|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
wiak2
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:19:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:19:44 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:21:22 PM |
|
Where are they getting 30,000 from? They bid 46,000BTC for an average price of $416..
|
|
|
|
Patel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:21:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Habeler876
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:23:32 PM |
|
The Silberts are master pumpers. I didn't even know he had a brother involved in this, LOL. Well, I guess it's moon time, $700+? Strapping my suit on now.
|
|
|
|
abercrombie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1159
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:24:08 PM |
|
$666 x 30,000 bitcoins = 19,980,000 (20 million didn't win)
|
|
|
|
p0peji
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:25:11 PM |
|
Volume is kind of disappointing at this stage imo.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:26:46 PM |
|
$666 x 30,000 bitcoins = 19,980,000 (20 million didn't win) As Alan is angrily pointing out in that twitter thread, he was using rough estimates.
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:27:02 PM |
|
Again, where is 30,000 coming from? They had 48,013 BTC of bids..
So, they had 16 bids.. (48,000 for 30,000 bitcoin)
I guess what matters here is wether or not the 20M includes the obvious 18,000 that didnt win (0% chance for them to win, before results were out). I dont see why it WOULDNT include that.
So, $20,000,000/48,000 = $416.67
|
|
|
|
nrd525
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1867
Merit: 1023
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:30:39 PM |
|
So far this price increase hasn't caused Bitfinex swap rates to increase. You can still get swap for as little as 0.165%/day. This is different from the rate spikes that we commonly see.
|
|
|
|
seljo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1178
Merit: 1014
Hodling since 2011.®
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:35:55 PM |
|
Whats up with pumps? Auction over?
DOOD! QUICK! THE DINOSAUR!!!!!!!!!! We need legit TA bring teh dinosaur!
|
|
|
|
ChrisML
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:36:15 PM |
|
Well... thats a first that I went long and shorted again in less than 2 hours. LMFAO.
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:37:11 PM |
|
So far this price increase hasn't caused Bitfinex swap rates to increase. You can still get swap for as little as 0.165%/day. This is different from the rate spikes that we commonly see.
Probably a lot of swaps closing out that were a little under water, happy to break even or make a small profit.
|
|
|
|
ejinte
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:37:24 PM |
|
So far this price increase hasn't caused Bitfinex swap rates to increase. You can still get swap for as little as 0.165%/day. This is different from the rate spikes that we commonly see.
Before all the swaps on bitfinex was on 30day minimum but it seems to have changed?
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:37:36 PM |
|
Huobi gon' blow.
NEXT LEG UP!!
|
|
|
|
nrd525
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1867
Merit: 1023
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:38:37 PM |
|
So far this price increase hasn't caused Bitfinex swap rates to increase. You can still get swap for as little as 0.165%/day. This is different from the rate spikes that we commonly see.
Before all the swaps on bitfinex was on 30day minimum but it seems to have changed? No. Minimum is 2 days. Maximum is 30 days.
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisML
|
|
June 30, 2014, 08:40:36 PM |
|
Huobi gon' blow.
NEXT LEG UP!!
Once again, I am very bullish. But I really think we need to see what the next 24 hours bring before we can officialy make a statement. I feel a beartrap coming in.. so fucking hard It's not funny anymore.
|
|
|
|
|