What would you accomplish by closing your BitFloor account right now?
Please direct me to where I agreed he could seize my bitcoin by calling them on 'hold' and use the proceeds to continue funding his lifestyle through this business.
You are either a sock puppet for Roman or suffering from a bad case of Stockholm syndrome.
WTF? How does that answer my question? That doesn't even make sense.
Lets try that again, maybe you simply ignored my question because it was inconvenient for your agenda. Lets try some of my other statements:
I'm not sure that Roman has said anything yet that has been demonstrated as a lie.
Please direct me to where I agreed he could seize my bitcoin by calling them on 'hold' and use the proceeds to continue funding his lifestyle through this business.
You are either a sock puppet for Roman or suffering from a bad case of Stockholm syndrome.
Nope, still doesn't make sense. What do sock puppets, Stockholm syndrome, his lifestyle, or your opinion about why the bitcoins were called "on hold" offer in the way of proof "demonstrating a lie"?
Lets try again:
I agree that he hasn't been as communicative as we'd all like, and that he didn't take financial responsibility for the "hack" that occurred last fall.
Please direct me to where I agreed he could seize my bitcoin by calling them on 'hold' and use the proceeds to continue funding his lifestyle through this business.
You are either a sock puppet for Roman or suffering from a bad case of Stockholm syndrome.
Sorry, still doesn't make any sense. Nothing in that comment of mine about seizing your bitcoins or funding a lifestyle. Nothing that would seem to indicate any socks, puppets, or Stockholm syndrome yet. You really are cherry-picking and attempting to ignore context to push your agenda aren't you? I suppose there are some small-minded people who will fall for such a ruse, but what does that get you?
Ok, last sentence of my post. I'm guessing this is going to have to be the one you're commenting on?
However, neither of those things are outside the terms of service that we agreed to when we chose to use his service, and it'd be interesting to see if any U.S. court would recognize either behavior as illegal (as compared to the BoA practice that appears to be pretty clearly illegal).
Please direct me to where I agreed he could seize my bitcoin by calling them on 'hold' and use the proceeds to continue funding his lifestyle through this business.
You are either a sock puppet for Roman or suffering from a bad case of Stockholm syndrome.
Ok, at least were starting to see some vague connection to reality now. I mention the words "terms of service" and you reply with the phrase "direct me to where I agreed", I defend a behavior as possibly not being considered illegal under current laws, and you apparently feel I'm sympathizing enough to be under the influence of "Stockholm Syndrome".
Of course, if anyone takes 5 seconds to look at what I actually said, and what your comments assume I said, they'll quickly realize that you either are struggling with reading comprehension, or are intentionally attempting to imply meaning that doesn't exist by ignoring context and using name calling to attempt to draw me into a battle of insults rather than an analysis of facts.
Nothing was said by me about "you agreeing that he could seize your bitcoins". My "neither of those things are outside the ToS" comment referred specifically to a Roman failing to take financial responsibility for providing insufficient security to prevent a "hack", and to his lack of communication. Please show me a verifiable copy of the ToS that guarantees frequent communication in the event that the business is shut down, or where it indicates that BitFloor will reimburse you for any losses that result from a hacker gaining unauthorized access to any bitcoins stored by BitFloor.
We can continue this conversation if you can provide any one of the following:
- Reasonable proof that the bitcoins were stolen with the willful cooperation of a BitFloor employee
- Reasonable proof that the ToS guarantees BitFloor will reimburse your losses do to unauthorized access
- Reasonable proof that the ToS guarantees frequent communication from BitFloor
- Reasonable proof that failing to communicate more often is illegal
- Reasonable proof that failing to replace bitcoins that were stolen by unauthorized access while otherwise under BitFloor's control is illegal
Barring your ability to provide anything substantial, I think we are done. Any further attempt to misconstrue my words, or flame-bait me will result in your being placed into the "ignore" list.
