Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2024, 05:59:01 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED  (Read 162878 times)
Fugio
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 15


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 03:52:00 PM
 #2601

Holy hash swings. wtf?!!?@ Huh
gcanelson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 56


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 05:08:37 PM
 #2602

Holy hash swings. wtf?!!?@ Huh
Block!
 "solvedby": "1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc",
 "date": "[2018-09-05 16:56:40.967]",
 "hash": "00000000000000000001289fe92952030807097248b39004f3f72b0dfc434b94",
 "shares": 2747168107197,
 "diff": 40.8
\o/

The block, an obstacle in the path of the weak, became a stepping-stone in the path of the strong.
o_solo_miner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2488
Merit: 1487


-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 05:31:52 PM
 #2603

Holy hash swings. wtf?!!?@ Huh
Block!
 "solvedby": "1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc",
 "date": "[2018-09-05 16:56:40.967]",
 "hash": "00000000000000000001289fe92952030807097248b39004f3f72b0dfc434b94",
 "shares": 2747168107197,
 "diff": 40.8
\o/

Congratualtion Wetsuit for the Block!

 Grin Grin Grin


from the creator of CGMiner http://solo.ckpool.org for Solominers
paused: passthrough for solo.ckpool.org => stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4312
Merit: 8873


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 05, 2018, 06:24:20 PM
 #2604

Holy hash swings. wtf?!!?@ Huh
Block!
 "solvedby": "1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc",
 "date": "[2018-09-05 16:56:40.967]",
 "hash": "00000000000000000001289fe92952030807097248b39004f3f72b0dfc434b94",
 "shares": 2747168107197,
 "diff": 40.8
\o/

this makes the last 4 blocks very close to 400  or 100 each

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
gcanelson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 56


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 08:19:34 PM
 #2605

Holy hash swings. wtf?!!?@ Huh
Block!
 "solvedby": "1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc",
 "date": "[2018-09-05 16:56:40.967]",
 "hash": "00000000000000000001289fe92952030807097248b39004f3f72b0dfc434b94",
 "shares": 2747168107197,
 "diff": 40.8
\o/

this makes the last 4 blocks very close to 400  or 100 each
That sounds about average...!
 Roll Eyes

The block, an obstacle in the path of the weak, became a stepping-stone in the path of the strong.
evade_57
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 11


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 08:21:50 PM
 #2606

Hello Fellow Miners!

I have a technical question about miners and pools.

I have 10 miners- 2-T9's(11.5TH/s), 2-T9+'s(10.5TH/s) and 6-V9's(4TH/s), and on this site/pool, the only miners that seem to work correctly without H/W errors, a lot of "rejected" and :discarded" shares, and with in factory hash rates are the T9's. The T9+'s show R/T has as per factory hash rate, but only show 8.5-9.3TH/s hash rate on this site. The V9's get a lot of H/W errors as well as "rejected" and "discarded" shares, but, I get an accurate hash rate.
The V9's are fairly new and run at stock 600MHz, and I do not get ANY H/W errors on a few different pools( I won't mention names ).
The T9+'s are fairly new as well,and I do get some H/W errors, but not like the V9's.
The T9's I bought used, and seem to be the only one's that "agree" with this site.
All miners have the latest firmware, and are cleaned on a regular basis, so I don't think heat would be an issue. All miners use the same make/model of P/S, so I don't thing that is an issue.
So I guess my question would be: What is the issue with all the H/W errors only on this pool? And only on the V9's? ( Yes, they are Bitmain, so possibly I got some "defective" miners?)
Why do the T9+'s not show the correct hash rate?

So, if any one could shed a little light on my "technicial" issues, it would be greatly appreciated.
 

I've been mining about a year, and have been thru a lot of pools, and came across this one, and it seems like a pretty neat site. I've been following the banter between users and see how everyone seems to care about pretty much the same things. Not many pools seem to share the same views/values as the users here at CKPool.

To CK: Great work on the mining software(or any other software) you developed and maintain. You should get some recognition from whom ever uses your core software, period!

Excellent pool as well!




 

I have two V9's myself and killed one off during the recent heat wave
Same experience as yourself with other pools but I'm sure it's due to the build quality of these low cost Bitmain S7 wannabe's
I've found for CK's pools, 400Mhz produces no hardware errors and only 10 ~ 20% rejects
My original Gekkoscience gear runs "way" better, no issues
Put the V9's on CK's Solo pool, better served there at the lower frequency
Low cost but low quality, only my opinion
EncoreMining
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 4


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 09:30:42 PM
 #2607

On a roll. Nice block.
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 05, 2018, 09:35:22 PM
 #2608

Code:
[2018-09-05 16:56:40.792] Possible block solve diff 242921463739813.062500 !
[2018-09-05 16:56:40.955] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 16:56:41.292] Solved block 540068 by 1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc.testing
[2018-09-05 16:56:41.292] User 1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc:{"hashrate1m": "5.15P", "hashrate5m": "5.12P", "hashrate1hr": "5.11P", "hashrate1d": "5.09P", "hashrate7d": "4.96P"}
[2018-09-05 16:56:41.292] Worker 1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc.testing:{"hashrate1m": "4.49P", "hashrate5m": "4.47P", "hashrate1hr": "4.46P", "hashrate1d": "4.45P", "hashrate7d": "4.31P"}
[2018-09-05 16:57:45.632] Hash for block height 540068 confirms block was CONFIRMED
[2018-09-05 21:19:55.635] Possible block solve diff 16830028369359.824219 !
[2018-09-05 21:19:55.763] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 21:19:56.382] Solved block 540093 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-09-05 21:19:56.382] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "25.9P", "hashrate5m": "25.6P", "hashrate1hr": "24P", "hashrate1d": "30.9P", "hashrate7d": "26.4P"}
[2018-09-05 21:19:56.382] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "25.6P", "hashrate5m": "25.3P", "hashrate1hr": "23.7P", "hashrate1d": "30.6P", "hashrate7d": "26.2P"}
[2018-09-05 21:33:01.569] Hash for block height 540093 confirms block was CONFIRMED

https://btc.com/block/540068
https://btc.com/block/540093

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
gcanelson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 56


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 09:38:18 PM
Merited by frodocooper (1)
 #2609

Block AGAIN !!!
 "solvedby": "36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V",
 "date": "[2018-09-05 21:19:55.779]",
 "hash": "00000000000000000010b96ca716348276dcb31574d8589c8fdc8d0a513e66b6",
 "shares": 350294734308,
 "diff": 5.2

THAT my friends is Better than Average!

The block, an obstacle in the path of the weak, became a stepping-stone in the path of the strong.
Fugio
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 15


View Profile
September 05, 2018, 09:40:36 PM
Merited by frodocooper (1)
 #2610

Code:
[2018-09-05 16:56:40.792] Possible block solve diff 242921463739813.062500 !
[2018-09-05 16:56:40.955] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 16:56:41.292] Solved block 540068 by 1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc.testing
[2018-09-05 16:56:41.292] User 1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc:{"hashrate1m": "5.15P", "hashrate5m": "5.12P", "hashrate1hr": "5.11P", "hashrate1d": "5.09P", "hashrate7d": "4.96P"}
[2018-09-05 16:56:41.292] Worker 1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc.testing:{"hashrate1m": "4.49P", "hashrate5m": "4.47P", "hashrate1hr": "4.46P", "hashrate1d": "4.45P", "hashrate7d": "4.31P"}
[2018-09-05 16:57:45.632] Hash for block height 540068 confirms block was CONFIRMED
[2018-09-05 21:19:55.635] Possible block solve diff 16830028369359.824219 !
[2018-09-05 21:19:55.763] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 21:19:56.382] Solved block 540093 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-09-05 21:19:56.382] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "25.9P", "hashrate5m": "25.6P", "hashrate1hr": "24P", "hashrate1d": "30.9P", "hashrate7d": "26.4P"}
[2018-09-05 21:19:56.382] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "25.6P", "hashrate5m": "25.3P", "hashrate1hr": "23.7P", "hashrate1d": "30.6P", "hashrate7d": "26.2P"}
[2018-09-05 21:33:01.569] Hash for block height 540093 confirms block was CONFIRMED

https://btc.com/block/540068
https://btc.com/block/540093
and with that last block at 5.2 difficulty, ladies and gentlemen our pool average is now 99.87! That minus the pool fee of 0% puts us in a pretty great and lucky pool  Cool

Philopolymath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 558
Merit: 295

Walter Russell's Cosmogony is RIGHT!


View Profile
September 06, 2018, 12:38:10 AM
 #2611

WOW..

Support Alien Beer Circle research...www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRXDk2RMQ4A
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2018, 12:40:06 AM
 #2612

WOW..
Code:
[2018-09-05 23:56:07.474] Possible block solve diff 8090605567910.196289 !
[2018-09-05 23:56:07.661] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] Solved block 540112 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "22.4P", "hashrate5m": "21.3P", "hashrate1hr": "24.5P", "hashrate1d": "30.3P", "hashrate7d": "26.4P"}
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "22.1P", "hashrate5m": "21P", "hashrate1hr": "24.2P", "hashrate1d": "30P", "hashrate7d": "26.1P"}
[2018-09-06 00:06:43.478] Hash for block height 540112 confirms block was CONFIRMED

"diff": 3.1

https://btc.com/block/540112

That is now officially our luckiest 24 hours by far, just as I have to stop mining myself since the weather is warming up, and stop getting any rewards myself soon...
Based on our block find rate, btc.com estimates our hashrate at 600PH lol.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
minerbobbert
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 177
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 06, 2018, 01:30:45 AM
 #2613

Can someone clarify the ramp up/ramp down again for me? I'm a small miner and have less than 100 gh at the moment. I've been mining here for months and managed to earn $1.06 as of a few days ago (not sure my herp/derp numbers as this was from the computergenie site.

Anyway, I get a problem with my miner and had to take it offline for 48 hours before I could start it again... Only to see my prior work is essentially erased and now I'm sitting at $0.05 in pending payouts.

So my question is if it is even worth my time mining here. I can't guarantee my miners won't have downtime in the months to years it will take to get in the payout pool, and if my prior work gets superceded by the guys with the real hashrates in only a few hours I will never earn a payout.

I don't expect to turn a profit mining, I do it to support the network but if I'll never even get a miniscule payout I might as well join the solo pool and give up here.

Update in case anyone else new cares:

So it took me a while but I finally figured out why my work "disappeared" - I got paid!  I have it set to an old address I don't use and checked it only to see I've gotten more than one.  

Basically, I had assumed they my hashrate was so low that I'd be months between payouts, but I actually got in the queue with nothing more than a pod miner.  All my prior confusion was simply because my first payout coincided with that random down time.

Makes me wonder if a "total btc paid" line to the miner stats would be helpful.

Anyway, FYI
Fugio
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50
Merit: 15


View Profile
September 06, 2018, 01:54:37 AM
Merited by frodocooper (1)
 #2614

WOW..
Code:
[2018-09-05 23:56:07.474] Possible block solve diff 8090605567910.196289 !
[2018-09-05 23:56:07.661] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] Solved block 540112 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "22.4P", "hashrate5m": "21.3P", "hashrate1hr": "24.5P", "hashrate1d": "30.3P", "hashrate7d": "26.4P"}
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "22.1P", "hashrate5m": "21P", "hashrate1hr": "24.2P", "hashrate1d": "30P", "hashrate7d": "26.1P"}
[2018-09-06 00:06:43.478] Hash for block height 540112 confirms block was CONFIRMED

"diff": 3.1

https://btc.com/block/540112

That is now officially our luckiest 24 hours by far, just as I have to stop mining myself since the weather is warming up, and stop getting any rewards myself soon...
Based on our block find rate, btc.com estimates our hashrate at 600PH lol.

Pool average 98.47
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4312
Merit: 8873


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2018, 02:00:53 AM
 #2615

WOW..
Code:
[2018-09-05 23:56:07.474] Possible block solve diff 8090605567910.196289 !
[2018-09-05 23:56:07.661] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] Solved block 540112 by 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] User 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V:{"hashrate1m": "22.4P", "hashrate5m": "21.3P", "hashrate1hr": "24.5P", "hashrate1d": "30.3P", "hashrate7d": "26.4P"}
[2018-09-05 23:56:08.364] Worker 36JMs8rogpizjkkp6eeKMmm3SLbSNo5H9V.0:{"hashrate1m": "22.1P", "hashrate5m": "21P", "hashrate1hr": "24.2P", "hashrate1d": "30P", "hashrate7d": "26.1P"}
[2018-09-06 00:06:43.478] Hash for block height 540112 confirms block was CONFIRMED

"diff": 3.1

https://btc.com/block/540112

That is now officially our luckiest 24 hours by far, just as I have to stop mining myself since the weather is warming up, and stop getting any rewards myself soon...
Based on our block find rate, btc.com estimates our hashrate at 600PH lol.

Pool average 98.47


Finally!

What is also nice is I did two small rentals.

You need to hit five blocks for a rental to be worth it. Due to 5n rule.

So far these rentals made 13 blocks about 0.013 in coin for 0.01 in rentals

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
MrMaxwell
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 2


View Profile
September 06, 2018, 02:15:50 AM
 #2616

Nice run boys!  Grin
gcanelson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 56


View Profile
September 06, 2018, 03:43:26 AM
 #2617

Update in case anyone else new cares:

So it took me a while but I finally figured out why my work "disappeared" - I got paid!  I have it set to an old address I don't use and checked it only to see I've gotten more than one.  

Basically, I had assumed they my hashrate was so low that I'd be months between payouts, but I actually got in the queue with nothing more than a pod miner.  All my prior confusion was simply because my first payout coincided with that random down time.

Makes me wonder if a "total btc paid" line to the miner stats would be helpful.

Anyway, FYI
Minerbobbert:
I'm only a Junior here but I've been hashing and reading Forums for quite some time now... and like you, I read everything I could lay my eyes on when I first started. It was only recently that I got enough knowledge (hopefully) and courage to contribute to this Forum... I remember that early on (I think it was one of the GS threads) that you and (was it?) your son had so much trouble getting the software to run the hardware... might even have been a Raspberry Pi controller(?) - that seems so long ago now...Anyways, I've been here at this pool since Feb/Mar - back in the days when the tab read [7PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE...

A few pages back, -ck explained that small miners were at about 11 block solves per payout. I think my payouts at that time had been at 11 or 12 solves. So I figured he was talking about me. Then came a 7 then a 5... You get the idea. When I first started here, I think I guessed or calculated that my first payout in would be in October... obviously the pool has been growing... and you always have the freedom of choice. Mine here - small payments. Mine solo, but only as a lottery. Or mine both if you can.

I don't think you and I are likely to get rich on ANY pool with our 2-PACs and Pods and their hash rates, but I've been mining here long enough to know that you will be welcome and from my calculations anyways, I make more BTC here than any other pool that I've tried. I've even tried mining sh*tcoins->BTC and am honest enough to admit that I did it - but it was always less BTC in the end. So now that you've `discovered' your payments, I'd imagine your already pretty clear on how the pool works, so I'm just checking in to say `hey'... and if your not clear on something, ask away... there are good people here. Know that you're in a good place.

The block, an obstacle in the path of the weak, became a stepping-stone in the path of the strong.
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2018, 06:49:37 PM
 #2618

That is now officially our luckiest 24 hours by far, just as I have to stop mining myself since the weather is warming up, and stop getting any rewards myself soon...

Code:
[2018-09-06 18:32:03.358] Possible block solve diff 30017888435090.492188 !
[2018-09-06 18:32:03.548] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2018-09-06 18:32:04.046] Solved block 540231 by 1LKB9eyRsCktjtZ1wjsHERNipieT3nDTA1
[2018-09-06 18:32:04.046] User 1LKB9eyRsCktjtZ1wjsHERNipieT3nDTA1:{"hashrate1m": "195T", "hashrate5m": "185T", "hashrate1hr": "179T", "hashrate1d": "173T", "hashrate7d": "166T"}
[2018-09-06 18:32:04.046] Worker 1LKB9eyRsCktjtZ1wjsHERNipieT3nDTA1:{"hashrate1m": "195T", "hashrate5m": "185T", "hashrate1hr": "179T", "hashrate1d": "173T", "hashrate7d": "166T"}
[2018-09-06 18:49:24.788] Hash for block height 540231 confirms block was CONFIRMED

"diff": 21.3
Small miner!

https://btc.com/block/540231



Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
minefarmbuy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 221


We are not retail.


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2018, 02:35:30 AM
 #2619

I should travel more if this is the case. Wink

Premier asic sourcing minefarmbuy.com #mineon
Twitter:@minefarmbuy -LN Tips-
Email: info@minefarmbuy.com PGP:1A1C A4D4 CE04 F57E 1C0C 5240 592A 09BF CCB4 F0C3
-ck (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4298
Merit: 1645


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2018, 03:11:06 AM
 #2620

I should travel more if this is the case. Wink
So long.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Pages: « 1 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 [131] 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!