Evolution is a hoax

[IsusCu]

https://www.wired.com/2008/12/evolutionexampl/

https://listverse.com/2011/11/19/8-examples-of-evolution-in-action/

http://www.businessinsider.com/recent-human-evolution-traits-2016-8?IR=T

Plenty of examples.

Those are examples of suggested evolution by novices and scientists who wish that they were examples of evolution. They are inconclusive regarding evolution. But they are not inconclusive regarding being simple adaptation.

Nope, those are examples of evolution and you can't debunk them so you type simple sentences so your brain doesn't stop working. It happens all the time, your brain has a defense mechanism, it will not accept being wrong and it has to ignore these arguments.

They debunk themselves right in their own language. In what way? you might ask. In the way that the language is full of things that haven't been proven, and often don't make any sense, or are incomplete, or lack facts to support them. All you have to do is track down all the statements in every example to its base, and you will come up with circular references, or dead ends.

Evolution is a hoax.

Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...

I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..

But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.

[1714645806]

1714645806

[1714645806]

1714645806

[BADecker]

Nope, they all have a ton of evidence behind them and are normal examples of evolution, you can find hundreds. All of them with evidence and proof.  You can see it in humans, there are plenty of fossils of our ancestors.

https://hastyreader.com/anagenesis-cladogenesis/

All of these are documented facts, you are just delusional.

Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...

I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..

But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.

A single evolution mutation in a plant or animal would not be large enough to be noticeable without microscopic examination. The before and after animals would be essentially the same.

Any plant or animal in the fossil record that is considered to be a missing link, would have to have thousands or millions more missing links before it and after it, to become the missing link that it is considered to be. These missing links are not available or visible in the fossil record anywhere.

If you change evolution theory so that you don't need all these missing links, then you would find easily recognized evolution changes all over the place today outside the fossil record, in everyday life.

The fact that adaptation explains all the so-called evolution evidences better, along with a fossil record that has no missing links, shows that ...

Evolution is a hoax.

[IsusCu]

Nope, they all have a ton of evidence behind them and are normal examples of evolution, you can find hundreds. All of them with evidence and proof.  You can see it in humans, there are plenty of fossils of our ancestors.

https://hastyreader.com/anagenesis-cladogenesis/

All of these are documented facts, you are just delusional.

Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...

I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..

But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.

A single evolution mutation in a plant or animal would not be large enough to be noticeable without microscopic examination. The before and after animals would be essentially the same.

Any plant or animal in the fossil record that is considered to be a missing link, would have to have thousands or millions more missing links before it and after it, to become the missing link that it is considered to be. These missing links are not available or visible in the fossil record anywhere.

If you change evolution theory so that you don't need all these missing links, then you would find easily recognized evolution changes all over the place today outside the fossil record, in everyday life.

The fact that adaptation explains all the so-called evolution evidences better, along with a fossil record that has no missing links, shows that ...

Evolution is a hoax.

Evolution happens over a period of hundreds of thousands even millions of years. Every generation of a species mutates "a little" as you mentioned and there's no noticeable way to see it (without DNA analysis) but when you take, lets say, a thousand generations the first and the thousandth generation are so much different from each other (since every generation is a little bit different than the previous) you get 2 different species. Those species (distinct species, not just 2 generations that came 1 after the other keep that in mind) are considered links in a chain of evolution.  Now, where is the line that separates 1 species from another, in which generation does 1 species become another I don't know. that question you need to ask someone who's more specialized in the field.

If you don't understand these simple things how can you claim evolution is a hoax lol..

It's as if I said "hey man the gods are angry" each time there's thunder just cose I can't understand or am not educated enough to understand whats really going on.

Knowlege is power, man, I wish more people realized that.

[Astargath]

Nope, they all have a ton of evidence behind them and are normal examples of evolution, you can find hundreds. All of them with evidence and proof.  You can see it in humans, there are plenty of fossils of our ancestors.

https://hastyreader.com/anagenesis-cladogenesis/

All of these are documented facts, you are just delusional.

Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...

I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..

But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.

A single evolution mutation in a plant or animal would not be large enough to be noticeable without microscopic examination. The before and after animals would be essentially the same.

Any plant or animal in the fossil record that is considered to be a missing link, would have to have thousands or millions more missing links before it and after it, to become the missing link that it is considered to be. These missing links are not available or visible in the fossil record anywhere.

If you change evolution theory so that you don't need all these missing links, then you would find easily recognized evolution changes all over the place today outside the fossil record, in everyday life.

The fact that adaptation explains all the so-called evolution evidences better, along with a fossil record that has no missing links, shows that ...

Evolution is a hoax.

Evolution happens over a period of hundreds of thousands even millions of years. Every generation of a species mutates "a little" as you mentioned and there's no noticeable way to see it (without DNA analysis) but when you take, lets say, a thousand generations the first and the thousandth generation are so much different from each other (since every generation is a little bit different than the previous) you get 2 different species. Those species (distinct species, not just 2 generations that came 1 after the other keep that in mind) are considered links in a chain of evolution.  Now, where is the line that separates 1 species from another, in which generation does 1 species become another I don't know. that question you need to ask someone who's more specialized in the field.

If you don't understand these simple things how can you claim evolution is a hoax lol..

It's as if I said "hey man the gods are angry" each time there's thunder just cose I can't understand or am not educated enough to understand whats really going on.

Knowlege is power, man, I wish more people realized that.

Badecker is delusional, he doesn't understand because he doesn't want to. He will keep repeating the same garbage without ever doing any real research on the matter. In fact he doesn't even realize that he is proving evolution with some of his arguments.

[BADecker]

Nope, they all have a ton of evidence behind them and are normal examples of evolution, you can find hundreds. All of them with evidence and proof.  You can see it in humans, there are plenty of fossils of our ancestors.

https://hastyreader.com/anagenesis-cladogenesis/

All of these are documented facts, you are just delusional.

Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...

I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..

But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.

A single evolution mutation in a plant or animal would not be large enough to be noticeable without microscopic examination. The before and after animals would be essentially the same.

Any plant or animal in the fossil record that is considered to be a missing link, would have to have thousands or millions more missing links before it and after it, to become the missing link that it is considered to be. These missing links are not available or visible in the fossil record anywhere.

If you change evolution theory so that you don't need all these missing links, then you would find easily recognized evolution changes all over the place today outside the fossil record, in everyday life.

The fact that adaptation explains all the so-called evolution evidences better, along with a fossil record that has no missing links, shows that ...

Evolution is a hoax.

Evolution happens over a period of hundreds of thousands even millions of years. Every generation of a species mutates "a little" as you mentioned and there's no noticeable way to see it (without DNA analysis) but when you take, lets say, a thousand generations the first and the thousandth generation are so much different from each other (since every generation is a little bit different than the previous) you get 2 different species. Those species (distinct species, not just 2 generations that came 1 after the other keep that in mind) are considered links in a chain of evolution.  Now, where is the line that separates 1 species from another, in which generation does 1 species become another I don't know. that question you need to ask someone who's more specialized in the field.

If you don't understand these simple things how can you claim evolution is a hoax lol..

It's as if I said "hey man the gods are angry" each time there's thunder just cose I can't understand or am not educated enough to understand whats really going on.

Knowlege is power, man, I wish more people realized that.

Thank you. Since you can't see evolution as you have said, and since everything that we CAN see, and that is CALLED evolution, can be explained by adaptation better, and since all the non-adaptation mutations that we see are destructive mutations, where is the evidence for evolution?

For example. If you had never seen a house built, and someone took you into a house and told you that there were 2x4 studs in the walls, you might believe him. But you might want some evidence, first. So, he might get out his stud finder and tell you that it is showing you where the studs are by finding the nails that hold the paneling on. You might respond with the idea that those are simply anomalies in the wall that the stud finder is finding.

How does anyone prove that there are studs in the wall? You tear the paneling off, and then you can SEE the studs, for a fact. Somebody, please come and tear the "paneling" off the "wall" of anthropology/geology/history/etc. so that we can SEE the actual evolution "studs" in the wall. Until you do this, all the evolution talk is, well, just talk.

Of course, since you can find many reasons why evolution is impossible - all you have to do is Google "impossible evolution" - that's why you can't find any evolution.

Evolution is a hoax. If you believe evolution exists, you are making it your religion.

[BADecker]

Thank you. Since you can't see evolution as you have said, and since everything that we CAN see, and that is CALLED evolution, can be explained by adaptation better, and since all the non-adaptation mutations that we see are destructive mutations, where is the evidence for evolution?

For example. If you had never seen a house built, and someone took you into a house and told you that there were 2x4 studs in the walls, you might believe him. But you might want some evidence, first. So, he might get out his stud finder and tell you that it is showing you where the studs are by finding the nails that hold the paneling on. You might respond with the idea that those are simply anomalies in the wall that the stud finder is finding.

How does anyone prove that there are studs in the wall? You tear the paneling off, and then you can SEE the studs, for a fact. Somebody, please come and tear the "paneling" off the "wall" of anthropology/geology/history/etc. so that we can SEE the actual evolution "studs" in the wall. Until you do this, all the evolution talk is, well, just talk.

Of course, since you can find many reasons why evolution is impossible - all you have to do is Google "impossible evolution" - that's why you can't find any evolution.

Evolution is a hoax. If you believe evolution exists, you are making it your religion.

Why you don't use your "studs" analogy to find the evidence of God?  You only try to discredit scientific facts by your "show me the money" mantra, and in the process you just show that you don't understand evolution, one tiny bit.

Why don't you ask your god to come out of the "walls" and show himself, for crying out laud?

Why is your god so shy?  He created the universe he can type, can't he?  Ask him to post here and we all can move on.

You are kinda off topic, there, bud. But we'll let it slide this time, because through being off topic, you are admitting that you agree that...

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

Thank you. Since you can't see evolution as you have said, and since everything that we CAN see, and that is CALLED evolution, can be explained by adaptation better, and since all the non-adaptation mutations that we see are destructive mutations, where is the evidence for evolution?

For example. If you had never seen a house built, and someone took you into a house and told you that there were 2x4 studs in the walls, you might believe him. But you might want some evidence, first. So, he might get out his stud finder and tell you that it is showing you where the studs are by finding the nails that hold the paneling on. You might respond with the idea that those are simply anomalies in the wall that the stud finder is finding.

How does anyone prove that there are studs in the wall? You tear the paneling off, and then you can SEE the studs, for a fact. Somebody, please come and tear the "paneling" off the "wall" of anthropology/geology/history/etc. so that we can SEE the actual evolution "studs" in the wall. Until you do this, all the evolution talk is, well, just talk.

Of course, since you can find many reasons why evolution is impossible - all you have to do is Google "impossible evolution" - that's why you can't find any evolution.

Evolution is a hoax. If you believe evolution exists, you are making it your religion.

Why you don't use your "studs" analogy to find the evidence of God?  You only try to discredit scientific facts by your "show me the money" mantra, and in the process you just show that you don't understand evolution, one tiny bit.

Why don't you ask your god to come out of the "walls" and show himself, for crying out laud?

Why is your god so shy?  He created the universe he can type, can't he?  Ask him to post here and we all can move on.

You are kinda off topic, there, bud. But we'll let it slide this time, because through being off topic, you are admitting that you agree that...

Evolution is a hoax.

Hmm, ignoring your own argument I see... Classic badecker. His brain probably got scared for 1 second here but quickly his delusion took over and had to ignore your post, af_newbie.

[twthmoses]

Thank you. Since you can't see evolution as you have said, and since everything that we CAN see, and that is CALLED evolution, can be explained by adaptation better, and since all the non-adaptation mutations that we see are destructive mutations, where is the evidence for evolution?

That’s your idea that everything fits adoption better then evolution.

Adoption is a need, will or society driven skill you acquired, evolution is a pre dispositioning you are born with. You don’t adapt to being taller, you are taller, you don’t adapt to become world champion in 100m run, you are born a fast runner, - that might require training. You don’t adapt to become a social or technical genius, you already are. Some might never recognize it; some might never grab or be given the chance of exploring it. The rest of us can adapt or train all our life, and will never reach such a level.

And once you recognize that some people are born more suited for certain tasks/skills (e.g. they do not adapt to them) it becomes very hard to reconcile with one man started it all (Adam) and all his offspring’s turn out variously suited for certain task – and none of them evolved. How can that be?

[BADecker]

Thank you. Since you can't see evolution as you have said, and since everything that we CAN see, and that is CALLED evolution, can be explained by adaptation better, and since all the non-adaptation mutations that we see are destructive mutations, where is the evidence for evolution?

That’s your idea that everything fits adoption better then evolution.

Adoption is a need, will or society driven skill you acquired, evolution is a pre dispositioning you are born with. You don’t adapt to being taller, you are taller, you don’t adapt to become world champion in 100m run, you are born a fast runner, - that might require training. You don’t adapt to become a social or technical genius, you already are. Some might never recognize it; some might never grab or be given the chance of exploring it. The rest of us can adapt or train all our life, and will never reach such a level.

And once you recognize that some people are born more suited for certain tasks/skills (e.g. they do not adapt to them) it becomes very hard to reconcile with one man started it all (Adam) and all his offspring’s turn out variously suited for certain task – and none of them evolved. How can that be?

From Dictionary.com:

adoption
[uh-dop-shuh n]


1. the act of adopting: the adoption of a new amendment.

2. the state of being adopted.

So, what does adoption have to do with evolution?

Kinda like, what does simple change evolution have to do with evolution theory evolution?

[IsusCu]

Nope, they all have a ton of evidence behind them and are normal examples of evolution, you can find hundreds. All of them with evidence and proof.  You can see it in humans, there are plenty of fossils of our ancestors.

https://hastyreader.com/anagenesis-cladogenesis/

All of these are documented facts, you are just delusional.

Dude, the amount of disinformation... I never thought that people could really believe these things...

I mean, it's all there, you just have to learn how to understand certain principles and use different tools such as statistics, mathematics, biology, physics (etc..), and you will be able to understand so many things. You will also realize how little you previously knew and wonder how much more knowledge there is that you do not possess..

But why would you do all that boring work and study these things for years to get the understanding you need when you can just google some attractive, mystical conspiracy subjects and theories for 2 hours and feel like you understand and know everything.

A single evolution mutation in a plant or animal would not be large enough to be noticeable without microscopic examination. The before and after animals would be essentially the same.

Any plant or animal in the fossil record that is considered to be a missing link, would have to have thousands or millions more missing links before it and after it, to become the missing link that it is considered to be. These missing links are not available or visible in the fossil record anywhere.

If you change evolution theory so that you don't need all these missing links, then you would find easily recognized evolution changes all over the place today outside the fossil record, in everyday life.

The fact that adaptation explains all the so-called evolution evidences better, along with a fossil record that has no missing links, shows that ...

Evolution is a hoax.

Evolution happens over a period of hundreds of thousands even millions of years. Every generation of a species mutates "a little" as you mentioned and there's no noticeable way to see it (without DNA analysis) but when you take, lets say, a thousand generations the first and the thousandth generation are so much different from each other (since every generation is a little bit different than the previous) you get 2 different species. Those species (distinct species, not just 2 generations that came 1 after the other keep that in mind) are considered links in a chain of evolution.  Now, where is the line that separates 1 species from another, in which generation does 1 species become another I don't know. that question you need to ask someone who's more specialized in the field.

If you don't understand these simple things how can you claim evolution is a hoax lol..

It's as if I said "hey man the gods are angry" each time there's thunder just cose I can't understand or am not educated enough to understand whats really going on.

Knowlege is power, man, I wish more people realized that.

Thank you. Since you can't see evolution as you have said, and since everything that we CAN see, and that is CALLED evolution, can be explained by adaptation better, and since all the non-adaptation mutations that we see are destructive mutations, where is the evidence for evolution?

For example. If you had never seen a house built, and someone took you into a house and told you that there were 2x4 studs in the walls, you might believe him. But you might want some evidence, first. So, he might get out his stud finder and tell you that it is showing you where the studs are by finding the nails that hold the paneling on. You might respond with the idea that those are simply anomalies in the wall that the stud finder is finding.

How does anyone prove that there are studs in the wall? You tear the paneling off, and then you can SEE the studs, for a fact. Somebody, please come and tear the "paneling" off the "wall" of anthropology/geology/history/etc. so that we can SEE the actual evolution "studs" in the wall. Until you do this, all the evolution talk is, well, just talk.

Of course, since you can find many reasons why evolution is impossible - all you have to do is Google "impossible evolution" - that's why you can't find any evolution.

Evolution is a hoax. If you believe evolution exists, you are making it your religion.

your eyes are the first to lie to you. you can not rely on your senses to prove something. you can't see black holes but we know they are there. You can see the rainbow but it's actually not a physical thing, iz's an illusion. Do not base your beliefs on what you can see, that's very limiting. Just cose you see something doesn't mean it's true and just cose you don't see it doesn't mean it's not true... That's why we have computers and other tools and instruments that can measure data waaaay better than we can...

As i said before, if you knew a thing or 2 about statistics you would be able to "see" the evolution in the data. if you know math you can calculate the distance between the sun and the earth although you cannot take an actual tape mesure and mesure it yourself. I strongly recommend you to get into math and physics, studying it can be so boring but once you start understanding it you will see how awesome it is, you will be able to do so many thing and understand so much more.

[mymenace]

How can a theory be a hoax



As with the big bang
How can a theory be held as truth



Maybe change the heading to "Evolution is only a theory"


One known fact

about 6000 years ago their was a worldwide flood documented in every "Global" civilization at the time

What civilizations (not cavemen) lived before 6000 years ago

Before the Abrahamic laws (Jew, Christian, Muslim), Hindu's, Egyptians

Before Noah

?

From there we could see, learn, if any evolution came from what is theory

[Browncephas]

So the question remains: How did humans acquire such vast intellectual capacities so comparatively recently and so rapidly?
If the Cambrian period of 530 million years ago poses serious challenges to Darwin’s insistence upon slow, incremental change in the amazingly rapid proliferation of animals over a mere 5 to 6 million-year timespan (see Darwin’s Doubt https://darwinsdoubt.com/), then how much more should the transformational changes in the human brain over the past 100 to 200,000 years cause as serious reevaluation of the nature of human beings and the means by which they came to be.

[BADecker]

How can a theory be a hoax



As with the big bang
How can a theory be held as truth



Maybe change the heading to "Evolution is only a theory"


One known fact

about 6000 years ago their was a worldwide flood documented in every "Global" civilization at the time

What civilizations (not cavemen) lived before 6000 years ago

Before the Abrahamic laws (Jew, Christian, Muslim), Hindu's, Egyptians

Before Noah

?

From there we could see, learn, if any evolution came from what is theory

Scientific theory is not a hoax by a long shot. Scientific theory is a thing that is designed to change over time as new info is found out. Scientific theory only starts becoming a hoax when people start believing that it is the truth, when they know that multitudes of theories have been upgraded to something else. Scientific theory becomes a true hoax when believers in it express that it is the final authority on something, while they know that it is not.

For example. Black Hole Theory has been upgraded many times. And nobody knows for a fact that this theory is even near truth. Why not? Because they all know that black holes might be something entirely different than what BHT suggests. The current BHT simply gives them a place to continue investigating. So, they accept it as true all the while knowing it might not be.

The hoax is when they tout any current scientific theory as truth.

[BADecker]

your eyes are the first to lie to you. you can not rely on your senses to prove something. you can't see black holes but we know they are there. You can see the rainbow but it's actually not a physical thing, iz's an illusion. Do not base your beliefs on what you can see, that's very limiting. Just cose you see something doesn't mean it's true and just cose you don't see it doesn't mean it's not true... That's why we have computers and other tools and instruments that can measure data waaaay better than we can...

As i said before, if you knew a thing or 2 about statistics you would be able to "see" the evolution in the data. if you know math you can calculate the distance between the sun and the earth although you cannot take an actual tape mesure and mesure it yourself. I strongly recommend you to get into math and physics, studying it can be so boring but once you start understanding it you will see how awesome it is, you will be able to do so many thing and understand so much more.

Are you really trying to say that rainbows aren't there because of what they are made up of?

Measure evolution data, and compare it to evolution theory. You can't do it, because according to evolution theory, there isn't any evolution. Things don't work like evolution theory suggests. If they did, we would have at least one factual example of evolution. But we have countless numbers of recognizable like-begets-like, and adaptation.

Evolution people are playing you, man... and maybe themselves, as well.

[mymenace]

How can a theory be a hoax



As with the big bang
How can a theory be held as truth



Maybe change the heading to "Evolution is only a theory"


One known fact

about 6000 years ago their was a worldwide flood documented in every "Global" civilization at the time

What civilizations (not cavemen) lived before 6000 years ago

Before the Abrahamic laws (Jew, Christian, Muslim), Hindu's, Egyptians

Before Noah

?

From there we could see, learn, if any evolution came from what is theory

Scientific theory is not a hoax by a long shot. Scientific theory is a thing that is designed to change over time as new info is found out. Scientific theory only starts becoming a hoax when people start believing that it is the truth, when they know that multitudes of theories have been upgraded to something else. Scientific theory becomes a true hoax when believers in it express that it is the final authority on something, while they know that it is not.

For example. Black Hole Theory has been upgraded many times. And nobody knows for a fact that this theory is even near truth. Why not? Because they all know that black holes might be something entirely different than what BHT suggests. The current BHT simply gives them a place to continue investigating. So, they accept it as true all the while knowing it might not be.

The hoax is when they tout any current scientific theory as truth.

So very true

[Astargath]

your eyes are the first to lie to you. you can not rely on your senses to prove something. you can't see black holes but we know they are there. You can see the rainbow but it's actually not a physical thing, iz's an illusion. Do not base your beliefs on what you can see, that's very limiting. Just cose you see something doesn't mean it's true and just cose you don't see it doesn't mean it's not true... That's why we have computers and other tools and instruments that can measure data waaaay better than we can...

As i said before, if you knew a thing or 2 about statistics you would be able to "see" the evolution in the data. if you know math you can calculate the distance between the sun and the earth although you cannot take an actual tape mesure and mesure it yourself. I strongly recommend you to get into math and physics, studying it can be so boring but once you start understanding it you will see how awesome it is, you will be able to do so many thing and understand so much more.

Are you really trying to say that rainbows aren't there because of what they are made up of?

Measure evolution data, and compare it to evolution theory. You can't do it, because according to evolution theory, there isn't any evolution. Things don't work like evolution theory suggests. If they did, we would have at least one factual example of evolution. But we have countless numbers of recognizable like-begets-like, and adaptation.

Evolution people are playing you, man... and maybe themselves, as well.

What would be a factual example of evolution in your opinion badecker? Do we have a factual example of spontaneous generation as stated in the bible? Ofc we don't. I gave you 100 examples of evolution and you copy pasted your shitty sentence for when you don't know how to argue against it.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=examples+of+evolution

[target]

I changed my stand to this topic. I use to think the result why crocs had legs because over millions of years the rivers dried up and they started finding better swamps and so they crawl and gradually their fins become legs. I'm not sure anymore after watching the some crocs still can't stand up with two legs lol. Anyway, I feel like there is a god, he is just not around anymore.

[Astargath]

I changed my stand to this topic. I use to think the result why crocs had legs because over millions of years the rivers dried up and they started finding better swamps and so they crawl and gradually their fins become legs. I'm not sure anymore after watching the some crocs still can't stand up with two legs lol. Anyway, I feel like there is a god, he is just not around anymore.

What the fuck? ''some crocs still can't stand up with two legs lol'' What? What are you talking about my dude?

[NOVL2]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

Bible clearly disproved human evolution. And  even though our human knowledge have evolved so much in terms of science and technology yet,  Bible still a very concise reference. So Human evolution is indeed a hoax.

[Astargath]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

Bible clearly disproved human evolution. And  even though our human knowledge have evolved so much in terms of science and technology yet,  Bible still a very concise reference. So Human evolution is indeed a hoax.

Does the bible explain anything? Do you know it's full of scientific mistakes and retarded laws? What's your IQ, <50 right?