 06:18:30 PM
Last edit: January 08, 2022, 06:39:30 PM by eXPHorizon

lol... everything 0 ? Thats why Bitcoin is 100% going to fail !

This aside, it is still a nice cashgrab opportunity



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjzGlXD6bsQ

This EP is awesome xD
ya should of taken the Cryptonian offer, yad be swiming in 6 digits rn
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3962
Merit: 8559



View Profile
January 08, 2022, 06:20:20 PM

I'm going to be OK. I just ordered some ramen from wish.com.

 Wishdotcom?! Dear god!  The best outcome is that it never arrives (probability of 0.875) because it is likely made from melamine (probability of 0.75).  You'd be better off taking your chances with starvation.
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 3006



View Profile
January 08, 2022, 06:22:20 PM

I'm going to be OK. I just ordered some ramen from wish.com.

 Wishdotcom?! Dear god!  The best outcome is that it never arrives (probability of 0.875) because it is likely made from melamine (probability of 0.75).  You'd be better off taking your chances with starvation.



hahahaha wish.com…. I remember once I ordered butt plugs from them but never arrived.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 07:01:27 PM


Explanation
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3836
Merit: 10793


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
January 08, 2022, 07:01:28 PM

I should come up with some numbers, but I do not know how to do it.

What you do is you randomly assign percentages based on your current emotions  Cheesy

Are you serious dragonvslinux? 

Some of us might get lines wrong, but I suspect that cAPSLOCK is attempting to be objective rather than emotional, even if there are some faults in his squiggly placements.

I could be wrong, but I took that more as a playful suggestion rather than a criticism of my own processes.

Fair enough.. I did see the possible friendly jab in there too.......

That said, I also do work on remaining objective in this environment, which is, frankly, sometimes hard.  Even after so many years of rising the Bitcoin coaster I can still get a little shook up by it. 

Yep... it is a bit strange that many of us can still get those kinds of feelings, even if we were to take an average cost of $1k, and we can feel that we went down from 69x in profits to ONLY 41x in profits... but maybe if our costs were ONLY $100 then we would be less concerned about going down from 690x in profits to ONLY 410x in profits, even though we would prefer to NOT be going down in our profits levels, but for sure there is some dynamic in there regarding how much in profits we might be. 

Oh, and take the other side of the profits level with some of the newbies of the past few years, some of these guys might have been able to accumulate a stash for an average of around $10k, as the example that I provided with shahzadafzal a few days ago (last paragraph of this post).  These guys might have gone from 6.9x in profits to ONLY 4.1x in profits, and so of course, they likely become even more worried than the guys with an earlier bitcoin entry-point timeline.

I believe that the sense of more calm these days does not ONLY come from your level of profits in you BTC investment portfolio, but also: 1) the overall power of the bitcoin investment thesis including the BIGgedness of some of the new bitcoin entrants becoming much more powerful in the past couple of years and 2) various aspects of recent BTC price performance that include both the 56% correction of May/June/July and today's so far 41% correction, shows that downside BTC price scenarios are not as likely to be in the 70% to 90% arena.. a 70
% correction would bring BTC prices down to $20k-ish, and a 90% correction would bring BTC prices down to $6,900-ish.  I just cannot see those kinds of scenarios being too likely in playing out, and I cannot imagine a world in which trucks won't be backed up to fill with BTC in the event that sub $30k prices were to be seen again.. ... so even though anything could happen, including the lower of prices, it does seem that we can feel a certain level of confidence regarding the extremes of how bad it could get even being tolerable scenarios.

Though I will say my current feeling of general zen around the market action is definitely something way higher than any other time in the past.

One major improvement, is I wrote a simple little android widget in which I could put an equation.  It made two API calls to get BTC and XMR prices.  And showed me a sum.  Basically "'how many dollars is your Bitcoin (and XMR) worth at this moment".  After running that for years.. I stopped about 3 months ago.  A damn good choice, frankly.

Well maybe it gets back to the question regarding NOT worrying so much about the level of your wealth going down from 690x in profits to ONLY 410x in profits because even if the amount that your wealth has gone down looks like a lot, you are not really that materially affected by that - unless, I suppose that you were considering cashing out soon.. and many of us remain long term HODLers even if we have been into BTC for a while, so we can shave off a bit of BTC anytime that we want.. and don't get me wrong, I am more in the camp of the going from 69x in profits to ONLY 41x in profits, so I don't really feel that I am greatly hindered in the event that I would want to shave off some BTC.. and let's say for example, any of us longer term BTC HODLers would want to shave off some relatively large quantity of BTC in the coming calendar year (2022), and maybe that quantity is ONLY a few percentages of our BTC holdings.... so if we end up shaving off at the worst times in the year, maybe we end up having to shave off  4-5% of our holdings, but if we could catch a price spike we would get the same amount of cash for 1-2%... so there might be some preference to be able to cash out at a top rather than a bottom.. even though we cannot really know where those are at, exactly.. especially while we are in the midst of the whole thing and thinking what should we do?  Based on the dip where we are at right now (40% down), my tentative plan would be to shave off 1/4 of the amount every quarter.. and yeah, the cashing out will not get maximized, but if there were a spike in the middle, I might be able to cash out more.. let's say prices shot up into the $90ks, then maybe I would just shave off the whole amount rather than 1/4 each quarter, but of course there surely would be discretion and each guy is not necessarily going to execute such shaving off of BTC in the same ways.
Pages: « 1 ... 29930 29931 29932 29933 29934 29935 29936 29937 29938 29939 29940 29941 29942 29943 29944 29945 29946 29947 29948 29949 29950 29951 29952 29953 29954 29955 29956 29957 29958 29959 29960 29961 29962 29963 29964 29965 29966 29967 29968 29969 29970 29971 29972 29973 29974 29975 29976 29977 29978 29979 [29980] 29981 29982 29983 29984 29985 29986 29987 29988 29989 29990 29991 29992 29993 29994 29995 29996 29997 29998 29999 30000 30001 30002 30003 30004 30005 30006 30007 30008 30009 30010 30011 30012 30013 30014 30015 30016 30017 30018 30019 30020 30021 30022 30023 30024 30025 30026 30027 30028 30029 30030 ... 33705 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!