borderline
|
|
October 12, 2017, 01:52:57 PM |
|
when electrum is connect to 188.226 etc i can see my balance if change the peer for example 172.19.16 my balance is 0
|
|
|
|
borderline
|
|
October 12, 2017, 01:57:54 PM |
|
ok now work...
|
|
|
|
SHIELDcurrency (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:10:10 PM |
|
when electrum is connect to 188.226 etc i can see my balance if change the peer for example 172.19.16 my balance is 0
This is because 172.19.16.117 is not ours, you should always use 188.226.178.216 The network page will be fixed in the next update - The SHIELD team
|
|
|
|
borderline
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:11:39 PM |
|
ok now work...
not really sometime the transaction was send immediatly sometimes the wallet it's blocked on broadcasting transaction
|
|
|
|
SmallRig
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
SafeCoin-SAFE
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:12:17 PM |
|
Coin price is 4 sats !! .. damn . i should stop mining and start buying lol. no way for a good profit
|
|
|
|
rptr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:29:18 PM |
|
too bad this coin isnt a masternode coin, that way would have 100 sats, people are crazy only after PoS/masternode coins, which is sad.
|
|
|
|
TheKryptonian
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:35:04 PM |
|
too bad this coin isnt a masternode coin, that way would have 100 sats, people are crazy only after PoS/masternode coins, which is sad.
My thoughts are: 1) This project is 9 days old. There is a money supply of over 200 million coins. This means the market cap at 3 sats (not 4) is US$30,000. This is actually quite good for such a young coin. Plus this is a low volume exchange, which suppresses prices a little. 2) The supply growth has way slowed with block halvings. So after any initial dumps, it will be very hard for miners to flood the market with sales. I think these are encouraging signs. Plus, the full roadmap is not unveiled, so we may see masternodes in the future. At the very least we will see PoS, which will encourage holding too.
|
|
|
|
gregor71
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:49:54 PM |
|
We just lowered our fee to 0.1% guys, come It's not a good thing to have 80% of the hash centralized, one error or late update from the hash holder and the chain break. Fortunately, it's solved now. To secure the network, please, spread the hash. https://bigmine.org-a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://bigmine.org:5433 -u YOUR_WALLET -p stats,c=XSH
|
|
|
|
xiaoxz
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:53:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
TheKryptonian
|
|
October 12, 2017, 02:53:54 PM |
|
We just lowered our fee to 0.1% guys, come It's not a good thing to have 80% of the hash centralized, one error or late update from the hash holder and the chain break. Fortunately, it's solved now. To secure the network, please, spread the hash. https://bigmine.org-a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://bigmine.org:5433 -u YOUR_WALLET -p stats,c=XSH +1. I am not mining on umine because it is bad for the network. Please do the same. This is not a knock against umine, which is a good pool (in my opinion), but they should also want the hash spread out. Concentrated hash is bad for umine and bad for the coin. This coin could actually be very valuable soon once initial dumping is over, because the supply growth will grind to a halt (good scheme to prevent deflation). Let's not ruin it for ourselves with carelessness over where we mine
|
|
|
|
sls
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
|
October 12, 2017, 03:20:54 PM |
|
We just lowered our fee to 0.1% guys, come It's not a good thing to have 80% of the hash centralized, one error or late update from the hash holder and the chain break. Fortunately, it's solved now. To secure the network, please, spread the hash. https://bigmine.org-a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://bigmine.org:5433 -u YOUR_WALLET -p stats,c=XSH make Lyra2 algo
|
|
|
|
gregor71
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2017, 03:51:44 PM |
|
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.
We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.
Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.
And further...
For dev You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?
|
|
|
|
SHIELDcurrency (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:05:53 PM |
|
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.
We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.
Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.
And further...
For dev You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?
Hey We don't really understand what you mean with that, can you send me a PM about your problems, we'll solve them as soon as possible! The SHIELD team.
|
|
|
|
gregor71
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:27:44 PM |
|
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.
We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.
Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.
And further...
For dev You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?
Hey We don't really understand what you mean with that, can you send me a PM about your problems, we'll solve them as soon as possible! The SHIELD team. check pm
|
|
|
|
SHIELDcurrency (OP)
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:31:34 PM |
|
Hey everyone,
we, first of all, want to advice everyone to spread the hash as keeping most miners on one or two pools could be dangerous for the chain, this is also why we are working very hard on our own pool. We're also announcing an article about our PoS article that will be uploaded to our Medium tomorrow (we'll link it here and on our twitter, don't worry.) The exact time is still unknown but it'll be there!
The SHIELD team.
|
|
|
|
trgnn
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:33:12 PM |
|
We close SHIELD in out pool. He not working.
We find a solution, but in the end the decision is always different? Except for the umine, not one branch of the chain will be correct.
Blocks on our pools are the same, but any of our found solutions do not fall into the chain. Developers need to intervene. You have got the CENTRALIZED network.
And further...
For dev You specifically did that when you restart the purse logs are stricken?
Hey We don't really understand what you mean with that, can you send me a PM about your problems, we'll solve them as soon as possible! The SHIELD team. We're reinstalling the wallet from scratch, rebuilding everything from the last sources (MASTER BRANCH). Dev, we'll need you here to be sure we're on the right chain. Nobody want this coin to fail because of a centralized network. Please, pm me your Skype if you have one, or make a Discord so we can fix this issue as soon as we can.
|
|
|
|
TheKryptonian
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:37:01 PM |
|
How do I see what nodes to use to make sure I connect to umine chain?
And again, +1 to everyone saying spread the hash. This project has a ton of potential, let's focus on execution now and price later.
|
|
|
|
SmallRig
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
SafeCoin-SAFE
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:39:41 PM |
|
What's going on with the chain ? And we need a stable QT wallet pls dev..
|
|
|
|
trgnn
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:40:45 PM |
|
Dev could you confirm us this is the right wallet to use on pools 2.1.0.0-4e6c77c-bet (it's the one from the MASTER branch of your sources). We didn't have the right block height the first time, if UMINE built on the dev branch, did they forked again ? They don't seem to work with the same version.
|
|
|
|
TheKryptonian
|
|
October 12, 2017, 04:43:14 PM |
|
Dev could you confirm us this is the right wallet to use on pools 2.1.0.0-4e6c77c-bet (it's the one from the MASTER branch of your sources). We didn't have the right block height the first time, if UMINE built on the dev branch, did they forked again ? They don't seem to work with the same version.
This was umine's post: Hello everyone, sorry for the delay. We've updated wallet to "v2.1.0.0-ada57c6-funky-beta" version
|
|
|
|
|