Bounty and too many participants

[Ricowavy]

You are right....bounty needs a form of regulation or filtering out....too many people on it nowadays

[_Mikasa_]

You sound like you don't want others to have the chance to join campaigns. As long as they do not break the rules and do not harm any people here at bitcointalk, it will not be problematic. Too many participants is good in my opinion because it will make the exposure of cryptocurrency a lot better in the public.

[Zedxxx]

Bounties participants becomes more every day. I choose companies for a long time and when I register in 1-2 days there are already several thousand people

[carrie_white]

I think all bounty managers should limit participants who want to participate in bounty campaign and also do kyc thoroughly to avoid multi account

[Megababa]

Wow dude sounds selfish to me. Only you wanna take the whole cake and leave none for others.
Sorry to disappoint you. Regulation ain't happening no time soon.

[bandar]

I mostly do translation bounties which are very limited in number of participants of course (mostly 10-30 for 10-30% of the cake).  But you need to actually work for those (more than sig/twitter bounties).  If I participate in a sig bounty, it's only when the total number of participants is limited and when you get to leave and still earn your stakes.  I'm very happy to be part of the Traxia bounty at the moment!  Team looks good, project too and the sig bounty is just what it needs to be: max 100 people.

[Mr.Been]

I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. And they usually do youtube, signature, article and other difficult companies, for twitter or fb you can't get much profit

[Action Gamble]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I see recently in some bounty campaign where they close the participation in 1000 participants and sometimes less then, i think that is the perfect solution for this problem.

[nikola22]

I think all bounty managers should limit participants who want to participate in bounty campaign and also do kyc thoroughly to avoid multi account

don't agree about KYC because many users don't want to give their personal data and it's their right. taken measures are good enough to avoid multi accounts.

[sashunya.popov.1993]

More people - less profit in one hand and more different Bounties in another. It's better to take part in those which are more limited campaigns. Here is a kind of regulation, not so many participants in translation and moderation, media.

[zool2003]

I also noticed that there are lots of high ranking users joining the signature campaigns in the last week or 2 of a bounty and in some cases dig switching between the bounty managers checking to try and get 2 bounty payments!

[rallyko]

I think the best option would be to set limits on the number of participants. Then the bounty would bring a good profit.
When there are more than 1000 people participating in one bounty campaign, then the profit will be small.

[varun bee]

well i have read this question or suggestion you may say many times in the past and no absolute answer comes to mind but, every new free lance work initially (in this case bounty hunting) has a heavy payoff which will reduce with growing time and it will saturate so people expecting previous payoffs should revise their expectation because too many people have realized the potential gain from bounty campaigns. Going with KYC might help but that raises doubts about privacy so there it goes. Everyone wants piece of that pie as they say.

[pjwaffle]

i do not think that the rising of participants will reduce the number of investors. if the project is really good, the people can do both bounty and invest in tokens. No problems!

[Nana99]

What about LuckyToken? There are not many participants here and rules are easy.

[roflmao129]

Accept that truth because the number of people wants to earn money with crypto increases day by day. Therefore, you have to understand the risk of dropping your real life job to make money with crypto

[adekogbe]

A lot of people are realizing the potential of making good tokens by helping  ICOs promote their projects and normally that is a good thing, the problem nevertheless is that some projects bounties are not capped and such projects may get more popularity than they actually need and the bounty hunters in return are paid pennies for the work done.
But anyway most tasks are easy enough to accomplish

[EmmanCryp]

Bounty campaigns are not easy to do. So for participants to earn stakes, they actually have to work for it. Even if there are many people, not everybody will get full stakes. Some people just apply and forget about it.

[Tohsigohay]

Share each other on the gift of why not, I prefer to share with each other on the bounty, because to pass sigcam not all can follow it, giving bonus sharing alternative also for others.

[pstraene]

In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.Bounty campaigns is very much known nowadays which results to have many participants.Have a nice day