Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[brokkoly]

Not always the ratings can determine a good ICO, therefore it is necessary to conduct our own research. Although ICO ratings can be a really helpful and trustable sources sometimes.

[1714787653]

1714787653

[1714787653]

1714787653

[1714787653]

1714787653

[agnostos]

If it's a legit ICO rating site, there's a high chance that it is not fake. Some ICO ratings are fake and they pay people to rate positive feedbacks, they do this to encourage investors to join their ICO.

[Arkham Knight]

I don't get why people based on websites that they don't even know who are the people who give these ratings. Those 'so-called experts' also don't have a lot of strong proof that they are best on what they do. Anyone can also give rating based on their opinion because that is how those rating sites does their thing.

[tronghoa]

Rating is just a parameter that you can see. I think you have to do analytics yourself if you want to invest to the ICO. With me, do analytics is better.

[Hue Moon]

I only consider it as part of my assessment of the project. Do not believe in it completely. But it also appreciates a part of the project

[CKdexter]

I do not look or even bother to visit this rating sites, for me they can be manipulated, if you are going to invest or join an ICO bounty its preferable to set up some basic criteria that you yourself set up to avoid being misled

[Titus Maximus]

I don't get why people based on websites that they don't even know who are the people who give these ratings. Those 'so-called experts' also don't have a lot of strong proof that they are best on what they do. Anyone can also give rating based on their opinion because that is how those rating sites does their thing.

Of course these are only opinions but they explain how they came to their opinion. You can factor them into your decision making but should not follow them blindly. The best advisor is still your own experience.

Example: I see you are promoting Gigtricks, I was also initially interested. On ICO Bench they get a very high overal rating. Then I read on a review from an expert who wondered why they need 35 million to build a platform for freelancers. Then my warning lamps went on...I had invested before in projects with a high hardcap and they collected far too much money. The problem is that the token is then overvalued from the start. So I stayed away. Not because of following ones opinion but to combine external indictions with my own personal experience. Not saying it will fail, but I passed on it.

[krat0s2019]

Not really. Especially that most of the time I only go for Airdrops and Bounty. Right now, I think this ICO is interesting and they have an ongoing Airdrop campaign. You, guys might want to check them out.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/10OlnEzIE6RG6ZNd82JmxEBP-UMJT1eVCwSt_8S8MUDw/viewform?edit_requested=true&utm_campaign=Airdrop&utm_medium=BTT&utm_source=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2868750.0

I tried to sign up to WOM's airdrop, but too bad it's already finished.

[btcmegastar]

I don't completely depend on those rating because people whoever shows interest will give positive rating about the project. So it is always good to research by ourselves to get updates from the team and what is their target for the future aspects of their blockchain.

[CryptoVictorC]

The more the loyalty points the more I need to keep a tab on what is stored where! This looks like a solution, Have a look here - https://medium.com/@RajPhani/loyalty-programs-making-those-points-count-10212587f63c

[malading]

A good ICO rating website can still provide us with a lot of useful information, but we can't fully believe them, we still need to collect more information to invest in the project!