da2ce7
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1222
Merit: 1016
Live and Let Live
|
 |
December 27, 2010, 01:33:09 AM |
|
Final formula for calculating reward would be:
(user's shares / total shares) * 45BTC for all participating in round; next 5 BTC for block founder.
This should motivate players which pool needs and should not make big loss for others (it is only 10% less in reward if user never find valid block, which is unlikely for loyal miners)
Cool I think that such sounds good... Except you need to announce the username that found the block... |
One off NP-Hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 27, 2010, 01:56:52 AM |
|
Hey, thanks a lot! I will add link to first thread post... Cool I think that such sounds good...
You are probably alone who like this idea  . Still I hope you won't leave us although reward formula won't change  |
|
|
|
Mahkul
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Every saint has a past. Every sinner has a future.
|
|
December 27, 2010, 02:57:51 AM |
|
I would also like it if the founder of the "real" block got 5BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanotube
|
|
December 27, 2010, 05:05:00 AM |
|
I would also like it if the founder of the "real" block got 5BTC.
fwiw, i'm not a fan of that idea... but full disclosure: i'm only mining on CPU |
|
|
|
|
adv
|
|
December 28, 2010, 04:23:19 PM |
|
I looked statistic few hours ago and seen smth like 100-110 "Active workers" with 2k+ Mhash/s Now: Active workers (at least one share in last hour): 140
Approx. cluster performance: 4996.607808 Mhash/s 20% peoples doing 60% cluster perfomance? May be add some information to statistic page? Like: 1-10 Mhps : 50 workers
10-50 Mhps : 50 workers
50-100 Mhps : 10 workers
>100 Mhps : 2 workers
Min: 0.2 Mhps; Avg: 50 Mhps; Max: 100500 Mhps |
U may thank me here: 14Js1ng1SvYBPgUJnjNAEPYH4d6SHF79UF
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 28, 2010, 04:42:13 PM |
|
I looked statistic few hours ago and seen smth like 100-110 "Active workers" with 2k+ Mhash/s
I don't have those stats with exact numbers yet, but there are some strong players with >200mhash/s and many (say ~60) workers with few mhash/s. But it isn't surprising and it does not affect pool fairness or performance in any way. Of course many of blocks was found by strong players, but we have already few blocks between weak workers. I'm working on better pool statistics right now so maybe I include also this performance histogram. |
|
|
|
|
adv
|
|
December 28, 2010, 05:07:33 PM |
|
But it isn't surprising and it does not affect pool fairness or performance in any way. Of course many of blocks was found by strong players, but we have already few blocks between weak workers.
I'm working on better pool statistics right now so maybe I include also this performance histogram.
I'm not talking about fairness. I was just wondering who uses the pool: the poor honest hardworking, middle class or rich bastards. : ^) Thank you very much, as it would be cool if there was an opportunity to see their own performance in the MHS on the account page. |
U may thank me here: 14Js1ng1SvYBPgUJnjNAEPYH4d6SHF79UF
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 28, 2010, 05:15:40 PM |
|
it would be cool if there was an opportunity to see their own performance in the MHS on the account page.
Already coded (on dev version). Will be released in nearest big update. |
|
|
|
Rai
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2010, 05:16:08 PM |
|
I would like to add in a small request too... I'd like to see an automatic refresh on the account page, like a refresh every couple of minutes or so. I have multiple workers but a few are on a machine that I'm away from, and I'd like to be able to monitor their progress. In that way I could catch it sooner if one of the workers crashes (which happened last night, but I didn't know until I got home).
|
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 28, 2010, 05:27:43 PM |
|
I would like to add in a small request too... I'd like to see an automatic refresh on the account page, like a refresh every couple of minutes or so. I have multiple workers but a few are on a machine that I'm away from, and I'd like to be able to monitor their progress. In that way I could catch it sooner if one of the workers crashes (which happened last night, but I didn't know until I got home).
In next release is also email notification about worker crash. I think it solve this problem better than watching account page manually... |
|
|
|
Rai
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
December 28, 2010, 05:35:49 PM |
|
I would like to add in a small request too... I'd like to see an automatic refresh on the account page, like a refresh every couple of minutes or so. I have multiple workers but a few are on a machine that I'm away from, and I'd like to be able to monitor their progress. In that way I could catch it sooner if one of the workers crashes (which happened last night, but I didn't know until I got home).
In next release is also email notification about worker crash. I think it solve this problem better than watching account page manually... That is definitely a better solution, thank you. |
|
|
|
|
DiabloD3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
DiabloMiner author
|
|
December 28, 2010, 09:19:58 PM |
|
For those using my miner, please update. The whole single getwork instance work was a bust. slush is just going to have to deal with the increased traffic.
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 28, 2010, 10:33:18 PM |
|
All users: Please update to newest version of your miner!
jgarzik's and m0mchil's miners fixed stability problems when pool is in maintenance mode or temporary down. This should prevent crashes as today, so you won't need restart miners so often.
Diablo's miner fixed important performance issue. Share count will go higher than with previous version for many users.
If you are user of jgarzik's CPU miner, try also new 'cryptopp_asm32' algorithm. It is working well now and improve performance for many users (hashrate is same or better than in official bitcoin client). Thanks jgarzik!
|
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1091
|
|
December 28, 2010, 11:21:56 PM |
|
Note that some of these stability fixes are only in cpuminer.git at the moment, not in a released tarball / Windows installer.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own.
Visit bloq.com / metronome.io
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
fabianhjr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
December 29, 2010, 05:20:30 PM |
|
Hey, I just signed up, however, my activation email hasn't arrived. My username is fabianhjr. Could you help me?
|
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 29, 2010, 08:12:47 PM |
|
Hey, I just signed up, however, my activation email hasn't arrived. My username is fabianhjr. Could you help me?
Hey, I resend confirmation code to your mail again. Please also check spam folder and so. |
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1091
|
|
December 29, 2010, 08:20:13 PM |
|
After adding diagnostics to cpuminer, I have gotten several 'getwork' failures with HTTP status code '502' when connecting to your mining pool: [jgarzik@bd cpuminer]$ ./minerd --userpass user:pass --algo 4way --url http://mining.bitcoin.cz:8332 --quiet
1 miner threads started, using SHA256 '4way' algorithm.
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
HTTP request failed: The requested URL returned error: 502
json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
PROOF OF WORK FOUND? submitting...
PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own.
Visit bloq.com / metronome.io
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 29, 2010, 08:35:18 PM |
|
Hey, I just signed up, however, my activation email hasn't arrived. My username is fabianhjr. Could you help me?
Hey, I resend confirmation code to your mail again. Please also check spam folder and so. So, email was returned with "550 No Such User Here" error. Please PM me some working mailbox... |
|
|
|
slush (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1097
|
|
December 29, 2010, 08:39:09 PM |
|
After adding diagnostics to cpuminer, I have gotten several 'getwork' failures with HTTP status code '502' when connecting to your mining pool:
What's their timestamps? 502 means service is temporary down. It happen time to time. Today it was because I had DDoS attack on server (another service, but server load was >30 for short time). I'm sorry for this, but re-submitting shares again in short period should solve it. |
|
|
|
FairUser
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 264
bit.ly/3QXp3oh | Ultimate Launchpad on TON
|
|
December 30, 2010, 01:10:59 AM |
|
Slush, got two questions for you.
1) Could you update the System statistics page on bitcoin.cz to show the block we're currently working on as a group?
2) If the current block is 100,084 and it is solved by someone else, the next network block would be 100,085. Does that information get updated with the group or are we all still crunching away @ block 100,084?
I had 3.48 bitcoins when I woke up today! Thanks for the awesome work!
|
|
|
|
|
