Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[ggh0stt1]

ICO Ratings can be very useful and beneficial in providing a general overview of the ICO, some of these sights are quite accurate, but not all tell the true story and potential of the ICO, remember, these are independent sights that might be influenced, so before you put your trust in them and use their take as a guide to invest, carryout your own research, it will be more helpful you knowing where to put your moneys

[1715041765]

1715041765

[1715041765]

1715041765

[1715041765]

1715041765

[1715041765]

1715041765

[Bitcoin1216]

If I only rely on an ICO rating then I do not believe it, but if the ICO rating from some sites then I believe, and I am grateful that simple things can make me successful in ICO investment.

[maunbot]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I think if we go in there we have to believe. Of course they are not always right, but at least give a little picture with their criteria.

[Yunbalo]

No, I don't believe in all ICO Ratings, only some of them. But sometimes I use ICO ratings to assist me when doing ICO research.  I take a look for different ratings, but I always make a decision based only on my own review.

I do not believe it, but they are also a factor to help us identify potential ico, those numbers they can deceive the site easily.

But in the future it may be worth trusting them in the future, maybe even in the time before these indicators are not real but nowadays, the indexes are more necessary.

[cryptomeo]

I used to evaluate ICO based on these rating sites, but not that much anymore. The review quality has gone downhill plus so many half-baked rating sites had emerged to ride on the crypto hype now.

And also don't rely on youtube review videos too, many supposedly reputable youtubers are actually paid for their reviews. I can say 99.9% of them are paid reviews.

[membis]

I dont belive at Ico ratings at all, if one ico has very high rate but in social media people dont talk about it, its not very good choose to invest on it. In ICOs most important thing is hype right now.

[Ziscadas]

I trust this source icodrops,because the projects that they put on their site are often successful.Their specialists conduct high-quality work, deliver truthful information, but in practice, not all things are reliably accurate

[Mystogan915]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Yes, i believe in ICO ratings, when i see the ICO had a good ratings, i join in that ICO because i believe in ICO ratings. Crypto experts are rating it, that's why i believe in ICO ratings.

[Jacata98]

Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.

[safi71]

No, I do not believe ICO ratings. Most of them rank for money, not for the merits of the project. And in general there is such a regularity: If ICO-project has many different positive ratings, then this project is bad. The last few months I have noticed this trend. Recent projects such as Pchain, Quarkchain and others did not have similar ratings.

[Cryptocoins__]

For me personally, I see ICO ratings as just a yardstick to judge a token's potential. There are a lot of other factors involved and should be read up about before making a final decision.

[alexey8080]

I only trust Icodrops.
Best Ico ratings site at all.
But of course you always need to do own research of the project.

[Escf4]

For me, I believe in ICO rating because this rating are the basis of trust in that certain ICO that are launched in the cryptoworld, it may not be a 100% rated to be successful but the rating is near , it matters in the running promotional campaign of that certain ICO.

[Akeeto]

There is a well known method for ICO investing: do your own research. In the previous year once I've been asked to help one ICO to send some e-mails to different ICO related websites (including listings) and I've discovered that a pretty big part of the ICO ratings are require payments to get your project listed on their website

[Athenakim.22]

I don't know for others but for me I believe in ICO rating.  It gives me an idea of a ideal campaign project that is worth to try.

[khoatg11]

I always researched my own before investing in ICO. I do not trust the ICO rating sites because I think in most cases they are paid for this.

[NORD YGGDRASIL]

Recently I saw the project which was very low rating, But this project has collected hard cap in a short time. Therefore, I do not believe in rating agencies.

[happy.memory33]

ICO rating assessed by a portal. And I think is a very honest assessment. because a portal must of course give our best in order not to disappoint the public. because the community is of course the hope is full so that the information provided is real.

[CatchSomeAirdrops]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion.

[bitcoinforus]

I have an assumption that some rating agencies take money for a high rating, so I check everything myself. Team, product, road map and only then I invest!