Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2019, 04:52:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 »
  Print  
Author Topic: SatoshiPoker ♣ 20% rakeback ♣ 5% affiliate bonus ♣ Hourly Freerolls  (Read 70340 times)
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 01:46:47 AM
Last edit: March 12, 2014, 02:04:10 AM by Junko
 #1101

Please check freeroll tourney #8189811 and and check the IPs and see what occurred there please thanks.

Chip dumping/collusion/likely multi-accounting in progress. Not good for business.

noobium
stupidnoob
villian5
tabasco
scooter
1556081566
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556081566

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556081566
Reply with quote  #2

1556081566
Report to moderator
1556081566
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556081566

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556081566
Reply with quote  #2

1556081566
Report to moderator
1556081566
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556081566

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556081566
Reply with quote  #2

1556081566
Report to moderator
100% New Software
PC, Mac, Android, & HTML5 Clients
Krill Rakeback
Low Rake
Bitcoin Poker 3.0
Bad Beat Jackpot
SwC Poker Relaunch
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
mastakith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 02:13:55 AM
 #1102

Please check freeroll tourney #8189811 and and check the IPs and see what occurred there please thanks.

Chip dumping/collusion/likely multi-accounting in progress. Not good for business.

noobium
stupidnoob
villian5
tabasco
scooter


Also in this tourney 2 players called 1967YS1967 and Noodle are clearly colluding. Check their hand histories, folding monsters to each other, etc.

The table ID they were at is 8186296
bobolini
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 568
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 04:09:21 AM
 #1103

hey was with you for a while but had to go the colluders are so outta control would deff consider coming back.nice client
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:58:47 AM
Last edit: March 12, 2014, 07:49:43 AM by Junko
 #1104

Please check freeroll tourney #8189811 and and check the IPs and see what occurred there please thanks.

Chip dumping/collusion/likely multi-accounting in progress. Not good for business.

noobium
stupidnoob
villian5
tabasco
scooter


Also in this tourney 2 players called 1967YS1967 and Noodle are clearly colluding. Check their hand histories, folding monsters to each other, etc.

The table ID they were at is 8186296
I am Noodle and I can only speak for myself. I do admit to implicit collusion which is a lot different from actual collusion which was what was going on on the other table. When I saw what those clowns (or clown, if indeed they are all the same person) were doing, I told the only player left with me on my table in the table chat what was going on over there (chip dump/collusion) and to expect a big chip dump going to one player - on a hand that was lasting over 1 hour, by the way, because the fool or fools were calling/min-raising each other pre-flop on one hand which as I just mentioned, lasted over one hour and into the break  - and sure enough, four full stacks (five if you count his own) of chips minus 1 chip from each player involved all went to one player and all in that one hand -> noobium (who eventually bubbled out later, btw LOL) though his buddy(or his other account - they talk the same way in chat which the chat records will show), stupidnoob finished third.

Like I said, I was implicitly colluding in that I wasn't going to raise/call the only other player at my table's big blind because of what was happening on the other table. Never in chat nor anywhere else did I suggest we fold to each other's big blind. Call me crazy, but I don't think its fair to be playing heads up with blinds at 500-1000 while at the other table they were 9-handed and five of those slowplaying one hand for an hour with blinds at 10-20.

The hand histories/replay, IP addresses and chat logs will give the admins and security team all they need to know.

I've seen the powers that be perma-ban cheaters and multi-accounters in the past since the beginning and hope they do the right thing here.

I dont care about the bots. I love playing against bots, ez game. It's the colluders/chip dumpers/multi-accounters who try to give themselves an unfair advantage who f things up for everyone else. (even though I won this tournament despite them/him - again, lol).
mastakith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 06:58:50 PM
 #1105

Please check freeroll tourney #8189811 and and check the IPs and see what occurred there please thanks.

Chip dumping/collusion/likely multi-accounting in progress. Not good for business.

noobium
stupidnoob
villian5
tabasco
scooter


Also in this tourney 2 players called 1967YS1967 and Noodle are clearly colluding. Check their hand histories, folding monsters to each other, etc.

The table ID they were at is 8186296
I am Noodle and I can only speak for myself. I do admit to implicit collusion which is a lot different from actual collusion which was what was going on on the other table. When I saw what those clowns (or clown, if indeed they are all the same person) were doing, I told the only player left with me on my table in the table chat what was going on over there (chip dump/collusion) and to expect a big chip dump going to one player - on a hand that was lasting over 1 hour, by the way, because the fool or fools were calling/min-raising each other pre-flop on one hand which as I just mentioned, lasted over one hour and into the break  - and sure enough, four full stacks (five if you count his own) of chips minus 1 chip from each player involved all went to one player and all in that one hand -> noobium (who eventually bubbled out later, btw LOL) though his buddy(or his other account - they talk the same way in chat which the chat records will show), stupidnoob finished third.

Like I said, I was implicitly colluding in that I wasn't going to raise/call the only other player at my table's big blind because of what was happening on the other table. Never in chat nor anywhere else did I suggest we fold to each other's big blind. Call me crazy, but I don't think its fair to be playing heads up with blinds at 500-1000 while at the other table they were 9-handed and five of those slowplaying one hand for an hour with blinds at 10-20.

The hand histories/replay, IP addresses and chat logs will give the admins and security team all they need to know.

I've seen the powers that be perma-ban cheaters and multi-accounters in the past since the beginning and hope they do the right thing here.

I dont care about the bots. I love playing against bots, ez game. It's the colluders/chip dumpers/multi-accounters who try to give themselves an unfair advantage who f things up for everyone else. (even though I won this tournament despite them/him - again, lol).

Collusion is collusion, regardless of situation. Just because other people are doing something wrong doesn't give you the right to do something wrong as well.

And since you just admitted to it, you and the other player should be banned as well as these other guys (or 1 guy with a bunch of accounts).
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 10:49:34 PM
 #1106

Please check freeroll tourney #8189811 and and check the IPs and see what occurred there please thanks.

Chip dumping/collusion/likely multi-accounting in progress. Not good for business.

noobium
stupidnoob
villian5
tabasco
scooter


Also in this tourney 2 players called 1967YS1967 and Noodle are clearly colluding. Check their hand histories, folding monsters to each other, etc.

The table ID they were at is 8186296
I am Noodle and I can only speak for myself. I do admit to implicit collusion which is a lot different from actual collusion which was what was going on on the other table. When I saw what those clowns (or clown, if indeed they are all the same person) were doing, I told the only player left with me on my table in the table chat what was going on over there (chip dump/collusion) and to expect a big chip dump going to one player - on a hand that was lasting over 1 hour, by the way, because the fool or fools were calling/min-raising each other pre-flop on one hand which as I just mentioned, lasted over one hour and into the break  - and sure enough, four full stacks (five if you count his own) of chips minus 1 chip from each player involved all went to one player and all in that one hand -> noobium (who eventually bubbled out later, btw LOL) though his buddy(or his other account - they talk the same way in chat which the chat records will show), stupidnoob finished third.

Like I said, I was implicitly colluding in that I wasn't going to raise/call the only other player at my table's big blind because of what was happening on the other table. Never in chat nor anywhere else did I suggest we fold to each other's big blind. Call me crazy, but I don't think its fair to be playing heads up with blinds at 500-1000 while at the other table they were 9-handed and five of those slowplaying one hand for an hour with blinds at 10-20.

The hand histories/replay, IP addresses and chat logs will give the admins and security team all they need to know.

I've seen the powers that be perma-ban cheaters and multi-accounters in the past since the beginning and hope they do the right thing here.

I dont care about the bots. I love playing against bots, ez game. It's the colluders/chip dumpers/multi-accounters who try to give themselves an unfair advantage who f things up for everyone else. (even though I won this tournament despite them/him - again, lol).

Collusion is collusion, regardless of situation. Just because other people are doing something wrong doesn't give you the right to do something wrong as well.

And since you just admitted to it, you and the other player should be banned as well as these other guys (or 1 guy with a bunch of accounts).

If you don't know the difference between "implicit/implied" collusion and actual collusion in poker then there's really nothing to discuss. Look it it up is the only thing I can suggest. Anyway, I submitted my case and hopefully the admins will take a look at it and judge for themselves.
mastakith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2014, 11:17:24 PM
 #1107

I understand the difference, but it's cheating either way. Just because others cheated doesn't give you the right to do the same.

Btw, you can also add villain, villain2, villain3, villain4 in addition to villain5 to that list.

Seems like the site doesn't give a shit since these guys aren't even trying to make it non-obvious
NLNico
Legendary
*
hacker
Online Online

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1210


DiceSites.com owner


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2014, 11:25:03 PM
 #1108

If you are on the bubble and there is 1 shortstack left which goes all-in.. most players will check flop/turn/river to make sure the shortstack has the biggest chance to lose and you are ITM. This is implicit collusion. It is not cheating, you do not officially agree to collude against the guy, but it's an obvious strategy to get ITM.

I assume mastakith means something like that.

mastakith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 01:45:46 AM
 #1109

If you are on the bubble and there is 1 shortstack left which goes all-in.. most players will check flop/turn/river to make sure the shortstack has the biggest chance to lose and you are ITM. This is implicit collusion. It is not cheating, you do not officially agree to collude against the guy, but it's an obvious strategy to get ITM.

I assume mastakith means something like that.

Nah, these 2 guys folded over 100+ hands to each other without playing a single hand.

As far as I'm concerned they're just as guilty for collusion as the villain clones and the other guys.
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 02:03:25 AM
Last edit: March 13, 2014, 02:21:32 AM by Junko
 #1110

If you are on the bubble and there is 1 shortstack left which goes all-in.. most players will check flop/turn/river to make sure the shortstack has the biggest chance to lose and you are ITM. This is implicit collusion. It is not cheating, you do not officially agree to collude against the guy, but it's an obvious strategy to get ITM.

I assume mastakith means something like that.

That is just one example of implicit/implied collusion. what I and the other player on my table were doing is another example. Neither of which is cheating.

Not sure what you mean by "I assume mastakith means something like that." since he doesn't seem to understand the concept that implicit/implied collusion isn't cheating since he says its cheating.

Anyway, the guy(noobium/stoopidnoob/villian1-20 et al) is still at it -multiaccounting/chipdumping: tourney #8201895. At least he had the decency not to drag out the chip dump over an hour during one hand this time.

Along with this nugget from chat:


Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 02:20:15 AM
Last edit: March 13, 2014, 02:32:27 AM by Junko
 #1111

If you are on the bubble and there is 1 shortstack left which goes all-in.. most players will check flop/turn/river to make sure the shortstack has the biggest chance to lose and you are ITM. This is implicit collusion. It is not cheating, you do not officially agree to collude against the guy, but it's an obvious strategy to get ITM.

I assume mastakith means something like that.

Nah, these 2 guys folded over 100+ hands to each other without playing a single hand.

As far as I'm concerned they're just as guilty for collusion as the villain clones and the other guys.

You're high, dude. We both could of just as well have sat out while the cheating was going on on the other table until the tables finally got rebalanced. Same difference. As I stated before, When I realized what was going on on the other table, I decided not to raise/call the only other guy at my table's big blind and apparently he seemed fit to do the same because he too realized what was going on on the other table. Again, what was going on on the other table was a long, drawn out, multi-player/multi-account chip dump. One hand lasting over one hour because each of the accounts involved int the chip dump were min-raising calling each other and taking the full time to do so.

So everyone on the other table were playing honestly and getting knocked until there were two of us left. I was wondering wtf, why havent the tables been balanced yet. 2 on my table and 9 still on the other, so I looked and thats when I realized what was up. While our table was heads up and the blinds 500-1000 and 600-1200 whatever, the other table was still on level one, 9 players with the blinds 10-20.

So yeah, like I said, you high and give me some of that shit.

mastakith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 02:30:10 AM
 #1112

If you are on the bubble and there is 1 shortstack left which goes all-in.. most players will check flop/turn/river to make sure the shortstack has the biggest chance to lose and you are ITM. This is implicit collusion. It is not cheating, you do not officially agree to collude against the guy, but it's an obvious strategy to get ITM.

I assume mastakith means something like that.

Nah, these 2 guys folded over 100+ hands to each other without playing a single hand.

As far as I'm concerned they're just as guilty for collusion as the villain clones and the other guys.

You're high, dude. We both could of just as well have sat out while the cheating was going on on the other table until the tables finally got rebalanced. Same difference. As I stated before, When I realized what was going on on the other table, I decided not to raise/call the only other guy at my table's big blind and apparently he seemed fit to do the same because he too realized what was going on on the other table. Again, what was going on on the other table was a long, drawn out, multi-player/multi-account chip dump. One hand lasting over one hour because each of the accounts involved int the chip dump were min-raising calling each other and taking the full time to do so.

So everyone on the other table were playing honestly and getting knocked until there were two of us left. I was wondering wtf, why havent the tables been balanced yet. 2 on my table and 9 still on the other, so I looked and thats when I realized what was up. While our table was heads up and the blinds 500-1000 and 600-1200 whatever, the other table was still on level one, 9 players with the blinds 10-20.

So yeah, like I said, you high and give me some of that shit.

So 2 wrongs make a right here?

Just because other players are cheating doesn't give you the right to cheat as well.
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 02:32:39 AM
 #1113

#thinkImbeingtrolledlol
mastakith
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 09:52:06 PM
 #1114

#thinkImbeingtrolledlol

You seem to have this idea that it's OK to take matters into your own hands.

It's the site's job to deal with collusion. You can't just do whatever you want because YOU feel what you're doing is fair.
Junko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 13, 2014, 10:07:19 PM
 #1115

#thinkImbeingtrolledlol

You seem to have this idea that it's OK to take matters into your own hands.

It's the site's job to deal with collusion. You can't just do whatever you want because YOU feel what you're doing is fair.

Sure, whatever you say, buddy. thumbsup.gif
st1letto
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 05, 2014, 04:04:50 PM
 #1116

what happens to satoshi poker?
i won a tourney and tried to withdraw s500, but it just vanished...
any info would be welcome!
mem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Herp Derp PTY LTD


View Profile
April 06, 2014, 02:59:49 AM
 #1117

HERE IS ME SAYING I WILL TRY AND TEST YOUR SITE

hello, may I suggest that you have a trusted AV Vendor do a report on your clients exe, it will set most users mind to ease.
Also, if you do not already you should have hashes of the client download file so users can confirmed it has not been tampered with.

I love poker, will try and set up an account tonight, was on seals for the first time in 3 months last night Cheesy

HERE IS YOU BLATANTLY LYING

It's clear that mem has little integrity, and not much in the way of intelligence either.  He's a liar and a shill.  He's not competent enough, nor intectually honest enough, to serve as some kind of "watchdog".
I would say that goes a little too far, but yes, i am annoyed about mem consequently rejecting satoshi poker on the gambling list. I feel some sort of conflict of interest in his list, hence the reason why he refuses honest businesses and uses non-business related reasons to flame businesses on his list.

At this moment we are content not to be listed on it, as an unstable individual as him/her can do only more damage than good.



I have serious reservations about a site operator that after 1 week of waiting resorts to lying simply because he wasn't added to my list quick enough.
Im dealing with about 6 new casinos right now, 3 are being extremely decent about my lack of time and are working with me to get their site vetted and added.

Here we have you being a a nasty lying sook because you didnt get your way after making no effort besides a reply posted to my thread to get your site reviewed.

Hi op, I'll be reviewing your site soon.

Looks all legit after so long in operation, such a shame you had to lie and attempt to bully yourself to the front of the list.
Anyway, shithead operator != shitty service.
Seems your customer support is also good, in fact the only issue I ever took was the above (lies, threats etc to get reviewed first).

st1letto
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 06, 2014, 05:45:07 AM
 #1118

what are you talking about - the site operator went missing and the support ended 10+ days ago, heh!
they are in the wind, it looks like...
mem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 501


Herp Derp PTY LTD


View Profile
April 10, 2014, 03:11:44 AM
Last edit: April 11, 2014, 05:25:29 PM by mem
 #1119

what are you talking about - the site operator went missing and the support ended 10+ days ago, heh!
they are in the wind, it looks like...

are you shitting me Tongue

well blow me down, I was right all along.
Next time I have someone sending me threats via PM to jump the review process I'll make them wait +1 year.

edit: batman is sad: http://memslist.com/?action=site_status&url=satoshipoker.org

notserp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 12, 2014, 09:22:58 PM
 #1120

what are you talking about - the site operator went missing and the support ended 10+ days ago, heh!
they are in the wind, it looks like...

so this site is closed? did they run with btc?

i never played here besides the promo
Pages: « 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 [56] 57 58 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!