Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[sedahan13]

I believe it but not 100% because succesfully of the ICO depend on the real product that they have, their community and solid team. ICO Bench and other site given that rating i think just depend other factor not like that i mention it.

[X-avier]

I personally do not trust any ratings! Correctly pointed out by the author of this theme, there's ICO, which do not have high ratings, but their ICO ends in 2-4 days is an indicator of demand among users. I follow and trust my personal analysis, this is a complicated process and takes a very long time. The only way I can be sure my money will not fly away in the garbage. Never listen to anybody, learn to do the analysis! At first it will seem an impossible task, but after 3-5 projects you will learn how to do it efficiently! I have repeatedly said in their posts that if you decided to deal with the cryptocurrency, then you just need to study it. Without this you'll lose all your money!

[Cactushrt]

Yes ico ratings are very important to me everytime i see upcoming ico i will try to look on icobench because most of trusted ico's are rated by experts there.

[Raymondavid47]

Honestly i do believe in ICO Ratings, but that doesn't stop me from doing my own person research. But there are some icos that might not be rated high or even rated at all but they end up doing very well that icos that were rated high..
So to be on the safe side you can combine your own research with the ICO ratings .

[totnaksquad]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I dont really believe with these websites,they are just hyping these ICOs probably because they are getting paid from these reviews,its better to do your own research so you can assure that your ICO would achieve success.

[Xiao Mei Mei]

no, because I think ICO rating does not guarantee that ICO will succeed, there is the ICO have a small rating but ICO is successful.

[lagista]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

ico rating can not be used as a benchmark to be able to give a project will be successful. but ico rating can give you an idea of a project that will run by utilizing the site. so we do not have to respond that ico with a high rating will be successful but we have to look at the ico trip is whether it can be successful or not.

[ruffles2016]

Sadly no. I wanted to believe ico ratings as I kept checking them before investing. But I basically realized some specific ico devs pay money to be advertised and have greater rating from those sites. It is basically like watching ads on tv, %99 lie and only truth is the price

[MiniMountain]

ICO ratings is only a reference for anyone who would like to participate on the upcoming ICO's but you don't need to fully believe on them 100% because it could lead to hype so you must better do your on research about the project before you invest your hard earned money although most of the details are presented on the ICO rating website's.

[koloNikolo]

I believe in ICO rating. The first top 3 icorating websites giving the same points to the same projects. So even if you check the first 3 you'll see that the top5 ico's will be almost the same.

But for sure blind trusting is not the choice. You have to make your own research and choose points which is the main for you.

[aceptamosbitcoin]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I prefer to use my own head when I'm choosing a place to give my money. But all those ICO monitors are good source of basic information about new projects. Because they don't list many of the garbage in ANN section like pointless airdrops, xBTC clones, etc.

[Avri Susanto]

I believe with the ICO rating. but I never made that data a reason to invest in a project. for me ICO rating is only for reference when i will choose project.

[Babyfaceless]

When I choose ICO, I usually check its review from ICO rating site. Although some give comprehensive recommendations, I still follow it up with my own research. Some rating sites is backed up by export crypto analyst so I think they have some authority in their reviews. But sometimes you need also to trust your instinct in your investments.

[masterkrypto]

Most of people are checking ico ratings as one of their reference on where they will choose to invest, but for me ico ratings is just a guide and I am not really believing on how they rate some icos. But is still depends with the investors how they will believe this ratings.

Indeed I agree. Some of these ratings offer a solid stepping stone but shouldn't necessarily be an ultimate decision to your investment. What I like most is reading about detailed reviews and analysis of the icos and getting that second perspective from the experts. It certainly helps me identify the strengths and weaknesses of the project overall, something that could have taken me longer to do myself. I would say looking at these reviews definitely gives that extra boost.

fyi Crush Crypto and Crypto Briefing are usually my go-to's.  

[Lerikaweb]

Those sites are just another source of information.  It should be considered,  but the ratings cannot take any responsibility for your losses.

[cartheron]

I think we should at least look into this ico rating sites because they filter total scam and we dont waste time, and about rating, just dont trust them, but first filter they are doing fine.

[jacafbiz]

What you need to realised is that most of this ICO rating website are just doing their own job, and mostof them are paid to give some of these ICOs high rating, which to me makes the rating not independent report, they can help you find a project but the decision to invest in those projects still lies with you

[Baton55]

I think it is necessary to take into consideration the ICO ratings, it can do a lot of help. But there can be an opportunity that ICO ratings are made by people who are paid for that. ICO ratings give you general idea, but I believe the best way to understand whether ICO is worthy or not is to do your own independent research.

[gorush]

Always do ur own due diligence.

[Ararbermas]

For me ICO rating is from a lot of people who already have investments on it which is they support it to become successful.  Or maybe  they are satisfied on it or they trust the dev and the team because of their good work  .