PSL
Member
Offline
Activity: 166
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2013, 12:53:55 PM Last edit: July 31, 2013, 02:49:07 PM by PSL |
|
Hope this helps people. Requires Safari and I think Chrome has a version now, but took the original poster here's GreaseMonkey script concept to the next level. This will return just the header and your bitcoin address on the webpage. Just replace <enter your bitcoin address here> with your own address between the quotes.
Extension for Google Chrome: http://tampermonkey.net/Info about GreaseMonkey: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greasemonkey
|
|
|
|
Fallout
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2013, 01:23:54 PM |
|
The Merged Coins give you about 4% extra (3,5% nmc, 0,3% ixcoin, 0,15% devcoin) according to coinchoose
|
|
|
|
Kuroth
|
|
July 31, 2013, 01:45:37 PM |
|
What does it mean when my Rejected MH/s (Last Hour) goes blank? Also I assume the lower this number the better correct?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Fallout
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2013, 01:46:03 PM |
|
Is there a pool where it is included as well? I only know bitparking, which only has nmx,ixc,dvc merged
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 31, 2013, 01:47:40 PM |
|
What does it mean when my Rejected MH/s (Last Hour) goes blank? Also I assume the lower this number the better correct?
Thanks!
It means that you have zero rejected shares for the past hour. Yeah, the lower the better, because it cuts into your accepted shares. You don't get paid for rejected shares.
|
|
|
|
linc0ln
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2013, 05:10:13 PM |
|
WFT?? I start minig on port 3332(diff 64), and my hash rate is going down! Now is 0,22mh on stat page and I have 2.5mh and 1%reject in cgminer.
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
July 31, 2013, 05:11:53 PM |
|
WFT?? I start minig on port 3332(diff 64), and my hash rate is going down! Now is 0,22mh on stat page and I have 2.5mh and 1%reject in cgminer.
That port is only for testing. You don't get paid on it. That test wasn't set up properly anyway, so it wasn't useful. I'm closing those ports.
|
|
|
|
Kuroth
|
|
July 31, 2013, 05:12:31 PM |
|
WFT?? I start minig on port 3332(diff 64), and my hash rate is going down! Now is 0,22mh on stat page and I have 2.5mh and 1%reject in cgminer.
You sure that port is even realy working? I thought it was a Temp test port from the other day..
|
|
|
|
linc0ln
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 31, 2013, 05:31:03 PM |
|
lol 1h of minig for nothin. So where goinig my shares??
|
|
|
|
xminerx
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 100
quickest cross blockchain transactions
|
|
July 31, 2013, 05:35:45 PM |
|
lol 1h of minig for nothin. So where goinig my shares??
In the post about the test servers, OP said that the shares submitted would not count.
|
|
|
|
Damnsammit
|
|
July 31, 2013, 06:19:15 PM |
|
Reading is hard, man...
|
|
|
|
MrJay
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
July 31, 2013, 06:44:15 PM |
|
Will you be setting up vardiff for testing again at all? The high diff and fast coin block kills me at times and I'm sure other people also. Lots of rejects and stales when mining faster coins. Just restarted one of my miners and within 20 minutes I have 43 accepted, 7 rejected and 3 stales - that's nearly 20% lost This is on a 3x 7950 rig as well.
|
|
|
|
Jriker1
|
|
July 31, 2013, 06:49:06 PM |
|
Will you be setting up vardiff for testing again at all? The high diff and fast coin block kills me at times and I'm sure other people also. Lots of rejects and stales when mining faster coins. Just restarted one of my miners and within 20 minutes I have 43 accepted, 7 rejected and 3 stales - that's nearly 20% lost This is on a 3x 7950 rig as well. I am also seeing high rejects, HOWEVER. I am still calculating my totals, want to get at least two days on this pool under my belt, however looking like I'm getting 0.01+ more bitcoins a day than I have anywhere else. I'm on basically a 1,000 kHash system so for me that's pretty decent. Maybe be even more with a lower difficulty, no clue but thinking tonight my calculations will show a positive outcome compared to all the other mining I've done. JR
|
|
|
|
Tigggger
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1098
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 31, 2013, 07:57:22 PM |
|
I'd suggest that rather than the difficulty being set by the user, the server should dynamically change it according to the length of time a block takes, so faster coins have low diff, slower coins have higher diff, the lower the reject rate for everyone the more the pool op and users both make. Anyway well done on the innovative pool, only been on 48 hours and working well so far
|
|
|
|
dudeami
|
|
July 31, 2013, 07:59:18 PM |
|
Reading is hard, man...
Ain't that the truth
|
Put your heart on the line, it determines your fate. BTC: 1DUDEAMiV54PFJFSe5fen3wr1e71unkaGj
|
|
|
Jriker1
|
|
July 31, 2013, 10:13:17 PM |
|
Reading is hard, man...
Ain't that the truth I don't understand. What is this reading thing you are talking about?
|
|
|
|
Kuroth
|
|
August 01, 2013, 01:08:46 AM |
|
Estimated payouts seem a bit on the low side tonight? Anything going on?
|
|
|
|
h2odysee (OP)
|
|
August 01, 2013, 01:12:21 AM |
|
Estimated payouts seem a bit on the low side tonight? Anything going on?
Just that there weren't any especially good coins today. CGB was at the end of it's run. Most of the last 24 hours was feathercoin mining. We should still be a decent bit above litecoin profits though.
|
|
|
|
Kuroth
|
|
August 01, 2013, 01:41:19 AM |
|
Estimated payouts seem a bit on the low side tonight? Anything going on?
Just that there weren't any especially good coins today. CGB was at the end of it's run. Most of the last 24 hours was feathercoin mining. We should still be a decent bit above litecoin profits though. Thanks for the quick reply...
|
|
|
|
cverity
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2013, 02:22:41 AM |
|
I've been on this pool for a few days and experienced no problems and received good payouts. I haven't decided whether to make this my permanent home or not because of two issues:
* As mentioned by many other posters, 512 difficulty is way too high to expect reasonable variance for small GPU mining, especially on low difficulty coins.
* No accountability. I am happy with my payouts and have no reason to suspect the operator is anything but honest, but am accustomed to being able to audit a pool more than I can here. Any pool operator can cheat the system regardless of the accountability they provide, and ultimately it boils down to whether the payouts seem accurate (which they do here best I can tell), but more details about which coins were mined, when/where they were exchanged will provide more piece of mind. This information doesn't need to be in real time if the pool operator wants to protect his algorithms (although it's trivial to determine which coin we are mining based on the difficulty).
I love what I've seen so far and hope you consider these suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|