Rodderman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:00:34 PM |
|
Ok then I will delete my block chain and start over
|
|
|
|
Rodderman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:11:25 PM |
|
After my re sync my wallet still does not match the explorer!
|
|
|
|
fpsnerd
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:42:44 PM Last edit: August 01, 2017, 06:19:50 PM by fpsnerd |
|
After my re sync my wallet still does not match the explorer!
same here i did rescan blockchain files after rebuild index and at end removed blc and rev dat and wallet is 30 blocks ahead " rebuild index crashes the wallet "
|
|
|
|
togoshigekata
|
|
August 01, 2017, 06:12:27 PM |
|
My Biblepay Core - Wallet says its on Block: 1285 BiblePay Explorer only shows: 1252 - Timestamp: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:49:51 GMT, so 7:49AM this morning in Central Standard Time http://biblepay.inspect.network/In Tools >> Peers, its showing 7 other nodes as being on 1285, 1 on 1284, 1 on 1282 Is something wrong?
|
|
|
|
fpsnerd
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2017, 06:22:53 PM |
|
My Biblepay Core - Wallet says its on Block: 1285 BiblePay Explorer only shows: 1252 - Timestamp: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:49:51 GMT, so 7:49AM this morning in Central Standard Time http://biblepay.inspect.network/In Tools >> Peers, its showing 7 other nodes as being on 1285, 1 on 1284, 1 on 1282 Is something wrong? same here my wallet was on 1280 something block resync few times now sync is 5 hours behind and im waiting to see what will show when sync is done
|
|
|
|
Plainkoin
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:00:18 PM |
|
Just curious, but are your computer clocks correct to the minute?
|
|
|
|
fpsnerd
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:10:15 PM |
|
is possible block explorer to be behind ? all peers are at same block as me 1290 block explorer shows 1252
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:36:52 PM |
|
Getblockhash 1290
0000013ff558d023d24745bfe2864b19afe7c9f33d3675cf13ec77838eafd15f
|
|
|
|
bible_pay (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 215
Jesus is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords
|
|
August 01, 2017, 09:05:40 PM |
|
Getblockhash 1290
0000013ff558d023d24745bfe2864b19afe7c9f33d3675cf13ec77838eafd15f
I have the same hash, 125 connections - on block 1302, getblockhash 1302: 0000066544535ea8e738114b60e4cce9baac72344af72de77d0df458fbab199e The BX appears to be stuck on 1291, but his hash is correct. I've been working on the pool. Its approximately 50% done - but will need some volunteers to test in testnet, hopefully by Saturday. Have not heard back from CCEX yet, will check in with them asap.
|
|
|
|
tiras
|
|
August 01, 2017, 09:09:22 PM |
|
I can help testing the pool. please PM if you need me.
|
|
|
|
Charloz24
|
|
August 01, 2017, 11:00:38 PM |
|
Getblockhash 1290
0000013ff558d023d24745bfe2864b19afe7c9f33d3675cf13ec77838eafd15f
I have the same hash, 125 connections - on block 1302, getblockhash 1302: 0000066544535ea8e738114b60e4cce9baac72344af72de77d0df458fbab199e The BX appears to be stuck on 1291, but his hash is correct. I've been working on the pool. Its approximately 50% done - but will need some volunteers to test in testnet, hopefully by Saturday. Have not heard back from CCEX yet, will check in with them asap. Good to know a pool is on the way 😀 I am ready to help and test it if you need some help (maybe not before monday), let me know.
|
|
|
|
PewPewGoesTheDuck
|
|
August 01, 2017, 11:03:59 PM |
|
I would be willing to help with pool testing. Will it need a large hash rate to test or if I just spin up a low powered vm would that be enough?
|
|
|
|
happy_merchant
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2017, 11:58:29 PM |
|
As far as the block explorer goes, the Iquidus Explorer framework the explorer runs on creates a temporary file which is used as a lock for thread safety while writing to the database. For some reason, the script didn't exit properly after reading block 1252 so it didn't delete the lock file and effectively locked itself out of calling the update script to automatically read new transactions after that point. It didn't seem to be related to any forks, since the log shows that the transaction hashes leading up to that point were all in agreement with the current blockchain.
Working on a fix.
|
|
|
|
|
fpsnerd
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
August 02, 2017, 12:29:15 AM |
|
i have a friend running it on allot pcs maybe this case is the same i have 6 blocks on my single pc but for like 5 days
|
|
|
|
happy_merchant
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 02, 2017, 12:39:13 AM |
|
There's a lot of people running a dozen or more nodes. The people on the top of the list have consolidated the rewards from all those nodes onto a single address, but I'd imagine there are miners holding even more BBP who have it spread across many addresses and don't appear in the richlist. Still, the distribution seems pretty good, there are a lot of coins where the top 10 or so wallets hold 99+% of all the currency. The total network hashrate is still low enough that I think everyone will be able to earn BBP at a respectable rate once the pool is ready regardless of hardware.
|
|
|
|
gigabyted
|
|
August 02, 2017, 01:11:37 AM |
|
If someone creates a pool does this mean that we will also have a distinct cpu miner, i would prefer to use a miner instead of the wallet, im used to this technique, i find it weird to mine with the mallet like we do right now. Just not used to this
|
|
|
|
happy_merchant
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 02, 2017, 01:27:54 AM |
|
If someone creates a pool does this mean that we will also have a distinct cpu miner, i would prefer to use a miner instead of the wallet, im used to this technique, i find it weird to mine with the mallet like we do right now. Just not used to this The dev has said that he wants to keep the pool miner with the wallet. A third party could potentially make a standalone miner, but you'd probably still have to run a Biblepay node due to the way BibleHash works so it wouldn't really accomplish much. If you don't want to run the graphical wallet to mine, you can do it from the command line. If you're on Windows, just run 'biblepayd.exe -gen=1 -genproclimit=<#threads>' (replace <#threads> with whatever number of threads you want to run). The exe is located in your Biblepay installation folder in the daemon directory. Alternatively, you can just run biblepayd.exe and then use biblepay-cli.exe to control it using the same commands as in the GUI debug menu (i.e. 'biblepay-cli.exe setgenerate true 4' to enable mining on 4 threads or 'biblepay-cli.exe getmininginfo' to check the current block and hashrate). If you do it that way, you can run biblepayd.exe with the -daemon option to make it run in the background without having to keep a console window open for it.
|
|
|
|
jmigdlc99
|
|
August 02, 2017, 01:34:20 AM |
|
Red flags here..
Does charity really need to have blockchain tech?
I fully support charity but it is sad to see that only 10% will be donated. Why don't the devs just ask for donations and donate it to orphans?? Because this is a money making scheme for the dev and he is using "charity" as a front. So unethical.
|
0xacBBa937A57ecE1298B5d350f40C0Eb16eC5fA4B
|
|
|
m4tsby
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
|
|
August 02, 2017, 01:45:02 AM |
|
can anyone lend a hand to a obvious WIN user. trying to compile on Mint so I can make use of this dual opteron 6272 server...
why cant i locate this? is Libtool not part of the ubuntu repository? thanks for any info-
Can't exec "libtoolize": No such file or directory at /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 345, <GEN7> line 5. autoreconf: failed to run libtoolize: No such file or directory autoreconf: libtoolize is needed because this package uses Libtool
|
|
|
|
|