Belozerov85
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 10, 2018, 10:31:34 AM |
|
I think you can't trust anyone. Especially in the crypto world. You need to think with your head and make decisions yourself. Then then it will not be so sad and you can get experience from your own mistakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NaXxow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1085
Merit: 1000
ALT Add: APfc4bykKHxYSVkvzsLdQvmiTXvTgMiCRM
|
|
June 10, 2018, 10:35:05 AM |
|
ratings in different websites are good source of informations, you can surely visit legit links of the project and of course, articles that you may rely on. But self stidy and own research will bring more good result than refer in 1rating only.
|
|
|
|
Semen89
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2018, 10:36:03 AM |
|
In my opinion, these reagents have a definite meaning, but you need to look at the verified sites and only then that estimate can correspond to the truth of this project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
aioc
|
|
June 10, 2018, 10:56:12 AM |
|
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
No I do my own research and so far I'm successful with it, I have nothing against these ico ratings but they are not a guaranty that the ICO is good especially if the ratings comes from visitors these icos can launch a voting campaign to manipulate the rating. |
|
|
|
pokemoso
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
|
|
June 10, 2018, 11:38:43 AM |
|
Only invest what you are willing to lose. Dont put your money all in one basket. Proper financial planning is important in every investment we make. Try looking in in SafeCrypt.io. A high security exchange that has high standards of quality and every piece of software is being tested multiple times before they make it publicly available. I spent some time to study SafeCrypt ICO. I think this ICO could become one of the best this spring, because of several reason: 1. This is cryptoexchange. And this cryproexchange has some advantages compare to existing ones: instant transactions, lowest fees, absolute anonimity, large select of crypto assts and others. 2. They lead very good ICO policy. 3. THey have Adequate and reasnable bonus rates. read more here https://safecrypt.io/r566 |
|
|
|
|
mihelson
Member
Offline
Activity: 149
Merit: 10
@crypto_pro01
|
|
June 10, 2018, 12:00:50 PM |
|
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
ICObench.com on this site you can buy a top rating for money. In general it became interesting to me and I looked at the rating on the ICObench of all top ico's for the last month and a half Mainframe 2.7 EdenChain 4 Egretia 3.1 Sentinel Protocol 2.9 Phantasma 2.5 QuarkChain 3 Atonomi 1.5 Draw conclusions yourself... |
|
|
|
|
MAXE
Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 17
|
|
June 10, 2018, 03:40:17 PM |
|
Imho Russian Icodrops are legit. Not sure about others. ICOs have a lot of money and they often offer for fake reviews and ratings.
I would not put any money on the table just because someone rated an ICO as a 5 out of 5 anyway. $DYOR
|
|
|
|
|
randyg29
Member
Offline
Activity: 330
Merit: 10
http://www.daxico.com/
|
|
June 10, 2018, 03:46:22 PM |
|
I don't trusted their website even it has a good way of entertaining some investors just like the ICO I use to read last year and participated. Because it is really disgusting they almost run their ICO and their spreadsheet didn't even update then almost 2 months of participating I ask their manager on the telegram they said paused it without a announcement on thread but in the emails of their website are still ongoing.
|
|
|
|
|
unknown-user
|
|
June 10, 2018, 03:49:05 PM |
|
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I actually don't beleive on such things as ratings of the ICOs to detwrmine whether it will be a huge one or not. Ratings are just speculations and expectations and atill, everything will nit always go as planned. The platform that the project is promoting would more determine if it will be a good one or not. Based on what OP stated, ICO ratings are not accurate. |
|
|
|
|
Riga
|
|
June 10, 2018, 03:49:24 PM |
|
I think that we need to be very cautious about the ratings of ICO. They are only recommendatory in nature, but you have to make the final choice of the project yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
itasannah
|
|
June 10, 2018, 03:49:57 PM |
|
Initially, ICO ratings only role as one of the consideration to choose an ICO. However, it is not the most important thing to consider. We must know their concept and team that creates the ICO. We may not directly believe in the rating only. It may lead you to be lazy to analyze the ICO. Just do your research and know the ICO more than well.
|
|
|
|
|
bayarau
Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 13
|
|
June 10, 2018, 03:55:57 PM |
|
I believe in ratings in which projects are discussed by living people and make a decision all together. An example of such a community: icodrops. In the telegram channel more than 11000 people, find and discuss new ICO, share their opinions and very rarely make mistakes! This is not advertising - it's true!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lang09
|
|
June 11, 2018, 08:51:31 AM |
|
ICO rating provided by such websites, I think, can only be used a references. Of course these sites have their processes and standards when giving such ratings. It doesn't mean that what they say is absolutely correct. they probably won't even reflect more than half of what the ICO is really worth.
|
|
|
|
|
KseniaLard
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 1
|
|
June 11, 2018, 04:05:24 PM |
|
He can just give the Idea, but we need to read the Technical Paper and Check the ICO Twitter page and the Telegram Group, which the ICO administrator does. How serious are they about the project on time? They are updated daily. They take care of the members and react well.
|
|
|
|
|
armakarisma
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Germany’s First STO
|
|
June 11, 2018, 04:07:22 PM |
|
I do not 100% believe it, maybe just as an additional reference only, because the ratings they provide are not all independent
|
|
|
|
Crypto Debate
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2018, 04:13:09 PM |
|
i don't believe ICO rating because some ICO have low rating but that ICOs is give profits and some ICOs are high rating but not give good profits hence better to understand project and read whitepaper about ICO then believe the ICO and invest
|
|
|
|
|
kudryas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2018, 04:18:48 PM |
|
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Those ratings don't guaranty anything. It can be used just as a reference only and as one of the sources of information. It's always best to rely on your own research. |
|
|
|
|
100kk
Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2018, 05:12:08 PM |
|
The presence ICO in the ratings is a good sign for me. At the same time, it is better if a lot of rating websites write and inform people about ICO project. But the rating itself (rating evaluation) practically does not matter for me.
|
|
|
|
|
sergikrnd
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 1
|
|
June 11, 2018, 05:38:37 PM |
|
Sites that you have called really carry false information, the network has a lot of evidence that provide a rating for the money. For me, there is 1 codrops site without yting but all the projects that they publish collect a lot of money
|
ORVIUM Open and Transparent Science
『 https://orvium.io/ 』 Powered By Blockchain |
|
|
|
bling-bling
|
|
June 11, 2018, 10:57:45 PM |
|
I would say yes. Not a 100%, but it's one of my basis in choosing projects to participate in. Ratings are done through research. So there is some accuracy in these ratings that we can rely on. Whether ratings turn out good or bad, these help investors and bounty hunters weigh their options when it comes to choosing the best ICO.
|
|
|
|
|
