Bitcoin Forum
November 21, 2017, 02:28:49 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][XCN] Cryptonite - NEW Thread | 1st mini-blockchain coin | Bounties!  (Read 155026 times)
JasonSW
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 02:02:07 AM
 #2621

I wonder if this is an opportunity to buy.  Cool

that would be great (if we had an exchange)  Cool

i hope the best to this coin and team.

Still hodling like a pro

We still have 3 exchanges: bx, nova and bter.
And bter is hong kong based, maybe will not be influenced by PBoC ban.
Bittrex or poloniex will be great, yobit can be a good start.
If @bitfreak! is back on the team, sky is the limit.

The Chinese trading pages of Bter will be surely shutdown, as it is dominated by a mainland company, there was already a public notice; whether or not the English trading pages is gonna down or they have channels to keep trading will see.
1511274529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511274529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511274529
Reply with quote  #2

1511274529
Report to moderator
1511274529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511274529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511274529
Reply with quote  #2

1511274529
Report to moderator
1511274529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511274529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511274529
Reply with quote  #2

1511274529
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511274529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511274529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511274529
Reply with quote  #2

1511274529
Report to moderator
1511274529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511274529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511274529
Reply with quote  #2

1511274529
Report to moderator
bogdanb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 06:28:35 AM
 #2622

I wonder if this is an opportunity to buy.  Cool

that would be great (if we had an exchange)  Cool

i hope the best to this coin and team.

Still hodling like a pro

We still have 3 exchanges: bx, nova and bter.
And bter is hong kong based, maybe will not be influenced by PBoC ban.
Bittrex or poloniex will be great, yobit can be a good start.
If @bitfreak! is back on the team, sky is the limit.

The Chinese trading pages of Bter will be surely shutdown, as it is dominated by a mainland company, there was already a public notice; whether or not the English trading pages is gonna down or they have channels to keep trading will see.

Maxcloud Inc.  Copyright © 2017  Address: British Virgin Islands   Phone : + 86 400-007-0955   Bter.com is powered by Bter Dev Team
From bter page. It is not a mainland china company.
xyj790204
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


Any store can buy, sell, and accept Crypto


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 06:36:14 AM
 #2623

i will support bter because it list xcn .also i will always support xcn

________Any Store Can Buy, Sell and Accept Cryptocurrency________
█████████ ██ ███ ██      PUNDI X      ██ ███ ██ █████████
Whitepaper      Twitter      Facebook      Telegram      Medium      Youtube
bitfreak!
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1535


electronic [r]evolution


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 07:12:13 AM
 #2624

I talked to pallas  had problems with xcn, but he did not believe it

How do you deal with these problems now?
I am always in communication with pallas and we were not aware there was any serious issue until just recently when btc38 made us aware. There were bugs with the wallet but those issues were not linked to this attack.

XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF
Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script
Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
bitfreak!
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1535


electronic [r]evolution


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 07:21:12 AM
 #2625

Well it's not about a statement people are free to go or stay with; it is more about how you listen people's comments.

When it sayed this is an obvious bug, I got astonished. Obviously this coin wasn't well looked after. The suggestion I'd give is how you can show your devotion to plans of development, rather than just marketing plans (don't talk Bittrex or Poloniex anymore pls until get it). Convince people how this coin is going to make improvements, and continue to improve the stability to make sure likability of "obvious" bugs are going to be reduced by orders. High-tech is great, but reliability is the first priority on top of anything else.

I recalled few pages back people were still saying sync issue; I might be wrong that has been years and that can make people think something not right. Just get it done if not.
As pallas said the bug is only obvious when you know what to look for, there is a lot of code and without knowing what to look for it's very hard to pick out bugs, especially when neither of us were the original dev for Cryptonite. I developed the idea for the mini-blockchain several years ago but my C++ skills were lacking at the time so I hired a dev to create Cryptonite. The work was very rushed and he was working alone so there was bound to be some problems in the code, although I'm still quite suspicious of the original dev because it seems like he should have noticed this bug. Obviously it's embarrassing because a bug like this should not have been there in the first place. However we are lucky the attacker didn't do more damage then they did because they easily could have.

XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF
Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script
Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 07:46:01 AM
 #2626

meeeh this coins is just done...if u wanna safe coin algorit, its bether to start with new coin and new hipe P.
2many problems with this coin...trust is just lost...

I don't agree. XCN has unique features and is now more stable than ever. Plus, I find that the long history of the coin (almost 4 years) is a big plus, not a deficiency.
If you like pump and dump coins, which are abandoned after a couple months, then yes, you are better with another coin.

Well it's not about a statement people are free to go or stay with; it is more about how you listen people's comments.

When it sayed this is an obvious bug, I got astonished. Obviously this coin wasn't well looked after. The suggestion I'd give is how you can show your devotion to plans of development, rather than just marketing plans (don't talk Bittrex or Poloniex anymore pls until get it). Convince people how this coin is going to make improvements, and continue to improve the stability to make sure likability of "obvious" bugs are going to be reduced by orders. High-tech is great, but reliability is the first priority on top of anything else.

I recalled few pages back people were still saying sync issue; I might be wrong that has been years and that can make people think something not right. Just get it done if not.

"this coin wasn't well looked after" - "just marketing plans"
Me and bitfreak have been working on the code for months, during our free time (I have a full time job) and with nothing in return. This coin is not developed by full time professionals. Again I think that, despite the issues, it's a very successful coin, considering how long it survived and all the new technology that it contains. Just compare it to the 90% of coins out there: they are just copy and paste from another coin with minimal differences, abandoned by the devs after few months.

"continue to improve the stability"
That's what we've been doing the last few months, after I took the coin development and bitfreak came back.

"reliability is the first priority"
Hence why we focused on stability and fixes in general, instead of adding new features.

"people were still saying sync issue"
Since the last sync fixes, I don't recall any such issue been reported.

have lada
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:03:28 AM
 #2627

I have the same  but my balance is showing fine.
chinaxcn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:15:11 AM
 #2628

I talked to pallas  had problems with xcn, but he did not believe it

How do you deal with these problems now?
I am always in communication with pallas and we were not aware there was any serious issue until just recently when btc38 made us aware. There were bugs with the wallet but those issues were not linked to this attack.

2 months ago I said to him
He thinks it is BTC38 problem
I calculated by the number of blocks and the output   1645179*195 =345487590

Block Count:   1645179
Block Reward≈ 210

But he does not believe, and do not check
I do not know why he does not attach importance to the problem,

I calculated that the total amount of xcn and the blocks are almost equal
btc38 found the problem is that I said


I suggest you let btc38 help solve.
Old xcn replaced by new xcn,This will allow you to solve all the problems and let xcn start again
So I can also help xcn on China overseas platform

pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:21:27 AM
 #2629

I talked to pallas  had problems with xcn, but he did not believe it

How do you deal with these problems now?
I am always in communication with pallas and we were not aware there was any serious issue until just recently when btc38 made us aware. There were bugs with the wallet but those issues were not linked to this attack.

2 months ago I said to him
He thinks it is BTC38 problem
I calculated by the number of blocks and the output   1645179*195 =345487590

Block Count:   1645179
Block Reward≈ 210

But he does not believe, and do not check
I do not know why he does not attach importance to the problem,

I calculated that the total amount of xcn and the blocks are almost equal
btc38 found the problem is that I said


I suggest you let btc38 help solve.
Old xcn replaced by new xcn,This will allow you to solve all the problems and let xcn start again
So I can also help xcn on China overseas platform



btc38 is all right with us and xcn, they opened their wallet some days ago because I'm in contact with them and provided the new wallet.
trading is closed, along with other coins, because they are closing ALL trading, like all the other chinese exchanges.
it is not related to any xcn issue.

chinaxcn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:39:11 AM
 #2630

I talked to pallas  had problems with xcn, but he did not believe it

How do you deal with these problems now?
I am always in communication with pallas and we were not aware there was any serious issue until just recently when btc38 made us aware. There were bugs with the wallet but those issues were not linked to this attack.

2 months ago I said to him
He thinks it is BTC38 problem
I calculated by the number of blocks and the output   1645179*195 =345487590

Block Count:   1645179
Block Reward≈ 210

But he does not believe, and do not check
I do not know why he does not attach importance to the problem,

I calculated that the total amount of xcn and the blocks are almost equal
btc38 found the problem is that I said


I suggest you let btc38 help solve.
Old xcn replaced by new xcn,This will allow you to solve all the problems and let xcn start again
So I can also help xcn on China overseas platform



btc38 is all right with us and xcn, they opened their wallet some days ago because I'm in contact with them and provided the new wallet.
trading is closed, along with other coins, because they are closing ALL trading, like all the other chinese exchanges.
it is not related to any xcn issue.

Unfortunately it looks like btc38 is going to remove XCN based on that announcement. Btc38 were the ones who first realized something was wrong because they had a suspiciously high number of XCN in their exchange wallet.

------------
I told you two months ago.
But you do not believe, do not check.


 
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:45:12 AM
 #2631

Unfortunately it looks like btc38 is going to remove XCN based on that announcement. Btc38 were the ones who first realized something was wrong because they had a suspiciously high number of XCN in their exchange wallet.

And why did they remove another 10 coins at the same time? The announcement they were referring to is not ours (xcn issues) but theirs (exchange shutdown because of chinese regulations).

chinaxcn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:47:16 AM
 #2632

xcn  wallet still has a lot of problems,Many Chinese people can not synchronize wallet, mistakes

I give cryptoid.info  btc
add xcn
But he said the block is not complete

xcn not re-development, will die!
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 09:50:01 AM
 #2633

xcn  wallet still has a lot of problems,Many Chinese people can not synchronize wallet, mistakes

I give cryptoid.info  btc
add xcn
But he said the block is not complete

xcn not re-development, will die!


Let's stop complaining and move on.
What problem do they have? Please have them contact us thru this forum or, better, thru slack so we can help them with their issue. Maybe they are just using an old wallet.

chinaxcn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 10:25:48 AM
 #2634

The wallet has been closed before the next frame, because this reason is closed

open again because the closure of the site

xcn there is the last chance to survive,If you do not solve, xcn will be used to leave China

A few months ago I was helping you to contact btc38 to solve the wallet problem,

 Goodbye, good luck。
xcn die and live,See if you can solve all the problems

Using the new xcn is the perfect way out
OLD XCN replaced with new xcn
bitfreak!
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1535


electronic [r]evolution


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 10:45:24 AM
 #2635

Using the new xcn is the perfect way out
OLD XCN replaced with new xcn
As I have previously stated I am working on a new coin coded from the ground up using a highly object orientated approach with cross-platform C++11 code and no large libraries like boost, but that will be at least a few months before I even have the foundations complete, and even after it's finished it will still be considered highly experimental. A coin like Cryptonite which at least has several years of history is going to be more trustworthy than a completely new coin, now that this bug has been patched I'd say Cryptonite is quite secure. I'm sure many people are going to be trying the exploit to see if they can get around our fixes, which will help us find any other holes in the protocol. Also I don't really think the attacker managed to shift the market a whole lot so it's not the end of the world, and we don't know how much of the funds were locked by exchanges, I'm sure the attacker would have triggered some alarm bells before being able to sell off all their coins.

XCN: CYsvPpb2YuyAib5ay9GJXU8j3nwohbttTz | BTC: 18MWPVJA9mFLPFT3zht5twuNQmZBDzHoWF
Cryptonite - 1st mini-blockchain altcoin | BitShop - digital shop script
Web Developer - PHP, SQL, JS, AJAX, JSON, XML, RSS, HTML, CSS
JasonSW
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 12:05:32 PM
 #2636

xcn  wallet still has a lot of problems,Many Chinese people can not synchronize wallet, mistakes

I give cryptoid.info  btc
add xcn
But he said the block is not complete

xcn not re-development, will die!


Let's stop complaining and move on.
What problem do they have? Please have them contact us thru this forum or, better, thru slack so we can help them with their issue. Maybe they are just using an old wallet.

Man, you gotta look into carefully what's users are talking about or complaining about even though they might be wrong, but I do see some points.
JasonSW
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 12:06:50 PM
 #2637

I wonder if this is an opportunity to buy.  Cool

that would be great (if we had an exchange)  Cool

i hope the best to this coin and team.

Still hodling like a pro

We still have 3 exchanges: bx, nova and bter.
And bter is hong kong based, maybe will not be influenced by PBoC ban.
Bittrex or poloniex will be great, yobit can be a good start.
If @bitfreak! is back on the team, sky is the limit.

The Chinese trading pages of Bter will be surely shutdown, as it is dominated by a mainland company, there was already a public notice; whether or not the English trading pages is gonna down or they have channels to keep trading will see.

Maxcloud Inc.  Copyright © 2017  Address: British Virgin Islands   Phone : + 86 400-007-0955   Bter.com is powered by Bter Dev Team
From bter page. It is not a mainland china company.

Look at the About page in Chinese (ofc need a translator).
oldschoolgamer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131

your damned if you do, your damned if you dont lol


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 01:47:20 PM
 #2638

wow hectic ... yeah i felt somthing was not right about this coin a while back ... some dishonest mining going down ... exploits .....who knows ......solo mining  certainly was not working correctly like it used to before that . shame to hear this and good luck with stuff .

TOO MANY MISSED OPPORTUNITIES!!!   buy any shitcoin today double your money tomorrow Tongue ol crypto woes
Dont leave coins in Bter exchange ...they are straight up thieves and dont even reply when your coins disappear Sad
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 01:54:09 PM
 #2639

wow hectic ... yeah i felt somthing was not right about this coin a while back ... some dishonest mining going down ... exploits .....who knows ......solo mining  certainly was not working correctly like it used to before that . shame to hear this and good luck with stuff .

solo mining (since the krnlx fix) is working pretty fine now, less than 10% orphans; much better than before, for sure.

gnasirator
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 08:20:07 PM
 #2640

Does anyone in here have some experience with this P2P exchange?
--> bisq.network

Reason I'm asking: I just did a quick google for online exchanges (FIAT to crypto) that don't require ID and are non-centralized and bisq popped up.
The concept is very intriguing.

I will look into the exchange and see whether it's possible to add XCN.
Here are the requirements to get XCN listed:
https://forum.bisq.io/t/how-to-add-your-favorite-altcoin/46

Summary:
Quote
Here is a basic rule set to make the process and requirements transparent:

    If the altcoin has a market cap or trading volume in the top 10 range we might add it without further requirements.
    If we think that an altcoin has some outstanding novelty or properties we want to support we might add it without further requirements.

Other altcoins need to fulfill the following requirements:

    The requesting person needs to be associated with the official coin (use an email address indicating that you are from the team)
    They need to add Bitsquare as official exchange to their webpage.
    There need to be an active block explorer available.
    They need to send an example address of the altcoin.
    The ticker symbol does not conflict with any Fiat or Altcoin symbol (Check here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_4217142, https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/13).
    The requirements to add the coin does not cause extra effort for Bitsquare like adding additional input fields (e.g. if the addresss alone is not sufficient for the trade).
    They need to provide the rules for validating a correct altcoin address. Input verification for the coin address will be added soon and we would need to get the specifics of a altcoin delivered from those who are interested that it get added (if the one who want to add a coin is not a developer he needs to request those information form the altcoin developers - Bitsquare will not do that task). A pull request with actual code contribution is preferred over pure text based information.
    There need to be some trading activity. If for a period of 2 months no trade activity is visible that coin might get removed again.
    If a coin represents political values which are diametral to Bitsquare’s values we reject it (e.g. fascistic, racist,…)

UPDATE:
Additional new requirement:

    Pullrequest for the Altcoin address validation (Regex test + checksum test or anything else if there is anything specific) and Unittest for it (use Dev branch NOT master branch for PR).
    Validation class is here37.
    Unittest is here30.

IMPORTANT NOTICE:
In case the PR contains major flaws (e.g. the unit test fails, code is not compiling) I will reject the addition and not accept further requests. Unfortunately that happened quite often in the past and I don’t want to spend my limited time to test other developers untested PRs.
Another issue is that many don’t read this requirements and request addition of an altcoin without a PR.
I will ignore such requests in future.

I think that suits us perfectly well, doesn't it? Especially as we might tick the special feature fast path requirement box.

XCN: CJSECkHi7tTTTA1ze9qYRkkUCKfFiF8EEG
Pages: « 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!