Bitcoin Forum
May 19, 2022, 03:52:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 346 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW  (Read 235259 times)
osnwt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 12:13:02 PM
 #1301

If so, then another question: what's the difference between this project and Tor except that Tor nodes are free for everyone and still are decentralised?
1652975529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1652975529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1652975529
Reply with quote  #2

1652975529
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1652975529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1652975529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1652975529
Reply with quote  #2

1652975529
Report to moderator
1652975529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1652975529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1652975529
Reply with quote  #2

1652975529
Report to moderator
1652975529
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1652975529

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1652975529
Reply with quote  #2

1652975529
Report to moderator
SilverCondor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 247
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 01:49:00 PM
 #1302

Did devteam already get answer by Nova about listing?
Speedie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 02:00:29 PM
 #1303

when planing echange ?

The road map says that the exchange should happen soon.
Hopefully it will happen in the next week or two.

This is what the devs said in their latest update:

  • At this time, we are still waiting for response from NovaExchange regarding listing, as their 1 BTC listing fee is something the core team is able to budget out of personal coffers

Though I think an exchange listing is unimportant at the moment. The core project has a lot of potential; make enough progress there and you'll find exchanges will be falling over themselves to ask to list this coin.


Totally agreed... Devs should focus on making a product and then all exchanges will want to have a slice of the INTS markets... First product then sale... It has worked in the real world for dozens of years...

I'm fairly new to this coin, but FWIW I'm with these guys. The only rush to list on an exchange is if you're incurring mining expenses that you can't cover out of pocket and need to dump ASAP to pay the bills. Not a sound strategy. Otherwise let the product mature before even trying to get an exchange listing. It has great potential and doesn't need to be yet another list, pump, and miner dump coin.
TheKingInYellow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 257


Have you found the Yellow Sign?


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 02:14:44 PM
 #1304

Hello does anyone have an estimate for how much they're earning mining this? Don't care what card, just make sure to mention what it is you're using~

DAPS Project, anonymizing assets for the world. Controlling your financial sovereignty is your right, join now!
DAPS (Decentralized - Anonymous - Payment - System)
Zero-Knowledge Proofs - Revolutionary Proof-Of-Audit algo - Masternodes - PoSv3 - Worldwide community
osnwt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 02:32:05 PM
 #1305

Hello does anyone have an estimate for how much they're earning mining this? Don't care what card, just make sure to mention what it is you're using~
The hashrate is the same as Monero (there is a lot of resources to get different hardware rates).
Then there is a calculator on the official pool to estimate ITNS/day with known hashrate.
speedfire
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 04:13:37 PM
 #1306

Something wrong with the pool: http://intensecoin.com/pool/#/ Please check!!!!
valiant1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 121


Lethean Developer


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2017, 04:40:31 PM
Last edit: September 21, 2017, 05:03:43 PM by valiant1
 #1307

Quote
Try running cmake with -DPORTABLE=1 -DWITH_AVX2=0
Did not help, the mistakes are the same.

Did you `rm -rf build` first, before running `cmake -DPORTABLE=1 -DWITH_AVX2=0 ..` ? Which version of cmake are you using? Please also try running cmake with `-DHAVE_SSE42 -msse4.2 `. If that doesn't work, open the Makefile and add those arguments like so:

previous:

Code:
build-release: cmake-release
        cd build/release && $(MAKE)

new:
Code:
build-release: cmake-release
        cd build/release && $(MAKE) -DHAVE_SSE42 -msse4.2

Something wrong with the pool: http://intensecoin.com/pool/#/ Please check!!!!

Sorry, it wasn't making new blocks for about an hour. The VPS it is hosted on seems to get cranky after 7-10 days and requires the daemon be restarted. It's running smoothly now.

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊ THE SAFEST WAY TO BE ONLINE: BLOCKCHAIN VPN┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊
█ █ █ █ █ █  Medium Twitter Discord Reddit TelegramFacebook Whitepaper  █ █ █ █ █  
valiant1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 121


Lethean Developer


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2017, 04:47:24 PM
Last edit: September 21, 2017, 05:14:50 PM by valiant1
 #1308

will it work , I mean we already have VPNs, we pay for it, so why we invest in this COIN? , I just want a good logical answer

The VPNs most people use are purchased through centralized VPN companies. Most people don't want their activities, information and identity known by VPN companies. After all, most people use VPNs for anonymity. ITNS will offer a solution to this, and offer VPN anonymity because the endpoint of your VPN is not some large provider forced to keep records on clients. In most cases it will be a user at their house, or someone with dedicated or VPS hosting. We cut out the middleman of requiring a VPN company and instead make the VPN a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) process. Furthermore, the P2P mechanism allows users to generate revenue (in ITNS) for allowing others to use their connection, creating a consumer-driven marketplace.

Also consider that centralized VPN providers allow companies and countries to easily perform sweeping blocks toward IPs used by the VPN company. This defeats the purpose of using a VPN since the nodes are inaccessible. With a P2P decentralized VPN network, it's impossible to categorically ban IPs as being accessed for providing VPN services. Consider this in the context of China, NK and other countries banning VPN use. The potential of a distributed, decentralized, P2P VPN system is much greater in terms of broad accessibility than single centralized providers.

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊ THE SAFEST WAY TO BE ONLINE: BLOCKCHAIN VPN┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊
█ █ █ █ █ █  Medium Twitter Discord Reddit TelegramFacebook Whitepaper  █ █ █ █ █  
cryptomaxsun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1348


Ukrainians will resist


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2017, 06:29:22 PM
 #1309

Add Makefile 
Code:
build-release: cmake-release
        cd build/release && $(MAKE) -DHAVE_SSE42 -msse4.2


Code:
intensecoin-master# rm -rf build
root@xci:/home/max/intensecoin-master# cmake -DPORTABLE=1 -DWITH_AVX2=0
-- Boost version: 1.55.0
-- Found the following Boost libraries:
--   system
--   filesystem
--   thread
--   date_time
--   chrono
--   regex
--   serialization
--   program_options
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:108 (message):
  Could NOT find Threads (missing: Threads_FOUND)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:315 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindThreads.cmake:166 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
  external/rocksdb/CMakeLists.txt:319 (find_package)


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/home/max/intensecoin-master/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/home/max/intensecoin-master/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".

❘|❘ Cлaвa Укpaинe! ❘|❘ Glory to Ukraine! ❘|❘
❘|❘ Укpaинa пoбeдит! Ukraine will win! ❘|❘
cryptkeeper1979
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 21, 2017, 07:00:25 PM
 #1310

will it work , I mean we already have VPNs, we pay for it, so why we invest in this COIN? , I just want a good logical answer

The VPNs most people use are purchased through centralized VPN companies. Most people don't want their activities, information and identity known by VPN companies. After all, most people use VPNs for anonymity. ITNS will offer a solution to this, and offer VPN anonymity because the endpoint of your VPN is not some large provider forced to keep records on clients. In most cases it will be a user at their house, or someone with dedicated or VPS hosting. We cut out the middleman of requiring a VPN company and instead make the VPN a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) process. Furthermore, the P2P mechanism allows users to generate revenue (in ITNS) for allowing others to use their connection, creating a consumer-driven marketplace.

Also consider that centralized VPN providers allow companies and countries to easily perform sweeping blocks toward IPs used by the VPN company. This defeats the purpose of using a VPN since the nodes are inaccessible. With a P2P decentralized VPN network, it's impossible to categorically ban IPs as being accessed for providing VPN services. Consider this in the context of China, NK and other countries banning VPN use. The potential of a distributed, decentralized, P2P VPN system is much greater in terms of broad accessibility than single centralized providers.

It sounds great, and VPN's on the blockchain are only inevitable, I also love the fact this is A. on Cryptonight and B. PoW...That being said, allowing people to be peer-to-peer VPN's is great and all, but doesn't that pose a risk if someone else is doing malicious activities on their end through you? So you essentially get PoS/Stake by allowing others to utilize your server/wallet/peer network but that also assumes some risk doesn't it? Also, I'm not happy to see a standard "cryptonight whitepaper" on the site, this project should have a detailed whitepaper of their own.

BTC: 1PP5r4YnGNXo4TFpCX4TKgSjrh9qRmWocn
Speedie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 07:45:27 PM
 #1311

https://intensemining.pro/

33 workers at the moment.


Now 43 workers and 50+ KH/s. Nice and stable too. C'mon guys, let's spread the mining power out. One pool with 90%+ of the network hashrate isn't good for anyone.
alexius89-2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 104



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 02:00:09 AM
 #1312

https://intensemining.pro/

33 workers at the moment.


Now 43 workers and 50+ KH/s. Nice and stable too. C'mon guys, let's spread the mining power out. One pool with 90%+ of the network hashrate isn't good for anyone.

If a few you guys can confirm that this pool is paying out as it should and you receive the coins then we can add it to the OP this weekend.

Cheers

▀    ★★★ BAND PROTOCOL ★★★ 
┊┈ DECENTRALIZED ORACLE FRAMEWORK FOR WEB 3.0┊┈
█ █ █  Medium Twitter Reddit Telegram Whitepaper  █ █ █  
Speedie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 02:05:35 AM
 #1313

https://intensemining.pro/

33 workers at the moment.


Now 43 workers and 50+ KH/s. Nice and stable too. C'mon guys, let's spread the mining power out. One pool with 90%+ of the network hashrate isn't good for anyone.

If a few you guys can confirm that this pool is paying out as it should and you receive the coins then we can add it to the OP this weekend.

Cheers

I'm about 1/5th of the pool's hashrate at the moment (kinda sad for a bunch of 7950 GPUs LOL) and I can confirm that I'm being paid exactly as I should be. Hope that helps.

valiant1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 121


Lethean Developer


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 03:32:44 AM
 #1314

Add Makefile 
Code:
build-release: cmake-release
        cd build/release && $(MAKE) -DHAVE_SSE42 -msse4.2


Code:
intensecoin-master# rm -rf build
root@xci:/home/max/intensecoin-master# cmake -DPORTABLE=1 -DWITH_AVX2=0
-- Boost version: 1.55.0
-- Found the following Boost libraries:
--   system
--   filesystem
--   thread
--   date_time
--   chrono
--   regex
--   serialization
--   program_options
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:108 (message):
  Could NOT find Threads (missing: Threads_FOUND)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:315 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindThreads.cmake:166 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
  external/rocksdb/CMakeLists.txt:319 (find_package)


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/home/max/intensecoin-master/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/home/max/intensecoin-master/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".

Need to cmake .. from build dir, not cmake in the main src dir. Also please try only cmake with the new options first, before you modify the makefile.

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊ THE SAFEST WAY TO BE ONLINE: BLOCKCHAIN VPN┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊
█ █ █ █ █ █  Medium Twitter Discord Reddit TelegramFacebook Whitepaper  █ █ █ █ █  
valiant1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 121


Lethean Developer


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 03:33:29 AM
 #1315

will it work , I mean we already have VPNs, we pay for it, so why we invest in this COIN? , I just want a good logical answer

The VPNs most people use are purchased through centralized VPN companies. Most people don't want their activities, information and identity known by VPN companies. After all, most people use VPNs for anonymity. ITNS will offer a solution to this, and offer VPN anonymity because the endpoint of your VPN is not some large provider forced to keep records on clients. In most cases it will be a user at their house, or someone with dedicated or VPS hosting. We cut out the middleman of requiring a VPN company and instead make the VPN a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) process. Furthermore, the P2P mechanism allows users to generate revenue (in ITNS) for allowing others to use their connection, creating a consumer-driven marketplace.

Also consider that centralized VPN providers allow companies and countries to easily perform sweeping blocks toward IPs used by the VPN company. This defeats the purpose of using a VPN since the nodes are inaccessible. With a P2P decentralized VPN network, it's impossible to categorically ban IPs as being accessed for providing VPN services. Consider this in the context of China, NK and other countries banning VPN use. The potential of a distributed, decentralized, P2P VPN system is much greater in terms of broad accessibility than single centralized providers.

It sounds great, and VPN's on the blockchain are only inevitable, I also love the fact this is A. on Cryptonight and B. PoW...That being said, allowing people to be peer-to-peer VPN's is great and all, but doesn't that pose a risk if someone else is doing malicious activities on their end through you? So you essentially get PoS/Stake by allowing others to utilize your server/wallet/peer network but that also assumes some risk doesn't it? Also, I'm not happy to see a standard "cryptonight whitepaper" on the site, this project should have a detailed whitepaper of their own.

Operating VPNs is indeed a risk, no way around that. We have plans for a whitepaper in our roadmap (October).

▀    ★★★ LETHEAN ★★★ 
┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊ THE SAFEST WAY TO BE ONLINE: BLOCKCHAIN VPN┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊┈ ┊
█ █ █ █ █ █  Medium Twitter Discord Reddit TelegramFacebook Whitepaper  █ █ █ █ █  
alexius89-2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 254
Merit: 104



View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 05:00:25 AM
 #1316

The OP has been updated. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2090765.msg20885571#msg20885571

We have added the following three Mining Pools:

https://intensemining.pro/

http://itns.globalpool.cc/

http://intensecoinpool.sytes.net/



Enjoy hashing! ^_^

▀    ★★★ BAND PROTOCOL ★★★ 
┊┈ DECENTRALIZED ORACLE FRAMEWORK FOR WEB 3.0┊┈
█ █ █  Medium Twitter Reddit Telegram Whitepaper  █ █ █  
osnwt
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 353
Merit: 251


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 05:47:44 AM
 #1317

The VPNs most people use are purchased through centralized VPN companies.
...
Could you answer my question above:

Quote
what's the difference between this project and Tor except that Tor nodes are free for everyone and still are decentralised?
hackg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 06:02:37 AM
 #1318

If the VPN can work and without major latency, slowing down the browser experience, then this project could defintiely have potential

The value of VPN is questionable when there is a corporate company you need to trust, that the govt can call into court demanding to see IP logs and records and such

If the VPN is decentralized though, there is nobody to subpoena into court
Speedie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 254


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 12:17:13 PM
 #1319

Another aspect to consider with the VPN service is bandwidth control. General surfing / browsing via a VPN running through a connection is one thing, streaming 4K UHD movies is quite another. I think there needs to be something built into the product that allows a VPN provider to cap the bandwidth usage.

internetfloozy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 108
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 12:44:30 PM
 #1320

Another aspect to consider with the VPN service is bandwidth control. General surfing / browsing via a VPN running through a connection is one thing, streaming 4K UHD movies is quite another. I think there needs to be something built into the product that allows a VPN provider to cap the bandwidth usage.



This...

A decentralized VPN service should be used for anonymous browsing not for streaming TV Shows/Movies from other countries.
Pages: « 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 ... 346 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!