jeezy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:14:06 PM |
|
Cryptocoins are always "cheap" because Fiat is destined to fail in the long run. But it's hard to free yourself from coupling BTC<->Fiat I know 
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 12955
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:14:17 PM |
|
I call it now. I can bet on it. This is the lowest you can ever buy for the next 100 years. Take it or leave it.
I have heard that before, several times... though I am glad that I bought 1 btc today at $380... I am running out of money.. fml...
|
|
|
|
DutchTrades
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:26:45 PM |
|
Kggg... Sir, we have movement, i repeat, we have movement kgggg.
|
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:27:34 PM |
|
wow no new blocks for almost 1h.
I wonder how big the transaction volume will be in the next block.
miners already shutting down or variance?  I shut down everything last night. BTC and Alts. Only running enough to keep a little hash on my little p2pool lol
|
|
|
|
uhoh
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:28:47 PM |
|
<===
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:30:21 PM |
|
... there was a network scale attack I pointed out to Gavin and the other devs after observing namecoin network getting "hung" for months by miners joining and leaving en-masse due to mining incentives and price fluctuations ...
if a well-resourced 'dishonest miner' attacker could build up a significant of quantity of mining power and ramp up hash-rate by bringing on-line an ever-increasing amount of compute, selling all btc the whole way and simultaneously drive price lower over the same period, squeezing out 'honest' miners ... then in a final act take all their mining power off-line during a final dump of price then it would leave the network hanging at very low block solving rate (long confirms) waiting forever for the next retargetting and a low price and take a toll on confidence ... the fix was to allow for a 'special' retargetting on the downside if it hasn't happened after a time-out, not just the set 2016 blocks.
|
|
|
|
CryptoFuture
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 181
Merit: 100
Diggit.io Admin
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:30:52 PM |
|
Does everyone here only check blockchain.info for blocks? Block discovery is fine... working as normal
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1442
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:33:08 PM |
|
Kggg... Sir, we have movement, i repeat, we have movement kgggg.
Foxtrot Uniform Charlie Kilo , Yankee Echo Sierra! Hotel Oscar Papa Echo , India Tango, Kilo Echo Echo Papa Sierra, Golf Oscar India November Golf. Over. (green on green has a different meaning in this context)
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:34:51 PM |
|
Ok ok, here is a good bull trap brewing. Target 430?
|
|
|
|
Grafzep
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:35:48 PM |
|
... there was a network scale attack I pointed out to Gavin and the other devs after observing namecoin network getting "hung" for months by miners joining and leaving en-masse due to mining incentives and price fluctuations ...
if a well-resourced 'dishonest miner' attacker could build up a significant of quantity of mining power and ramp up hash-rate by bringing on-line an ever-increasing amount of compute, selling all btc the whole way and simultaneously drive price lower over the same period, squeezing out 'honest' miners ... then in a final act take all their mining power off-line during a final dump of price then it would leave the network hanging at very low block solving rate (long confirms) waiting forever for the next retargetting and a low price and take a toll on confidence ... the fix was to allow for a 'special' retargetting on the downside if it hasn't happened after a time-out, not just the set 2016 blocks.
Was this fix put in place? I've had similar concerns about a "remove hashing power" attack
|
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:37:21 PM |
|
... there was a network scale attack I pointed out to Gavin and the other devs after observing namecoin network getting "hung" for months by miners joining and leaving en-masse due to mining incentives and price fluctuations ...
if a well-resourced 'dishonest miner' attacker could build up a significant of quantity of mining power and ramp up hash-rate by bringing on-line an ever-increasing amount of compute, selling all btc the whole way and simultaneously drive price lower over the same period, squeezing out 'honest' miners ... then in a final act take all their mining power off-line during a final dump of price then it would leave the network hanging at very low block solving rate (long confirms) waiting forever for the next retargetting and a low price and take a toll on confidence ... the fix was to allow for a 'special' retargetting on the downside if it hasn't happened after a time-out, not just the set 2016 blocks.
Wow that seems to be a very possible scenario, but would have to be a very large hash to make that happen. Hard to imagine but the results would be as you said, left hanging" interesting 
|
|
|
|
Malin Keshar
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:37:36 PM |
|
FUUUU almost a hour and a half and no confirmation. Why the price crashed just when I needed to transfer some coins 
|
|
|
|
_javi_
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:38:55 PM |
|
and now they decided to buy...
sheeps!! follow!!! (in 300s voice)
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:39:49 PM |
|
... there was a network scale attack I pointed out to Gavin and the other devs after observing namecoin network getting "hung" for months by miners joining and leaving en-masse due to mining incentives and price fluctuations ...
if a well-resourced 'dishonest miner' attacker could build up a significant of quantity of mining power and ramp up hash-rate by bringing on-line an ever-increasing amount of compute, selling all btc the whole way and simultaneously drive price lower over the same period, squeezing out 'honest' miners ... then in a final act take all their mining power off-line during a final dump of price then it would leave the network hanging at very low block solving rate (long confirms) waiting forever for the next retargetting and a low price and take a toll on confidence ... the fix was to allow for a 'special' retargetting on the downside if it hasn't happened after a time-out, not just the set 2016 blocks.
Was this fix put in place? I've had similar concerns about a "remove hashing power" attack Would never happen to a big coin like btc: to much power needed. Like 99% attack...
|
|
|
|
Cassandra_PR
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:40:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
jl2012
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1137
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:41:45 PM |
|
FUUUU almost a hour and a half and no confirmation. Why the price crashed just when I needed to transfer some coins  blockchain.info is broken. The height now is 321524
|
|
|
|
mmitech
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:42:42 PM |
|
FUUUU almost a hour and a half and no confirmation. Why the price crashed just when I needed to transfer some coins  are you kidding ? did you include a fee with your transaction ? because lats hour we had at least 6 blocks 
|
|
|
|
Malin Keshar
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:44:45 PM |
|
FUUUU almost a hour and a half and no confirmation. Why the price crashed just when I needed to transfer some coins  are you kidding ? did you include a fee with your transaction ? because lats hour we had at least 6 blocks  I got the transference. Seems blockchain.info is in problems, like someone said before. (and of course I included the fee)
|
|
|
|
uhoh
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:49:37 PM |
|
blockchain.info has been broken ever since their database problems earlier in the year. Its a mess.
|
|
|
|
spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1047
|
 |
September 19, 2014, 01:50:44 PM |
|
......we heading up now?
|
|
|
|
|