Bounty and too many participants

[Ovgri]

But it seems to me that the number of bounty participants grows proportionally with those who wish to participate in the ISO. Therefore nothing bad happens. Everyone tries to earn in different ways.

[rumexx]

I think you are right. More and more hunters are now around in the forum. Reward will become less as the number is increasing. But what do we do because a lot of these hunters are family men supporting their family from their earning from the bounty reward.More people will join in the coming days.
Families need to survive s o there should be no difficult hurdles to new comers.

[sanjay6121]

people who are not able to invest are doing bounty campaigns for making money. there are a number of participants in bounty campaigns selecting through first come first service. it is a tough competition for the old users because income will get distributed. I  hope some new rules and guidelines will be in favor of the old joiners.

[whatthesith]

Lets make some experiment how much of you are reading previous posts. I think not many, and it is because you are spam here only for getting reward from signature campaigns .
So if you read this post, add please this hashtag to your post (#iread).  

[ll63248555]

I don't think the key to participating in the ICO problem is the quality of the project, some astute and smart investors, they will meet the good project, they will participate in the ICO!

[DmitriySar]

For ICO, the greater number of participants will only be better, they will be able to attract more people for the same money. I think they are satisfied with such conditions. For members of the bounty on the contrary, they will receive smaller amounts for the bounty.

[ZaynDale]

One of the best score of the ICO is when their bounty campaign are being managed by veteran bounty campaign managers and there are too many participants.
One of the most participated ICO today is Cedex that is being managed by Sylon and is a 5 months long bounty campaign as I joined since its first week.
Cedex is one of the finest ICO running today.

[ZaynDale]

For ICO, the greater number of participants will only be better, they will be able to attract more people for the same money. I think they are satisfied with such conditions. For members of the bounty on the contrary, they will receive smaller amounts for the bounty.

Sometimes there are some ICOs and bounty campaigns that not really participated by many due to it's lack of good ICO criteria, like Oyster Pearl PRL last October.
Oyster Pearl PRL bounty campaign have less bounty participants and only acquired $75,000 on its ICO but look at its journey now, it's one of the most effective blockchain project today.
It's bounty campaign participants are now millionaires like me in our local currency.

[IwanGunawan]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

if my opinion, as much as anything that goes bounty is not a problem as long as it does not give bad effect, in my opinion more and more follow bounty the bigger potential project is known to many people and will have a chance of success on the project, and when the project is successful then the greater the gift that bounty get

[Khailequang334]

airdrops and bounty become more popular and some of them are fake, people do not get the real token but they lost their private information

[petorosconk]

if the participants bounty too much then the results are in just a little but I'm sure it is enough for daily needs

[Faeton]

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are no yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's and so on. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

I also agree that the participants in the campaign of generosity, namely the signature campaign is not so much. Several dozen people join the ICO projects, although the ICO team itself is interested in more participants. They, after all, allocate their tokens to the generosity campaign as a percentage of the total number of tokens produced, and therefore the more participants in the subscription campaign are, the more often their ads will appear. And tokens they vseravno allocate the same number.

If there are a lot of such participants for the participant of the campaign, he may not join such a campaign. So I do not see any problems here.

[bitor]

I think, that we will get reward, but the Terms of getting reward and doing posts will be more difficult

[Rrotess]

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

Yeah i will agree.But because of many participants we can't make a huge profit on it not just because of the rank position but the participants which really upgraded also.

[ogini]

The too many particpants is causing low payment and this is becoming meaning less because the payment worth nothing at the end of the day

[dedet]

in my opinion bounty dab too many participants is not a problem. a benefit to the project if many participants to promote the product is because their tokens sell and profit also for us. if the bounty project reaches har cap

[Harley Quinn]

It is normal for exciting business like this to grow more saturated. The campaigns get what they want, their promotion - and the people who do the bounty hunting get what they deserve, their payment. It seems pretty fair to me. There should only be limited pools for bounty hunting where the rest is for investors to participate in.

[kakawin]

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are no yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's and so on. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

I also agree that the participants in the campaign of generosity, namely the signature campaign is not so much. Several dozen people join the ICO projects, although the ICO team itself is interested in more participants. They, after all, allocate their tokens to the generosity campaign as a percentage of the total number of tokens produced, and therefore the more participants in the subscription campaign are, the more often their ads will appear. And tokens they vseravno allocate the same number.

If there are a lot of such participants for the participant of the campaign, he may not join such a campaign. So I do not see any problems here.

This system is built in such a way that it regulates itself. The more participants in the campaign bounty, the lesser the reward each participant will receive, hence after a certain number of participants joining, bounty participation becomes less profitable and bounty hunters will look for another project.

[varun bee]

i think in coming future we will be seeing in more strict rules like increase in no. of followers, certain no. of tweets, account age etc which are becoming more of a trend nowadays in all bounty campaigns. if increase in good icos keeps on matching with increase in no. of bounty hunters i think there won't be much problem, plus still there is a lot of money that crypto has to offer.

[dashunka]

it's not good for us when there are a lot of participants in the company's bounty and especially in the company of signatures. and investors as they were and will be and less of them will not be because it is a faster payroll.