AngelSky
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:19:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
bbxx
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:27:42 AM |
|
They lied to shareholders. Swede is promising 50Th in 2 weeks. labcoin account says wait till november
Wtf?
Fake boards without proper traces, naked, faked chip photos.
Yeah it is scam, very badly crafted.
Burnside said he is waiting for personal data to lock the shares... But they are not giving it to him.
Finally shares will be at satoishi value after liquidating failed outdatted chips and bag of useless boards.
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:28:48 AM |
|
They lied to shareholders. Swede is promising 50Th in 2 weeks. labcoin account says wait till november
Wtf?
Fake boards without proper traces, naked, faked chip photos.
Yeah it is scam, very badly crafted.
Burnside said he is waiting for personal data to lock the shares... But they are not giving it to him.
Finally shares will be at satoishi value after liquidating failed outdatted chips and bag of useless boards.
Link?
|
|
|
|
KCBitcoin
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:29:33 AM |
|
They lied to shareholders. Swede is promising 50Th in 2 weeks. labcoin account says wait till november
Wtf?
Fake boards without proper traces, naked, faked chip photos.
Yeah it is scam, very badly crafted.
Burnside said he is waiting for personal data to lock the shares... But they are not giving it to him.
Finally shares will be at satoishi value after liquidating failed outdatted chips and bag of useless boards.
Troll harder! GOGOGO!
|
|
|
|
AngelSky
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:29:59 AM |
|
They lied to shareholders. Swede is promising 50Th in 2 weeks. labcoin account says wait till november
Wtf?
Fake boards without proper traces, naked, faked chip photos.
Yeah it is scam, very badly crafted.
Burnside said he is waiting for personal data to lock the shares... But they are not giving it to him.
Finally shares will be at satoishi value after liquidating failed outdatted chips and bag of useless boards.
Maybe someone can ask burnside to know if the main labcoin account has seen some trades. If yes, this is going to be.. a mess. Once again.
|
|
|
|
TMAN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:30:58 AM |
|
Holding,
|
|
|
|
Zakryze
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:32:27 AM |
|
tihi some people have to learn it the hard way. go burn ur money.
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ PRIMEDICE The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀SNttx1hwtpf8TQEK7ZBojcvQrDmBaz9QPK SFC Addy
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:32:36 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. How do people fall for this blatant manipulation?
I've seen this pattern multiple times over the last hours. Tell me more about. You missed the step between 1. Oh looky, manipulation!, 2. , 3. Labcoin goes up/down.
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:35:10 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Me? I think it is a good idea to own a bit just in case they pull 500TH out of their backside.
|
|
|
|
bbxx
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:37:04 AM |
|
the 3 million shares should either not be tradeable on BTCT until a certain amount of time OR the shares should be marked/colored in a way so that people know that they are buying the team's shares. this would also indicate for everyone to panic - heh
I agree, there's a reason there's a IPO "lock up" period for insiders in real world IPO. Especially when labcoin is going against the norm on btct (insider shares are not normally tradable) I would like to point out that the 'Lock in' period for founders/insiders is one of those 'sometimes there is one, sometimes not'. I can also say that the Labcoin team didn't even consider this in the IPO process due to no one being interested in selling out shares in the project. That said, I will talk to Sam this weekend to see about a public solution that will allow share holders to feel secure in that the Labcoin founders and developers are not selling out. Two ways this can be addressed on BTCT. - The founders could turn on their public portfolios and publish a list of url's where the shares are held. - (with Labcoin's consent) if they send us a list of accounts that are holding the shares we can lock the accounts and publicly state the number of shares effectively "in escrow". WAITINGI just need a list of accounts to lock. (feel free to PM or email me.) Cheers. Here you go, about locking shares...
|
|
|
|
TMAN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:38:58 AM |
|
the 500TH is on route, they have issues - they are F*cking up not being totally honest, we need an engineer here for us to do a Q & A, also I want a smartphone video of the lab & what they are working on.
it doesn't need to be professional & it only needs to be up for a few hours, but we need the video proof now.
disclosure - still holding & will be buying more when I see the above.
|
|
|
|
matt4054
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:40:01 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistent and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either
|
|
|
|
Zakryze
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:40:06 AM |
|
the 500TH is on route, they have issues - they are F*cking up not being totally honest, we need an engineer here for us to do a Q & A, also I want a smartphone video of the lab & what they are working on.
it doesn't need to be professional & it only needs to be up for a few hours, but we need the video proof now.
disclosure - still holding & will be buying more when I see the above.
quit dreaming - it's daytime.
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ PRIMEDICE The Premier Bitcoin Gambling Experience @PrimeDice ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀SNttx1hwtpf8TQEK7ZBojcvQrDmBaz9QPK SFC Addy
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:41:47 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Labcoin never said they are not hashing, they said they are teaking the hardware to get better results.
|
|
|
|
AngelSky
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:43:27 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake.
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:44:05 AM |
|
the 3 million shares should either not be tradeable on BTCT until a certain amount of time OR the shares should be marked/colored in a way so that people know that they are buying the team's shares. this would also indicate for everyone to panic - heh
I agree, there's a reason there's a IPO "lock up" period for insiders in real world IPO. Especially when labcoin is going against the norm on btct (insider shares are not normally tradable) I would like to point out that the 'Lock in' period for founders/insiders is one of those 'sometimes there is one, sometimes not'. I can also say that the Labcoin team didn't even consider this in the IPO process due to no one being interested in selling out shares in the project. That said, I will talk to Sam this weekend to see about a public solution that will allow share holders to feel secure in that the Labcoin founders and developers are not selling out. Two ways this can be addressed on BTCT. - The founders could turn on their public portfolios and publish a list of url's where the shares are held. - (with Labcoin's consent) if they send us a list of accounts that are holding the shares we can lock the accounts and publicly state the number of shares effectively "in escrow". WAITINGI just need a list of accounts to lock. (feel free to PM or email me.) Cheers. Here you go, about locking shares... LMAO August 09
|
|
|
|
matt4054
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:44:58 AM |
|
What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors".
Again, my words: saying "We are hashing at 2 TH/s right now and you will see it growing up to 4 until Monday", then switching to "we are not / no longer (never said quite clearly) hashing at all and you should hold until October 30 to see if it was worth it*", that is quite a setback IMO. * to be honest, they added that it would probably be a 10-bagger by then. Believe it or not...
|
|
|
|
klee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:45:05 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. How do people fall for this blatant manipulation?
I've seen this pattern multiple times over the last hours. Tell me more about. You missed the step between 1. Oh looky, manipulation!, 2. , 3. Labcoin goes up/down. Zakryze too EDIT: all in ignore list
|
|
|
|
bbxx
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:45:27 AM |
|
the 500TH is on route, they have issues - they are F*cking up not being totally honest, we need an engineer here for us to do a Q & A, also I want a smartphone video of the lab & what they are working on.
it doesn't need to be professional & it only needs to be up for a few hours, but we need the video proof now.
disclosure - still holding & will be buying more when I see the above.
quit dreaming - it's daytime. 130nm chips, 1.8GH/sec 7 times better than competition They are breaking psychics laws with their unicorns In two weeks 50TH. Yeah it is legit Lies after lies... But wait two weeks... Or seven to be sure.
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 14, 2013, 08:46:55 AM |
|
<--- *wears a tinfoil hat since some hours* ... we will see, how it turns out. One important question to ask is: why does someone solely focus on posting "this or that is flawed, the ship will go down" with over 20 posts in a row? matt4054, foxykah, limbaugh for example, please tell me. This is no accusation, maybe I got it all wrong.. Labcoin mentioned in virtually every thread in the Securities forum too. A concerted effort to get minimum price?
I think so. And I believe there were thousands of artifical trades in the last hours, split into smallish parts, to flood the trading feeds. Well, I made my point quite clearly in my posts. Lies are not acceptable to investors because while miners can estimate the chance of success of a project themselves with some relatively simple hints, these hints need to be truthful and not either "lies" or "nonsense" (don't say you're hashing when you are by some kind of magic for a transient moment). This is a loud complaint because NONE of my point have been correctly addressed by Labcoin IMO. Is that clear? Or you see some conspiracy? I lost several BTC on Labcoin, and I said I thought it would "hover above IPO price for six weeks" (these are my words). And I even bought back some shares near IPO price. If that's not consistant and honest behaviour, I don't quite follow. But anyway, not that I care that much either What "lies"? The only lies are coming from "investors". Someone told us earlier that you would be mad. Just open your eyes for God's sake. But I'm not mad and my eyes are open. A bunch of liars are claiming labcoin lied about mining. Labcoin made no such claim and if yoiu think they have, then quote Labcoin saying so. What Labcoin actually said is that they're tweaking hardware to get better results. On what planet does "tweaking hardware" mean "we're not mining and never were"?
|
|
|
|
|