popcorn1
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
 |
June 20, 2017, 11:03:31 PM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one..  But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible.  A theory is not FACT   And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:10:32 PM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:18:02 PM |
|
Yep. It is a fact that those links exist as of this writing. However, the info in them is incomplete. The "wiki" link even shows that there is a lot of non-clarity one way or another. But, you have offered no explanation of the way that your links are on-topic. Here is what is wrong with thinking about finding incorrect things in the Bible. There are some gigantic things that are very correct in the Bible. The Biggest being God. Many of the things that God shows us in the Bible are clear and readily understandable. But the attitude should be one of accepting that the Bible is right, simply because it is God's Book. From there we can go on to finding why our weakness shows us some things that seem to be wrong at first glance, and finding out what the correct understanding of them is. |
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:31:44 PM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. Gravity is fact/scientific law. BUT IT'S NOT..It's a THEORY .. I am sorry to mess your god theory up because you always mention Isaac newton as proof of your god BUT gravity is just a THEORY until proven to be absolute fact.. With quantum mechanics many things might need to be changed.. Still early but just a THEORY ..So not fact.. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:33:23 PM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. Gravity is fact/scientific law. BUT IT'S NOT..It's a THEORY .. I am sorry to mess your god theory up because you always mention Isaac newton as proof of your god BUT gravity is just a THEORY until proven to be absolute fact.. With quantum mechanics many things might need to be changed.. Still early but just a THEORY ..So not fact.. Let me repeat for you. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. |
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:37:30 PM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. Gravity is fact/scientific law. BUT IT'S NOT..It's a THEORY .. I am sorry to mess your god theory up because you always mention Isaac newton as proof of your god BUT gravity is just a THEORY until proven to be absolute fact.. With quantum mechanics many things might need to be changed.. Still early but just a THEORY ..So not fact.. Let me repeat for you. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. The real fact is how wrong and useless the bible is: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Biblical_scientific_errorshttp://www.news24.com/MyNews24/The-Problem-of-the-Bible-Inaccuracies-contradictions-fallacies-scientific-issues-and-more-20120517http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/science/long.htmlThe real fact also is that science works, religion, supernatural and other beliefs don't. |
|
|
|
CoinCube
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1055
|
|
June 20, 2017, 11:58:54 PM |
|
Whence, Whither, Who?http://www.scifiwright.com/2017/06/whence-whither-who/#more-18616
A reader asks: I wish someone could explain to me the antipathy towards Evolution that is so common in religious circles, mostly among Evangelicals, but also some Catholics.
There are only three questions that no man escapes answering. For most people, the answer is shown rather than spoken, demonstrated in the way he lives his life. For most people, the answer is implicit rather than expressed.
The questions are whence, whither, and who?
From where do you come? Where are you going? Who are you?
I submit that the antipathy is not directed at the Darwinian model as it applies to biology. It is directed at the Secular Progressivism cult which claims (falsely) that Darwinism provides answers to these questions.
No one is livid over the idea that raccoons and bears may have had a common ancestors, or that the remote ancestors of whales may have been land mammals. The theory may be true or false as applied to biology, and there are philosophical difficulties with a theory that cannot be falsified, but that is not what causes the antipathy.
Nor is the antipathy necessary. The account of the origin of Man in Genesis disagrees with Darwin if and only if you makes assumptions not found in the wording either of Genesis nor in Darwin’s writings.
Genesis say man comes from dust by the will of the Creator. Darwin says man come from apes, who come from simper organisms, who come from simpler yet. Darwin says nothing about how life arose in the first place.
So if man arose from apes who arose from simpler organisms, who arose from dust by the will of the Creator, both are correct. One account says who created man. The other speculates as to a mechanism regarding how it was done.
Neither one contradicts the other. Neither one enforces the other.
Nor does Darwin say anything one way or the other as to the ultimate final cause of evolution. That is a question outside the realm of science. While it is true that most secular progressives and many religious folk read Darwin to say that evolution is blind and purposeless, his writings do not support this conclusion. Darwin is writing an empirical theory. Talk of blindness and purposefulness is a teleological matter, that is, a metaphysical assumption.
If you find a pack of cards and all the cards are in order by number and suit, empiricism only tells you the arrangements of the cards. It does not tell you whether a hand deliberately put those cards in sequence, or random shuffles by happenstance arranged the sequence.
(It is a very remote happenstance indeed, but not technically impossible. In a multiverse of infinite parallel timelines, we happen to be occupying the one where random chance laid out the deck in perfect numerical order. If you find this kind of reasoning palatable — I confess I do not.)
Be that as it may, the question of whether something was done on purpose is a question of final causes, that is, a metaphysical question. The cards are in the same order either way.
So what causes the antipathy?
It is not an argument over the origin of species, nor even an argument over the origin of man. It is an argument over whether or not life is worth living, thought worth thinking, man worth being man.
Or, in other words, whence, whither, and who?
The Christian answers these question by saying Man is the creation of an omnipotent and omniscient father; due to our rebellion, we are headed for hell, but due to the creator’s incomprehensible benevolence, we have hope of paradise; we are the beloved children of God, the most wretched of animals, and the crown and glory of creation, set here on Earth to learn to love, serve, and glorify the Lord. Human nature is built to find lasting joy in no other service. We were made for love.
Whether true or not, whether flattering to human pride or not, these answers are certainly dramatic. Every tiny act of love or sin has eternal consequences. No aspect of human existence, no matter how tiny, lacks a deeper, spiritual meaning. No one’s life is meaningless.
Indeed, by the Christian answer of who we are, the universe itself is less meaningful than the smallest human life history forgets, because that soul will outlast the universe by an infinite proportion.
Darwin himself, if you read ORIGIN OF SPECIES, makes no pretense of answering any such question. That book does not address these issues.
However, Hegel, Nietzsche, Marx, and an countless number of our modern version of Gnostics, the Secular Progressives, place a strained and unjustified interpretation Darwinism, and from it deduce philosophical, moral and political conclusions.
What Darwin does not say is that simpler, more primitive, and worse things always turn, by means of their own innate power, directed by the directionless outcome of endless conflict, into better and more complex things.
Hegel is the one who said the clash of opposite philosophical ideas leads to an ever increasing approach to the absolute truth.
Nietzsche is the one who said the superman, the next stage of human evolution, would overthrow Christian moral thought and erect an amoral suprehuman to whom categories of good and evil no longer applied.
Marx is the one who said that the clash of class conflict between economic roles (he conflated the two) would produce ever more efficient economic systems, culminating in socialism.
Darwin never said any of this nonsense.
It is nonsense because it is self refuting: if Hegel is true, anti-Hegelianism is also true, and a new truth will leap out of a synthesis of Hegelianism and Anti-Hegelianism, ergo Hegel by his own terms is not true; if Nietzsche is good, the progress from man to superman is not a good thing, nor evil, but pointless ergo Nietzsche by his own terms is pointless, that is, not good; and if the political theory of Marx is correct, political evolution is controlled by nonhuman factors of history beyond human control, ergo theorizing about it is in vain, ergo by his own terms, Marx is not correct.
Darwin never even said natural selection is a noticeable factor, or a factor at all, among intelligent toolusers. There is certainly no obvious reason why it should be: instead of growing hair, the Eskimos hunt and trap seals for fur. Instead of letting the bookish people with poor eyesight dies out before mating, the European invents eyeglasses.
If natural selection were a noticeable factor among human reproduction, the Catholics, who forbid contraception, divorce, abortion, sodomy, feminism, and fornication (all of which hinder fertility and childrearing), should significantly outbreed other sects, and pass along the “religious objection to contraception” gene, assuming there is such a gene.
But even if natural selection were a noticeable factor among human reproduction, there is no reason to assume that the secular progressive notion that the past is always worse and the future always better would hold true.
Why Mother Nature would select for intelligence or artistic talent or beauty or any other quality we humans find desirable in mates is unanswered: the robust and fertile Morlocks or the docile and fecund Eloi are just as likely to be the inheritors of the human legacy, going simply by Darwinian natural selection, than the godlike superman of Nietzsche or DC comics.
So, Darwin himself is silent on the matter. Darwinism, however, the misreading provided by Hegel, Nietzsche, Marx and Progressivism does answer the questions, and has, with remarkable success, won the war of ideas and forced all other answers into silence.
According to Progressivism, we come in the long run from the unintentional by product of mindless chemical and atomic forces operating inside the mechanism of an animate but dead and mindless and indifferent universe. Blind chance blew us into being by mere happenstance, and not for any reason, nor to serve any purpose.
We come in the short run from beastlike ancestors, and through the heroic operation of genetic and social evolution, passed from cannibal savagery, to hunter-gatherer bands, to nomadic herdsmen, to farmers, to city-dwellers, domesticating the dog and horse, and learning the arts and sciences along the way.
We passed from primitive animism through polytheism, encountered a centuries long fever of monotheism, from which we have happily broken free, allowing us to create rigorous science, which in turn gives us the philosophical, moral and political doctrines of Hegelianism, Nietzscheanism, Marxism.
According to Progressivism, in the short run, the future holds a Green Energy world of solar powered rocketships to the moon, eugenics to wipe out all Jews, Catholics, and lesser races, diversity in all things but ideas, endless abortions to make sure there will be fewer persons to burden the planet, and those few will share all property in common. The laws of economic will vanish softly and suddenly away like the Boojam, and, without specialization of labor, there will suddenly and for no imaginable reason be no more original sin. An infinitely powerful Big Brother style government will bring us all into a walled garden of total thought conformity, and wipe all tears from our eyes, and there will be no pain, war, or sorrow in Utopia.
According to Progressivism, in the long run, we are heading for entropy and the heat death of the universe, the death of all we know, love and cherish, and nothing and no one will mourn, or even note, our passing. The atoms of which we are currently composed will enter other combinations as the winds of blind chance blow, and then also will decay.
According to Progressivism, you are nothing, your life is meaningless, there are no laws of morality, no truths for the mind to discover, nothing worth doing except that your willpower makes you will to do it. You are a meat robot.
Again, all these answers are nonsense, and refute themselves. Even a schoolboy can see the error in the statement, “the truth is that there is no truth.” If the Progressive account of the past is correct, then all of the contents of our brains, including the Progressive account of the past, is a mechanical by product of atomic and chemical forces, or of historical accident. If the Progressive account of the future is correct, then all human activity is vain, including the making of accounts of the future, Progressive or otherwise.
The Christian answer and the Progressive answer are diametrically at odds with each other in terms of the Three Questions. Darwin himself does not give the Progressive answer to the riddle of Human life, but the Progressive answer falls to nothing if Darwinism hence Hegel, Nietzsche and Marx fall to nothing.
Under the Darwinian answer to the Three Questions, you may live for physical pleasures until those pleasures pall.
After pleasure-chasing fails, the sad reality sinks in that nothing is worth doing because nothing has meaning. Even love, superlative love, has no meaning if there is no spiritual component to it, for them it is just a by product of chemicals in the brain affixing emotional responses to arbitrary objects.
Trying to reproduce or improve the species via polygamy and eugenics and genocide of inferiors might seem a fun goal, but, ultimately, it too is vain, and will go the way of the dinosaurs. Saving the environment is pointless. It is destined to go the way of the Archean Eon atmosphere.
Whether true or not, whether flattering to human pride or not, these answers are certainly undramatic to an ultimate degree. Every act of love or sin, howsoever gigantic, has no lasting consequences. Every aspect of human existence, no matter how tiny, lacks any meaning of any kind, deep or shallow. No one’s life is meaningful.
Which means the answers to the questions are not meaningful either.
Please read and support my work on Patreon!
About John C Wright
John C. Wright is a practicing philosopher, a retired attorney, newspaperman, and newspaper editor, and a published author of science fiction. Once a Houyhnhnm, he was expelled from the august ranks of purely rational beings when he fell in love; but retains an honorary title.
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 21, 2017, 12:19:28 AM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. Gravity is fact/scientific law. BUT IT'S NOT..It's a THEORY .. I am sorry to mess your god theory up because you always mention Isaac newton as proof of your god BUT gravity is just a THEORY until proven to be absolute fact.. With quantum mechanics many things might need to be changed.. Still early but just a THEORY ..So not fact.. Let me repeat for you. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. Like this you mean..  Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = fact.. Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. Evolution i have a theory very possible theory .. An alien race made this earth and planted us to evolve .. Found a star spun a rock and planted living things so it could evolve .. Or aliens find a planet and seeded it with life and here we are today.. Or this is all a dream .. Or this is a computer game like the SIMS .. Or we live on a MASSIVE EYE BALL and it could be your god. deep i know just smoked some lovely weed.. Or what about time is 1 hour 1 hour it could be 50 years Or 50 years could be 1 second.. And with SCIENCE not GOD we will try to understand life because it helps us live on FOREVER with a bit of LUCK.. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 21, 2017, 01:23:19 AM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. Gravity is fact/scientific law. BUT IT'S NOT..It's a THEORY .. I am sorry to mess your god theory up because you always mention Isaac newton as proof of your god BUT gravity is just a THEORY until proven to be absolute fact.. With quantum mechanics many things might need to be changed.. Still early but just a THEORY ..So not fact.. Let me repeat for you. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. Like this you mean.. Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = fact.. Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. Evolution i have a theory very possible theory .. An alien race made this earth and planted us to evolve .. Found a star spun a rock and planted living things so it could evolve .. Or aliens find a planet and seeded it with life and here we are today.. Or this is all a dream .. Or this is a computer game like the SIMS .. Or we live on a MASSIVE EYE BALL and it could be your god. deep i know just smoked some lovely weed.. Or what about time is 1 hour 1 hour it could be 50 years Or 50 years could be 1 second.. And with SCIENCE not GOD we will try to understand life because it helps us live on FOREVER with a bit of LUCK.. There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, that cannot be applied to something else, like cause and effect. But gravity is all around us and used everyday by everyone. Cause and effect nullifies evolution, but it supports gravity. However, I respect that you have formed you own non-scientific religion, and that you express what you think you believe. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 21, 2017, 01:27:44 AM |
|
The real fact is that God upholds science, and science proves God. Science works, but mankind only understand the tiniest fraction of science. Science disproves evolution and evolution theory. |
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 21, 2017, 01:43:17 AM |
|
Science:
1. Hypothesis - a reasonable guess about something that you have observed or that you know. Must be testable.
2. Theory - one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual. A single failed test immediately removes the theory from being called a "theory".
3. Law - description of a repeatedly observed phenomenon, NOT why and NOT what causes it. Usually expressed in the simplest mathematical terms possible. Laws do not turn into theories, and vice versa.
Note theories in the scientific sense, not the everyday-language sense, are the highest form of certainty in science.
Also note there is the Law of Gravity (thanks Newton) and the Theory of Gravity (thanks Einstein).
. A scientific theory by this definition is considered by scientists to be true and factual.. Who ever is a scientist if you say a theory is true and fact your not a SCIENTIST.. And no your not one.. But, gravity itself is observed and used both by scientists and non-scientists all over the world, continually, all the time. The theory of gravity only tries to explain how and why gravity exists. In other words, gravity is fact while gravity theory is not yet known to be fact. At the same time, nobody knows if he is living in evolution. All the things that are suggested to be evolution can be attributed to things other than evolution. Along with this, evolution theory is not known to be the way that all this unknown evolution might work. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. There is no comparison. Evolution is completely unknown. When you Google things like "evolution fallacies," you can plainly see that there is easily enough question about evolution to show that it is at best, unknown. However, some of the hits show why evolution is impossible. A theory is not FACT And gravity is not an absolute fact it still really is a THEORY .. When something becomes fact then you know it to be TRUE.. Gravity is still not real FACT.. Gravity is fact. It is the name we give the force that causes things to fall. We don't know why it works, but it is fact so strongly that it is called a scientific law. When you go outside at night, and try to jump to the moon, you can't do it. Why? Gravity stops you. Gravity is all over the place. It is factual. We don't know why it works, THEORY not fact.. How do you know we wont call it something else as time goes on .. Might not be called gravity anymore .. Like someones theory on gravity is all wrong and they need to change the word to well your guess is as good as mine because Gravity is still a THEORY .. Why go to all that trouble... waiting for time to go by so that you can change the word. Just go to a different language, and the word is different right now. However, even though the word is different, the force of gravity has not changed. Gravity is fact/scientific law. Using the word "gravity" is not. Gravity is fact/scientific law. BUT IT'S NOT..It's a THEORY .. I am sorry to mess your god theory up because you always mention Isaac newton as proof of your god BUT gravity is just a THEORY until proven to be absolute fact.. With quantum mechanics many things might need to be changed.. Still early but just a THEORY ..So not fact.. Let me repeat for you. What you get is: Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = unknown to be factual; Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. Like this you mean.. Gravity = fact; Gravity theory = unknown to be factual; Evolution = fact.. Evolution theory = unknown to be factual. Evolution i have a theory very possible theory .. An alien race made this earth and planted us to evolve .. Found a star spun a rock and planted living things so it could evolve .. Or aliens find a planet and seeded it with life and here we are today.. Or this is all a dream .. Or this is a computer game like the SIMS .. Or we live on a MASSIVE EYE BALL and it could be your god. deep i know just smoked some lovely weed.. Or what about time is 1 hour 1 hour it could be 50 years Or 50 years could be 1 second.. And with SCIENCE not GOD we will try to understand life because it helps us live on FOREVER with a bit of LUCK.. There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, that cannot be applied to something else, like cause and effect. But gravity is all around us and used everyday by everyone. Cause and effect nullifies evolution, but it supports gravity. However, I respect that you have formed you own non-scientific religion, and that you express what you think you believe. There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, ON YOUR FACE .. A simple SPOT evolves where who knows but you know a spot can evolve somewhere on your face.. Evolution means evolve or evolved .. Also are you saying this youtube video is a lie?.. Evolution in Action: Ring Species - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjcFSy1KCTI17 Sep 2007 - Uploaded by phoenixshade3 This video presents to the layman an example of evolution as an ongoing process: The Ensatina salamanders Evolution in Action - California Salamanders - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDIQFQOCGaI29 May 2012 - Uploaded by Science For the Win David Wake, a renowned evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, as he explains why . Proof of evolution that you can find on your body - YouTube Video for can we see evolution▶ 3:55 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFxu7NEoKC817 Mar 2016 - Uploaded by Vox Proof of evolution that you can find on your body. Vox ... to find signs of our evolutionary history — you can . YOUR BIBLE BLINDS YOU |
|
|
|
|
|
bkbirge
|
|
June 21, 2017, 02:07:13 AM |
|
Several of you have not read or understood the definitions of scientific theory and scientific law.
You are arguing over definitions of words you do not understand or just outright reject because they don't fit your preconceptions.
A scientific theory is NOT the same as your idea of a theory just being an unknown. Read it again and concentrate on the meaning because you have totally missed it.
There is a gravity law that is the observation of gravity, reduced to mathematics. There is the gravity theory that explains why we observe what is described by the gravity law. This meaning of "theory" is the basis of all science and is tested over and over and over again.
A scientific theory is only a scientific theory by virtue of the tests being so complete that no one can prove holes in it, that is as close to fact as you can get on any topic. All the other religious justification, appealing to unverifiable sources and texts stuff is magical thinking and has zero basis in rooting out facts.
The reality is that the scientific theory of evolution has been proven to hold up under the assault of thousands of experiments attacking its model. It is real. It is factual. If you can prove, via independently testable experiments that it is not true then you will be considered one of the greatest scientists that ever lived.
Creationism on the other hand can not stand up to any sort of testing and in many cases can not even be tested, it is by definition NOT science. Arguing as if it is science, on an equal footing to be discussed along with other scientific study is a damned lie.
You are all entitled to your own opinions of course but you are not entitled to your own facts and when you argue using scientific language but ignoring the accepted meanings of that language you aren't even trying to communicate, you are just shouting into the void to avoid looking at reality.
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 21, 2017, 02:23:43 AM |
|
There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, ON YOUR FACE .. A simple SPOT evolves where who knows but you know a spot can evolve somewhere on your face.. Evolution means evolve or evolved .. Also are you saying this youtube video is a lie?.. Evolution in Action: Ring Species - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjcFSy1KCTI17 Sep 2007 - Uploaded by phoenixshade3 This video presents to the layman an example of evolution as an ongoing process: The Ensatina salamanders Evolution in Action - California Salamanders - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDIQFQOCGaI29 May 2012 - Uploaded by Science For the Win David Wake, a renowned evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, as he explains why . Proof of evolution that you can find on your body - YouTube Video for can we see evolution▶ 3:55 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFxu7NEoKC817 Mar 2016 - Uploaded by Vox Proof of evolution that you can find on your body. Vox ... to find signs of our evolutionary history — you can . YOUR BIBLE BLINDS YOU There can be many meanings for a word. Here is what I mean when I say evolution. Evolution in the sense of inanimate material becoming life without some other life causing it to do so, there is no evolution. Evolution in the sense of one species changing into another, there is no evolution. In the sense of random happenstance, there is no mutation. Mutations are programmed into the universe through cause and effect just like everything else. Evolution through random happenstance mutation is nonexistent, because there is no random. If your meaning of the word "evolution" is approximately equal to the word "change," then there is evolution all over the place. But note that scientific evolution doesn't limit itself to the word "change." There is no evolution in the sense that standard evolutionists talk about it. |
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 21, 2017, 02:39:34 AM |
|
Several of you have not read or understood the definitions of scientific theory and scientific law.
You are arguing over definitions of words you do not understand or just outright reject because they don't fit your preconceptions.
A scientific theory is NOT the same as your idea of a theory just being an unknown. Read it again and concentrate on the meaning because you have totally missed it.
There is a gravity law that is the observation of gravity, reduced to mathematics. There is the gravity theory that explains why we observe what is described by the gravity law. This meaning of "theory" is the basis of all science and is tested over and over and over again.
A scientific theory is only a scientific theory by virtue of the tests being so complete that no one can prove holes in it, that is as close to fact as you can get on any topic. All the other religious justification, appealing to unverifiable sources and texts stuff is magical thinking and has zero basis in rooting out facts.
The reality is that the scientific theory of evolution has been proven to hold up under the assault of thousands of experiments attacking its model. It is real. It is factual. If you can prove, via independently testable experiments that it is not true then you will be considered one of the greatest scientists that ever lived.
Creationism on the other hand can not stand up to any sort of testing and in many cases can not even be tested, it is by definition NOT science. Arguing as if it is science, on an equal footing to be discussed along with other scientific study is a damned lie.
You are all entitled to your own opinions of course but you are not entitled to your own facts and when you argue using scientific language but ignoring the accepted meanings of that language you aren't even trying to communicate, you are just shouting into the void to avoid looking at reality.
When you research rebuttals against evolution, you find many points that evolution theory has not overcome. Why hasn't evolution theory overcome them? Because evolution theory doesn't even take them into account. Three simple rebuttals that destroy evolution are: 1. Probability math, combined with the way things happen; 2. Irreducible Complexity; 3. No visible/provable missing link fossils. There are many more. They are not religious except in the sense that there is religion in everything that people do. Explanations that try to rebut the rebuttals are so convoluted that if they were added to evolution theory, they would immediately destroy the whole evolution idea. This makes evolution theory quite acceptable as far as it goes. But it is sci-fi acceptable only, because it doesn't fit the real world. The attempts of science to make things that are not real into reality, is why the word "theory" has become as convoluted as it has between regular theory and science theory. A house of cards may be structurally strong if there is no force that acts against it. That is the way evolution theory is. Stand it up next to reality, and it fails miserably. |
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 21, 2017, 02:41:17 AM |
|
There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, ON YOUR FACE .. A simple SPOT evolves where who knows but you know a spot can evolve somewhere on your face.. Evolution means evolve or evolved .. Also are you saying this youtube video is a lie?.. Evolution in Action: Ring Species - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjcFSy1KCTI17 Sep 2007 - Uploaded by phoenixshade3 This video presents to the layman an example of evolution as an ongoing process: The Ensatina salamanders Evolution in Action - California Salamanders - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDIQFQOCGaI29 May 2012 - Uploaded by Science For the Win David Wake, a renowned evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, as he explains why . Proof of evolution that you can find on your body - YouTube Video for can we see evolution▶ 3:55 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFxu7NEoKC817 Mar 2016 - Uploaded by Vox Proof of evolution that you can find on your body. Vox ... to find signs of our evolutionary history — you can . YOUR BIBLE BLINDS YOU There can be many meanings for a word. Here is what I mean when I say evolution. Evolution in the sense of inanimate material becoming life without some other life causing it to do so, there is no evolution. Evolution in the sense of one species changing into another, there is no evolution. In the sense of random happenstance, there is no mutation. Mutations are programmed into the universe through cause and effect just like everything else. Evolution through random happenstance mutation is nonexistent, because there is no random. If your meaning of the word "evolution" is approximately equal to the word "change," then there is evolution all over the place. But note that scientific evolution doesn't limit itself to the word "change." There is no evolution in the sense that standard evolutionists talk about it. There can be many meanings for a word. NOT when you talk about evolution .. 3 meanings to the word.. POINT1 EVOLVE meaning what will come or where will it come POINT2 EVOLVING meaning the thing that come is still in it's process POINT3 EVOLVED meaning the thing that's come as finished it's process .. And all 3 points point back to 1 point EVOLUTION .. And Gravity has nothing to do with EVOLUTION because things can evolve without GRAVITY.. |
|
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 21, 2017, 02:46:08 AM |
|
Several of you have not read or understood the definitions of scientific theory and scientific law.
You are arguing over definitions of words you do not understand or just outright reject because they don't fit your preconceptions.
A scientific theory is NOT the same as your idea of a theory just being an unknown. Read it again and concentrate on the meaning because you have totally missed it.
There is a gravity law that is the observation of gravity, reduced to mathematics. There is the gravity theory that explains why we observe what is described by the gravity law. This meaning of "theory" is the basis of all science and is tested over and over and over again.
A scientific theory is only a scientific theory by virtue of the tests being so complete that no one can prove holes in it, that is as close to fact as you can get on any topic. All the other religious justification, appealing to unverifiable sources and texts stuff is magical thinking and has zero basis in rooting out facts.
The reality is that the scientific theory of evolution has been proven to hold up under the assault of thousands of experiments attacking its model. It is real. It is factual. If you can prove, via independently testable experiments that it is not true then you will be considered one of the greatest scientists that ever lived.
Creationism on the other hand can not stand up to any sort of testing and in many cases can not even be tested, it is by definition NOT science. Arguing as if it is science, on an equal footing to be discussed along with other scientific study is a damned lie.
You are all entitled to your own opinions of course but you are not entitled to your own facts and when you argue using scientific language but ignoring the accepted meanings of that language you aren't even trying to communicate, you are just shouting into the void to avoid looking at reality.
I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY.. A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY .. You do know many things might need to be wrote again .. Like light speed.. |
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3962
Merit: 1380
|
|
June 21, 2017, 02:47:52 AM |
|
There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, ON YOUR FACE .. A simple SPOT evolves where who knows but you know a spot can evolve somewhere on your face.. Evolution means evolve or evolved .. Also are you saying this youtube video is a lie?.. Evolution in Action: Ring Species - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjcFSy1KCTI17 Sep 2007 - Uploaded by phoenixshade3 This video presents to the layman an example of evolution as an ongoing process: The Ensatina salamanders Evolution in Action - California Salamanders - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDIQFQOCGaI29 May 2012 - Uploaded by Science For the Win David Wake, a renowned evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, as he explains why . Proof of evolution that you can find on your body - YouTube Video for can we see evolution▶ 3:55 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFxu7NEoKC817 Mar 2016 - Uploaded by Vox Proof of evolution that you can find on your body. Vox ... to find signs of our evolutionary history — you can . YOUR BIBLE BLINDS YOU There can be many meanings for a word. Here is what I mean when I say evolution. Evolution in the sense of inanimate material becoming life without some other life causing it to do so, there is no evolution. Evolution in the sense of one species changing into another, there is no evolution. In the sense of random happenstance, there is no mutation. Mutations are programmed into the universe through cause and effect just like everything else. Evolution through random happenstance mutation is nonexistent, because there is no random. If your meaning of the word "evolution" is approximately equal to the word "change," then there is evolution all over the place. But note that scientific evolution doesn't limit itself to the word "change." There is no evolution in the sense that standard evolutionists talk about it. There can be many meanings for a word. NOT when you talk about evolution .. 3 meanings to the word.. POINT1 EVOLVE meaning what will come or where will it come POINT2 EVOLVING meaning the thing that come is still in it's process POINT3 EVOLVED meaning the thing that's come as finished it's process .. And all 3 points point back to 1 point EVOLUTION .. And Gravity has nothing to do with EVOLUTION because things can evolve without GRAVITY.. Whatever you want to say about it, look at my last post, above. In the sense that I have said, there is no evolution. There are way too many proofs against it. |
|
|
|
popcorn1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
|
|
June 21, 2017, 03:18:05 AM |
|
There isn't one proven instance of evolution around us, ON YOUR FACE .. A simple SPOT evolves where who knows but you know a spot can evolve somewhere on your face.. Evolution means evolve or evolved .. Also are you saying this youtube video is a lie?.. Evolution in Action: Ring Species - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjcFSy1KCTI17 Sep 2007 - Uploaded by phoenixshade3 This video presents to the layman an example of evolution as an ongoing process: The Ensatina salamanders Evolution in Action - California Salamanders - YouTube Video for evolution in action salamanders▶ 3:22 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDIQFQOCGaI29 May 2012 - Uploaded by Science For the Win David Wake, a renowned evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, as he explains why . Proof of evolution that you can find on your body - YouTube Video for can we see evolution▶ 3:55 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFxu7NEoKC817 Mar 2016 - Uploaded by Vox Proof of evolution that you can find on your body. Vox ... to find signs of our evolutionary history — you can . YOUR BIBLE BLINDS YOU There can be many meanings for a word. Here is what I mean when I say evolution. Evolution in the sense of inanimate material becoming life without some other life causing it to do so, there is no evolution. Evolution in the sense of one species changing into another, there is no evolution. In the sense of random happenstance, there is no mutation. Mutations are programmed into the universe through cause and effect just like everything else. Evolution through random happenstance mutation is nonexistent, because there is no random. If your meaning of the word "evolution" is approximately equal to the word "change," then there is evolution all over the place. But note that scientific evolution doesn't limit itself to the word "change." There is no evolution in the sense that standard evolutionists talk about it. There can be many meanings for a word. NOT when you talk about evolution .. 3 meanings to the word.. POINT1 EVOLVE meaning what will come or where will it come POINT2 EVOLVING meaning the thing that come is still in it's process POINT3 EVOLVED meaning the thing that's come as finished it's process .. And all 3 points point back to 1 point EVOLUTION .. And Gravity has nothing to do with EVOLUTION because things can evolve without GRAVITY.. Whatever you want to say about it, look at my last post, above. In the sense that I have said, there is no evolution. There are way too many proofs against it. But evolution exist everywhere.. Look a theory is not fact in needs to be studied and proved to be fact.. Einstein's gravity theory could be wrong as new theory passes first test ... www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Was-Einstein-WRONG-gravity-Controversial-new-theory-rewri... 19 Dec 2016 - The new theory, which suggests our understanding of gravity is wrong, is now ... 'But then if you mathematically factor in the fact that Verlinde's Gravity and dark matter are NOT real, according to theory that would ... www.express.co.uk › News › Science 10 Nov 2016 - Gravity and dark matter are an illusion, according to a new theory ... is correct, it would essentially disprove Albert Einstein's theory of relativity Gravity: It's Only a Theory | NCSE https://ncse.com/library-resource/gravity-its-only-theoryThis satirical look at "only a theory" disclaimers imagines what might happen if advocates applied the same logic to the theory of gravitation that they do to the Einstein's gravity theory could be wrong as new theory passes first test ... www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Was-Einstein-WRONG-gravity-Controversial-new-theory-rewri... 19 Dec 2016 - This new particle, if it exists, would not fit into the description given by the Standard ... 'We have evidence that this new view of gravity actually agrees with the ... 'At large scales, it seems, gravity just doesn't behave the way See we English own the world .. Well we must do because on my globe every country is wrote in ENGLISH so that makes the world MINE .. So what i say goes.. And a theory is not fact because we don't know the whole truth about this theory to make it FACT.. If you say something is FACT it is SO and a THEORY IS NOT SO.. And yes it was a Greek word Very clever the Greeks at one time in history ..We humans owe a lot to the GREEKS You think the EU would let them off with the DEBT because they will never get out of it.. So forget the debt..And let the Greeks start again..You done it for AFRICA . wiped the debt clean.. |
|
|
|
|
|
bkbirge
|
|
June 21, 2017, 03:20:56 AM |
|
I am ENGLISH we wrote the word THEORY..
A theory is not FACT IT'S A THEORY ..
You do know many things might need to be wrote again ..
Like light speed..
LOL, ok then. Except we are talking not about "theory" but about "scientific theory". If you rewrite light speed you'll have to rewrite the definition of a meter. Have at it, maybe you can successfully revive the concept of aether. |
|
|
|
|
|
Makka
|
|
June 21, 2017, 03:24:05 AM |
|
I was kind of amazed by the exchange of ideas here.
Well, for me, evolution remains to be a theory, yes, just that, a theory, until now. I don't know how Charles Darwin became a celebrity scientist right after he theorized that what we are now are different centuries and centuries ago. Perhaps because his idea was sort of radically new? The discovery actually caused a bandwagon mentality among a lot people. The entire world was stirred by his claim. Established religion was terribly shaken to its core. School curricula are challenged. The people's comfort zone was rendered uncomfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
