[ANN]BANKERA – Building the Bank for the Blockchain Era

[jubeis_coffee]

go to proxy URL:  https://m.sslsecureproxy.com/

then type bankera's URL:  www.bankera.com

They have job openings in 2 cities.

[Ansault]

The exchange isn't a problem as is. The problem lies in the fact that they are moving away further and further from the original plan. The plan was to make a crypto bank! BANKERA not EXCHANGERA If you have read everything correctly i have asked multiple times if and when they applied for a banking license.

The answer to that was:
that it would be a waiste of time and resrouces to go and get a banking license because Pervesk already has one.
Next to that we always have been told that pervesk was part of the whole "eco-system", but yesterday they told us there will be no wr from Pervesk.

So to keep it simpel. The revenue which should make our wr is now done by a sister company which they can let charge every price as they are the owners and whatver goos into Pervesk they don't have to share with you and me.
And for Bankera there will be no banking license what was the idea what attracted me to the project.

From the whitepaper:

To achieve this, Bankera will not only become a regulated European bank, but 
also will seek to become authorised issuer and acquirer of payment cards and obtain 
banking licenses in key jurisdictions to avoid dependency on the correspondent bank 
services, which are extremely fragile nowadays as identified by the World Bank when 
they concluded that correspondent banking relationships (CBRs) are declining due to 
several factors including AML risk or reduction of risk. 

Are you saying they have gone on record completely changing their tune about not wanting to rely on correspondent banks (like Pervesk) and abandoned the goal to become a fully licenced bank?

I'm not saying anything. This is what i'm trying to find out, if you read the last few pages this is the conclusion one might draw. But you tell me what you make out of it?

Unless you can produce concrete evidence Bankera has gone 180 on their promise to become a fully licenced bank, you're just contributing to the FUD. Running around like chicken little yelling "Is the sky falling?!?!?! Is it?!?!?!?" is not helping anybody.

[huup]

The exchange isn't a problem as is. The problem lies in the fact that they are moving away further and further from the original plan. The plan was to make a crypto bank! BANKERA not EXCHANGERA If you have read everything correctly i have asked multiple times if and when they applied for a banking license.

The answer to that was:
that it would be a waiste of time and resrouces to go and get a banking license because Pervesk already has one.
Next to that we always have been told that pervesk was part of the whole "eco-system", but yesterday they told us there will be no wr from Pervesk.

So to keep it simpel. The revenue which should make our wr is now done by a sister company which they can let charge every price as they are the owners and whatver goos into Pervesk they don't have to share with you and me.
And for Bankera there will be no banking license what was the idea what attracted me to the project.

From the whitepaper:

To achieve this, Bankera will not only become a regulated European bank, but 
also will seek to become authorised issuer and acquirer of payment cards and obtain 
banking licenses in key jurisdictions to avoid dependency on the correspondent bank 
services, which are extremely fragile nowadays as identified by the World Bank when 
they concluded that correspondent banking relationships (CBRs) are declining due to 
several factors including AML risk or reduction of risk. 

Are you saying they have gone on record completely changing their tune about not wanting to rely on correspondent banks (like Pervesk) and abandoned the goal to become a fully licenced bank?

I'm not saying anything. This is what i'm trying to find out, if you read the last few pages this is the conclusion one might draw. But you tell me what you make out of it?

Unless you can produce concrete evidence Bankera has gone 180 on their promise to become a fully licenced bank, you're just contributing to the FUD. Running around like chicken little yelling "Is the sky falling?!?!?! Is it?!?!?!?" is not helping anybody.

well unlike you running around with fairytales and fairydust spreading fomo all day. I thought i invested in a BANK. Not some crowdfunding project who wishes to send some home meals or something. So unless they have a good explanation how things are managed and organised i wish you keep your FUD campain to yourself. Because at the moment we are a year in and the only answer i'm getting is that getting a bank license will be a waist of money. If that for you sounds like the next new crypto bank fine by me! but i rather get some reansurance ok harry potter?

[Ansault]

Just glanced at the chat and found this:




Their stance hasn't changed at all, Bankera is going to be a bank. So what's all the bellyaching about?

[Pab]

Ansault thanks for that. I suppose it depends on the interpretation of currency exchange. My interpretation was an extension of SC functionality as a brokerage exchange converting fiat between fiat/ fiat to the big crypto's, crypto back fiat. A trading platform/exchange for just crypto is a different beast all together IMHO.

Given the crypto/blockchain background of this project, I don't think it's a stretch to take it to mean crypto-centric exchange. Spectrocoin's platform was already operational during the ICO and so was the (trading) exchange demo, which any ICO participant could test drive. I don't see any kind of misleading or obfuscation there.

Why is the exchange suddenly a problem anyway? It's a revenue generating mechanism that benefits all token holders.

The exchange isn't a problem as is. The problem lies in the fact that they are moving away further and further from the original plan. The plan was to make a crypto bank! BANKERA not EXCHANGERA If you have read everything correctly i have asked multiple times if and when they applied for a banking license.

The answer to that was:
that it would be a waiste of time and resrouces to go and get a banking license because Pervesk already has one.
Next to that we always have been told that pervesk was part of the whole "eco-system", but yesterday they told us there will be no wr from Pervesk.

So to keep it simpel. The revenue which should make our wr is now done by a sister company which they can let charge every price as they are the owners and whatver goos into Pervesk they don't have to share with you and me.
And for Bankera there will be no banking license what was the idea what attracted me to the project.

According to unofficial data, Banker was interested in the possibilities to obtain a license from the Bank of Lithuania, but was not endorsed as it did not collect details on the identity of investors in ICO Banker

https://www.vz.lt/rinkos/2018/09/21/mokejimu-istaigai-ir-jos-vadovui--12-mln-eur-baudu#ixzz5T0jPZ9ZB


Spectro Finance, headed by Mr. Karalevicius, also affiliated with the Spectro Coin cryptanalytic exchange, did not submit the last year's financial statements to the Center of Registers. The company employs 36 people.
That above will be delivered soon i guess

[andrei1982]

so ,,should i sell my 5 million BNK tokens or not ?

[huup]

so ,,should i sell my 5 million BNK tokens or not ?

not yet! it seems they got the message.

[Ikikyabut]

Ansault thanks for that. I suppose it depends on the interpretation of currency exchange. My interpretation was an extension of SC functionality as a brokerage exchange converting fiat between fiat/ fiat to the big crypto's, crypto back fiat. A trading platform/exchange for just crypto is a different beast all together IMHO.

Given the crypto/blockchain background of this project, I don't think it's a stretch to take it to mean crypto-centric exchange. Spectrocoin's platform was already operational during the ICO and so was the (trading) exchange demo, which any ICO participant could test drive. I don't see any kind of misleading or obfuscation there.

Why is the exchange suddenly a problem anyway? It's a revenue generating mechanism that benefits all token holders.

The exchange isn't a problem as is. The problem lies in the fact that they are moving away further and further from the original plan. The plan was to make a crypto bank! BANKERA not EXCHANGERA If you have read everything correctly i have asked multiple times if and when they applied for a banking license.

The answer to that was:
that it would be a waiste of time and resrouces to go and get a banking license because Pervesk already has one.
Next to that we always have been told that pervesk was part of the whole "eco-system", but yesterday they told us there will be no wr from Pervesk.

So to keep it simpel. The revenue which should make our wr is now done by a sister company which they can let charge every price as they are the owners and whatver goos into Pervesk they don't have to share with you and me.
And for Bankera there will be no banking license what was the idea what attracted me to the project.

According to unofficial data, Banker was interested in the possibilities to obtain a license from the Bank of Lithuania, but was not endorsed as it did not collect details on the identity of investors in ICO Banker

https://www.vz.lt/rinkos/2018/09/21/mokejimu-istaigai-ir-jos-vadovui--12-mln-eur-baudu#ixzz5T0jPZ9ZB


Spectro Finance, headed by Mr. Karalevicius, also affiliated with the Spectro Coin cryptanalytic exchange, did not submit the last year's financial statements to the Center of Registers. The company employs 36 people.
That above will be delivered soon i guess

See now this article makes the picture clearer to me. 

[Moris1987]

Just glanced at the chat and found this:

https://i.imgur.com/P4i4qmb.png


Their stance hasn't changed at all, Bankera is going to be a bank. So what's all the bellyaching about?

But they already have bank in Vanuti:) lol

The person who believe in this BS is so either retarded or blind. They are not even capable to arrange supply number on CMC.

[DT13]

Bankera has invited a critical investor who is preparing a lawsuit against Bankera. 



           
 Info from Telegram:

Ingrid Schuurmans:
Hi all, this group is meant for all Bankera investors who have lost faith in the team. Right now we are preparing for a class action for which you can register with me. Info will be here and on FB, Bankera ICO Investors Community.

 Info from the bankera chat.

 joye October 9, 2018 10:58 AM

Guys, our team decided to invite one of the Bankera's community contributors to our office in Vilnius to meet a team and see on what we are working on now. Community member Ingrid was selected to receive an official invitation. We do believe that Ingrid will be happy to accept it and share her experience with a community as well! 😉

[DT13]

Read and learn @Moris this is how you do it

[jamolo]

Bankera has invited a critical investor who is preparing a lawsuit against Bankera. 



           
 Info from Telegram:

Ingrid Schuurmans:
Hi all, this group is meant for all Bankera investors who have lost faith in the team. Right now we are preparing for a class action for which you can register with me. Info will be here and on FB, Bankera ICO Investors Community.

 Info from the bankera chat.

 joye October 9, 2018 10:58 AM

Guys, our team decided to invite one of the Bankera's community contributors to our office in Vilnius to meet a team and see on what we are working on now. Community member Ingrid was selected to receive an official invitation. We do believe that Ingrid will be happy to accept it and share her experience with a community as well! 😉

Great bankeras team move, now have to invite moristroll 😁😁😁😁

[Ansault]

Bankera has invited a critical investor who is preparing a lawsuit against Bankera.  


          
 Info from Telegram:

Ingrid Schuurmans:
Hi all, this group is meant for all Bankera investors who have lost faith in the team. Right now we are preparing for a class action for which you can register with me. Info will be here and on FB, Bankera ICO Investors Community.

 Info from the bankera chat.

 joye October 9, 2018 10:58 AM

Guys, our team decided to invite one of the Bankera's community contributors to our office in Vilnius to meet a team and see on what we are working on now. Community member Ingrid was selected to receive an official invitation. We do believe that Ingrid will be happy to accept it and share her experience with a community as well! 😉

So, Vytautas is gonna wine & dine some antsy "community member" who wanted her Lambo & Gucci bag yesterday. It's not a bad way to play it, but Vytautas - you don't have to go all the way with her if you don't want to  No one will blame you 

[qf3l3k]

Bankera has invited a critical investor who is preparing a lawsuit against Bankera. 



           
 Info from Telegram:

Ingrid Schuurmans:
Hi all, this group is meant for all Bankera investors who have lost faith in the team. Right now we are preparing for a class action for which you can register with me. Info will be here and on FB, Bankera ICO Investors Community.

 Info from the bankera chat.

 joye October 9, 2018 10:58 AM

Guys, our team decided to invite one of the Bankera's community contributors to our office in Vilnius to meet a team and see on what we are working on now. Community member Ingrid was selected to receive an official invitation. We do believe that Ingrid will be happy to accept it and share her experience with a community as well! 😉

That is pathetic to be honest. Instead of good news about project development we got some BS about party for chosen one.
?!?!??!WTF?!?!?!?!
That is now plan to use money from ICO?

[fred_handsome7]

A bank of crypto.. this could be what we need right now, to unite the people from different standpoints

it will be a game changer to be able to bank your crypto the way fiat is been banked. very unique and impressive concept.

[flashtr0n]

I'm trying to make a Spectrocoin deposit in Ether Classic, iExec. Instead of the wallet adress to replenish, it shows me the following error:

"Some errors occurred:
Can't get deposit address. Please contact support"

In the tech support chat I was asked to contact ShapeShift myself. Banker - if you accept payments through ShapeShift, and it doesn’t work for you now - why is this my problem? It's your problem! I, what would make MY money to YOU, also should solve technical problems for you? This is ridiculous. This is not a business, not a bank, but a kindergarten of some kind! Fix your system. Or ShapeShift, too, began to suspect you of fraud? Why this problem?

[Ikikyabut]

I'm trying to make a Spectrocoin deposit in Ether Classic, iExec. Instead of the wallet adress to replenish, it shows me the following error:

"Some errors occurred:
Can't get deposit address. Please contact support"

In the tech support chat I was asked to contact ShapeShift myself. Banker - if you accept payments through ShapeShift, and it doesn’t work for you now - why is this my problem? It's your problem! I, what would make MY money to YOU, also should solve technical problems for you? This is ridiculous. This is not a business, not a bank, but a kindergarten of some kind! Fix your system. Or ShapeShift, too, began to suspect you of fraud? Why this problem?

I didn’t think they had a eth classic wallet, only eth btc dash nem bnk.

[Bankera]

I'm trying to make a Spectrocoin deposit in Ether Classic, iExec. Instead of the wallet adress to replenish, it shows me the following error:

"Some errors occurred:
Can't get deposit address. Please contact support"

In the tech support chat I was asked to contact ShapeShift myself. Banker - if you accept payments through ShapeShift, and it doesn’t work for you now - why is this my problem? It's your problem! I, what would make MY money to YOU, also should solve technical problems for you? This is ridiculous. This is not a business, not a bank, but a kindergarten of some kind! Fix your system. Or ShapeShift, too, began to suspect you of fraud? Why this problem?

Hello,

SpectroCoin does not offer support to Ether classic. It is possible to deposit it through a 3rd party service, as informed on the website. Therefore, if you have problems with your transaction, please contact ShapeShift, the service provider, as informed by SpectroCoin support.

[Ribak1992]

I'm trying to make a Spectrocoin deposit in Ether Classic, iExec. Instead of the wallet adress to replenish, it shows me the following error:

"Some errors occurred:
Can't get deposit address. Please contact support"

In the tech support chat I was asked to contact ShapeShift myself. Banker - if you accept payments through ShapeShift, and it doesn’t work for you now - why is this my problem? It's your problem! I, what would make MY money to YOU, also should solve technical problems for you? This is ridiculous. This is not a business, not a bank, but a kindergarten of some kind! Fix your system. Or ShapeShift, too, began to suspect you of fraud? Why this problem?

as you answered above there is simply no option to add through this gateway. you can certainly try but i think it's better to use not the ether classic, but other options that are exactly supported.

[flashtr0n]

I'm trying to make a Spectrocoin deposit in Ether Classic, iExec. Instead of the wallet adress to replenish, it shows me the following error:

"Some errors occurred:
Can't get deposit address. Please contact support"

In the tech support chat I was asked to contact ShapeShift myself. Banker - if you accept payments through ShapeShift, and it doesn’t work for you now - why is this my problem? It's your problem! I, what would make MY money to YOU, also should solve technical problems for you? This is ridiculous. This is not a business, not a bank, but a kindergarten of some kind! Fix your system. Or ShapeShift, too, began to suspect you of fraud? Why this problem?

as you answered above there is simply no option to add through this gateway. you can certainly try but i think it's better to use not the ether classic, but other options that are exactly supported.

I had to replenish the account through NEM.