BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:30:38 AM |
|
Looks like i'll be getting margin called by the cent again for the 3rd fucking time...
Fucking disgusting
Dude 
|
|
|
|
simmo77
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:46:07 AM |
|
That is stupid. Do you also pay 10% GST when you convert Aussie dollars to USD for your vacation to Hawaii? not yet... Shhhhh don't give them ideas. The Australian govt would tax air if it could.
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4494
Merit: 5813
You're never too old to think young.
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:51:40 AM |
|
The Australian govt would tax air if it could.
Shhhhh don't give them ideas. 
|
|
|
|
mymenace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:53:23 AM |
|
The Australian govt would tax air if it could.
Shhhhh don't give them ideas.  too late carbon tax even though it has now been removed, it will come back
|
|
|
|
simmo77
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:54:59 AM |
|
The Australian govt would tax air if it could.
Shhhhh don't give them ideas.  too late carbon tax even though it has now been removed, it will come back Haha true I never thought of that...
|
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 04:58:06 AM |
|
going up from here?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 05:01:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Malin Keshar
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 05:23:12 AM |
|
End of the weekend dump
Back to normal from here
|
|
|
|
simmo77
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 05:37:01 AM |
|
I agree, but it's basically irrelevant to me - I've done all (well, most of) my accumulating before the rule was introduced. Actually bought most of mine from Gox waaaay back before they needed your dox!
|
|
|
|
byronbb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
HODL OR DIE
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 06:00:43 AM |
|
So you hope he lapses into a coma? Not very nice 
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 06:01:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465
Clueless!
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 06:02:18 AM |
|
$400 usd baby...baby oh baby.....heh...knew you'd come back to me....hubba hubba
|
|
|
|
noobtrader
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 06:16:15 AM |
|
So you hope he lapses into a coma? Not very nice  says the man which its avatar says that everything is possible....
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 06:43:08 AM |
|
Bullish penant forming??
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 07:01:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 08:01:16 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Phillis
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 08:01:42 AM |
|
Looks like we'll be going down  nope, we are going up, slowly but surely.
|
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 08:12:58 AM |
|
Here's the [ formula ] I use:
Bmo = N x A
Bmo ~ total value bitcoin M0 (also called 'market cap') N ~ total number of entities holding bitcoins A ~ average Amount of value holding entities are willing to hold in btc
It appears likely that N is only going to keep increasing for the forseeable future (perhaps with exponential adoption rates at times).
A will stay around the same but also may increase as the confidence in holding value in btc becomes firmer.
You can let N to be any number of people, as long as it includes all people holding bitcoins in some time interval of interest and A is the average over that same set of people. So, let N be the number of all people who have held some bitcoin at any time since January. Then N is fixed. The Bmo of bitcoin has fallen 50% since January. Therefore A must have fallen by that much, too. So much for "A will stay around the same". The formula is problematic also because it does not take into account the dynamics of BTC investing. It seems that most of the extant bitcoins are held by "old" inactive investors, who are confident enough to hold them for a while longer, but were not confident enough to buy more coins over the last year. (If the price keeps falling and they eventually decide to sell at 100 $/BTC, their old bitcoins would still have been a great investment, but any bitcoins acquired over the last year would have been a terrible one.) So, the contribution to the A factor of those old investors does not depend on their confidence in bitcoin. Rather, the amount of BTC that they are willing to hold is constant, and the amount of value that they are wlling to hold in BTC varies according to the market price of BTC, as determined by the Chinese traders. In that case the value of A does not determine the market price, but is passively determined by it -- making the formula useless as a predictor of price. VC's are doing their value added inputs (like the miners before them) once that market has a little more hierarchy, I can visualize it will be like the miners before them they'll realise it's cheaper to buy coins than build business to skim off the top.
|
|
|
|
brg444
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 08:16:48 AM |
|
Here's the [ formula ] I use:
Bmo = N x A
Bmo ~ total value bitcoin M0 (also called 'market cap') N ~ total number of entities holding bitcoins A ~ average Amount of value holding entities are willing to hold in btc
It appears likely that N is only going to keep increasing for the forseeable future (perhaps with exponential adoption rates at times).
A will stay around the same but also may increase as the confidence in holding value in btc becomes firmer.
You can let N to be any number of people, as long as it includes all people holding bitcoins in some time interval of interest and A is the average over that same set of people. So, let N be the number of all people who have held some bitcoin at any time since January. Then N is fixed. The Bmo of bitcoin has fallen 50% since January. Therefore A must have fallen by that much, too. So much for "A will stay around the same". The formula is problematic also because it does not take into account the dynamics of BTC investing. It seems that most of the extant bitcoins are held by "old" inactive investors, who are confident enough to hold them for a while longer, but were not confident enough to buy more coins over the last year. (If the price keeps falling and they eventually decide to sell at 100 $/BTC, their old bitcoins would still have been a great investment, but any bitcoins acquired over the last year would have been a terrible one.) So, the contribution to the A factor of those old investors does not depend on their confidence in bitcoin. Rather, the amount of BTC that they are willing to hold is constant, and the amount of value that they are wlling to hold in BTC varies according to the market price of BTC, as determined by the Chinese traders. In that case the value of A does not determine the market price, but is passively determined by it -- making the formula useless as a predictor of price. VC's are doing their value added inputs (like the miners before them) once that market has a little more hierarchy, I can visualize it will be like the miners before them they'll realise it's cheaper to buy coins than build business to skim off the top. Some smarter ones have realized it already. In fact, most diversify their porftfolio by buying the underlying asset. I believe Chamath Palihapitiya is solely buying Bitcoins and has expressed his opinion that this is the very best bet one could make at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|