AcoinL.L.C
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 31, 2014, 11:09:24 AM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here.
|
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
|
July 31, 2014, 11:10:57 AM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here. For people it's good enough to earn only a month .
|
|
|
|
ranochigo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4420
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
July 31, 2014, 11:14:20 AM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here. For people it's good enough to earn only a month . It can be troublesome if they need to switch campaign after they announced it will be discontinued. It does take sometime for them to find and register for a new campaign. IMO, it is a better idea for me to stick with one that would more likely last longer, given that Stunna have more than a thousand BTC and is constantly profiting.
|
|
|
|
Assad
|
|
July 31, 2014, 12:35:45 PM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here. where did you get the data about their funds and their profits?
|
|
|
|
ranochigo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 4420
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
July 31, 2014, 12:41:53 PM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here. where did you get the data about their funds and their profits? For their funds, you can find it on their official thread with their cold storage address on the first post. Even though their profits can be manipulated, I don't see any reason to assume they are scammers. The profits should be able to be found on site.
|
|
|
|
serje
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1002
|
|
July 31, 2014, 02:47:07 PM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here. where did you get the data about their funds and their profits? For their funds, you can find it on their official thread with their cold storage address on the first post. Even though their profits can be manipulated, I don't see any reason to assume they are scammers. The profits should be able to be found on site. Who has 225BTC? Care to share a link with me?
|
Space for rent if its still trending
|
|
|
AuroraHF
|
|
July 31, 2014, 03:26:59 PM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I don't think Stunna would actually rise much price. Yes they have escrow but can they prove that they won't run away even after a few rounds? I believe Stunna's reputation is more valuable than the price he pays for. It won't affect him if users abandon this campaign, he already have a lot of recognition for his dice site already, furthermore with PD3 just around the corner. To people saying the other signature might run out of funds... They did have over 225 BTC invested in their own bankroll and put 5 btc up as escrow. The investment pool already has 12 more btc since I last checked, and the site has profited 0.4 btc in just 4-5 days. It's ignorant to immediately jump to scammer conclusion. And stunna will likely lose 50-60 people to this other signature campaign, so I think it does have a reason to be brought up here. where did you get the data about their funds and their profits? For their funds, you can find it on their official thread with their cold storage address on the first post. Even though their profits can be manipulated, I don't see any reason to assume they are scammers. The profits should be able to be found on site. Who has 225BTC? Care to share a link with me? DiceBitco.in. Just look at the other services threads.
|
lmao
|
|
|
keithers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001
This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf
|
|
July 31, 2014, 05:23:36 PM |
|
I don't understand why people discuss other signature campaigns in this thread. There are special topics for that.
Because we want to see how Stunna will respond to the competition. Better sooner than later. Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . I doubt it...most people hung around and stayed with Primedice even when Updown and Ritz were paying slightly higher payouts per post just because of history Primedice.
|
|
|
|
jjc326
|
|
July 31, 2014, 05:25:14 PM |
|
Agreed that this thread has become kind of a free for all discussion about sig campaigns because let's face it, Stunna runs the longest and most responsive and highest paying one. There are a few newer ones that pay more so the question is whether and when Stunna would increase payment. Maybe people are interested in that because they might jump ship from another campaign. I def think Stunna needs to see another campaign go longer than 1 month before changing rates though. He was spot on to not change in response to FXO and updown, etc.
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
July 31, 2014, 05:51:53 PM |
|
Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . Yeah I'll most likely switch as suggest by a certain few people. You already see that they have a decent amount of people in it. Stunna only has the reputation here.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
redsn0w
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
|
|
July 31, 2014, 06:09:43 PM |
|
Oh yes ... if stunna will not raise prices many users will abandon . Yeah I'll most likely switch as suggest by a certain few people. You already see that they have a decent amount of people in it. Stunna only has the reputation here. sure .. stunna has more reputation I never said the contrary .
|
|
|
|
Baitty
|
|
July 31, 2014, 06:31:22 PM |
|
Some people claim they will leave but will not. I don't think stunna needs to raise his prices but hopefully he won't reduce the payment either.
|
Currently held as collateral by monbux
|
|
|
Zyborg
|
|
July 31, 2014, 06:45:13 PM |
|
Agreed that this thread has become kind of a free for all discussion about sig campaigns because let's face it, Stunna runs the longest and most responsive and highest paying one. There are a few newer ones that pay more so the question is whether and when Stunna would increase payment. Maybe people are interested in that because they might jump ship from another campaign. I def think Stunna needs to see another campaign go longer than 1 month before changing rates though. He was spot on to not change in response to FXO and updown, etc.
Lol, there'll be far more than 1 month of payments needed before even starting to CONSIDER changing rates. Ritz was around for long, Stunna didn't lose everyone to them even though they had an automatic payment / enrolling system, AND higher rates. KNOWING you will get paid a good rate per post > Not knowing whether or not you're going to get paid an even better rate, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Holdaaja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 31, 2014, 06:57:30 PM |
|
Agreed that this thread has become kind of a free for all discussion about sig campaigns because let's face it, Stunna runs the longest and most responsive and highest paying one. There are a few newer ones that pay more so the question is whether and when Stunna would increase payment. Maybe people are interested in that because they might jump ship from another campaign. I def think Stunna needs to see another campaign go longer than 1 month before changing rates though. He was spot on to not change in response to FXO and updown, etc.
Lol, there'll be far more than 1 month of payments needed before even starting to CONSIDER changing rates. Ritz was around for long, Stunna didn't lose everyone to them even though they had an automatic payment / enrolling system, AND higher rates. KNOWING you will get paid a good rate per post > Not knowing whether or not you're going to get paid an even better rate, IMHO. As already said, unlike Ritz, they are using escrow. So in my opinion they are much more trustworthy than Ritz. Plus Ritz casino wasn't provably fair and he laid about that so that was main reason for that why he wasn't trustworthy.
|
|
|
|
Armed
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:12:48 PM |
|
Agreed that this thread has become kind of a free for all discussion about sig campaigns because let's face it, Stunna runs the longest and most responsive and highest paying one. There are a few newer ones that pay more so the question is whether and when Stunna would increase payment. Maybe people are interested in that because they might jump ship from another campaign. I def think Stunna needs to see another campaign go longer than 1 month before changing rates though. He was spot on to not change in response to FXO and updown, etc.
Lol, there'll be far more than 1 month of payments needed before even starting to CONSIDER changing rates. Ritz was around for long, Stunna didn't lose everyone to them even though they had an automatic payment / enrolling system, AND higher rates. KNOWING you will get paid a good rate per post > Not knowing whether or not you're going to get paid an even better rate, IMHO. As already said, unlike Ritz, they are using escrow. So in my opinion they are much more trustworthy than Ritz. Plus Ritz casino wasn't provably fair and he laid about that so that was main reason for that why he wasn't trustworthy. Even if the casino wasn't provably fair ( which I don't know nor care about ) they did pay all their participants on time and very fairly for every constructive posts they made.
|
|
|
|
Holdaaja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:22:58 PM |
|
Agreed that this thread has become kind of a free for all discussion about sig campaigns because let's face it, Stunna runs the longest and most responsive and highest paying one. There are a few newer ones that pay more so the question is whether and when Stunna would increase payment. Maybe people are interested in that because they might jump ship from another campaign. I def think Stunna needs to see another campaign go longer than 1 month before changing rates though. He was spot on to not change in response to FXO and updown, etc.
Lol, there'll be far more than 1 month of payments needed before even starting to CONSIDER changing rates. Ritz was around for long, Stunna didn't lose everyone to them even though they had an automatic payment / enrolling system, AND higher rates. KNOWING you will get paid a good rate per post > Not knowing whether or not you're going to get paid an even better rate, IMHO. As already said, unlike Ritz, they are using escrow. So in my opinion they are much more trustworthy than Ritz. Plus Ritz casino wasn't provably fair and he laid about that so that was main reason for that why he wasn't trustworthy. Even if the casino wasn't provably fair ( which I don't know nor care about ) they did pay all their participants on time and very fairly for every constructive posts they made. Yeah, they sure did pay, I got one payment from them too. But if someone lies to me about one thing, I can't trust fully to anything he says.
|
|
|
|
RocketSingh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:39:15 PM |
|
Agreed that this thread has become kind of a free for all discussion about sig campaigns because let's face it, Stunna runs the longest and most responsive and highest paying one. There are a few newer ones that pay more so the question is whether and when Stunna would increase payment. Maybe people are interested in that because they might jump ship from another campaign. I def think Stunna needs to see another campaign go longer than 1 month before changing rates though. He was spot on to not change in response to FXO and updown, etc.
Lol, there'll be far more than 1 month of payments needed before even starting to CONSIDER changing rates. Ritz was around for long, Stunna didn't lose everyone to them even though they had an automatic payment / enrolling system, AND higher rates. KNOWING you will get paid a good rate per post > Not knowing whether or not you're going to get paid an even better rate, IMHO. As already said, unlike Ritz, they are using escrow. So in my opinion they are much more trustworthy than Ritz. Plus Ritz casino wasn't provably fair and he laid about that so that was main reason for that why he wasn't trustworthy. Escrow is gonna create the problem here. At the end of the month u'll see that this escrow will act like a gatekeeper and start evaluating people's post.
|
|
|
|
Mitchell
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 2331
Verified awesomeness ✔
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:46:53 PM |
|
Escrow is gonna create the problem here. At the end of the month u'll see that this escrow will act like a gatekeeper and start evaluating people's post. I haven't done this for the XBTec campaign and I won't do so for the DiceBitco.in campaign. However, if the OP disappears, I will have to check posts to make sure that payments to the members of that campaign are fair. A spammer shouldn't get more because he/she spammed. NOTE: I did check the posts of a few users during the XBTec campaign when they didn't get paid. This in case I needed to pay them using the escrowed amount.
|
| | | . Duelbits | | | ▄████▄▄ ▄█████████▄ ▄█████████████▄ ▄██████████████████▄ ▄████▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄███▄ ▄████▐▀▄▄▀▌██▄█▄██▐▀▄▄▀▌███ ██████▀▀▀▀████▀███▀▀▀▀█████ ▐████████████■▄▄▄■██████████▀ ▐██████████████████████████▀ ██████████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ | | | | | . ▄ ▄▄▀▀▀▀▄▄ ▄▀▀▄ █ █ ▀▄ █ ▄█▄ ▀▄ █ ▄▀ ▀▄ ▀█▀ ▄▀ ▀█▄▄▄▀▀ ▀ ▄▀ ▄▀ ▄▀
Live Games | | ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄ ▄▀ ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄ ▀▄ ▄▀ █ ▄ █ ▄ █ ▀▄ █ █ ▀ ▀ █ █ ▄▄▄ █ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █▄█ █ ▀▀█ ▀▀█ ▀▀█ █ █▄█
Slots | | . ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▄ █ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ █ ▄▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▀▀▄▀▀▄ █ █ █ ▀▄ ▄▀ █ █
Blackjack | | | | █▀▀▀▀▀█▄▄▄ ▀████▄▄ ██████▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀ ▀▀█ ████████▄ █ █████████▄ █ ██████████▄ ▄██ █████████▀▀▀█▄▄████ ▀▀███▀▀ ████ █ ███ █ █▀ ▄█████▄▄▄ ▄▄▀▀ ███████▀▀▀ | | | | | | | | | | [ Đ ][ Ł ] AVAILABLE NOW | |
Advertisements are not endorsed by me.
|
|
|
Ejaculation
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:47:51 PM |
|
PD is still dominating the competition, but if this goes on for another couple months, Stunna may have to reconsider raising the rates.
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ASICMINERPRISMA 1.4T+ ● 0.70-0.78J/GH ● ONLY 1.39BTC Shipping in Oct. ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|
|
|
RocketSingh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050
|
|
July 31, 2014, 09:55:39 PM |
|
Escrow is gonna create the problem here. At the end of the month u'll see that this escrow will act like a gatekeeper and start evaluating people's post. I haven't done this for the XBTec campaign and I won't do so for the DiceBitco.in campaign. However, if the OP disappears, I will have to check posts to make sure that payments to the members of that campaign are fair. A spammer shouldn't get more because he/she spammed. NOTE: I did check the posts of a few users during the XBTec campaign when they didn't get paid. U r not entitled to check people's post. People did not trust u as an escrow to verify their post. U r simply no one to decide what is a spam and what is not. This is something the campaign owner is supposed to decide.
|
|
|
|
|