digitalindustry
|
|
November 29, 2013, 01:37:51 AM |
|
To all those wondering what happened. It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD. Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday). Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan. All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k. Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump. If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow. Be careful during these following days. I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I had I started mining again for kicks, too ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though. this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it a lot of people would like to thank you -
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
November 29, 2013, 01:40:28 AM |
|
To all those wondering what happened. It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD. Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday). Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan. All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k. Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump. If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow. Be careful during these following days. I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I had I started mining again for kicks, too ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though. this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it a lot of people would like to thank you - for what? selling my quarkcoins at ~0.000035? yeah, i missed the top, but so what? are you inferring that you purchased them at this value, 70x higher than it was a few days prior? ed: maybe i'm missing something obvious here
|
|
|
|
Voodah
|
|
November 29, 2013, 01:42:40 AM |
|
What amazes me is that people still don't realize what is happening.
What's your take on it?
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
November 29, 2013, 01:43:45 AM |
|
What amazes me is that people still don't realize what is happening.
What's your take on it? I suspect his take is a lot like mine... some fool with too much money put a lot of bitcoins into Crypsty and then bought every single alt currency on the market. Look at all the charts
|
|
|
|
duuuuude
|
|
November 29, 2013, 01:49:25 AM |
|
hey zvs, is your quark pool back up, that is the pool i mined on all the time. it had good shares.
j
|
|
|
|
robcop
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2013, 01:51:06 AM |
|
What about other exchanges accepting Quarkcoins? Will that ever happen 0.0
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
November 29, 2013, 02:01:11 AM Last edit: November 29, 2013, 02:21:51 AM by zvs |
|
hey zvs, is your quark pool back up, that is the pool i mined on all the time. it had good shares.
j
it's back up right now, but might not be for long, haha nogleg.com:8372 i have been mining on it by myself for a few hrs ed: i'll reset the p2pool now back to 0 shares, so if you wanted to mine on it, now would be the time to start.. i'll keep it up for the next 12 hrs at least.. have a backup pool set ed2: i'll restart it once more, so it's even. lots of DOA at start because share difficulty takes a while to adjust
|
|
|
|
thetopham
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2013, 02:45:55 AM |
|
jeeze panic sell much? can't believe went from 5000 to 1700...
|
|
|
|
mnightwaffle
|
|
November 29, 2013, 02:47:14 AM |
|
I can
think ftc will take an even worse dive someday
|
|
|
|
thetopham
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2013, 02:49:33 AM |
|
I can
think ftc will take an even worse dive someday
what drove the price down so much? too many sells from premined coins?
|
|
|
|
duuuuude
|
|
November 29, 2013, 02:52:05 AM |
|
none of the coins were premined but many people had just been holding for along time and 200 million coins is alot of supply.
j
|
|
|
|
thetopham
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2013, 02:53:51 AM |
|
none of the coins were premined but many people had just been holding for along time and 200 million coins is alot of supply.
j
lame... guess I'll hold
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
November 29, 2013, 03:10:29 AM |
|
There is a lot happening for Quarks, and 2014 seems like a promising year with many new sites accepting QRKS coming out. When all of these sites are out QRK prices will soar. Besides, when a coin has a strong community like Quarks, the only way is up. Don't trust me, do your own research.
The fact is that anyone selling now is selling their Quarks to "smart money" investors. If you don't know what smart money means, then buy a couple of thousand now for almost nothing, and sit on it, by the end of 2014 you will know what "smart money" means.
What do you consider smart money. You suggesting qrk will be like ltc in 14? I'd be very surprised if it reaches $2 in 5 years. See, first off 100s of cryptocurrencies available, Quark technicals is in the top 5 (minimum). Second, it's designed to be a true cryptocurrency -- no mining @ speed of light; only the existing is circulated. Third -- No premining by devs, it's completely fair. Any reason besides popularity that quark will not succeed? Besides in this age 5 years is like a century. It's impossible to predict that far.
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
November 29, 2013, 03:17:22 AM |
|
To all those wondering what happened. It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD. Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday). Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan. All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k. Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump. If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow. Be careful during these following days. No coin got pumped that much, quark's value rose times higher suddenly, higher than anything else at the same time.
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
November 29, 2013, 03:37:38 AM |
|
To all those wondering what happened. It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD. Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday). Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan. All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k. Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump. If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow. Be careful during these following days. I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I had I started mining again for kicks, too ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though. this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you). By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it.
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
November 29, 2013, 04:21:27 AM |
|
To all those wondering what happened. It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD. Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday). Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan. All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k. Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump. If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow. Be careful during these following days. I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I had I started mining again for kicks, too ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though. this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you). By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it. well, my distribution is done. i sold the first few millions for around .00000150, so i was happy to take .00003500, which I think was artificially high due to a single buyer & then you have the bandwagon jumpers i would consider buying back in at .00000250 or so and my pool got its first block in about 35 days! woot
|
|
|
|
dE_logics
|
|
November 29, 2013, 04:37:07 AM |
|
To all those wondering what happened. It was not marketing nor anything QRK related. That's just FUD. Almost all alt-coins were pumped 100-300% in the last few days. Also lots and lots of new hashing all of sudden (which caused the problems yesterday). Just look at the charts at http://coinmarketcap.com/If you're big player, pump, mine & dump (maybe?) new coins with low diff sounds like a plan. All of this started when BTC hovered between 900-980, as if big players we're laying preparations on the alts for when BTC goes above 1k. Now in hindsight it seems kind of logical that alts will try to somehow (as best as they can) follow BTC's growth, but at the same time, this was clearly an all around orchestrated pump. If BTC were to really skyrocket and go to >2-3k I highly doubt alts can follow. Be careful during these following days. I already offloaded the 1.5m or so coins I had I started mining again for kicks, too ed: aha, here we go, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.msg3311965#msg3311965i did have like 4 or 5m at one point, though. this recent price increase is artificial, some person w/ no clue got on crypsty and bought every single alt coin. i dumped as soon as i saw it There was no single large order; there were a lot of large single sellers (like you). By design, I think initially quark is supposed to be owned by a handful early adapters, and it's distribution should be done by their selling it. well, my distribution is done. i sold the first few millions for around .00000150, so i was happy to take .00003500, which I think was artificially high due to a single buyer & then you have the bandwagon jumpers i would consider buying back in at .00000250 or so and my pool got its first block in about 35 days! woot Oh no it'll never get that low again. I was planning to buy but I had payment issues to buy bitcoins (Oh, you know, Visa, master card, bank transfer etc... etc... etc...). You see, I'm not in the US. Now Quarks have the popularity and the technicals; and this's all what's needed to drive a cryptocurrency.
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
November 29, 2013, 04:44:12 AM |
|
Game over !
Sell guys ! sell !
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
November 29, 2013, 04:55:39 AM |
|
yes thats disingenuous - i'm sorry i'm a big promoter so i shouldn't say this - i'm not selling that was a joke i hope you know how i feel anyhow . we will see a nice slow trend upwards - - i don't look at D1 i look at M 1
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
|