runam0k
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
Touchdown
|
 |
May 28, 2014, 06:31:11 PM |
|
@MPalokaj: You're the guy who got on the scene and "liquidated" COG, amirite?
He's right, you have zero credibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MPalokaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:35:27 PM |
|
@MPalokaj: You're the guy who got on the scene and "liquidated" COG, amirite?
He's right, you have zero credibility. I do not expect you to make decisions based on my credibility. You are not a sheep, you have your own mind. I expect you to make your own decisions and can only offer my perspective. Do you question that your shares become worth more if you spend energy on growing Peta? That is an argument I'd love to have. Shouting matches between credible people I have no interest in. As for Cognitive, like I said: @MPalokaj: You're the guy who got on the scene and "liquidated" COG, amirite?
I'm the one who oversaw a controlled demolition. I didn't make the decision and simply tried to make the best of the situation. Naturally some individuals do their best to act out their frustrations on me, I understand that. The simple fact is that if the project owner would have done communication it would have turned into a mess that would left everyone in a worse situation. There was no saving that project, only making the end as painless as possible. If you want to discuss details I'm happy to answer any questions over PM. The Peta thread is not the right location to discuss other projects. |
|
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:38:08 PM |
|
@MPalokaj: You're the guy who got on the scene and "liquidated" COG, amirite?
I'm the one who oversaw a controlled demolition. I didn't make the decision and simply tried to make the best of the situation. Naturally some individuals do their best to act out their frustrations on me, I understand that. The simple fact is that if the project owner would have done communication it would have turned into a mess that would left everyone in a worse situation. There was no saving that project, only making the end as painless as possible. If you want to discuss details I'm happy to answer any questions over PM. The Peta thread is not the right location to discuss other projects. Nah, I just see your sudden appearance in this thread as an unpleasant omen  And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth. |
|
|
|
|
MPalokaj
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:43:56 PM |
|
Nah, I just see your sudden appearance in this thread as an unpleasant omen And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
Scroll back. I've been here since the beginning at Havelock... My involvement in the Cog liquidation is purely that at the end someone was needed to prevent a lose-lose situation. I had had nothing to do with cog upto that point so was chose as an impartial outsider. In your lovely quote, hell doesn't follow me, I jump into hellish situations and try to bring the temperature down. If you want to indulge in looking for bad omens and bible quotations though I suggest watching Supernatural. Quite a fun show really. Shall we return back on topic? |
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:45:15 PM |
|
If anyone is interested, I'm selling shares in bulk below current IPO price. PM and we can work out a deal (100 shares min)
|
|
|
|
|
|
BiteMyShinyMetalAss
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:46:21 PM |
|
It is clear that PETA wont sell this IPO. Will CRYTPX buy shares as well?  So when is the next divident? |
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:55:41 PM |
|
Nah, I just see your sudden appearance in this thread as an unpleasant omen And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
Scroll back. I've been here since the beginning at Havelock... My involvement in the Cog liquidation is purely that at the end someone was needed to prevent a lose-lose situation. I had had nothing to do with cog upto that point so was chose as an impartial outsider. In your lovely quote, hell doesn't follow me, I jump into hellish situations and try to bring the temperature down. If you want to indulge in looking for bad omens and bible quotations though I suggest watching Supernatural. Quite a fun show really. Shall we return back on topic? We are on topic. You are no more guilty of the inevitable than the fourth rider--just someone who shows up when when the seal's already broken and bad shit's to be done. Or an executioner rigging the gallows. Simply not a happy occasion, nothing more. *But great job of keeping the COG bagholders from going for their pitchforks, nicely done  |
|
|
|
|
currencydebt
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 06:58:20 PM |
|
Assuming there was a vote, the largest players would of known that the IPO price was going to be considerably higher than the current share price and that the terms of the project were just about to get extremely sweetened in their minds that they voted unanimously for it.
Yet there was virtually no movement of the share price whatsoever after all of these big shareholders were informed before the announcement of the IPO. Not a single one of these big investors thought it a good idea to pick up a bunch of 'cheap' shares. None of those big investors increased their holdings at the outset of the IPO release either, as so few shares were sold during the first few days. Yet it took less than 30 minutes after the IPO announcement for the collective 40% of small time investors to run the share price up to the IPO price.
I am gonna cast a public vote that there was in all likelihood no private vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
howardb
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:06:42 PM |
|
Assuming there was a vote, the largest players would of known that the IPO price was going to be considerably higher than the current share price and that the terms of the project were just about to get extremely sweetened in their minds that they voted unanimously for it.
Yet there was virtually no movement of the share price whatsoever after all of these big shareholders were informed before the announcement of the IPO. Not a single one of these big investors thought it a good idea to pick up a bunch of 'cheap' shares. None of those big investors increased their holdings at the outset of the IPO release either, as so few shares were sold during the first few days. Yet it took less than 30 minutes after the IPO announcement for the collective 40% of small time investors to run the share price up to the IPO price.
I am gonna cast a public vote that there was in all likelihood no private vote.
Your speculating that Havlock is lying? Anyone know when open market trading recommences? |
|
|
|
|
Elvis Trout
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:14:04 PM |
|
I really don't think we need to claim that havelock is lying, I guess they could be, but it doesn't seem like the kind of thing they'd do. What is annoying is that the 5% voting right was never publicly stated, else I would have invested everything in Peta in a bid to get 5% instead of being more conservative. And secondly the prospectus was misleading. All that being said there isn't much we can do about it now so lets just celebrate the new hashrate and try and drum up support for the IPO.
IPO ends 31st May so open market trading should be soon after that, havelock is usually pretty quick.
|
|
|
|
|
Elvis Trout
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 08:24:47 PM |
|
Inspired by having just finished a marathon session of Columbo - The Complete First Season and few glasses of Stolichnaya I came up with a genius solution to benefit all shareholders credit to a deflated member of frycats fan club for original idea. We stick together in these tough times because it's what makes us strongSince a boardmember requires 5000 shares and it is stated nowhere that a boardmember is required to be a natural person I suggest that minority shareholders with sufficient stake agree to pool their shares into a groupentity. There should be more then enough people that have 100 or more direct shares to also get one seat together. I suggest that the person to become boardmember shall be elected representitive for this group by votes per direct shares per group member. Your control of your shares shall not leave you, all that will be required is a signed message to agree to form the group and give boardmemberstatus to group by proxy. Anyone interested can contact me. Editing: Grammer and spelling Second edit: Maybe 50 shares is fine, too? Also 1/5th of required shares are allready interested  This is a great idea. Message sent. So in short - I am starting a Pass-thru on havelock. together we can own 5% and put and end to this womanly games Of course we canot retroactively verify these dubious claims but we can proof in future whether we do or do not receive voting rights which we the people entitle to simply transfer shares to the following address in havelock system: cryptx@peta-mine.co the rest is handled automatically. This sounds like a great idea, anyone else want to do this? I have 200 shares, 1/25th of the way there. |
|
|
|
|
Door
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
May 28, 2014, 09:59:17 PM |
|
I am happy with the decisions and progress with this project. Anyone reading this thread needs to consider the agendas of those who seem upset at how things are developing. Bitcoin securities are the riskier end of high risk. Do your own research; have the courage of your convictions.
|
|
|
|
|
Aireun
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier.
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:58:40 AM |
|
Hmmm... is it me (which it may be) or does it seem like we are not mining much more BTC per week.. at current we have mined a total of 185.17779368 BTC. I know we are going to go above 200BTC but really how much more? I wonder...
|
|
|
|
|
bigdude
|
|
May 29, 2014, 04:15:09 AM |
|
Lol at Havelock coming into this thread, commenting when its not their thread, and causing a shitstorm for cryptx to deal with.
Just lol
|
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
May 29, 2014, 04:30:22 AM |
|
I am happy with the decisions and progress with this project. Anyone reading this thread needs to consider the agendas of those who seem upset at how things are developing. Bitcoin securities are the riskier end of high risk. Do your own research; have the courage of your convictions.
Lol, welcome to the forum, Door! Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm in this offering, and for warning us about folks with hidden agendas! I know you yourself are srsly legit 'coz shills have to wait 'till the *third* post before doling out helpful advice--you did it in your second  |
|
|
|
|
vaguhs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2014, 07:08:37 AM
Last edit: May 29, 2014, 07:48:07 AM by vaguhs |
|
PETA IS DOWN! http://www.peta-mine.co/stats/UPDATE: Ok it was a restart I guess. It was down for like an hour |
|
|
|
|
|
EdoBcn
|
|
May 29, 2014, 07:14:59 AM |
|
Let the >5% vote on that. |
|
|
|
|
altoidmintz
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
After Economics: Learning is just the first step.
|
|
May 29, 2014, 01:53:01 PM |
|
Let the >5% vote on that. UPDATE: Ok it was a restart I guess
Looks like they voted the right way. Again. |
|
|
|
|
EdoBcn
|
|
May 29, 2014, 02:35:18 PM |
|
Let the >5% vote on that. UPDATE: Ok it was a restart I guess
Looks like they voted the right way. Again. Indeed. Those >5% guys really know what they are doing. Aaaah, if only I was a >5% guy. Wait, that means I would have 376 bitcoins. Wow. |
|
|
|
|
|
MonkeyBear68
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:17:14 PM |
|
I own a few hundred shares, but far less than 5%. I am very satisfied with how PETA is being run. Cryptx seems to be genuinely interested in making this project a success. I understand the hash rate/difficulty and how it will affect the mining. I am surprised that the current network hash rate is not above 100,000 TH/S. I have owned various mining shares over the past couple of years and understand the importance of updating equipment at crucial times and reinvesting to keep up with difficulty increases.
Basically you will know you are successful in keeping up with difficulty if the weekly dividend per share remains relatively constant over time. It is vital to have a dividend/reinvestment ratio that ensures the dividend will not drop due to difficulty increases. I would have no problem increasing the amount to go toward reinvestment.
It seems that some investors may simply want to see a huge weekly dividend so that the share price will rise and they can sell out and make a big profit at the long term expense of the project. IMO mikemikemike was pumping this project and constantly trying to drive up the share price a month or so ago simply to sell out. Now that he has apparently sold all his shares he has nothing but bad to say about PETA. It is wise to have only large > 5% shareholders vote, so that we can eliminate the self-interested pump and dumpers that do not care about the long term success and are only here for a quick buck.
Hats off to Cryptx for the fine work being done to ensure the long term success of Petamine!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
