[ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!

[gnasirator]

blockchain explorer not working for address balance.
What is correct total number of coins in circulation?

Ah sorry, I'm still reparsing all transactions, had done a small change to the domain setup recently.
Here is the number you're looking for:

367664707.675039

Explorer is now back in sync.

[1669986991]

1669986991

[1669986991]

1669986991

[1669986991]

1669986991

[cergfalcone]

a good day, I can take part in the airdrop or bounty program, Crane for some reason does not work. Or all tasks are completed.

[gnasirator]

Btw, looking at the explorer's connected peers:
There are still quite a few wallets running the old protocol version 10100 out there.

Everybody please update to the latest wallet version. It contains some important network improvement fixes.

[paging]

blockchain explorer not working for address balance.
What is correct total number of coins in circulation?

Ah sorry, I'm still reparsing all transactions, had done a small change to the domain setup recently.
Here is the number you're looking for:

367664707.675039

Explorer is now back in sync.

Thanks for response.
Does this circulation include the coins generated due to recent bug that was fixed in the blockchain?

[gnasirator]

blockchain explorer not working for address balance.
What is correct total number of coins in circulation?

Ah sorry, I'm still reparsing all transactions, had done a small change to the domain setup recently.
Here is the number you're looking for:

367664707.675039

Explorer is now back in sync.

Thanks for response.
Does this circulation include the coins generated due to recent bug that was fixed in the blockchain?

That Pallas would have to answer as I was not involved in that and honestly don't know.

[JustMe22]

Btw, looking at the explorer's connected peers:
There are still quite a few wallets running the old protocol version 10100 out there.

Everybody please update to the latest wallet version. It contains some important network improvement fixes.

Thanks for the update bro. I have a question if i continue using old wallet is any problem. Is a long story, short i can't download anything from internet for now!

[pallas]

blockchain explorer not working for address balance.
What is correct total number of coins in circulation?

Ah sorry, I'm still reparsing all transactions, had done a small change to the domain setup recently.
Here is the number you're looking for:

367664707.675039

Explorer is now back in sync.

Thanks for response.
Does this circulation include the coins generated due to recent bug that was fixed in the blockchain?

That Pallas would have to answer as I was not involved in that and honestly don't know.

It is very difficult to find out: with bitfreak we estimated an additional of about 200M; but we can't be sure that the hacker has access to them and if he can actually spend them.
For example, it is likely that part of those funds were into poloniex and btc38 when they disabled their wallets.
We couldn't detect any hacker activity since months ago, well before the Chinese regulatory crackdown.

[pallas]

Btw, looking at the explorer's connected peers:
There are still quite a few wallets running the old protocol version 10100 out there.

Everybody please update to the latest wallet version. It contains some important network improvement fixes.

Thanks for the update bro. I have a question if i continue using old wallet is any problem. Is a long story, short i can't download anything from internet for now!

It is possible that you end up in your own fork. It may work forever but it is not guaranteed: it depends on how the chain evolves.

[Kompik]

blockchain explorer not working for address balance.
What is correct total number of coins in circulation?

Ah sorry, I'm still reparsing all transactions, had done a small change to the domain setup recently.
Here is the number you're looking for:

367664707.675039

Explorer is now back in sync.

Thanks for response.
Does this circulation include the coins generated due to recent bug that was fixed in the blockchain?

That Pallas would have to answer as I was not involved in that and honestly don't know.

It is very difficult to find out: with bitfreak we estimated an additional of about 200M; but we can't be sure that the hacker has access to them and if he can actually spend them.
For example, it is likely that part of those funds were into poloniex and btc38 when they disabled their wallets.
We couldn't detect any hacker activity since months ago, well before the Chinese regulatory crackdown.

Yes I have lost more than 17k of cryptonite coins on BTC38 Smiley

[pallas]

Anyone tested the "no-ep" branch? Need a linux binary?

[JustMe22]

Btw, looking at the explorer's connected peers:
There are still quite a few wallets running the old protocol version 10100 out there.

Everybody please update to the latest wallet version. It contains some important network improvement fixes.

Thanks for the update bro. I have a question if i continue using old wallet is any problem. Is a long story, short i can't download anything from internet for now!

It is possible that you end up in your own fork. It may work forever but it is not guaranteed: it depends on how the chain evolves.

Will update it when I'll be forced to use the coins, transfer them, until then I think I don't have any issue. Anyway I have saved my private keys previously.

[pallas]

Anyone tested the "no-ep" branch? Need a linux binary?

Merged into master. Now the github sources do include the "epamounts" option.

[antantti]

Anyone tested the "no-ep" branch? Need a linux binary?

Merged into master. Now the github sources do include the "epamounts" option.

I've been running it for 30 hours now, no problems whatsoever. Haven't tried to transfer coins though, solomining works.

Is there a way to "stress test" it somehow?

[pallas]

Anyone tested the "no-ep" branch? Need a linux binary?

Merged into master. Now the github sources do include the "epamounts" option.

I've been running it for 30 hours now, no problems whatsoever. Haven't tried to transfer coins though, solomining works.

Is there a way to "stress test" it somehow?

The issues that could arise are in case you set epamounts to 0: it could return wrong or approximate values, or it could wrongly convert a value sent into an rpc call.

[pallas]

"Hello! Sorry, the current wallet is still being deployed Oh, to be gradually opened up after the server improvement, the specific time open customer service for the time being I do not know, please note follow-up notice, thank you for your support, I wish you a happy life."

[CRYPTONAIRE]

"Hello! Sorry, the current wallet is still being deployed Oh, to be gradually opened up after the server improvement, the specific time open customer service for the time being I do not know, please note follow-up notice, thank you for your support, I wish you a happy life."

Was that an update from AEX?

[pallas]

"Hello! Sorry, the current wallet is still being deployed Oh, to be gradually opened up after the server improvement, the specific time open customer service for the time being I do not know, please note follow-up notice, thank you for your support, I wish you a happy life."

Was that an update from AEX?

Yes, it's the "google translate" powered meme with earphones ;-)

[info_infoman1]

in triewiew.cpp

Code:

if(node->Balance() < MIN_BALANCE){
TrieEngine::Remove(&m_root,node);
undo.m_destroy=true;
}
undos.push_back(undo);

why not send those coins to coinbase wallet pubkey=0 ?

[pallas]

in triewiew.cpp

Code:

if(node->Balance() < MIN_BALANCE){
TrieEngine::Remove(&m_root,node);
undo.m_destroy=true;
}
undos.push_back(undo);

why not send those coins to coinbase wallet pubkey=0 ?

Why?

[info_infoman1]

in triewiew.cpp

Code:

if(node->Balance() < MIN_BALANCE){
TrieEngine::Remove(&m_root,node);
undo.m_destroy=true;
}
undos.push_back(undo);

why not send those coins to coinbase wallet pubkey=0 ?

Why?

not to lose coins, for future generations