[ANN] Ignite Ratings - Decentralized Ratings and Index Fund

[PDAngel]

Well, for their goal they must build a lot of trust around themselves. It will require time, and lot of patience. And a lot of teamwork.

Yes, they need invest on so much money and many people also. And of course they need everyone building Ignite Ratings togethers. Anyway, reviews have more and more person give will nearly correct information.

[1715250332]

1715250332

[mardaed]

We will happy to this promising project launch, we reviewed your website, you got a great team setup, I believe they are the main reason behind this great blossom of success, however we would like to know what mechanism of records you maintain to capture the ignite ratings

[Rabby637]

This is ICO police or ICO for the people and by the people? Just kidding, but yes I think this is a nice one. People being paid to rate in favour of ICOs , makes it very difficult to separate real from fake. Rating being done solely by an anonymous crowd and favouring a particular ICO means their is alot of potentials there. No conflict of interest or secrect handshake puts this ICO at the top of my list.

Maybe it's good to know that there data about the rating of an ICO is being transparent just to be sure that the investor knows where does it coming from. Aside from that, this project is still under development so maybe they can add more reliable source when it comes to ICO ratings.

Of course, the developer will do everything possible to create an independent rating, but ICO is very much and the number of them is growing. How does the platform plan to collect information about the passing ICO?

That's the challenge of this project on how they collect information about a new ICO. Knowing that their services is to rate an ICO based on their reliable sources. This team must have many specialists that has a deeper understanding about an ICO.

Yeah developer must be add some different thing from another ICO project. Every ICO project have some same thing as usual as they add their project. If Ignite want to conquer then developer have to add some different thing.

[Arvilaine]

I can already take a grasp of how this platform will work. Only those token-holders will be able to participate in its ecosystem.
The ratings won't be manipulated by paying a token holder since at the end the token holder will only gain from a successful investment asset.

[coinbitcoin91]

just some advice... you should try to keep the user base at the same level that you attracted them... if your users are found on this forum please give them all the info they want .. on this forum ... and not send them off to other websites in hope to find the info that should already be on this ANN thread.

Very good speech. I also do not understand the developers who send users to other sites. I think it's the team's responsibility to help with the project's flying. If the developer does not normally communicate this is a bad sign.

Excellent advice, because it's been a long time since the beginning of this project, and no news and updates. The people demand some news from the developers to be sure of the project that everything is good and they can support it further.

[Pokesoul]

I think Ignite Ratings is changing the game for decentralizing ratings and index fund. Cause most of binary options and even trading platform are lacking that kind of service. Ignite ratings has more sleek version when it comes to trading platform and just look all of the details that they are presenting in their project, isn't that well organized and well presented? For me, ignite ratings are the platforms we really should support. Yes, it might be a new kind of platform but maybe this is the change you really want.

I do not think that other ratings will not be needed if this rating works, but it will help create an independent additional opinion. And independent opinion will be useful to the whole community.

[feeltun]

I think Ignite Ratings is changing the game for decentralizing ratings and index fund. Cause most of binary options and even trading platform are lacking that kind of service. Ignite ratings has more sleek version when it comes to trading platform and just look all of the details that they are presenting in their project, isn't that well organized and well presented? For me, ignite ratings are the platforms we really should support. Yes, it might be a new kind of platform but maybe this is the change you really want.

I do not think that other ratings will not be needed if this rating works, but it will help create an independent additional opinion.

I agree, if this project will support by many users as well as investors and having more funds ,well definitely this project will succeed. As one of there platform is to create the world’s first democratic, self-levelling and self-governing ratings system, fostering transparency, fairness and trust in the marketplace.

The developer has ambitious plans for the community, but I'm not sure that it will work for all projects. How will the rating be prepared for little-known projects?

[BRNSTYLE]

Finding a honest review on certain coin or token is hard to get in current time, I have only few people on youtube that I trust them, but most of time they only made review on few projects and I have to read or watch others videos that I don't really trust since a lot of them are getting money to promote those project.
According to ignite's team, they are going to build a platform than will provide a honest review on those project to help us choose to the right one to invest in.

Honesty is an abstract term.
One might be 100% honest about the project he's reviewing, but that's no guarantee that he is actually right. And vice versa.
There's a real demand for an impartial analysis in the market, but for now, I'm a bit concerned about project's odds and it's only because of project's complexity.

[Semaj123]

Just a sort of review about the Ignite RATINGS platform places the burden of generating “profits” squarely into the hands of IGNT holders themselves, and there is no expectation of profits for those IGNT holders who do not actively participate in the Ignite RATINGS process.

[Igniteratings]

I can already take a grasp of how this platform will work. Only those token-holders will be able to participate in its ecosystem.
The ratings won't be manipulated by paying a token holder since at the end the token holder will only gain from a successful investment asset.

All the token holders are anonymous on the platform, we don’t have any user names or anyway to identify or contact  users, or even identify a user. We feel this keeps things more honest and users less likely to try and cheat.

All ratings are reviewed by the ignite community . Only ratings which come from users with a strong reputation are considered to have an influence on the rating of an ICO or crypto asset. If a user provides bad ratings or is thought to be manipulating our community will down vote his reputation so that he has no influence.

The platform is ambitious but very important for this market and finance in general. Allready we have a few hedge funds which would like to use the software along with some other use cases.

[seriin]

This project is really good and interesting. I will be keep looking forward to this Ignite Ratings for god news and updates. I believed that this project will continue to make better progress in the community to be more productive so that more investors will come to this. GoodLuck to the whole team of Ignite Ratings for the upcoming Token Sale. I hope and waiting for the good and positives news and outcome ahead. Keep developing for the better remarks of this project and continue make your way to success.

[quimbi777651]

Finding a honest review on certain coin or token is hard to get in current time, I have only few people on youtube that I trust them, but most of time they only made review on few projects and I have to read or watch others videos that I don't really trust since a lot of them are getting money to promote those project.
According to ignite's team, they are going to build a platform than will provide a honest review on those project to help us choose to the right one to invest in.

Honesty is an abstract term.
One might be 100% honest about the project he's reviewing, but that's no guarantee that he is actually right. And vice versa.
There's a real demand for an impartial analysis in the market, but for now, I'm a bit concerned about project's odds and it's only because of project's complexity.

Very well said about the problem of existing ratings. As I understand it, the project will express the opinion of most of the participants in the community and the likelihood that it will be correct more.

[ehrz22]

We will happy to this promising project launch, we reviewed your website, you got a great team setup, I believe they are the main reason behind this great blossom of success, however we would like to know what mechanism of records you maintain to capture the ignite ratings

Agreed. However, I wonder why you say 'we' instead of 'I'? Are you the team of another project? Btw, it is a good choice to review the website since the website looks so nice to see.

He used "we" to generalized all of us who are already aware about the project. Yes, this project really looks nice, but they must have devs that are very active in promoting and answering peoples queries.

[steampunkz]

just some advice... you should try to keep the user base at the same level that you attracted them... if your users are found on this forum please give them all the info they want .. on this forum ... and not send them off to other websites in hope to find the info that should already be on this ANN thread.

Yes, this is what I am hoping. Other Ann thread answers all the question regarding to the project in their threads and hoping that they will do the same in this project in order for the community to grow faster.

Yeah. this project needs and must have an active dev to answers members queries. An active devs means they are really serious to run the project also this attitude will help them to attract more serious investor to invest and support their project.

Will just wait for further updates then? Are the developers and admin active from our quires? Or they are just busy improving the site?

[rabotacoin]

Well, for their goal they must build a lot of trust around themselves. It will require time, and lot of patience. And a lot of teamwork.

Yes, they need invest on so much money and many people also. And of course they need everyone building Ignite Ratings togethers. Anyway, reviews have more and more person give will nearly correct information.

Of course, in order to become popular, you need a lot of time and investment. This project needs our support, we will follow the news and the development of the project.

[MiiDoViic]

just some advice... you should try to keep the user base at the same level that you attracted them... if your users are found on this forum please give them all the info they want .. on this forum ... and not send them off to other websites in hope to find the info that should already be on this ANN thread.

Yes, this is what I am hoping. Other Ann thread answers all the question regarding to the project in their threads and hoping that they will do the same in this project in order for the community to grow faster.

Yeah. this project needs and must have an active dev to answers members queries. An active devs means they are really serious to run the project also this attitude will help them to attract more serious investor to invest and support their project.

Will just wait for further updates then? Are the developers and admin active from our quires? Or they are just busy improving the site?

The admins are responsive ,it's just they are busy improving other important stuff and it's the holiday weekend ,everyone is celebrating so it's only fair if they are a little bit inactive.

[SlimShadyMmp]

To me ignite rating wants to be a bigger project more than its particular platform. Having a card is really a great idea but at what cost for both teams and users or investors. am really sure you will be required to make payment once you apply for card and also ignite will spend alot to get this on board which is actually not necessary from my view

[BranZolt]

Finding a honest review on certain coin or token is hard to get in current time, I have only few people on youtube that I trust them, but most of time they only made review on few projects and I have to read or watch others videos that I don't really trust since a lot of them are getting money to promote those project.
According to ignite's team, they are going to build a platform than will provide a honest review on those project to help us choose to the right one to invest in.

Yes i really agreed with you.Nowdays many people give the fake reviews for the money so we couldn't find the legit ICO.Anf ignite rating is decentralise and give true review for ICO.so we can easily choose the best ICO for investment.

Yes, idea of ignite developers looks really interesting, and i hope we get the great product of this. Fake reviews everywhere, you are right, some people buy thats reviews from massive square of different review to pay sites.

Yes , I agree with you and your opinion here there are agencies which pay people to post.
But that's technically legal and we cants do much about it.
But I think this coin is free from that stuff.

[ishinn99]

I can already take a grasp of how this platform will work. Only those token-holders will be able to participate in its ecosystem.
The ratings won't be manipulated by paying a token holder since at the end the token holder will only gain from a successful investment asset.

Maybe your thoughts will happen and maybe not, let us see what will happen after the project launch. Yes admit it, those who have tokens are the ones that will benefited in this project. Bu Im sure there will be other options for other people to participate.

[KimberlyGB]

Finding a honest review on certain coin or token is hard to get in current time, I have only few people on youtube that I trust them, but most of time they only made review on few projects and I have to read or watch others videos that I don't really trust since a lot of them are getting money to promote those project.
According to ignite's team, they are going to build a platform than will provide a honest review on those project to help us choose to the right one to invest in.

Honesty is an abstract term.
One might be 100% honest about the project he's reviewing, but that's no guarantee that he is actually right. And vice versa.
There's a real demand for an impartial analysis in the market, but for now, I'm a bit concerned about project's odds and it's only because of project's complexity.

Great remark! Honesty is not a mathematical term and people can make mistakes and honestly give a good rating to a bad project.