deprecated

[yuansuyi]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

[DarkPunk]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

What exactly are you talking about? Do you really think that the service will not work well? did you draw this conclusion only after reading the white paper? But the same method can be implemented differently

[redlay]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

Oh, it's hard not to believe a person who really understands the software, but I'll only conclude after a real test

[kainus78]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

Oh, it's hard not to believe a person who really understands the software, but I'll only conclude after a real test

I think that everything will be fine. What is the point not to trust the platform, which has already collected a whole lot of money and the participants continue to invest in it!

[yuansuyi]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

Oh, it's hard not to believe a person who really understands the software, but I'll only conclude after a real test

You are one of those people who do not perceive the experience of other people and do not digest the advisors, right? In this case, I suggest that you risk your money to understand

[DarkPunk]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

Oh, it's hard not to believe a person who really understands the software, but I'll only conclude after a real test

You are one of those people who do not perceive the experience of other people and do not digest the advisors, right? In this case, I suggest that you risk your money to understand

Oh, come on!
The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

[redlay]

It seems to me that the mechanism that uses this platform is very cumbersome and complex. Why could not I use a standard platform?

Yes, I noticed some sagging and lagging behind the platform, but I think that this is a cost of the initial stages of the platform.

Maybe you got it wrong. He talks about the work of the service for the exchange of crypto-currency funds, and not about the work of the site. It's already an established fact that the site hangs up a bit

Oh, yes. You're right, I'm talking about the site's work. And you are talking about the direct work of the platform and service for sharing? I did not have time to use it ..

Does the resource generally allow at this stage to use the mechanism of working with other users? I thought that this phase would be after all stages of the ICO project!

I got acquainted with the technical documentation and came to the conclusion that there is absolutely no need to test the platform for operability

Oh, it's hard not to believe a person who really understands the software, but I'll only conclude after a real test

I think that everything will be fine. What is the point not to trust the platform, which has already collected a whole lot of money and the participants continue to invest in it!

I'm afraid that the most basic reason for such investments is a herd feeling. People see that others invest in similar projects and follow them

[kainus78]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

[yuansuyi]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

Yes, this is the main reason why I am saying that the platform is not a reference. But you're right, you can risk your currency as much as you want

[DarkPunk]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked?

[redlay]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

Yes, this is the main reason why I am saying that the platform is not a reference. But you're right, you can risk your currency as much as you want

We will not know this until we try, that's how I think. But this is not the reason for risking your money!

[kainus78]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked?

I'm sure of the stability of the platform, it's true. I just explained to the person what is at stake. As I said above - it all depends only on the implementation of the product

[yuansuyi]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked?

I'm sure of the stability of the platform, it's true. I just explained to the person what is at stake. As I said above - it all depends only on the implementation of the product

At the same time, I'm sure that no matter how hard you try to close the holes in the existing system, if it works badly - it does not help

[DarkPunk]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked?

I'm sure of the stability of the platform, it's true. I just explained to the person what is at stake. As I said above - it all depends only on the implementation of the product

At the same time, I'm sure that no matter how hard you try to close the holes in the existing system, if it works badly - it does not help

As an argument, I can say that not all the old works badly. Often, old algorithms that are tested and work fine make up for fewer problems

[redlay]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked?

I'm sure of the stability of the platform, it's true. I just explained to the person what is at stake. As I said above - it all depends only on the implementation of the product

At the same time, I'm sure that no matter how hard you try to close the holes in the existing system, if it works badly - it does not help

As an argument, I can say that not all the old works badly. Often, old algorithms that are tested and work fine make up for fewer problems

I agree. Where are the guarantees that the new algorithms will be able to implement those functions that the old systems offer us?

[kainus78]

The platform will transfer money, this is absolutely certain, another question is how quickly it will do it. Your argument - the platform will do this much more slowly than competitive

developers have long started their development. Therefore, at this stage, it is obsolete, everyone is well aware of its vulnerability, and this can cause crypto attacks

I thought you were convinced of the stability of this platform. Well, why do you think that the platform really needs to be reworked?

I'm sure of the stability of the platform, it's true. I just explained to the person what is at stake. As I said above - it all depends only on the implementation of the product

At the same time, I'm sure that no matter how hard you try to close the holes in the existing system, if it works badly - it does not help

As an argument, I can say that not all the old works badly. Often, old algorithms that are tested and work fine make up for fewer problems

At the same time, I want to note that among the new algorithms there are those that are well executed and tested. But I can not say that the algorithms are very different timeframes

[yuansuyi]

Old systems function stably, but they have a completely different problem: everyone knows how they work. This means that they are prone to hacking

[DarkPunk]

Old systems function stably, but they have a completely different problem: everyone knows how they work. This means that they are prone to hacking

The project has not only passive, but also active protection, as far as I know. It's not so easy to bypass all types of defense and make a attack

[Nold]

Old systems function stably, but they have a completely different problem: everyone knows how they work. This means that they are prone to hacking

Security is great, but I think the main advantage of the platform is revenue for token holders. That's what I like about the project. Competitors do not have such a function.

[Dynika]

Old systems function stably, but they have a completely different problem: everyone knows how they work. This means that they are prone to hacking

Security is great, but I think the main advantage of the platform is revenue for token holders. That's what I like about the project. Competitors do not have such a function.

I think that only a combination of all the positive factors of The localcoinswap platform (holders profit, security and others) gives advantages over competitors.