Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Wolfman15]

Of course there are good ratings with analytics and a serious approach to this issue, but I'm not sure that I can trust each of them. Hardly. I believe only my own strategy and my approach to such issues. Good projects are not so much and choosing from them is not too difficult even with minimal efforts

[1715641682]

1715641682

[1715641682]

1715641682

[1715641682]

1715641682

[1715641682]

1715641682

[maro101]

You can trust such ratings, this will reduce the probability of scam, but no one will tell exactly which project will be scam, and which project will not. Ico is always a big risk

[zinluzgina]

I do not think that these sites are worth paying attention to. It's only the sites that are doing the evaluation one particular metrics. + You can order a run to increase the rating metrics. And where is the truth

[hardcaps.com]

Well, you shouldn't trust anything 100% but ICO ratings and reviews give you a solid ground for future research. You shouldn't care about the rating itself but the information that it points your attention to. Important factor that you should look for are the caps. You can learn a lot about a project from the hard and soft caps of the ICO. If they are unrealistically high or there is no explenation how the team plans to distribute the raised money, than either it's a scam or the team is incompetent. In both cases you should stay away from the ICO.

[blood.maple.0401]

ICO Rate sites sound like a centralized system.

[beliomir]

It is not worthwhile to believe completely trackers, since they are all bought, but you can look at the evaluation.

[jhowww]

Don't trust everything you see in ICO rating websites. I usually read the white paper first before going to the ICO ratings/review websites. I also try to see if there are reviews in youtube mostly to validate what I understood from the whitepaper.

[xanaxxx]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

this is a good topic. I'm pretty sure certain projects are overvalued and some of them undervalued. Some of them even pay to get higher ratings. I wouldn't still say that if the rating was 3.7 and project reached hardcap, ICO rating was wrong. I would measure the accuracy of ratings based on the long term performance instead of amount raised.

[ntuananh200a]

ICO ratings should be used as guides only, so it's fine to look at them and see what they have to say, but I wouldn't part with any funds based solely on their opinion. Best to do your own research, coupled with ICO ratings, plus it doesn't hurt to check forums - like here - to see what others have to say.

[elzjmirra]

Actually, it is very simple with the ICOrating.com I think it's very helpful to us in determining the ICO. What is in ICO rating we have to do checks resetting because this is very important. Because when the ICO's very good rating but after repeated checks be done does not comply with expectations.

[strawberrypills]

There are only a handful of ICO rating sites I trust like ICObench and ICOrating but their ratings aren't really 100% accurate since most of them use predictions and some of these sites get paid to advertise these ICOs.

It would be wise to use these rating sites for references only and still do your own research of the project you're participating in.

[Snake9999]

I do not believe in rating agencies. This may be my distrust of ICO. I think there is a problem with the fairness of rating agencies. Because they are profitable. So I do not choose ICO.

[Amalker]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

All this ratings websites and tables make a most important thing - hype around the project. And our goal, as investors, find an ICO projects with a high hype level, cool idea, solid team and acceptable metrics.

[ARss88]

If the ratings and comments from the expert reviews are consistently good or bad, it could be an indicator of the validity of the project.  Reading for yourself is good on top of the review sites.

[sunshine222]

Most ratings might be wrong or might not go as planned. Some ICOs can be rated very high and yet at the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any major exchange or they won't yield any profit.

[waterproof]

I do not believe all these rating sites, but there you can find a condensed information about the project. This is sometimes useful.

[clonedone]

I don't trust these ratings at all, because most of them were paid. I prefer to do my own research or rely on the research of famous investors before investing in ICO.

[TremorPB]

There are some sites that I trust partly due to their past and unbiased reviews, but even then at the end of the day, only you can make a decision alone.

[zidanaltaer]

this is a good and courageous question, personally I do not believe it because it is not completely independent and is paid

[cryptokath19]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

As my opinion, ICO Ratings is the way to check or used as guides only whether if it is High or Low ratings but definitely we must do an own research regarding ICO's project that we want to know more about it. Other saying, the highest rating will become a successful project but its only their opinion. Once do a research, just study and analyze it.