Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[lorylore]

It depends on where the ico rating is from. A lot of ico rating site make money by 'selling' their rating. In such cases, ico has to give them money to improve the rating. Hence, these rating are very bias and not reliable.

[Riskiagung2425]

ICO ratings is a good reference but it is not very reliable because you can pay for it to be included in their list. Doing your own research  is still the best way to check an ICO if it is worth to invest or not.

[19Nov16]

In the fact that ICO ratings never guarantee that they can succeed and achieve softcap, of course this makes me never use ICO rating as a reference to invest, I prefer to know and believe from more independent references such as discussion forums.

[ishirut009]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Not that much, but they are really useful if you wanna have some sort of confirmation before entering or joining a certain bounty campaign issued by that company to avoid waste of time doing scam bounties. I know that ico rating sites can be manipulated that's why i only wanna use it as a 2nd confirmation.

[Essaint56]

I have seen a thread here exposing the game behind ICO rating sites. ICO's just pays the right amount of money to get a good review about their ICO. What I think is this sites are corrupted and can't be trusted with their feedback. There's a new upcoming ICO review platform that will fix this, www.menlo.one their guild system is what amaze me, it will prevent the fraud and corruption within ICO space.

[minttop]

It's really depends on ICO
You need to look through its history, the backup, plans for future (esp. for not far future)
You need to make some kind of analysis to understand should you believe in it not

[Jericka D Ranillo]

I donot believe in any rating sites and never to let my decision just becUse of this ratings. I do rating of an ICO by myself, more reliabke because you have the power to find information that suits to your taste. I guess some or all ICO get paid and rait them as high. The higher you paid the higher rate you will get.

[ChristineBenson]

Truly, I trust in some ICO rating . There is a notable technique for ICO contributing: do your own examination. In the earlier year once I've been requested to help one ICO to send some messages to various ICO related sites (counting postings) and I've found that an entirely enormous piece of the ICO evaluations are expect installments to get your undertaking recorded on their site. That comes especialy about the neighborhood sites. The mail nesson was that ICO appraisals can never be 100% trusted. Ofcourse they may demonstrate the grneral buildup around the coin however you ought to dependably make your own particular research.

[kaltar]

Each of us can make mistakes and also ICO Ratings can make mistakes. But in General, these Ratings bring a lot of benefits because they help to choose from hundreds of new ICO only a few of the most worthy and thus save time. Of course, you should not completely rely on someone else's opinion, but take into account the rating is necessary.

[Maya56674]

 I do not really know that because I did not read icoratings and icobench looking for some ico's because I don't think that they provide ico it will legit and successful so I really appreciated their beliefs to those ico that really matter but I don't really base my expectations to those site.

[meldrio1]

Not anymore I don't believe in ICO ratings because some of them paid to rate ICO if they want to perfect rate then they should pay high for that, it's already fixed rate what if you invested a scam ICO with high rating in website that big loss for you so better to research by yourself.

[Princessjilian]

It depends to the situation for me, maybe I can compare my own research from the ICO ratings then I can make it as basis on my decisions that im going to make. Also, not all ICO ratings is legit because we never know it just a part of their plan to control the ICO ratings that we were looking at.

[MortonAlden]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Not really, I'm doing my own research! go for the ones that are well presented and have an already established platform. LVN, Sparkster, VirtuePoker and Edenchain are few good projects that I like.

Do check these out and DYOR instead of believing in 3rd parties.

[Denigmatic]

There are many ICO Rating sites, and most of them give objective estimates and reviews. You should be able to trust their rating, because at the end of the day you can view your rating by adding a message below the ICO, which they rated. Thus, the rating is real, not counterfeit. If the rating or review was provided, and this is inaccurate, then this site will no longer be trusted, so most rating sites do their best to ensure that the rating and review are as reliable as possible.

[BurakTurk]

I'm looking into ICO rating, but we cannot believe them for a 100% since as any other rating, they can be bought by ICO owners

[sunshinelavapie]

ico rating is for reference only. I do not completely trust it. It can only be partially based on theory. But the reality is quite different. The sale of other ico will depend on the intent of the investor

[ashao1015]

ICO ratings are the last thing i will pay my attention to. This is the worst way to analyse ICO. Good projects attract the attention of serious guys from forbes, wallstreet journal, twitter or famous investors like Mark Cuban or Jeff Bezos.

At leas it will attract some attention from ICO shillers like Ian Balina or "The Gob One". But be careful with these guys they can make statements because of the large bonuses on presales.

[honghai0730]

I read the rankings from time to time but I am not totally dependent on them and prefer to compare the various sources. It's even better to do your own project analysis, so at least there'll be no one to blame except yourself in case of ICO failure.

[honghai0730]

I trust this source icodrops,because the projects that they put on their site are often successful.Their specialists conduct high-quality work, deliver truthful information, but in practice, not all things are reliably accurate

[arde13]

I don't believe in them that much but at least they somehow give me some help me with my ICO research. After all, we still need these ICO reviews to get the opinions of the so called experts in the market. However, we should not just dwell on these review site's ratings. Their ratings do not assure in any way that the higher the projects get the more successful they will be. Apparently, that is not the case.