Bitcoin Forum
September 25, 2016, 02:00:21 PM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: What type of pool payouts do you prefer?
Bitcoins - 3151 (80.4%)
Bank transfer / USD - 407 (10.4%)
Gold/silver coins and bars - 359 (9.2%)
Total Voters: 3915

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 1103 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [40+ PH] SlushPool (slushpool.com); World's First Mining Pool  (Read 3852752 times)
demonofelru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:15:24 AM
 #921

The server's officially exploded:


That's weird mine is showing right amounts?

Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
1474812021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474812021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474812021
Reply with quote  #2

1474812021
Report to moderator
1474812021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474812021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474812021
Reply with quote  #2

1474812021
Report to moderator
1474812021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474812021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474812021
Reply with quote  #2

1474812021
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
riush
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73


View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:17:35 AM
 #922

The server's officially exploded:



looks like this is the block # until it is waiting before considering it confirmed?
(looks normal for me too)

1MKKiJhUJgqKyfCLeo7bB1bvELNEM8wUbz
Miner-TE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 511



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:29:12 AM
 #923

For the record ... My payment was sent shortly after my post.

Still seeing ...
Current shares CFD: 99.98 %
Current Bitcoin block#:   109060

but the block history still shows the last block at 109018.  Is block history still delayed by 2 hrs?


BTC - 1PeMMYGn7xbZjUYeaWe9ct1VV6szLS1vkD - LTC - LbtcJRJJQQBjZuHr6Wm7vtB9RnnWtRNYpq
FooDSt4mP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:29:24 AM
 #924

Scores are renormalized every hour to prevent overflow.

ah, i see.
but does this explain the high estimated reward? if the pool were to find a block now would i receive that amount?
if so, it must be to the loss of someone finding shares before the renormalization? or what am i missing here?

The values of shares decreases over time, and people have been dropping out since the pool may be stuck.  As their shares lose value, and as you find more shares, your estimated reward grows.  The "renormalization" every hour just scales everyones score the same so that the number doesn't get too big for the program to handle.

As we slide down the banister of life, this is just another splinter in our ass.
demonofelru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:30:30 AM
 #925

For the record ... My payment was sent shortly after my post.

Still seeing ...
Current shares CFD: 99.98 %
Current Bitcoin block#:   109060

but the block history still shows the last block at 109018.  Is block history still delayed by 2 hrs?



No not delayed it's just we haven't found one since that long ago lol

Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
G-Nugget
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:36:02 AM
 #926

Is the current 7 hour round just due to statistics being a jerk or could something have happened to the server?
xenon481
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:37:48 AM
 #927

A few days ago there was a ~5.5 hour round. With a 40% increase in difficulty, you can extrapolate up to ~7.7 hours.

Tips Appreciated: 171TQ2wJg7bxj2q68VNibU75YZB22b7ZDr
demonofelru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:37:56 AM
 #928

Is the current 7 hour round just due to statistics being a jerk or could something have happened to the server?

I think the odds are 1 in 100,000 that we wouldn't find one by now it should be around 99.999% by now I suck at math though lol.  Yeah I think it's a server problem though.

Edit: I'm just going by the CFD BTW I'm assuming that's the odds we would find one by now but might be wrong.

Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
Miner-TE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 511



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:46:07 AM
 #929

Is the CFD calculated dynamically as difficulty increases or is it still showing the previous difficulty calculation?

BTC - 1PeMMYGn7xbZjUYeaWe9ct1VV6szLS1vkD - LTC - LbtcJRJJQQBjZuHr6Wm7vtB9RnnWtRNYpq
Xerol
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3


View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:49:51 AM
 #930

Is the CFD calculated dynamically as difficulty increases or is it still showing the previous difficulty calculation?

I was about to ask the same thing, although from a brief mental calculation that would still put it around 97-98%. Could just be a run of bad luck combined with the difficulty increase.
demonofelru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 05:51:54 AM
 #931

Is the CFD calculated dynamically as difficulty increases or is it still showing the previous difficulty calculation?

I was about to ask the same thing, although from a brief mental calculation that would still put it around 97-98%. Could just be a run of bad luck combined with the difficulty increase.

So CFD does equal the chance we should have a generation by now if so 95% is only just over 2 hours so it seems 99.99% is more accurate then 97-98

Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
zoidial
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8



View Profile WWW
February 19, 2011, 05:53:31 AM
 #932

Interesting to see the new scoring during a long round such as this.  

I had two workers that I turned off early in the round because it's a warm day and I tend to run a few only during the night.  They had found ~50 and 9 shares prior to turning off.  Looking now, I see their scores were zero (probably decayed to zero after they were offline for ~6 hours).  I turned them both back on just to see what would happen, and found a few proof of works fairly quickly, and the scores went up accordingly.  This seemed to add quite a bit to the estimated reward within a short amount of time (>0.10 BTC).  

It may be that my other miners (all GPU's) had some really good luck within that timeframe as well, or that the late entry into the round means these new proofs of work are scored much higher, perhaps also because there's old proofs of work already there.  I'm unsure, this is conjecture.  Just thought I'd share.
schnak
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:08:55 AM
 #933

1235   2011-02-18 17:11:39   0:18:14   13999   0.01030634   108968    23 confirmations left
1234   2011-02-18 16:53:25   0:43:59   34270   0.00499486   108962    invalid
1233   2011-02-18 16:09:26   0:51:23   42473   0.01593388   108956    11 confirmations left
1232   2011-02-18 15:18:03   0:24:58   19695   0.00655422   108950    5 confirmations left

I've never seen an invalid before... cause or symptom?

Tips, donations, and bribes welcome:
1NvJJcmw9RCs8tUwfJ1GGzZufD3ENqPhkS
demonofelru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:10:28 AM
 #934

1235   2011-02-18 17:11:39   0:18:14   13999   0.01030634   108968    23 confirmations left
1234   2011-02-18 16:53:25   0:43:59   34270   0.00499486   108962    invalid
1233   2011-02-18 16:09:26   0:51:23   42473   0.01593388   108956    11 confirmations left
1232   2011-02-18 15:18:03   0:24:58   19695   0.00655422   108950    5 confirmations left

I've never seen an invalid before... cause or symptom?

You are right it wasn't like that before something is up.

Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
xenon481
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:13:42 AM
 #935

The accepted explanation for an invalid is that someone else submitted the solution a split second before the pool did. And only at this point did the two parts of the network join up to confirm which one actually found it first.

Tips Appreciated: 171TQ2wJg7bxj2q68VNibU75YZB22b7ZDr
demonofelru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:15:38 AM
 #936

Current shares CFD:   100.00 %?  lol that means we were definitely supposed to have one by now?

Edit: Maybe since it only goes 2 decimals deep when it reaches 99.995% it rounds up to 100%?

Names do not matter; however, if you insist...id...
schnak
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:15:49 AM
 #937

has the pool had an invalid before? may its what caused the glitch.

Tips, donations, and bribes welcome:
1NvJJcmw9RCs8tUwfJ1GGzZufD3ENqPhkS
xenon481
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:18:46 AM
 #938

has the pool had an invalid before? may its what caused the glitch.

Yes, there have been invalids before, including a few days ago. You can search this post for other people wondering what it meant.

Tips Appreciated: 171TQ2wJg7bxj2q68VNibU75YZB22b7ZDr
Miner-TE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 511



View Profile
February 19, 2011, 06:20:31 AM
 #939

Odd,  With 120 confirmations for validation and only 18 left .... took that long for the network to converge.  I guess that is exactly why 120 are needed.

1234    2011-02-18 16:53:25    0:43:59    34270    0.00639603    108962    18 confirmations left

BTC - 1PeMMYGn7xbZjUYeaWe9ct1VV6szLS1vkD - LTC - LbtcJRJJQQBjZuHr6Wm7vtB9RnnWtRNYpq
[Tycho]
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742



View Profile WWW
February 19, 2011, 06:25:38 AM
 #940

I had two workers that I turned off early in the round because it's a warm day and I tend to run a few only during the night.  They had found ~50 and 9 shares prior to turning off.  Looking now, I see their scores were zero (probably decayed to zero after they were offline for ~6 hours).  I turned them both back on just to see what would happen, and found a few proof of works fairly quickly, and the scores went up accordingly.  This seemed to add quite a bit to the estimated reward within a short amount of time (>0.10 BTC)
Cheating will be much more effective with new scoring - you just need to start some ~20 minutes after new block.

Welcome to my bitcoin mining pool: https://deepbit.net - Both payment schemes (including PPS), instant payout, no invalid blocks !
ICBIT Trading platform : USD/BTC futures trading, Bitcoin difficulty futures (NEW!). Third year in bitcoin business.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 1103 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!